Back in 2022, then-former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard got blistered for raising concerns that the United States might be funding bio-research labs with dangerous pathogens in foreign countries like war-torn Ukraine.
Republican Mitt Romney – like Gabbard a former presidential candidate – accused her of spreading "treasonous lies" and "Russian propaganda," and many in the news media joined the chorus in a concerted effort to diminish the threat that U.S. tax dollars could one day lead to an accidental virus outbreak from one of those foreign labs.
Four years later, Gabbard turned the tables in epic fashion.
In one of her final acts as the U.S. Director of National Intelligence, she declassified evidence Friday showing that America did, in fact, fund a whopping 120 bio-labs in 30 foreign countries, and that some of those labs had handled dangerous pathogens or were engaged in virus-enhancing techniques known as gain-of-function research.
And yes, Ukraine was one of the locations with multiple labs.
"Despite the obvious potential for catastrophic global impact research on dangerous pathogens in bio-labs can have, politicians, so-called health professionals like Dr. [Anthony] Fauci, and entities within the Biden administration's national security team lied to the American people about the existence of U.S.-funded and supported bio-labs, and threatened those who attempted to expose the truth," Gabbard declared in a video released on her social media account.
The release of the declassified memos and video statement was more than just a retort to Romney: it was a rebuke to the journalism profession and its pack mentality coverage.
Numerous legacy media outlets, including The New York Times, long claimed that conservatives were pushing conspiracy theories relating to the funding of biological laboratories in other countries.
Some got the basic facts wrong. Others changed the argument, suggesting there was no reason for concern because tax dollars weren't going to bioweapon labs.
And nearly all missed or distorted Gabbard's factually driven point: whether for peaceful research or heinous weaponry, a biological lab with dangerous pathogens in a foreign country struck by terrorists or war, like Ukraine, posed an avoidable risk.
Documents show Ukraine works with anthrax, tuberculosis, SARS, Ebola, other pathogens
The documents released by Gabbard show that the labs in Ukraine were working with “Especially Dangerous Pathogens,” including some stored from the Soviet Era, including bacteria such as Anthrax, tuberculosis, SARS, Ebola, the plague, and others.
The labs were ostensibly for veterinary research, but documents released by Gabbard suggested that although one “facility had updated some areas with modern equipment and infrastructure, [The Institute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine] IECVM as recently as 2019, had at least some biosafety and biosecurity deficiencies—most notably in rooms handling contagious Brucella bacteria” which may result in life-threatening results.
If Russia gets to one of these labs, its research status won't matter, as the dangerous pathogens within could be used as biological weapons. The Wuhan Institute of Virology was researching coronaviruses and receiving U.S. funding at the exact time and place where the COVID pandemic began.
The revelation won widespread praise for Gabbard.
"This is a historic declassification by DNI Gabbard. Ty! Another 'conspiracy theory' proved true," Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., tweeted out.
Dr. Robert Malone, one of the pioneers of the MRNA vaccine, cheered the revelation too.
"In March 0222 [sic], I wrote about the Ukraine biolabs- I was labeled as spreading misinformation by various news sources. Today, Tulsi Gabbard released the hard evidence that I had uncovered in 2022 - there were many, many biolabs in Ukraine," he wrote.
The bio-labs roller coaster of 2022 is another textbook case of a censorship campaign that tried to portray a legitimate debate as Russian propaganda, just like the Hunter Biden laptop of 2019.
Media misses inconvenient truths, blames Russia
In March 2022, the New York Times published two articles downplaying the idea that the U.S. was funding biological weapons labs in other countries, including Ukraine. “One of Russia’s most incendiary disinformation campaigns ramped up days ago, when its defense and foreign ministries issued statements falsely claiming that the Pentagon was financing biological weapons labs in Ukraine,” the Times began the March 10, 2022, article.
The story quoted then-White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki – now an MS NOW host – saying that Russia made “false claims” that could be a cover “for Russia to possibly use chemical or biological weapons in Ukraine, or to create a false flag operation using them.”
Psaki went on to call the accusations “preposterous” and claimed that the U.S. “does not develop or possess such weapons anywhere.” The Times paraphrased Psaki as saying “Ukraine has no biological weapons labs” and stated that “Top American intelligence officials reiterated those points in a Senate hearing on Thursday.”
On March 11, 2022, the Times ran a second article on the bio-labs, stating: "There is no evidence to support the claims, which President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, the White House, the Pentagon and the State Department have all unequivocally denied.”
In this article, the Times reported that Ukraine does have biological laboratories, and that the U.S. “has provided backing” to some of those labs, but insisted it was to “prevent the production of biological weapons.” (Emphasis original.)
In the press release revealing the U.S.’s funding of bio-labs, DNI said that many of the “U.S. government-funded bio-labs are currently or have previously engaged in research using hazardous and highly contagious pathogens, in some cases including dangerous Gain-of-Function research, with very little visibility or oversight.”
The Times followed up its March coverage with another article in September calling the bio-lab funding accusations “outlandish.”
“The United States and others have dismissed the accusations as preposterous, and Russia has offered no proof. Yet the claims continue to circulate. Backed at times by China’s diplomats and state media, they have ebbed and flowed in international news reports, fueling conspiracy theories that linger online,” the Times wrote.
Others line up to minimize the danger
NewsGuard, a left-wing “fact-checker” business entity claiming to be a “global leader in information reliability,” called the story “Russian disinformation” and accused Chinese state-run news organizations of spreading that disinformation. The Federal Trade Commission had at one point issued a civil investigative demand (CID) to probe NewsGuard, which was accused widely of publishing ratings that commission leadership and thousands of readers believed were biased against conservative outlets. NewsGuard sued the FTC in federal court and on April 17, the FTC withdrew the case.
NPR also ran a story titled, “How the false Russian biolab story came to circulate among the U.S. far right,” claiming, along with the Times, that then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson falsely made the claim about the bio-labs.
The Times and other outlets claimed that conservatives were misrepresenting what Biden administration officials said in congressional hearings and interviews, including an interview in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists with Dr. Robert Pope, former director of the Pentagon’s Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Pope said that none of the biological labs in Ukraine have “any of the sort of infrastructure for researching or producing biological weapons.”