Wednesday, October 21, 2026

Believe these America hating mongrels at their word...do you want to be ruled by these non producing takers?

US radicals who traveled to France to join cop-bashing protests reveal plans to ‘raise hell’ on our shores

A Minnesota rapper who traveled to France to join escalating riots has urged white people to “raise hell” and “f–k s–t up” as part of a revolution on American soil, The Post discovered. And communist-linked groups in the US may be working to bring that hell to the nation’s capital.

Artist Tufawon, whose real name is Rafael Gonzalez Jr., joined Swedish activist Greta Thunberg outside Paul Éluard, the high school at the heart of the leftist protests marred by violence, looting and arson.

He addressed balaclava-clad protesters before performing his song “No One Is Illegal,” and riling up the crowd with chants of “f–k ICE” and “ICE out.”

“All power to the people,” the 40-year-old from Minneapolis boasted to his fans on Facebook. “After returning home from France I can clearly see how we need to become far more radicalized in the states.

“We have to be more enraged. Our comfort is hindering our progress. It really and truly needs to be white people that go outside and raise hell if we want to see revolution.

Artist Tufawon, whose real name is Rafael Gonzalez Jr., joined Swedish activist Greta Thunberg outside Paul Éluard, the high school at the heart of the leftist protests marred by violence, looting and arson. tufawon/ Instagram

Warning: Graphic Language 

“There are far too many neoliberals that are just as bad as the fascists. The French have figured this out a while ago. Now it’s time to take it to the next level. Go f–k s–t up white people. It’s your time.”

“They said they were going to globalize the intifada and now they have,” foreign policy expert at the Heritage Foundation Mike Gonzalez told The Post.

“What you are seeing here is the red-green alliance, the marriage of convenience between leftists and Marxists. They have a common enemy which is the Judeo-Christian democratic West. They want to dismantle it.”

Tufawon, who is part Native American and has appeared on the popular radio show The Breakfast Club, claimed that the perceived underfunding of schools and declining public services in France is similar in the US.

“I’m incredibly inspired by what’s going on with the student activists and organizers,” the rapper said.

“The most marginalized students, the brown and the black students are the ones that are feeling the implications the worst.”

Tufawon urged fellow protesters in the US to “take influence from the French” so that they can defeat the “same common enemy”.

Rapper and activist Tufawon speaks outside Lycée Paul Éluard in Saint-Denis, on the outskirts of Paris, France. Left Voice and Tufawon/ Instagram
Tufawon, who is part Native American, claimed that the perceived underfunding of schools and declining public services in France is similar in the US. Unicorn Riot/ YouTube

“It is dangerous rhetoric,” Gonzalez told The Post. “If people listen to him and act upon what he is recommending it is very dangerous.”

Tufawon told The Post his trip to Saint-Denis was unplanned and “very spontaneous”. He said he was in Paris on vacation and left before last weekend’s violent protests.

He added that his Facebook posts “fall under figurative speech and in no way, shape or form did I use them with the intent to incite violence of any kind”. 

The rioters have targeted France’s cultural heritage, with thugs torching the 140-year-old city hall in the southern city of Limoges, and some have hit stores including Louis Vuitton, Hermes, and Apple as French authorities appeared to lose control of the streets.

Meanwhile, CCP-linked nonprofit Code Pink, backed by Neville Singham, has wasted no time using the unrest in France to plan similar protests in America, with a “taxpayer uprising” planned in Washington, DC, between November 10 and 12. 

The feminist anti-American group has called on protestors to flood the halls of Congress in what it calls “three days of peaceful resistance.” 

But its leader Jodie Evans, 72, a radical Hollywood filmmaker and wife of Shanghai-based tech millionaire Singham, called on “people to look at France” as she urged Americans to take to the streets.

Protesters clash with police near Place de la Republique as fires burn and barricades are erected during a protest in Paris, France, Sunday, Oct. 18, 2026. ZUMAPRESS.com
Protesters stand in front of a fire in Faubourg du Temple street as clashes erupted at Place de la Republique following an unauthorized demonstration in central Paris, Sunday, Oct. 18, 2026. A day earlier, nationwide protests against the high cost of living resulted in 1,200 arrests and 150 injured police officers across France. AFP via Getty Images

CodePink has been accused of radicalizing a new generation of activists by spending millions of dollars to teach anti-American rhetoric.

Elsewhere, the Singham-linked Party for Socialism and Liberation, based in the US, has committed to joining French protesters in their “struggle for a socialist future”.

“We in the United States stand with you in your struggle against capitalist austerity,” the group proudly wrote on Instagram.

“We stand with you, because we too demand money for housing and education, instead of war and occupation. Vive la commune! Vive la révolution!”

CCP-linked nonprofit Code Pink, backed by Neville Singham, has wasted no time using the unrest in France to plan similar protests in America, with a “taxpayer uprising” planned in Washington, DC, between November 10 and 12. Code Pink/ Instagram

Gonzalez, who fled communist Cuba in the 1970s, insists that China, Cuba and Iran are directing these protests. “These activists are taught to despise their own society,” he told The Post. “The groups involved in elevating the French protests, a lot are in the Singham network.”

Police made 2,500 arrests across France, while nearly 1,000 officers were injured over the weekend.

French President Macron said that “nothing justifies” the riots his country has seen and blamed the “unrestrained violence” on “insurrectionist elements from radical far-left groups, joined by numerous criminals.”

What do you think? Post a comment.

His comments came after Vice President JD Vance blamed mass immigration for the violent scenes in France.

“Western liberals imported the Third World into France and other countries in the name of diversity and compassion. They ignored fundamental questions of assimilation and compatibility. They were told it would lead to this, and they didn’t listen,” he wrote on X.

“I pray that France, a beautiful country of amazing people, will stop this madness before more of its landmarks burn,” Vance added.

CodePink and the Party for Socialism and Liberation declined to comment.“We have to be more enraged. Our comfort is hindering our progress. It really and truly needs to be white people that go outside and raise hell if we want to see revolution.



See more of our coverage in your search results.

A justice system tailored for the criminal and laws that prevent your ability to protect yourself

Another Violent Attack Exposes the Folly of Chicago's 'Gun-Free' Transit System


Devon Jones is no stranger to the criminal justice system in Illinois. Though he's only 25-year-old, he's managed to rack up an impressive amount of charges, convictions, and guilty pleas including unlawful use of a weapon and aggravated battery of a peace officer. Because of his prior felony conviction, when Jones was arrested last August for disturbing the peace at a Chicago restaurant and was found to have a Taser in his possession, prosecutors asked to have him detained without bond until his trial. 

The Cook County judge overseeing his case refused that request and instead placed Jones on electronic monitoring. Jones allegedly violated the terms of his release a half-dozen times in the following four weeks, but Judge Charles Burns still refused to have him detained behind bars. 

When Jones failed to show up for his court hearing in September 2025, Burns issued a warrant for his arrest; one that was still active in October, when Jones attacked a pregnant woman in a pedestrian walkway connecting two Chicago Transit Authority train stations. 

The woman later told police she felt Jones strike her buttocks with an open hand before grabbing her. Wearing a mask, he allegedly tried to take her purse, and the two struggled over it. The woman fell to the ground multiple times during the struggle. Eventually, the purse strap broke, spilling its contents, including an iPad, onto the tunnel floor.

Jones allegedly grabbed the iPad and fled, exiting at street level on Jackson Boulevard before getting back on his bicycle and riding away. The woman was taken to a hospital for treatment of scratches and bruising.

CWB Chicago reports that Jones has now been sentenced for that crime after taking a plea deal with prosecutors. Jones was sentenced to 10 years, but with Illinois' policy of cutting a day off a sentence for every day served, that decade-long sentence will be closer to five years. As part of the deal, Cook County prosecutors also dropped the weapons charge that led Jones to be placed on electronic monitoring last year. 

Why wasn't Jones picked up for violating his release in the days after a warrant was issued for his arrest? If he was still on electronic monitoring, it should have been easy enough to find him. Of course, we can also ask why he was allowed to remain on electronic monitoring after repeatedly violating the terms of his release. 

And then there's the issue of Chicago's "gun-free" public transit system. I've lost track of how many incidents I've written about where the "gun-free" status of the CTA was ignored by violent predators, though in this case, Jones wasn't accused of having a weapon on him when he attacked his pregnant victim. Still, Illinois law and CTA policy prohibited her from carrying a firearm for self-defense if she wanted to, and a peaceable gun owner with a valid carry license is going to be far less likely to violate that prohibition than someone who's already decided to commit a violent felony. 

Just last week, a CTA janitor was stabbed to death at the Damen Green Line station, allegedly by another repeat offender who was wearing an ankle monitor despite multiple violations of his probation. Prosecutors had reportedly tried at least four times to have his probation revoked, to no avail. Like Jones, the accused killer was supposed to be under the watchful eye of the Cook County criminal justice system. And like Jones, he was apparently free to prey on innocent people instead.

Chicago officials can't seem to keep track of dangerous repeat offenders even when they're wearing GPS monitors, but they insist that law-abiding citizens must be disarmed when they step onto a CTA train or bus. The people who obey the law are stripped of a fundamental right to protect themselves, while those who repeatedly violate the law are given chance after chance to victimize others. Chicago's gun-free transit system isn't keeping violent criminals off the CTA. It's just making sure their potential victims can't legally carry the most effective means of fighting back.







Violence is the go to for Islamists especially for those with emotional control

“I Don’t Give a F*ck Who You Are!” El-Sayed Staffer Tries to Assault James O’Keefe and Has to be Restrained in Wild Confrontation (VIDEO)

Biden and the Democrats ongoing war against the Constitution and free speech

COVID Was Just the Beginning: New Docs Reveal Biden's Bigger Censorship Plans

The Biden administration wasn't just trying to police COVID posts. It wanted broader control over health information, and newly released internal documents show former Surgeon General Vivek Murthy's office was actively strategizing how to make it happen.

The documents Protect the Public's Trust obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) date back to 2021, when the Biden administration was already pushing Facebook and other technology companies to remove content it labeled misinformation.

One exchange from May 2021 is particularly revealing.

Murthy's policy adviser, Daniel Tartakovsky, suggested that the administration's efforts should reach considerably further than COVID.

"May be worth emphasizing that you don’t just see this as a COVID-related issue (i.e., it’s health and medical misinformation, not just COVID-related misinformation). More broadly, it gets at the issue of how social media impacts people, especially young people."

So much for the temporary emergency justification. Officials were already considering a much larger role for the federal government in deciding what Americans should be allowed to discuss.

Another memorandum, prepared for Murthy's "misinformation tiger team" (yes, that was a real thing), outlined an approach involving "maximum pressure" on social media companies. It also celebrated the temporary suspension of then-Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's account as "momentum" toward removing more accounts.

The same memorandum acknowledged that the campaign could politicize the Surgeon General's office by involving it in a "social media/censorship war."

The documents Protect the Public's Trust obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) date back to 2021, when the Biden administration was already pushing Facebook and other technology companies to remove content it labeled misinformation.

One exchange from May 2021 is particularly revealing.

Murthy's policy adviser, Daniel Tartakovsky, suggested that the administration's efforts should reach considerably further than COVID.

"May be worth emphasizing that you don’t just see this as a COVID-related issue (i.e., it’s health and medical misinformation, not just COVID-related misinformation). More broadly, it gets at the issue of how social media impacts people, especially young people."

So much for the temporary emergency justification. Officials were already considering a much larger role for the federal government in deciding what Americans should be allowed to discuss.

Another memorandum, prepared for Murthy's "misinformation tiger team" (yes, that was a real thing), outlined an approach involving "maximum pressure" on social media companies. It also celebrated the temporary suspension of then-Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's account as "momentum" toward removing more accounts.

The same memorandum acknowledged that the campaign could politicize the Surgeon General's office by involving it in a "social media/censorship war."

This wasn't simply a matter of issuing public health guidance. A 2024 House Judiciary Committee investigation concluded that White House pressure influenced moderation decisions at Facebook, YouTube, and Amazon. Committee Republicans found that the material targeted included satire, factual information, and posts that hadn't violated the companies' own policies.

The Biden administration was so busy policing misinformation that even accurate information wasn't necessarily safe.

And Murthy's office had been leaving fingerprints on the process for years.

Earlier documents released by Protect the Public's Trust showed his staff preparing talking points for interviews in July 2021. Those materials acknowledged that officials were flagging posts for social media companies and requesting policy changes from Facebook.

Murthy also received prepared responses to criticism of the government's involvement. Asked whether the campaign amounted to cancel culture, his suggested answer was that it was actually the opposite.

Naturally.

Protect the Public's Trust Director Michael Chamberlain, commenting on the previously released records, offered a considerably different assessment:

"The foundation of the COVID arm of the Censorship Industrial Complex during the Biden administration was their obsession with so-called 'misinformation.' But the tragically ironic part was that much of the actual misinformation was coming from inside their house."

The administration's behavior eventually landed in court. The Supreme Court punted in 2024, dismissing Murthy v. Missouri without touching the First Amendment questions at its core. A settlement reached afterward put some limits on the Surgeon General's office, CDC, and CISA, but narrow ones, and the constitutional questions remain unresolved.

But the latest documents leave little doubt about what officials were discussing behind closed doors. The Biden administration wanted technology companies to become more aggressive about controlling health-related speech, and its own staff recognized the political nature of the campaign.

Americans were told this was about protecting public health. The internal correspondence shows officials were willing to pressure private companies over what people could say, including speech extending well beyond the pandemic.

For an administration that spent so much time warning about threats to democracy, it certainly had an interesting approach to the First Amendment.