Saturday, March 21, 2026
You Won't Believe What The UK Green Party Wants To Teach Children...
You Won't Believe What The UK Green Party Wants To Teach Children...
Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,
Radical leftists want a new Department of Migration to push open borders propaganda in schools and fast-track voting rights, free housing and citizenship for illegals.
A leaked Green Party dossier has blown the lid off plans to brainwash British schoolchildren into believing they have a ‘moral duty’ to embrace endless immigration.
The document, hidden behind a password-locked policy archive normally only accessible to party members, calls for a new Department of Migration to work hand in glove with education chiefs. Its stated goal is to “disseminate knowledge” about immigrants directly into classrooms.
🚨 A LEAKED Green Party dossier reveals radical plans to teach children they have a 'MORAL OBLIGATION' to accept immigrants pic.twitter.com/Vzjt0qG89R
— WeGotitBack 🏴🇬🇧🇺🇸 (@NotFarLeftAtAll) March 19, 2026
Children would be taught they have a “moral obligation” to accept immigrants under these radical plans.
The exact wording from the leaked dossier states the new department would educate pupils on “the situations from which those seeking asylum and resettling refugees are fleeing, and the need for and moral obligation of asylum and humanitarian protection.”
It goes further, declaring the party “seeks not only to provide asylum to those forced from their homes but to work towards a world in which no one has to flee their home.”
Additional proposals include free legal advice and support to illegal immigrants to “regularise their status without penalty for being undocumented,” granting settled status to those who have been in the UK for at least five years — complete with welfare benefits, voting rights and a pathway to citizenship — and opening borders wider for those from countries with “seriously disturbing public order” or claiming persecution under equality laws.
In short, the Greens want to hand illegals free housing, votes and passports while telling British kids it’s their moral duty to cheer it on.
They also want to be SOFTER on terrorist suspects.
🚨NEW: The Green Party wants to weaken the police's ability to tackle terrorism by cutting the maximum detention period for terror suspects from 14 days to 4.
— The Mercian (@TheMercianNews) March 19, 2026
We now live in a country where appealing to jihadis is a sizable vote winner.https://t.co/soJD5lrqUZ
This all comes at a time when the UK is already buckling under the weight of mass migration, with migrants set to swallow 40% of new homes by 2030.
This fits a disturbing pattern. The same political class has already turned schools into surveillance hubs, urging them to snitch on “anti-Muslim hostility.”
Counter-terror police run ads warning teens that sharing funny content could be terrorism, and a government video game literally teaches kids they’re terrorists for questioning mass migration.
A recent caller perfectly encapsulated how most British people feel about the invasion overwhelming their country.
The deadly folly of Covid lockdowns exposed
UK COVID Inquiry Finds Lockdowns May Have Cost 1000s Of Lives
Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,
The authoritarian COVID lockdowns and stay-at-home orders sold as life-saving measures have been unmasked once again as a deadly failure of big government overreach.
A new UK Covid-19 Inquiry report has concluded that the relentless “Stay Home, Protect the NHS, Save Lives” messaging likely cost thousands of lives by convincing people they could not get access to health services.
The inquiry, led by Baroness Hallett, slammed the slogan created by Cabinet Office officials without input from health leaders. It “led some people to feel they must avoid burdening the NHS” and “may have inadvertently sent the message that healthcare was closed,” contributing to a sharp decline in A&E attendances for life-threatening emergencies such as heart attacks.
A new UK Covid-19 Inquiry report has concluded that the relentless “Stay Home, Protect the NHS, Save Lives” messaging likely cost thousands of lives by convincing people they could not get access to health services.
The inquiry, led by Baroness Hallett, slammed the slogan created by Cabinet Office officials without input from health leaders. It “led some people to feel they must avoid burdening the NHS” and “may have inadvertently sent the message that healthcare was closed,” contributing to a sharp decline in A&E attendances for life-threatening emergencies such as heart attacks.
The report states plainly: “It is clear that, during the pandemic, worsening delays in diagnosis and treatment led to increased ill-health and suffering and, in some cases, cost lives.” Some patients waited so long their conditions became “untreatable,” with permanent loss of mobility.
Baroness Hallett stressed: “It is important that government communication campaigns do not deter those in need from accessing healthcare.” She urged future governments to consult healthcare professionals on messaging “to avoid unintended consequences.”
Office for National Statistics data backs this up, recording more than 17,000 excess deaths from non-Covid conditions at the height of the pandemic. Cancer screenings were paused, diagnoses plummeted, and non-urgent care cancellations left patients suffering. Hospital visiting bans were branded too tough, with dying people left alone and families devastated.
The NHS itself “coped, but only just,” teetering on the brink of collapse under “intolerable strain,” per Hallett, who noted politicians like then-health secretary Matt Hancock were reluctant to admit the system was overwhelmed.
The findings come on the back of mountains of research indicating isolation policies inflicted generational damage on children’s development.
A recent University of East Anglia-led study, published in Child Development, concuded that lockdowns may have permanently damaged kids’ brain development through lost socialisation and routine.
The study tracked 139 children and found the greatest harm hit reception-year pupils aged four to five when the first lockdowns struck in March 2020 – a critical window for learning routines, friendships, and self-regulation.
Lead researcher Prof John Spencer said: “Children who were in reception when the country shut down showed much slower growth in key self-regulation and cognitive flexibility skills over the next few years than children who were still in preschool.”
He added: “Reception is a critical year for peer socialisation. It’s when children learn classroom norms and build early friendships that shape their confidence.”
Without those experiences, “children’s self-regulatory skills didn’t develop as quickly year-on-year after the lockdowns ended.” The study concluded: “Without these experiences, reception children had a challenging time developing self-regulation and cognitive flexibility in the years that followed the pandemic.”
That research adds to a cascade of older studies exposing the full horror.
A 2023 report by Speech and Language UK revealed the average child missed 84 school days due to Covid policies. Eight in ten teachers reported worsened pupil inattention post-pandemic, blaming screen-based “learning” and stunted social skills.
Teachers have also noted rises in needless chatter, shouting, and inappropriate laughing, with the “ever-swiping nature” of social media like TikTok worsening the fallout.
Previous research showed teenage girls’ brains aged prematurely by up to four years during lockdowns, with boys affected by one-and-a-half years—linked to social restrictions hitting girls harder.
University of Washington researchers compared MRI scans from 2018 to post-pandemic ones in 2021-2022, finding accelerated cortical thinning, a natural process tied to anxiety, stress, and higher disorder risks. Whether this is permanent remains unclear, but it spotlights the unseen toll of isolating youth.
This latest warning adds to a mountain of evidence exposing lockdowns as a disastrous overreach that prioritized control over common sense, devastating children’s futures.
A previous study highlighted how lockdowns drove 60,000 children in the UK to clinical depression, with the enforced isolation sparking widespread mental health crises among youth that required professional intervention.
Another investigation revealed that babies born during lockdown were less likely to speak before their first birthday, as the lack of face-to-face interactions and exposure to facial expressions hindered early language acquisition.
A further study found many children unable to say their own name due to the impact of lockdown, pointing to profound speech and developmental delays from limited social engagement.
Research also uncovered that children were suffering from as many as three different viruses simultaneously due to weakened immunity caused by lockdown, since prolonged indoor confinement prevented the natural building of defenses against common pathogens.
In addition, an outbreak of hepatitis in children was directly attributed to lockdowns that weakened immunity, resulting in unexpected surges of the liver condition among previously healthy kids.
Doctors also raised alarms over a mysterious outbreak of brain infections in Nevada kids, believing it was linked to COVID lockdowns that left children’s immune systems vulnerable and unprepared for routine exposures.
Disturbing lockdown drawings also illustrated the severe effect on children’s mental health, where artwork captured the trauma, fear, and emotional distress from being cut off from normal life.
These findings, among others like excess deaths and ignored warnings, paint a picture of policy failure. Lockdown zealots dismissed the collateral damage, but the data doesn’t lie—government mandates crushed freedom and futures alike.
These inquiries and studies should bury any remaining excuses for repeating such experiments. Surrendering liberty to bureaucrats never saves lives – it only costs them, and scars the next generation forever.
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
Victor Hanson: What Is It With The Fickle Europeans?
Victor Hanson: What Is It With The Fickle Europeans?
Via The Daily Signal,
This is a lightly edited transcript of a segment of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words” podcast from Daily Signal.
What is it with the fickle Europeans? I know that they have different interests than ours, but we’re both Western entities. You’d think that we’d be more collaborative on the effort to disarm and denuclearize Iran. But a lot of strange things are happening.
The traditional use of the Diego Garcia critical airbase in the Indian Ocean, run by the British, but often leased to us and allowed us to have a very valuable base for our long-range bombers. The British initially refused to allow us to use it. And then, only under conditions that it would be used for defensive purposes.
don’t know what that means. But I think they forgot the 1982 Falklands War. They were in big trouble going all the way across the world to attack a country in the Western Hemisphere.
We were trying to be on friendly relationships so that [Argentina] wouldn’t join the other communist nations. And of course, we offered them 2 million gallons of gasoline. We offered them the use of a carrier if they needed it. We gave them sophisticated intelligence. Without the United States’ help, they would’ve had a very hard time retaking it. So, what’s happened?
And then Spain has said that we can’t use at all the NATO base there in Spain. [President Emmanuel] Macron in France and [Chancellor Friedrich] Merz in Germany have also said they’ve expressed reservations.
President Donald Trump is now trying to say, you know, we’re using all of our assets to disarm this common threat to the West. Could you just send a few ships to help us, you know, patrol the Strait of Hormuz? And they’re reluctant.
This gets back to the United States, who pays an inordinate amount of the NATO budget. And it keeps having to, you know, to harangue and hammer. “Please, please defend yourself. We are here to help you, but we’re across the ocean, 3,000 miles away. And this is in your interest. You know, this is the third time Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine.”
So, don’t they have a fear of Iran? I mean, there was a joint missile defense project. Obama canceled it, in that infamous quid pro quo hot mic conversation where he made a deal with the Russians to give him space so he could get reelected. He would dismantle the Czech and Polish project to have missile defense. That was primarily for the protection of Europe. The United States was going to pay a great deal of it. Protection from Iran.
So, what’s going on? What explains this European schizophrenia? That they want to be an ally, but they don’t want to be an ally. They’re scared to death of a nuclear Iran, but they don’t want to do anything about it. They want the United States to handle it, but they want the United States to handle it and keep them out of it.
But most of their oil comes from the Middle East or North Africa. So, they are adamant that they want the supplies, reliable. They want the Strait of Hormuz open. They want the United States to ensure that. They want the United States to clear the Red Sea of Houthi attacks. We know all that, but they’re not there when we need them at all. And a very, you know, a very reasonable request.
And so why is this?
Well, I think there’s a lot of reasons.
I think they’ve made some disastrous, internal and external choices in their policies.
First of all, Germany has 16 percent of its population are immigrants that weren’t born in Germany.
The vast majority of them are unassimilated, unacculturated, unintegrated Muslims.
Many of them, or most, under Angela Merkel policy. She was the German version of Alejandro Mayorkas, who opened the border and pretty much enacted this destructive policy. In other countries at 6 percent to 10 percent to 12 percent.
But the key is there’s a force multiplier of these open-border illegal immigration policies.
And that is the Muslim communities that immigrate are more radical often than the countries they left that were radical enough.
They don’t want to be part of the West. They feel that their birth rate and their increased immigration will soon swamp these European governments. And the European governments are terrified of them.
So, on key issues of concern to the West, to emasculate Iran, they’re afraid to say anything. And they’re afraid to express support for Israel because these internal populations within the continent will turn on them, or they won’t get their votes.
The second disastrous policy was green energy. Germany and other countries, with the exception of France, have either put on hold or dismantled their coal plants. In the case of Germany, they had to restart them because they disarmed or displaced their nuclear facilities.
They don’t want to tap the huge natural gas deposits that are thought to be in continental Europe. They are not looking for new sources of offshore oil. They don’t want any fossil fuels. No natural gas unless we import it.
They don’t want to develop themselves. And the result is their energy is two or three times more expensive than their economic competitors. And they’re captives of the Middle East and Russia for energy. So that has affected their political independence.
Third, they thought they were at the end of history after the fall of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact. So, they thought they were in some type of disarmament utopia. So, they, more or less, disarmed.
So, here we are with tiny little Israel with 11 million, 10 million people, and they have 300 front-line aircraft fighters, jets that are flying every day with some of the best pilots in the world. And they have more fighters than our key trio of NATO partners. More than Germany. More than France. More than Great Britain.
Of course, we know about European fertility. Ours is bad enough at 1.65. Theirs is down to 1.3 and 1.4 in some countries, and 1.1. There’s been a new credo in Europe that you’re not going to have children. The good life is too precious. Why waste it raising children? And of course, socialism is not sustainable.
They have this huge socialist safety net, which is exacerbated by millions of impoverished Middle East people coming in illegally who demand entitlements and, sort of, threaten their hosts. And they’re not very gracious immigrants. And you put it all together, and you get European schizophrenia.
And what is that schizophrenia? It’s quietly whispering to the United States, “Help us. Help us. You’ve got to make sure that Russia doesn’t go further west in Ukraine. What are you going to do?”
“All seven presidents before you, Mr. Trump, they’ve all worried about the Iranian nuclear ballistic missile crisis. We’re closer than you are. We can’t keep appeasing them. They hate us as much as they hate you. Who is going to do something? Please, Mr. President.”
And then publicly, “Oh, we’re very disturbed. This is very disturbing. This is very dangerous. I don’t think that we really want to be actively a participant.”
And, the final irony, Europe’s got a bigger population than we do. 450 million people. And its GDP is about the size of China’s. So, it’s got huge resources and potential, even under its socialist and green energy policies. Even with its open borders. Even with its low fertility. With all of those crises that are self-inflicted, it still could arm itself and be a full partner. And yet, it will not do it.
And therefore, it knows it should do it. And it knows there’s things that must be done. And it wants them done, but it wants the United States to do it. So, at the same time, it can criticize them and triangulate against its own savior.
It’s a tragic and really, to be honest, pathetic situation.
NYC in decline
Mamdani is giving e-bikers a ‘license to kill’ as NYPD loosens enforcement
New Yorkers instinctively avoid raving street-corner lunatics. They don’t know if the psycho might suddenly come at them with a knife, so they cross to the other side to be safe.
There’s no street to cross when the lunatic is the man they elected as their mayor. But if there was, they might get run over by e-bikers to whom Zohran (Madman) Mamdani gave license to kill.
Because he wants to shield them from ICE, motorized bikers can now speed as fast as they want yet face only a civil ticket. This, even as Madman wants to slow auto traffic to a 10 mile per hour crawl.
It isn’t breaking news that traffic lights and human life mean nothing to e-bikers. I watch them zoom up First Avenue, and sometimes down the one-way uptown avenue, from the safe perch of my 16th-floor windows.
In a part of town with more restaurants and fast-casual food places than a neighborhood needs, nothing matters to deliverers except this:
General Tso’s chicken must go through! Never mind collateral damage to human beings.
Theft impacts inflation
Golf carts, TVs, top-shelf liquor and a million in cash uncovered in wild $7M SoCal cargo theft bust
U.S. citizen takes helm of Mexico’s fiercest cartel, exposing ugly truth on birthright citizenship
U.S. citizen takes helm of Mexico’s fiercest cartel, exposing ugly truth on birthright citizenship
The new cartel boss Juan Carlos Valencia González possession of dual citizenship presents challenges for U.S. intelligence surveillance, which led the Mexican government to his predecessor.
A California-born U.S. citizen whose mother is a Mexican national and is reportedly part of a drug and money laundering cartel herself, has now taken the helm of Mexico’s most dangerous cartel as the Supreme Court is set to consider a Trump administration challenge to the very birthright policy that granted him that citizenship.
Multiple reports indicate that the 41-year-old Juan Carlos Valencia González, a dual U.S. and Mexican citizen, took charge of the notorious "Jalisco New Generation" cartel (CJNG) in the aftermath of a Mexican special forces raid that took out the cartel’s former boss, El Mencho, last month.
The raid was the most direct action Mexican authorities have taken against the cartels in coordination with the United States, which, under President Donald Trump, ramped up pressure on the drug trafficking organizations after naming them designated foreign terrorist organizations.
U.S. intelligence helped locate past cartel kingpin in Mexico
As a result, the American administration has increased surveillance of the cartels and, at times, has threatened to take direct military action if Mexico didn’t step up. It was reportedly U.S. intelligence that provided Mexico with the location of El Mencho, precipitating the successful operation.
CJNG was shepherded to prominence by that former leader, Ruben Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, known as “El Mencho,” and grew into Mexico’s most powerful and well-equipped cartel. Based in Mexico’s coastal Jalisco state, the cartel’s network operates a global drug trafficking empire spanning from China to North Africa and has for years smuggled drugs into the United States.
But now, with El Mencho dead, and his biological son in an American prison for life, the cartel has turned to Valencia González, his stepson, to assume leadership of the sprawling enterprise. Valencia González’s American citizenship is likely to complicate the U.S. government’s efforts to gather intelligence but could also stand in the way of any future military strikes against him as head of CJNG.
"Exploiting U.S. birthright citizenship" author says
The ascension of a U.S. citizen to head of the designated terrorist organization also comes at the same time that the Supreme Court is considering a Trump administration challenge to U.S. birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment, which, under the current interpretation, grants citizenship to most children born in the country–just like Valencia González.
“This is another example of adversaries exploiting the U.S. birthright citizenship for their benefit, to the detriment of America,” investigative journalist and author Peter Schweizer told Just the News. Last month, Schweizer’s new book, The Invisible Coup, outlined the ways in which China in particular exploits the standard by encouraging birth tourism.
Schweizer pointed to the similar example of infamous drug lord Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán of the Sinaloa cartel. El Chapo’s wife, Emma Coronel, traveled to Los Angeles to give birth in the United States in 2011. Though she was already a U.S. citizen, giving birth in the country would ensure that she wouldn’t have to apply for citizenship for her children later, which would require her to provide their father’s name.
“A US citizen who has a baby in another country must apply for citizenship for the child through the consulate, which would have been complicated by being married to the most famous criminal in North America,” Schweizer wrote in his book. “It was easier [for her], as a US citizen, to travel freely to the United States, give birth here, and leave the father’s name blank on the birth certificate.”
Mark Morgan, the former acting commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, said the ascension of a birthright American citizen to the head of a Mexican cartel lens Creedence to the Trump administration's effort to end the concept.
"It's something we don't talk enough about ... just simply because you're born here does not mean that you fully assimilated, and does not mean your allegiance is to this country," he said. "So it's a righteous issue for the Trump administration to push back on."
SCOTUS to hear arguments in Trump v. Barbara
The U.S. Supreme Court is currently considering a challenge to the Trump administration’s efforts to end birthright citizenship. The court will hear oral arguments in the case, Trump v. Barbara, on April 1.
The president issued an executive order intended to prevent babies born in the United States from automatically receiving U.S. citizenship if their parents are in the country illegally or only temporarily. However, the order was challenged and never went into effect.
The challengers argue that the order contradicts the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause, which provides that “[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
The Trump administration argues that the amendment’s framers only intended for the clause, which was added to the Constitution in 1868, to grant citizenship to former slaves and their children.
How Valencia González came to U.S. citizenship: a family's tale
Valencia González was born in Santa Ana, California to Rosalinda González Valencia, reportedly a drug kingpin in her own right and known as La Jefa, Spanish for “the boss” for her association with the “Cuinis” gang which later allied with the Jalisco New Generation Cartel.
Though details of La Jefa’s early life are murky, she was born in Mexico in the 1960s where her family grew avocados in a plantation field. Later, she and several of her 18 siblings eventually moved to the United States, possibly illegally. The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to inquiries about La Jefa’s immigration status.
It was there that she gave birth to Valencia González, whose father was Armando Valencia Cornelio, head of the Milenio Cartel, for whom several of her siblings worked. Valencia Cornelio was arrested by Mexican authorities in 2003 but the public record is vague on his fate. He was designated by the United States under the Kingpin Act as a significant foreign narcotics trafficker in 2004.
At some point, La Jefa and Valencia Cornelio separated, and she returned to Mexico. She married El Mencho in 1996, uniting her clan with the growing CJNG and putting Valencia González into the cartel’s line of succession.
Emerging as a globe-spanning drug trafficking empire
CJNG rose to power in Jalisco following a dispute with El Chapo’s Sinaloa cartel. The U.S. Department of State has described CJNG as a “transnational organization with a presence in nearly every part of Mexico” that traffics fentanyl, engages in extortion, smuggles migrants, steals oil and minerals, and trades in weaponry.
Since building its globe-spanning drug trafficking empire, the group has also increasingly employed military grade weaponry like drones, improvised explosive devices, and rocket-propelled grenade launchers, posing a novel problem for Mexican authorities and the United States, Just the News previously reported.
Recent battles between CJNG and rival cartel cells have terrorized villages, some within just a few hundred miles of the U.S. border. The use of drones in particular has made them more dangerous, which they use to drop explosives on their enemies, both Mexican police and rivals.
Surveillance requires approval from the U.S. Attorney General and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
Juan Carlos Valencia González’s U.S. citizenship creates hurdles for American intelligence agencies that did not exist when targeting his predecessor, El Mencho. Under U.S. law, surveillance and data collection on American citizens abroad are subject to stricter regulations.
While high-resolution CIA drone surveillance was instrumental in the operation that eliminated El Mencho, using similar methods against a U.S. citizen requires additional steps, including seeking approval from the U.S. Attorney General and convincing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that Valencia González is acting as an “agent of a foreign power,” The Wall Street Journal reported. President Trump’s designation of CJNC as a foreign terrorist organization could smooth this process, however.
Previously, the Obama administration cited the 2001 congressional authorization for the use of force against terrorist groups deemed responsible for the 9/11 attacks to justify the strike. Currently, no such authorization exists for the use of force against Mexican cartels.
Mexican authorities have been reluctant to take President Trump up on his offer of U.S. military assets to strike against the cartels, and a future strike against Valencia González would certainly spark constitutional questions. The Constitution recognizes a right to a “speedy and public trial.” Advocacy groups have also argued that the extrajudicial killing of American citizens abroad is in violation of the Fifth Amendment right to due process.
When President Barack Obama ordered a drone strike against Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S.-born cleric who assumed leadership of Yemen’s al-Qaeda branch, the administration justified the strike as an act of self-defense against a terrorist organization.
There was a time when immigrants had to prove they would not be a burden to society before they were allowed to come in...
'Give Us Your Tired, Your Poor, Your...Freebies'? Nearly Half of U.S. Immigrant Households on Welfare
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Posts
