Sunday, June 7, 2026

Britain takes another turn to the absurd...the rise of anti white hatred! Will the next step be images of Islamic figures?

A Serious Country Does Not Swap Its Greatest Leader On Banknotes For Little Animals

BY TYLER DURDEN
SUNDAY, JUN 07, 2026 - 04:00 AM

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity,

The Bank of England has now admitted the quiet part out loud. Historical figures including Winston Churchill were removed from future banknotes after researchers told officials they were "elitist and divisive."

The move replaces British legends with wildlife in a calculated step to sideline national heroes and accelerate cultural replacement.

This is not a neutral design update. It is institutional capture in action, where the man who rallied Britain against Nazi tyranny gets sidelined because focus groups and consultants found him too problematic for modern sensitivities and would prefer to look at a Fox or a hedgehog instead.

The revelation aligns precisely with plans first laid out months earlier. Back in March, the Bank announced it would phase out portraits of Churchill on the £5 note, Jane Austen on the £10, JMW Turner on the £20, and Alan Turing on the £50. In their place would come native British wildlife, plants, and landscapes.

King Charles III would remain on the front of the notes. Officials claimed the shift followed a public consultation with over 44,000 responses, where around 60 percent supposedly favored nature themes for security reasons and to celebrate the environment.

Critics at the time called the idea absurd and bonkers. They warned it represented a war on history and showed the Bank had been captured by progressive ideology. One former business minister said notes should honor the historical giants who shaped the nation rather than fuzzy animals.

Another asked what came next - squirrels running the economy. Observers noted it fit a wider pattern of erasing or downplaying Britain's past under the banner of progress and diversity.

That pattern includes London museums draping portraits to "reclaim Caribbean history," the removal of Shakespeare, Thatcher, and Churchill artworks from 10 Downing Street in favor of pieces by artists with Caribbean ties, Cambridge panels labeling Churchill a white supremacist whose empire was supposedly worse than the Nazis, and a London primary school renaming "Churchill House" after Marcus Rashford to promote diversity. Statues of Churchill have faced vandalism and calls for removal, including during pro-Palestine protests earlier this year. Each step chips away at the symbols that once unified national memory.

Now the June reporting makes the motive unmistakable. Research commissioned by the Bank concluded that figures such as Churchill, Alan Turing, and Jane Austen were "contentious and not representative of the UK's cultural and natural diversity." Officials received advice to replace the portraits with nature images because historical figures represented "a backward-looking vision of the UK that carries too great a risk of division and controversy."

The Bank has insisted the decision was not driven by that specific research but by an earlier poll showing public preference for nature. Yet the Freedom of Information details tell a different story about how the process unfolded behind closed doors.

A public consultation is currently running on the wildlife shortlist. Proposed replacements include an owl, hedgehog, badger, or common frog. One commentator summed up the national mood: "We are not a serious country anymore."

Some of the animals under consideration are not even native to Britain. That detail alone exposes the move as more than harmless environmental appreciation. It functions as a psyop to further erode British culture - stripping away recognizable national symbols and replacing them with generic or imported imagery that weakens any sense of rooted identity.

This fits the same ideological framework that has infected other institutions. DEI priorities and critical race theory obsessions treat any strong assertion of British heritage as inherently suspect. The man who helped defeat fascism is recast as "divisive" while the focus shifts to animals that supposedly better reflect "cultural and natural diversity." The result is a currency that no longer celebrates the people who built and defended the country. It celebrates detachment instead.

The broader assault continues without pause. Schools, museums, government buildings, and now the Bank of England itself participate in softening, diluting, and apologizing for the past. Historical giants are judged not by their achievements but by whether they pass modern committee tests on representation. When they fail, they are quietly retired in favor of whatever the latest advisory group deems safe and inclusive.

Britain's wartime leader did not save the nation so that unelected researchers and captured bureaucracies could later declare him unfit for the money supply. Yet that is exactly what has happened. The same institutions that owe their continued existence to Churchill's stand now treat his image as a liability.

A country that systematically removes its heroes from public view is not evolving. It is forgetting how to value itself. The Bank of England's choice to prioritize "non-divisive" wildlife over the figures who actually shaped the United Kingdom sends a clear message: national pride is now considered too risky for everyday transactions.

Britons who still believe their history is worth defending have every reason to push back. This is not about banknote design. It is about whether the nation retains the confidence to honour the people and events that made it possible. Replacing Churchill with a hedgehog is not progress. It is surrender dressed up as sensitivity.


Posted by jerry at 9:06 AM 0 comments

Safe spaces for who?

UK Cop Fired For Questioning Islam In 'Safe Space'

BY TYLER DURDEN
SUNDAY, JUN 07, 2026 - 07:30 AM

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity,

A Christian police community support officer lost his career after asking a Muslim colleague about jihad and Hamas atrocities during a diversity session that promised open discussion. At the same time, training drilled "white privilege" into police ranks.

Posted by jerry at 9:01 AM 0 comments

The sort of grifters that get elected to office in NYC

NYC Councilwoman and congressional candidate Julie Won ‘squatted’ in luxury Queens condo: landlord

An NYC councilwoman running for Congress owes $25,000 in back rent after squatting for five months in a luxury high-rise, according to her ex-landlord and court documents.

Councilwoman Julie Won (D-Queens) and her family vacated a one-bedroom condo at swanky Skyline Towers on Long Island City’s waterfront on Monday — three days after being slapped with eviction papers by the condo’s owner, Justin Chae, a top NYC political consultant and former family friend.

The gleaming-glass, 67-story skyscraper includes a fitness center with a swimming pool, a sauna and spa, a yoga room, and other A-list amenities.  

However, Won insisted to The Post that she and her political strategist husband Eugene Noh never signed any lease on the luxury pad, claiming Chae forged her name onto a bogus lease agreement.    

City Council member Julie Won in a red jacket.
NYC Councilwoman Julie Won (pictured) and her political-strategist husband Eugene Noh were slapped with legal papers on May 29, beginning eviction proceedings against them for allegedly refusing to fork over $5,000-a-month rent since January for the swanky Skyline Towers condo complex on Long Island City’s waterfront.  Gabriella Bass

Chae, whose unit is valued at nearly $1 million, said he agreed to let the power couple and their two young children move in rent-free in November 2024, under a one-year lease that he shared with The Post.

He offered the free rent as a bonus to Noh, a fellow Korean-American, for agreeing to work as vice president of campaigns at Chae’s company, Legion Outreach Consultants. Their families have known each other since the 1980s, Chae said.

The business relationship never worked out, and Noh’s employment was terminated on June 26, according to the petition Chae filed in Queens Housing Court.

Chae told The Post he agreed to let the family reside there rent-free until the end of 2025 and then charge $5,000 monthly rent if they wanted to stay.

However, the couple never paid a cent and started “ghosting” Chae in April by ignoring calls and other messages, the landlord claims.

Chae said he plans to file additional court papers seeking $25,000 owed in rent for the first five months of the year. There’s a hearing on the case scheduled for June 30.

“Chae can’t believe his friends would take advantage of him this way,” said his spokesman, longtime Democratic consultant Hank Sheinkopf.

Skyline Tower, a glass skyscraper in Queens, New York.
Skyline Towers includes a fitness center with a swimming pool, a sauna and spa, a yoga room, and other A-list amenities. Helayne Seidman for the NY Post

Won, however, accused Chae of “politically extorting her” while she’s running for higher office and predicted the lease agreement he provided to The Post will never hold up in court. She also threatened to countersue him over a “clearly political smear job.”

“This is a gross misrepresentation of reality but unfortunately thousands of families face the same kind of intimidation and abuse by landlords across the city,” she said. “I look forward to setting the record straight in court especially since there’s no executed lease — nor has there been a service of a predicate notice as required by law.”

A far-left NYC councilwoman running for Congress and her family are squatting illegally in a luxury Queens high-rise condo complex, their landlord claims.
Councilwoman Julie Won (right) and her husband Eugene Noh Instagram / @Juliej_won

However, Won failed to address an Oct. 17, 2024 email exchange between Chae and Noh provided to The Post that shows her husband saying he “signed” the lease — and whether it’s possible he also signed her name, too. The couple also didn’t address allegations that they never paid rent.

Won, who is running in a crowded field in the June 23 Democratic primary to replace retiring Rep. Nydia Velázquez in New York’s 7th Congressional District (covering parts of Queens and Brooklyn), claimed in a May 26 interview published by The New York Editorial Board that she and her husband currently pay “over $4,000” monthly for rent.

She didn’t mention her ongoing landlord-tenant dispute but said she moved to LIC “where it’s extremely expensive” because “Council security” suggested she enroll her “children in a school where there’s more Asian children, so that they can blend in more.”


Won — who represents LIC, Sunnyside and other parts of Western Queens — earns $148,500 annually.

Noh reportedly planned to buy out parts of Chae’s consulting business last year, but Chae said they never agreed to a deal.

Noh now operates his own political consulting business similar in name to Chae’s — called Legion Consulting. It’s earned $268,696 in city, state and federal campaign work since August, according to records.

Kitchen interior with light-colored cabinets, a stainless steel stove, and a sink.
Justin Chae, a top NYC political consultant, owns the one-bedroom condo valued at nearly $1 million, Obtained by the New York Post

Noh’s biggest client since breaking off from Chae is ex-Mayor Eric Adams. He racked up $104,735 in payments working as Adams’ contracted campaign manager during the Democratic ex-mayor’s failed 2025 re-election bid as an independent.

Won, a member of the Council’s Progressive Caucus, endorsed now-Mayor Zohran Mamdani in last year’s Democratic primary.


The couple claimed to QNS.com in July that they were unfairly targeted by “sexist” and “misogynistic” media scrutiny of their relationship because they backed different mayoral candidates.

Velázquez has endorsed Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso to succeed her, while Mamdani is backing fellow socialist and state Assemblywoman Claire Valdez (D-Queens).

By 
Rich Calder
Published June 7, 2026, 2:29 a.m. PT



Posted by jerry at 8:42 AM 0 comments

Iraq

New Iraqi leader promises security deals for U.S. oil companies ahead of Trump meeting

Iraqi civilian authorities say they would compensate international and U.S companies for losses resulting from attacks on their facilities if they originated within Iraq.

Posted by jerry at 8:24 AM 0 comments

Protecting seniors

‘Never, Ever’: Trump’s HHS becomes a protection powerhouse for America’s seniors

In the age of smartphone cameras, viral videos and scams, victims of senior abuse and exploitation have splashed in public awareness.


The Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Elder Justice Coordinating Council (EJCC) has adopted a sweeping Federal Elder Justice Action Plan and is launching an aggressive “Never, Ever” awareness and prevention campaign, a powerful MAHA-aligned move to protect seniors’ dignity under Trump’s leadership.

“When federal agencies work together to streamline oversight and administrative processes, it strengthens protections for vulnerable seniors while improving accountability across the aging services continuum,” President and CEO of LeadingAge South Carolina, Kassie South, told Just The News.  

South, who has served decades as a senior health advocate, added, “Reducing burdens that hinder solutions enables providers and caregivers to focus less on paperwork and more on enhancing quality of life for residents. We appreciate the Administration’s commitment to pursuing reforms that support better outcomes and quality of life for older adults and their families.”

The "Never, Ever" initiative isn't just another awareness campaign during Elder Justice Awareness Month. It marks a decisive shift from policy to practice, uniting multiple federal agencies with states, local governments and community partners to combat growing problems in the senior sector: abuse, neglect, financial exploitation and scams that rob millions of seniors annually. 

The focus is zero tolerance for overlooking senior issues, emphasizing "never, ever" let it go unreported or accepting fragmented responses when unified action can deliver solutions. 

Under President Donald Trump, HHS has been tasked with implementing the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) agenda across all applicable sectors, with this initiative serving as an extension of prevention-first leadership to America’s seniors.  

It also mirrors MAHA’s fight against chronic vulnerabilities, delivering quick wins, empowering communities, and ensuring that no senior is left behind in Trump’s vision of a healthier, stronger nation at every stage of life, including the golden years.

Practical implementation, ramped up enforcement

The program will rely on teamwork across 17+ federal agencies by creating shared strategies, training programs for police, prosecutors, and first responders, and rapid-response teams that help states and local Adult Protective Services investigate and intervene faster when abuse or neglect is suspected.

For public awareness, the “Never, Ever” campaign will run national public education efforts—like targeted ads, social media, community toolkits, and clear messaging—to make families and neighbors more alert, encourage reporting, and teach simple prevention steps, so people stop looking the other way. 

It ramps up enforcement by forging tighter federal-state partnerships to investigate and prosecute financial scams, nursing home neglect, and exploitation cases more aggressively. Finally, it drives immediate “quick wins” by spotting high-impact priorities (such as cutting underreporting), delivering better victim support services, and giving states flexible tools to test local solutions that actually deliver results on the ground. 

Neglect and abuse against seniors 

Neglect and abuse among seniors represent a growing crisis as America’s older population expands. Approximately 1 in 10 older adults experience some form of elder abuse each year, with estimates reaching as high as 5 million victims annually, according to The Nursing Home Abuse Center, a privately-owned advocacy and informational web resource that connects victims and their families with for-profit legal partners and personal injury law firms.

Neglect is among the most common forms, often intertwined with emotional and psychological abuse, which affects nearly 5% of seniorsyearly and emotional neglect in up to 27% of cases, according to the World Health Organization.

In nursing homes alone, over 7,600 health citations were reportedly issued in 2023 for abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Only 1 in 24 cases is reported to authorities, which, if accurate, means the true scale is vastly undercounted. These issues have worsened post-pandemic due to isolation and caregiver strain, leading to serious physical injuries, higher mortality risk, and long-term psychological harm like PTSD in up to 60% of victims. 

Scams and Financial Exploitation

Scams and financial exploitation are surging, draining seniors’ life savings at alarming rates. Older Americans lose an estimated $27–28.3 billion annually to financial exploitation, with $27 billion in suspicious activity flagged in just one recent 12-month FDIC analysis. 

One in five seniors over 65 may fall victim to scams, reports Issues & Advocacy, with average losses around $120,000 per case and family members or trusted contacts responsible for the majority. FBI data shows elder fraud complaints rose 14% in recent years, with investment and impostor scams driving massive spikes — losses more than $10,000 reported by older adults quadrupled from 2020–2024. 

Underreporting is severe (as low as 1 in 44 cases for financial abuse), allowing the crisis to escalate as sophisticated AI-enabled scams target this vulnerable group, according to The National Adult Protective Services Association, a national non-profit 501(c)(3) organization.

Amanda Head is White House Correspondent for Just The News. You can follow her here. 

Posted by jerry at 8:23 AM 0 comments

How Do Federal Government Employees Get Away With Not Paying Their Taxes?

How Do Federal Government Employees Get Away With Not Paying Their Taxes?



•   June 6, 2026

We have known for some time that our federal employees have cushy lives compared to the people for whom they work (us). What is particularly infuriating is that so many of them either don’t pay their taxes or are seriously delinquent on what they owe their employer—the federal government.

Recently, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration found in a new report showing that 6.9% of federal employees are delinquent on their IRS taxes. That amounts to about 215,000 employees. This is a marked increase in three short years from 4.9%. It is appalling that the rate was previously as high as it was, but it has now hit crisis level, seemingly with little or no consequences. This is in contrast to a 5% delinquency rate among the general population.

The number of delinquents exploded during the Biden administration, which was lax on enforcing anything for favored groups. We can only speculate as to why federal employees felt they had the right to forgo paying their taxes. It might be Biden allowing so many people to go without repaying their student loans that encouraged the government’s employees to skip payments.

The fascinating aspect of this is that these employees are W-2 wage earners who have withholding taken out of their paychecks. The government can easily enforce additional withholding to make sure its employees are in compliance. The feds can easily garnish workers’ wages, as they certainly know where they work. Indeed, the feds do this all the time to ordinary citizens.

Worse, about 2,000 of these culprits work for the IRS. It is estimated that their back debt is $50 million. As of 2024, the most recent year for which data is available, there are about 50 employees who have been delinquent for more than five years. Yet these people still work for the agency collecting taxes from the public. There have only been 20 employees terminated for nonpayment in recent years.

Nongovernmental professionals who help American citizens comply with the maze of tax laws to properly file their personal returns have significant requirements to stay current on their tax filings and payments.  

The broadest manner in which the feds control tax preparers is through the Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN). These numbers became mandatory in 2010. It allows the feds to track anyone who is a preparer. The preparer must renew annually and must attest to the fact that he or she is current on tax filing and payments. If the preparer is not current, the preparer’s right to file taxes will be suspended.

Of course, we know it is illegal to lie to the federal government in these situations. As usual, government likes to punish people with penalties. If someone files a return without a valid PTIN, there is a $530 penalty per return.



There is another mandatory number tax professionals receive to be able to file tax returns electronically. That number is an Electronic Filing Identification Number (EFIN). The IRS conducts continuous surveillance of tax preparers to monitor their compliance with tax laws and, if someone is not current, they will suspend the tax professional’s right to file.

There is an even higher standard for CPAs and tax attorneys. The IRS issues a document called Circular 230 for code of conduct for tax professionals. I once asked if there was a similar document for conduct of IRS employees. Not surprisingly, the answer was no. The failure to file or pay taxes can permanently disbar these professionals from representing clients or signing tax returns.

This is the way the government treats ordinary Americans regarding tax filings or delinquencies. It is an understatement to say that dealing with the IRS can be very harsh and incomprehensible. It would be nice to know if our federal employees delinquent on their taxes were receiving similarly harsh treatment for their errant liabilities.

When American citizens are working hard and complying with the tax laws, they should have no tolerance for their federal employees failing to file and pay their taxes on time. It seems natural that, in order to work for the federal government, employees should be current on their taxes, just like tax professionals must.

Working for the government is a privilege, not a right. To maintain that privilege, employees should be required to file and pay their taxes on time. Lax enforcement of this standard must end. The American people should demand this.


Posted by jerry at 8:19 AM 0 comments

These are incoherent vile people of the left...I see they even brought a Palestinian flag.

Police Bring Down the Fire When Radical Activists Create Chaos at TPUSA Women's Summit in TX

By Nick Arama  | 6:46 PM on June 06, 2026 
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.
Posted by jerry at 8:14 AM 0 comments
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)