Oh Dear. Never Mind.
58 minutes ago
Saturday, May 9, 2026
Subway crime is more than a statistics it's the destruction of mental health and any sense of common security...it changes lives and not for the better
Subway crime down, but underground murders, robberies surge: NYPD data
Landlord from hell accused of lighting tenant’s car on fire in campaign of terror
Landlord from hell accused of lighting tenant’s car on fire in campaign of terror
A worthless piece of human trash:Subway shove suspect flashes smile in court after allegedly killing retired NYC teacher
Subway shove suspect flashes smile in court after allegedly killing retired NYC teacher
A crazed repeat offender flashed a devilish grin as he made his first court appearance Saturday for allegedly shoving an elderly, retired teacher down an NYC subway stairwell, killing him.
Rhamell Burke, who’s been arrested four times since February, showed no remorse at his arraignment on murder charges for the random attack against retired teacher Ross Falzone.
Burke, 32, was released from Bellevue Hospital just five hours before he pushed the 76-year-old man to his death Thursday evening at a Chelsea subway station.
The alleged maniac was caught on video as he followed the victim, according to a Manhattan prosecutor who described the attack as “completely unprovoked.”
The judge ordered Burke – who already had four open criminal cases when Falzone was killed – remanded and said the suspect was a flight risk.
Vanity mixed with child porn
‘Looksmaxxing’ influencer caught with sick cache of child porn by girlfriend: cops
What 'Rights' Do They Want That They Don’t Already Have?
What 'Rights' Do They Want That They Don’t Already Have?
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Claiming, or implying, that certain groups don’t have the same “rights” as other (mainly white male) Americans do, is one of their major ploys. The great Thomas Sowell once wrote, "If you believe in equal rights, then what do ‘women's rights,’ ‘gay rights,’ etc., mean? Either they are redundant or they are violations of the principle of equal rights for all." If homosexuals or woman or blacks must have their own special set of “rights,” then that means, as Sowell so correctly points out, that “equal rights” means nothing. “Equal rights for all, special privileges for none,” Thomas Jefferson said, but that isn’t what the Democratic Party believes.
Of course, the Democrats like to claim that “gays,” “blacks,” and “women” are denied “equal rights” that other Americans have. Well, even if they are (more on that in a moment), why not insist upon “equal rights” for everybody? That would include blacks, women, homosexuals, white males, etc. Why do they need to single out certain groups? Historical grievances and inequalities are invalid unless those historical inequalities can be proven to be happening now. And that can’t be done. What are they?
The Democrats shout “women’s rights,” “gay rights,” whatever special group of “rights” they can concoct for one purpose and one purpose only—to try to obtain votes. And they lie incessantly to accomplish it. Hence, no conscience, only lust for power.
I’d very much like to know what rights I, as a straight, Caucasian male, have that homosexuals, blacks, and women do not have. What rights have been, by law, given to me that haven’t been given to them? What rights do they WANT that they don’t now have? Do blacks want the right to vote? Well, they have that. No law in the land prevents them from doing so. Do women want the right to work any job they wish, run for political office, or have equal pay for equal work? They, by law, have all those things. Do homosexuals want the right to have sex with whomever they wish? Well, they have that, though we aren't going to give them the right to abuse children. They can’t have that “right”; children have rights, too. But the Democrats have given transgenders the right to butcher children (a right they shouldn’t have); so, what is it they want that they don’t now have? What do “gay rights,” “women’s rights,” and “black rights” mean in a practical sense? What rights do other Americans have that they don’t have, and what equal rights do they want they don’t now possess?
These groups already have, by law, every right other Americans have. But the Democrats want to convince them they don’t. That’s one way the Democrats keep them in line, and it has worked marvelously for Democrats over the decades.
Again, this “gay rights,” “women’s rights,” etc., issue has nothing to do with true rights and everything to do with votes and power. The Democrats continue to lie, telling their constituents that America continues to be unfair to them and that Democrats are fighting for their “rights,” rights they already have, and Democrats can’t say what rights they don’t have. “Trump and Republicans are trying to take away blacks right to vote.” That is, 100 percent, a bald-faced lie, and every Democratic politician knows it. So, it’s back to my first point—these people have no conscience whatsoever. And people with no conscience are evil, the most dangerous people on earth. America’s greatest enemy today is not Iran, Middle Eastern terrorists, Vladimir Putin, Cuba, or even China. America’s greatest enemy, the barbarians, are already on our shores—evil, conscienceless Democrats who will say and do anything to have power over us. And countless millions of Americans are too blind to see it. It will destroy the country if not corrected soon.
There isn’t a black citizen in the country who doesn’t have the right to vote (if they are old enough). There isn’t a person (citizen or not) who doesn’t have the right to have sex with any consenting adult they wish. And the only “right” women no longer have is the right to compete fairly in sporting events against members of their own gender without males also competing in those contests—and that is a right Democrats have taken away from them, not Trump or Republicans. If certain groups must have their own special “rights,” then those are not equal rights for all Americans; those are special privileges for some, a principle directly opposite to what true America stands for.Again, I ask, what rights do straight, white males have that homosexuals, blacks, and women do not have? And to show that this has nothing to do with the rights of Americans, the Democrats now want non-citizens to have the same rights that citizens possess. If they succeed in that, it means there will no longer be a true America. Not even Putin or Communist China does that.
The Democrat leadership is conscienceless, despicable liars, using people for their own selfish political gain. That is nothing but vile and pure evil.
Democrats are more interested in protecting their centers of indoctrination than helping students
‘HYPOCRITES’: Top Ed Official Slams Democrats for Opposing Rule to Lower College Costs
“Democrats are hypocrites,” Kent told The Daily Signal in an exclusive interview. “For years, they have purported to care about student debt, but now they’ve reaffirmed what we’ve all been saying, which is, it was never about helping students, but rather about buying votes.”
On April 30, the Department of Education announced a rule taking effect July 1 to put new caps on student loan borrowing. The rule implements changes passed in President Donald Trump’s “One Big, Beautiful Bill Act.”
On Thursday, a group of House and Senate Democrats introduced a Congressional Review Act resolution to repeal the rule. The Democrats argue that it will “force future nurses, social workers, teachers, firefighters, physical and occupational therapists, and many others to turn to often predatory, high-interest private lenders to complete their degrees.”
“While working families struggle to buy groceries and put gas in their cars, the Trump Administration is sending a clear message to aspiring nurses, health care providers, social workers, teachers, and firefighters: If you can’t afford a high-interest loan, then you can’t serve your community,” said Rep. Lauren Underwood, D-Ill.
But Kent says most graduate programs are not affected: 78% of graduate-level nursing programs, 94% of graduate-level teacher programs, and 100% of graduate-level fire service programs are not impacted by the loan caps.
“Unlike Democrats, we’re trying to fix the problem without buying votes or saddling other taxpayers with debt that they did not take on. These Democrats are attempting to repeal our well-thought-out rule,” he said. “They’re hypocrites, and they’re using lies and scare tactics.”
Democrats’ effort to repeal the rule would allow institutions to continue overpricing students, Kent said.•He touted savings for students since the loan caps launched. The University of California, Irvine, cut tuition by more than 20%.
The University of Kansas will offer new scholarship opportunities to law students following the administration’s announcement. The law school will also use its endowment to offer student loans at a lower interest rate than the government provides.
Santa Clara University Law School launched the “Pledge Scholarship,” a $16,000 tuition scholarship to every incoming first-year student joining its J.D. programs.
“Some Democrats don’t actually care about helping students, and they certainly want to keep students in debt,” Kent said. “They want to keep colleges fat and happy and then cry wolf during election time that loan forgiveness is the only option to help borrowers.”
A number of professional associations or advocacy organizations endorsed the Democrat effort, but Kent said it’s because they care about dues.
“These associations are working together with institutions of higher education, and they actually don’t care about helping students,” he said. “They don’t care that these students are taking on unmanageable debt.”
While Democrats want to forgive student loans, Kent said he wants to fix the root cause of the problem, so debt forgiveness is not necessary.
“The previous administration always wanted to solve the problem at the end of the story,” he said.
“They wanted to saddle those individuals that never went to college with the debt of someone who did, and the American people overwhelmingly said that they did not accept that,” he said.
Kent called it “unconscionable” that Democrats want to stop the rule from taking effect.
“When you see really irresponsible members of Congress, like the ones who introduced this resolution,” he said, “what it signals to institutions is to pause the initiatives that they have in place to make those changes.”
Some of the biggest higher education institutions collectively have endowments of over $950 billion. That money should be used to lower the cost of higher education for students, Kent said.
“Institutions recognize that the gravy train is ending,” he said. “Students and families live within their needs. Institutions need to as well.”
Corruption id the Democrat raison d' être
Michigan Indicts Gretchen Whitmer’s ‘Best Friend’ on Felony Charges
A longtime donor and friend of Democrat Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer now faces no fewer than 16 felony charges related to misuse of funds.
Interestingly, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced the charges, proving that even a broken clock — or a corrupt Democrat — is right twice a day. “Today, we allege Fay Beydoun sought and received a $20 million 'Michigan enhancement grant' from the state Legislature, operated a criminal enterprise to use those funds for personal expenses and her own enrichment, and lied repeatedly when reporting how she used those funds,” Nessel accused.
It seems as if this was a corrupt give-and-take, where Beydoun received state-approved funds after supporting Democrats in the state for years, including through $20,000+ in donations to Whitmer, according to the Daily Mail. Beydoun also hosted a fundraiser for Whitmer that garnered $13,500. As an important point, it was Whitmer who reportedly appointed Beydoun to the board that oversaw the grants, meaning Whitmer provided the opportunity for Beydoun to misuse funds, even if she wasn't directly complicit in the crime.
Nessel explained, “The process by which this grant was proposed, developed, awarded, and administered bears practically zero semblance to the traditional grant process, and was only made possible through a system that pairs political cronyism with minimal oversight.” Her press release on May 6 stated:
[Beydoun is charged with] the alleged theft of funds and fraudulent administration of a $20 million state legislative grant awarded to Global Link International, a company created and controlled by Beydoun. Beydoun allegedly used appropriated funds for her own personal use and enrichment, repeatedly lied to the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) about expenses contrary to the purpose of the grant and activities of the business accelerator, and did each of these to further a criminal enterprise for her own financial gain.
Playing up her own supposed dedication to saving taxpayers' money, Nessel pronounced, "Since the enactment of the Global Link grant, some significant reforms have been enacted by the Legislature. These reforms are meaningful, but with millions of dollars in public funding at hand, the State and each of its agencies must do more to prevent abuses of state funds and to require responsible administration of enhancement grants — regardless of whether their recipients enjoy positions of power, privilege, and political connections."
Recommended: California GOP Official Preposterously Says That Illegal Aliens Should Vote
The Michigan Economic Development Corporation Board was to implement the $20 million taxpayer-funded grant, but apparently, the MEDC Board received reports on $1.35 million documented as spent, of which only $20,000 actually went to the purpose described in the statutory grant language. That means Beydoun spent considerably more than a million dollars on non-approved purposes.
The Michigan GOP broke down some of the problematic expenditures in more detail:
> $4,500 for a coffee maker.
> $11,000 first-class plane ticket.
> $408,000 in salaries over 3 months for 2 people.
> $6,148 on two handmade rugs from Tunisia.
> $11,325 on a forged legal invoice.
> $40,800 check to Salhab Enterprises for "fully furnished 2 units," yet the address led to a vacant lot.
It is not clear what happened to the rest of the $20 million. But judging by Beydoun's predilection for handmade rugs, first-class plane trips, and fraudulent businesses that don't exist, I'm going to guess that she misspent that money egregiously.
We Need to Stop Letting Democrats Casually Commit Felonies With No Consequences
We Need to Stop Letting Democrats Casually Commit Felonies With No Consequences
It's incredibly demoralizing to law-abiding, rule-following, normal Americans to watch Democrats publicly commit crimes without ever getting in trouble for it.
I’m not talking about the indictments and prosecutions of high-level Democrats on charges that may or may not hold up in court — the Jim Comeys and Letitia Jameses. These prosecutions may or may not be at least partly politically motivated, but Democrats will always think that's all they were. And the refined legal arguments for conviction stand little chance of success in leftist jurisdictions like Washington and New York.
I’m talking about Democrat politicians who knowingly flout the law, brazenly and openly, on video for all to see. These people are undeniably committing serious, felony-level crimes which all Americans can see with their own eyes.
Democrats have always been the lawless party. Look what they did with mass illegal immigration. But back then, they at least pretended to have legal justification. For example, their gross distortion and semi-execution of asylum laws was met halfway by international NGOs coaching the aliens on exactly what to say to give it all that fig-leaf of defensibility.
Also, failing to enforce the law and claiming it's a policy argument is not the same thing as brazenly, openly breaking the law.
Let's start with Tennessee State Rep. Justin Pearson. Yesterday, when the House voted to redistrict itself (potentially taking the state from 9-1 Republican to Democrat representation in the U.S. House to 10-0), Pearson threw quite the fit. Action News 5 sets the scene:
Cameras in the Tennessee Capitol captured a tense moment between State Representative Justin J. Pearson (D-Memphis) and state troopers who were detaining his brother Thursday, moments after GOP lawmakers passed a new congressional map that split the brothers’ city into three districts.
Before state Republicans passed the newly proposed congressional map on Thursday, protests erupted in the House chamber, prompting Tennessee Highway Patrol to remove demonstrators.
“Get the f*** back!” Justin is heard shouting at officers as he and his brother, KeShaun Pearson, were being escorted out of the House chambers.
The Memphis lawmaker could be heard raising his voice at one particular trooper as the crowd moved outside. “Boy! The f*** is wrong with you?! The f*** is wrong with you?! Stupid m***********...”
Troopers were seen on video bringing at least one other person into custody.
Pearson hugged KeShaun and told him he was proud of him before troopers took him away.
In fact, Pearson could be seen and heard doing more than just "raising his voice." Watch this video of the state rep committing multiple felony-level crimes against Tennessee state troopers (explicit language warning):
I count Pearson committing at least three serious crimes: interfering, assault on an officer, and obstruction. And what the heck — throw in disturbing the peace for the foul mouth on that guy. What an a**.
As an aside, Pearson is getting roasted on social media today for his preposterous makeover from clean-cut policy bro to this ghetto gangsta persona:
Rep. Justin Pearson in 2016 vs 2026:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
