House Judiciary Chairman urges DOJ to permanently dismiss all Trump cases after bombshell report
"It's probably time that this all just ended," Jim Jordan told Jsu the News.
"It's probably time that this all just ended," Jim Jordan told Jsu the News.

There’s a pattern here.
In Maine, Socialist Senate candidate Graham Platner, who claims to be a working class oysterman, is a rich kid who isn’t an oysterman, and in Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed, whose whole pitch for office is claiming to be a doctor and running on implementing socialized medicine… has no medical license and barely ever practiced.
Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed for years has publicly said he’s a physician — but there’s overwhelming evidence that he’s had no experience as a licensed medical doctor.
This April, he gave an interview to a local TV journalist where he talked up his credentials as a physician multiple times. In March, he told a group of Teamsters nurses that he had “been in enough codes to watch who really does the work” and said that same month on a podcast that “I’ve been a doctor my whole career.”
His LinkedIn profile currently says he’s a “physician,” and late last month he called himself “a physician and epidemiologist” at a Council of Baptist Pastors debate in Detroit.
But according to a review of Michigan and New York state medical records, he’s never been granted a medical license in those states. El-Sayed’s hands-on experience treating patients appears to be a short clinical rotation called a sub-internship at a small hospital in Manhattan for four weeks at the end of medical school, he told a podcast in 2022, where he said his “job was to be the, like, worst doctor on the team” and he was “cosplaying a doctor.”
Politicians routinely inflate their resumes when running for office, but Abdul El-Sayed has only two things he’s running on…
1. Opposing America and Israel while claiming that they’re persecuting Muslims
2. Being a ‘doctor’ who understands how medicine needs to be fixed through socialized medicine.
And in turns out that El-Sayed is as much of a doctor as Marx was an economist or Mohammed was literate enough to read any book, let alone the Koran.
Still the lie is so out there that Google Search classifies him as a ‘doctor’.
Abdul El-Sayed worked in the area of ‘public health’ rather than actually treating patients and his campaign has taken to climbing that he’s even more of a doctor because of that. Just not the kind who actually treats patients or does anything useful.
The state of Michigan prohibits anyone who is not licensed “to induce the belief” that they have a license or are registered to practice medicine.
Don’t expect any consequences though.
If you do a TV ad claiming to be a physician while selling vitamins, you could be in big trouble, but if you do a TV ad claiming to be a physician while selling socialized medicine and the destruction of America, it’s all good.
At the center of the dispute is an ongoing disciplinary case involving former Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark, who faced scrutiny over his role in discussions surrounding the 2020 presidential election.
The Justice Department filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday against the District of Columbia Bar’s disciplinary authorities, alleging that the attorney discipline process has been improperly used to investigate and penalize federal government lawyers for actions taken in their official capacities.
At the center of the dispute is an ongoing disciplinary case involving former Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark, who faced scrutiny over his role in discussions surrounding the 2020 presidential election and a draft letter concerning allegations of election fraud in Georgia. According to the Justice Department, the letter was never finalized or sent, and the disciplinary proceedings improperly target internal executive branch deliberations.
The lawsuit aligns with President Donald Trump’s Executive Order titled Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government and a related presidential memorandum aimed at limiting what the administration describes as politically motivated uses of legal and regulatory processes.
“As our complaint and history make clear, the DC Bar has long acted as a blatantly partisan arm of leftist causes. No more,” said acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.
Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward, who filed the complaint, stated: “President Trump promised to put an end to the weaponization of the legal process, and today’s lawsuit against the D.C. Bar makes good on that promise.
"The D.C. Bar will no longer be permitted to probe sensitive Executive Branch deliberations and target Executive Branch officials with whom they happen to politically disagree, and Federal attorneys will once again be free to share their candid legal advice with their bosses and colleagues.”
The DOJ argues that the Bar’s actions violate the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, discriminate against federal attorneys, and chill the ability of executive branch lawyers to provide frank advice—potentially undermining the functioning of the federal government. The complaint is available on the Justice Department’s website.
The filing marks the latest escalation in tensions between the Trump administration and the D.C. Bar over ethics investigations involving current and former officials.
The news stories are pretty much all the same. Heartless Republicans slashed Medicaid spending and let temporary “enhanced” Obamacare subsidies expire, and now millions are losing health insurance.
But buried deep within those stories, if it’s there at all, is the fact that when measured properly, enrollment for both programs is up.
Here’s a prime example.
Axios this week ran a story with the headline “Health program cuts hit home, fueling blame game.”
It begins by saying that “Sweeping changes that congressional Republicans made to the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid are starting to take effect, fueling an election-year blame game over coverage losses” and that enrollment in Obamacare is down 1.2 million from last year.
It goes on to say that 20,000 people could lose Medicaid coverage in Nebraska alone thanks to the new work requirements included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
It’s only buried at the bottom of that story that Axios admits the truth:
Obamacare “enrollment will likely still be well above the numbers from before the enhanced subsidies were first passed in 2021, when there were around 12 million enrollees,” it grudgingly admits.
(Why isn’t that the headline?)

Even then, Axios leaves out the fact that those “enhanced subsidies,” passed by Democrats and signed by Joe Biden, were meant to be a temporary salve in the wake of COVID. Enrollment was always supposed to come back down.
The same is true with Medicaid. During COVID, states were banned from cleaning their enrollment rolls. The result was that enrollment exploded. Once that ban was lifted, states started cleaning up their rolls, and the numbers started to decline.
And while today’s news reports blare claims that millions will lose coverage, the truth is that the number of enrollees today is still higher than it was in 2020, before the massive COVID expansion.
Even though new Medicaid work requirements will thin enrollment somewhat going forward, in a decade it’s still forecast to be 73 million, which is higher than any time in the program’s history before 2016.

What’s more, the current enrollment forecast is in line with projections made before COVID, according to data from the Congressional Budget Office.
Of course, the lie at the center of all these stories is that the bigger the enrollment in Medicaid and Obamacare, the better. The truth is that the ideal enrollment in these programs is zero. Because that would mean nobody is dependent on government to cover the cost of health insurance.
— Written by the I&I Editorial Board
Susan Quinn | May 13, 2026
The UAE is prepared to fight for its life against Iran, and has militarily joined the U.S. and Israel in taking down the region’s largest supporter of terrorism. Although it acted secretly, the UAE reportedly attacked a refinery on Lavan Island in the Persian Gulf; the attack took the facility offline for months.
Iran has attacked the UAE aggressively, sending 2,800 missiles and dronesinto the country. The UAE responded to these attacks, and the U.S. and Israel quietly acknowledged and welcome their support.
Out of all the Gulf countries, the UAE is the only one that has responded to Iran’s attacks. It also signaled its unhappiness with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), which was supposed to contribute to cohesion among the Gulf states—the council provided logistical support but almost no political or military backing when the UAE was attacked. The Emirates leaving OPEC will also put a crimp in the activities of OPEC and the GCC.
The UAE’s military response is in part a result of their joining Israel in the Abraham Accords, along with Bahrain and Morocco. (Kazakhstan indicated it intends to join, and Saudi Arabia is non-committal.) Originally, people primarily saw the Accords as a boon to trade and communications between the nations involved, but the UAE has demonstrated the importance of the Accords concerning military matters, and their fighting is a testament to their strong relationship with Israel.
The consequences of the response against Iran are not insignificant:
People familiar with the matter told the newspaper that Emirati forces targeted a refinery on Iran’s Lavan Island in the Gulf in early April.
The UAE has not publicly acknowledged the operation. The strike reportedly triggered a large fire and disabled much of the facility’s capacity for months….
Given the rapport that has been building between the UAE and Israel over the last few years, the change in their relationship is impressive. Israel has been assertive in its support of the Emirates:
Given the rapport that has been building between the UAE and Israel over the last few years, the change in their relationship is impressive. Israel has been assertive in its support of the Emirates:
In a historic and highly classified move, Israel deployed an active Iron Dome battery, accompanied by dozens of Israel Defense Forces operators, directly to the UAE to help defend Emirati airspace. This marked the very first time Israel deployed its premier air defense system and its own troops to protect a foreign Arab nation. Integrated with U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) and existing Emirati air defenses, the Iron Dome intercepted dozens of incoming Iranian projectiles, physically saving Emirati lives and infrastructure.
This deployment fundamentally rewrites the strategic calculus of the Middle East. It proves the original, unspoken thesis of the Abraham Accords: ‘peace for peace’ built on the bedrock of collective security against Tehran.
Ultimately the war with Iran will likely have a transformational effect on the region. The countries that remain in the GCC now realize that they can’t count on that organization for protection. They also realize that their alliance with the UAE is not as strong as it has been in the past, particularly since the Gulf countries have not provided any military support to the UAE. They also realize that the UAE has developed a powerful alliance not only with the U.S., but also with Israel. And they will be on their own against the military of Iran.
The future suddenly looks brighter.
A Texas Democrat seeking re-election in November has been arrested — again.
Early Saturday morning, police in Texas City responded to a report of a car parked in the left lane of Highway 3. Around 1:30 a.m., they discovered Harris County Treasurer Carla Wyatt (D) fast asleep in the driver's seat of a vehicle parked with the engine running and its hazard lights on, according to reports citing court documents.
'This arrest is for a subsequent offense/arrest of Driving While Intoxicated.'
Reports claim the officer opened the door and turned off the ignition for safety reasons before waking Wyatt up. When the officer asked her where she was, she claimed both that she was "in heaven" and in Houston, court documents said, even though Houston was more than 40 miles away.
According to court documents, Wyatt also told the officer she was in the area for a conference in Galveston later that morning. She initially claimed she had had one glass of wine at home around 10 p.m. the previous night but later changed her story and said she'd had two glasses of wine.
The cop smelled alcohol and noticed that Wyatt was not steady on her feet, the documents indicated. She also expressed uneasiness about taking a field sobriety test on account of a previous foot injury.
Wyatt was arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated, a Class B misdemeanor. She was released on $3,000 bond and is scheduled to appear in court again on June 26.
Wyatt did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News, but her attorney, Chris Downey, sent the following statement: "Dr. Wyatt denies that she committed any criminal offense on the date in question. We are awaiting the release of the relevant discovery in the case so that we can evaluate the facts that led to her arrest."
RELATED: Play stupid games: Tennessee GOP makes Democrats pay a heavy price for childish tantrums over
A bond addendum signed by the investigator notes that "this arrest is for a subsequent offense/arrest of Driving While Intoxicated."
Indeed, Wyatt was similarly charged with DWI in December 2023 after reportedly registering an astonishing blood alcohol level of between 0.365% and 0.367%, more than four times the legal limit.
According to the Houston Chronicle, Wyatt allegedly violated the terms of her probation in that case, once in January 2024 and once in March 2024. Nevertheless, the case was dismissed in August after she completed a pretrial diversion program.
Then in December 2025, Wyatt was arrested again, this time for alleged burglary of a vehicle. A grand jury declined to indict her in connection with that case in April.
Wyatt, 56, was first elected to be Harris County treasurer in 2022. She is running for re-election in November and is among the 2026 candidates listed on the Harris County Democratic Party website.
The HCDP did not respond to a request for comment.
Editor's note: This article has been edited after publication to include a statement from Wyatt's attorney, Chris Downey.
Seattle residents are asking why a career criminal with 28 arrests and 13 convictions was allowed to walk the streets before allegedly kidnapping and raping a 15-year-old girl.
Joshua V. Kowalczewski, 36, allegedly lured the girl from a school bus stop in the Northgate neighborhood and dragged her into nearby woods, where he sexually assaulted her.
Kowalczewski was allowed to enter Seattle's 'Drug Prosecution Alternative' diversion program just one week before he allegedly raped the teenage girl.
He was later captured when firefighters saw him defecating on the sidewalk after he burned clothing that was connected to the attack, according to police.
The man was charged with first-degree rape and second-degree kidnapping.
A judge set Kowalczewski's bail at $1 million after prosecutors argued he was a threat to public safety given his criminal past. That criminal past included convictions for the following:
Prosecutors said that Kowalczewski was allowed to enter Seattle's "Drug Prosecution Alternative" diversion program just one week before he allegedly raped the teenage girl.
The suspect initially denied ever talking to the girl, according to detectives, but then later admitted that he approached the girl because he thought she was "hot." He also allegedly admitted asking her to go the woods but denied assaulting her.
The girl was treated at the Seattle Children's Hospital and given a sexual assault examination.
The King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office said it pursued rape charges instead of child rape charges because under Washington law, rape charges carry harsher penalties.
The office also explained that it was difficult under state law to hold a suspect based on misdemeanor charges.
"Prosecutors are bound by the sentencing guidelines from state lawmakers; that's what judges go off of when they make determinations," communications director Casey McNerthney said. "It's pretty difficult to hold somebody on a misdemeanor in some instances."
An infamous serial murderer and rapist said that taxpayer-funded digital tablets allowed him to watch pornography and receive a topless photo from a 22-year-old German psychology student.
That's just one account in a City Journal investigation into a "digital equity" program pushed by Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom to ensure prisoners had access to the Bible. And also porn.
Amador told the Journal that he alternates between watching short clips of his 'family at the beach' and pornography delivered in 30-second clips.
Officials told the Journal that the tablets were "tightly controlled education tools" to provide inmates "access to the Bible, education, and re-entry resources that actually reduce crime."
The investigation found dozens of death-row inmates who said the tablets allowed them access to pornography as well as sexually explicit conversations.
It’s a simple proposition: Whatever our views on the Middle East conflict, we should all be able to agree that dogs cannot be trained to rape human beings.
Yet this is exactly what a New York Times “opinion” piece posing as an in-depth journalistic investigation, perhaps to avoid any real journalistic accountability, published on Monday claims, based on anonymous testimonies and a report by a well-known anti-Israel organization that has proven ties to Palestinian terror.
Putting aside the bias of Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, a Geneva-based advocacy group that the NYT gently points out is “often critical of Israel,” the newspaper’s long-time columnist Nicholas Kristof seems to have become confused about whether he is an opinion writer or a news reporter, and has gone ahead and dabbled in a bit of field reporting himself.And why not? In a post-factual world, it seems, anything is acceptable. An opinion piece can be an investigation with unverified claims and a half-hearted attempt to get a response from the accused party. It can also feature clearly bogus claims that Israel has trained dogs to rape Palestinian prisonersheld in its jails.
While the impossible assertion about dogs has been shared broadly in recent weeks by anti-Israel conspiracy theorists on social media, to see it displayed front and center in a New York Times article, peddled by one of its most-trusted columnists and featured prominently on the powerful media outlet’s website, is mind-blowing.
In this tumultuous post-October 7 period of war and violence, there are Palestinian prisoners – many of whom were involved directly in the atrocities carried out in Israel on that horrific day – who report being treated roughly, abused, and even raped.
It must also be said that Israel’s prison service, now under the command of National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, a proud racist, has been called on to take a harsher stance in its handling of Palestinian prisoners, and, likely, any such despicable acts have gone either unacknowledged or unpunished.
Yet Sari Bashi, an Israeli-American human rights lawyer who is the executive director of the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, and who was interviewed for Kristof’s opinion column, points out that there is no “evidence that it has been ordered.” She said she believes, however, that there is “persistent evidence that the authorities know it’s happening and are not stopping it.”
And even Kristof himself admits that “it’s impossible to know how common sexual assaults against Palestinians are” - though that does not stop him from going on for almost 4,000 words about the total certainty that Israelis “systematically employ rape and sexual torture” to humiliate Palestinian prisoners and that Israel allows, even enables, Israeli settlers to sexually assault Palestinian civilians in the West Bank.
The famed New York Times columnist even goes so far as to call on the US to “condition arms transfers on an end to sexual assault,” arguing that “we could send a moral and practical message that sexual violence is unacceptable no matter the identity of the victim.”
Maybe it would also send a message to other departments of his own newspaper that the Israeli victims of Hamas’s systematic sexual violence and rape on October 7, and afterward, as Israeli hostages languished in Gaza, also deserve to have their stories told?
Kristof’s column was published and promoted prominently on the NYT’s website, even including a separately produced video clip, one day ahead of a monumental Israeli report into Hamas’s systematic sexual crimes on October 7, which over the past two-and-a-half years have been downplayed or outright denied by a multitude of human rights and women’s rights activists, organizations, and officials.
The report by the Civil Commission on October 7th Crimes by Hamas against Women and Children was distributed to media outlets in Israel, including the NYT, weeks ahead of its publication on Tuesday. It was picked up by many journalists and platforms, but was somehow skipped by The New York Times.
It’s disappointing that the newspaper prefers baseless claims of Israeli rape dogs over actual reports on atrocities.
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament of the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand.
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use united force to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.