Saturday, October 31, 2026

So much fraud

LA sheriff’s dept probes its ties to $43M Wall Street swindler — after admitting it didn’t know his past


Why it is necessary to rein in the bureaucracy

California hospital chain scraps $1B expansion amid red tape nightmare

A Sacramento health care giant abruptly scrapped a $1 billion Bay Area expansion Friday, blaming red tape and dealing a crushing blow to the local economy.

Sutter Health will no longer pursue building a hospital in Emeryville, citing California’s environmental review law that has plagued construction projects for its red tape.

“Over two years, we pursued relief under the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA. Those efforts did not secure the certainty needed to advance the hospital project, leaving it vulnerable to litigation that could delay construction and new hospital services for years,” the company said.

Under CEQA, projects need to complete adequate reviews of their environmental impacts before receiving approval to proceed. That process can be bogged down by lawsuits and take years

Instead, Sutter Health said it will expand outpatient care in Emeryville while searching for a new location for the hospital.


“Our commitment to the 542,000 patients we serve across the East Bay remains strong,” Sutter Health insisted, adding it will continue to try to convince lawmakers to grant a full exemption from the environmental law.

The stunning decision comes after more than a year of planning over the proposed hospital, which would have included a 17-story tower with approximately 325 beds, emergency services and a rooftop helipad.

The project would have been one of the largest developments in Emeryville’s history.

The reversal also poses questions for the larger Emeryville campus, located at Hollis and 53rd streets, which Sutter had purchased for $450 million in early 2025 and provided much needed tax revenue for the city.

The proposed medical campus was to encompass roughly 1.3 million square feet, though it faced local opposition, the Emeryville Eye reported.Now, the campus may only have a range of outpatient services such as a primary and specialty care, diagnostic services, urology and orthopedics, or imaging, laboratory and pharmacy facilities.

“The project remains vulnerable to litigation and years of potential delay. We cannot allow that uncertainty to stall needed investments in care,” Sutter Health said on the pivot to outpatient facilities.

Sutter Health abandoned plans for a new Bay Area campus, citing uncertainty around environmental rules and litigation after spending $450 million. KTVU Fox2

The new hospital was intended to replace Sutter’s Alta Bates Summit Medical Center in Berkeley, which is scheduled to close in 2030 due to compliance concerns with California earthquake safety rules for hospitals. 

Sutter said it will pursue legislation to allow Alta Bates to stay open until a new hospital is built and that “there is no immediate change to patient care or services at Alta Bates.”


City officials said they were shocked by the news.

“The project, initially, when they announced it was more about healthcare access in this part of the region,” Emeryville City Manager LaTanya Bellow told the San Francisco Chronicle. “Now that they’re not moving forward, I don’t know what happens to that.”


Gavin's plan to make Californians cold and immobile...no natural gas to heat your home and gasoline so expensive you cannot leave it!

Gavin Newsom shown up by judge for secret order to ban key energy resource in California



The riots in France have nothing to do with education...it is a war against western civilization

Violent Paris protests draw 70K people as Molotov cocktails hurled at cops, US and Israeli flags burned


LA botox doctor learns fate for $45M Medicare scheme that funded luxury vacations

LA botox doctor learns fate for $45M Medicare scheme that funded luxury vacations


A crooked California doctor who ripped off Medicare for more than $45 million to bankroll luxury vacations, expensive cars, and a jaw-dropping $12,000 antique crossbow is finally facing serious prison time.

Violetta Mailyan, 45, of Glendale, was sentenced to 15 years behind bars after a jury found her guilty of running an enormous fraud operation through her Healthy Way Medical Center clinic, submitting fraudulent claims for Botox treatments that were medically unnecessary, purely cosmetic or never performed at all.

The staggering scam wasn’t just about bogus paperwork. Mailyan billed taxpayers for treatments supposedly administered while her clinic was shuttered — and even while she was thousands of miles away enjoying vacations.


Violetta Mailyan, 45, of Glendale, was sentenced to 15 years behind bars. Dr Violetta Mailyan



See more of our coverage in your search results.

Guess who?Eight Indicted in Alleged $7 Million Scheme to Drain New Yorkers’ SNAP Benefits

Eight Indicted in Alleged $7 Million Scheme to Drain New Yorkers’ SNAP Benefits

Eight Indicted in Alleged $7 Million Scheme to Drain New Yorkers’ SNAP Benefits

AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough


https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/3425931072122654177/2270521656260303923

Eight people have been indicted for conspiring to steal more than $7 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (“SNAP”) between April 2023 and September 2025. 

The alleged fraud impacted thousands of victims, many of whom never received reimbursement for the stolen benefits. 

Belal Hauter, 34, allegedly led the conspiracy by opening or directing coconspirators to open numerous merchant processing accounts in the names of various delis, bodegas, or grocery stores, including a deli where multiple defendants worked. The co-conspirators also opened numerous bank accounts to connect to those processing accounts, so EBT transactions went directly to accounts under their control.

Gregory Fabiani, 46, and Abdulla Aezah, 35, helped open the accounts and provided technical back-end support for the use of those accounts and the POS machines.

Others used the POS machines to conduct thousands of transactions.

Finally, Milton Rios, 53, and Yvette Rivera, 58, also opened additional merchant processing accounts and bank accounts for the conspiracy.

They are charged in a New York State Supreme Court indictment with conspiracy in the fourth degree, as well as various counts of grand larceny and identity theft.

 “SNAP and EBT fraud harms New Yorkers in need of assistance and the New Yorkers whose tax dollars fund these essential programs,” said District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr. “As alleged, this conspiracy created fraudulent merchant processing accounts for fraudulent delis and paid themselves by repeatedly swiping stolen EBT cards at point-of-sale systems associated with those accounts. The defendants allegedly tracked the timing of benefit funds and drained accounts before the legitimate SNAP recipient could buy food and other necessities, eventually stealing more than $7 million. I thank our law enforcement partners at DOI for their work in putting a stop to this fraud.”


They Ruined Empires. They Will Do It to the USA Too


Money out of your pocket and into the hands of an inefficient bureaucracy...Homelessness is the cover name for untreated drug addicts. The problem needs to be correctly identified if you want to solve it!

Dallas County Voters Face $102.9 Million Property Tax Decision As Homelessness Debate Intensifies

 

Dallas County voters will decide November 3 whether to approve a higher property tax rate that county officials estimate would generate an additional $102.9 million. The stated purposes of the additional revenue are programs to reduce homelessness, resolve encampments, expand access to mental-health treatment, support self-sufficiency, and provide stable housing.

The proposed increase would raise the county’s tax rate to $0.248650 per $100 of taxable property value, exceeding the voter-approval rate by 2.4 cents.

County officials and Housing Forward have outlined plans to expand services, including a goal of helping approximately 4,500 additional households exit homelessness annually. However, the county’s August 11 election order does not establish individual spending allocations, approve provider contracts, or specify numerical performance requirements.

The proposal comes as Dallas County considers a larger financial commitment to homelessness programs, with voters responsible for deciding whether to authorize the higher tax rate.


What Dallas County Taxpayers Would Pay

The county’s proposed rate of $0.248650 per $100 of taxable value exceeds its voter-approval rate of $0.224650 and last year’s adopted rate of $0.215500.

For a property with a county taxable value of $300,000, the proposed rate would produce a county tax bill of $745.95.

That represents $72 more annually than the voter-approval rate and $99.45 more than last year’s rate, assuming the property’s taxable value remains unchanged.

Dallas County’s election fact sheet projects approximately $1.58 billion in total revenue under the higher tax rate, including $102.9 million tied to the tax-rate election. Separately, commissioners adopted a $1,588,983,013 all-funds budget for fiscal year 2027 on August 11.

The $102.9 million figure represents projected additional revenue under the proposed tax structure, not a list of approved payments to individual contractors or service providers.

If voters reject Proposition A, the county’s rate would revert to $0.224650 per $100 of taxable value rather than the lower rate from 2025.


Housing Forward Outlines Its Proposed Results

Housing Forward and the All Neighbors Coalition have presented a countywide plan to expand homelessness assistance.

728x90

Their proposal includes helping approximately 4,500 additional households escape homelessness annually through diversion services, transitional assistance, supportive housing, and other interventions.

An August 11 presentation by Housing Forward and the All Neighbors Coalition sets a goal of resolving homelessness within an average of 65 days. It also proposes tracking permanent exits from homelessness, returns to homelessness, and reductions in jail and hospital use.

Housing Forward reports that more than 25,000 people have exited homelessness through the regional response system since 2021.

The county anticipates that proposed programs could begin January 1, 2027, if voters approve the measure.


What The Election Order Actually Requires

Dallas County Commissioners Court approved the election order August 11 in a 3-2 vote.

County Judge Clay Jenkins and Commissioners Theresa Daniel and Andrew Sommerman supported the measure. Commissioners John Wiley Price and Elba Garcia opposed it.

Court Order 2026-0879 identifies several purposes for the additional tax revenue: “measurably reduce homelessness and resolve encampments to improve neighborhood vibrancy, support homeless people to achieve self-sufficiency, increase access to mental health treatment and support programs that provide stable housing….”

However, the order itself does not allocate specific dollar amounts among those purposes.

It also does not incorporate the proposed 4,500-household annual target or 65-day average into the ballot measure as numerical requirements.

County officials would still need to address contracting, spending allocations, implementation, and performance oversight through applicable processes.


Supporters And Opponents Differ Over Tax Increase

Supporters point to reported reductions in street homelessness and argue that additional funding would expand services beyond downtown Dallas.

728x90

The Dallas Regional Chamber supports Proposition A. In an August 11 presentation to county commissioners, Housing Forward and the All Neighbors Coalition reported a 25% reduction in street homelessness since 2021, based on their assessment of the regional response system.

The proposal has also drawn differing assessments reported on by The Dallas Express.

In an October 9 opinion column, Republican nominee for Dallas County Commissioner, District 2, Barry Wernick argued for stronger fiscal oversight before increasing taxes.

In an October 15 column, downtown homelessness tracker Mark Nunneley, who serves as chairman of the City of Dallas Citizen Homelessness Commission, representing the mayor-appointed District 15 seat, supported the proposal, citing changes in downtown street counts and the potential to expand services.


Property Tax Reform Remains A Separate Question

The Dallas County vote comes as Texas lawmakers consider additional property tax relief, including proposals to increase the general school district homestead exemption to $200,000.

Those proposals would affect school property taxes rather than directly reducing the Dallas County tax rate.

As previously examined by The Dallas Express, homeowners could receive savings from future state legislation while facing higher taxes from separate local taxing authorities.

For Dallas County voters, Proposition A presents a more immediate decision.

Approval would authorize the higher county rate for the 2026 tax year. Subsequent county decisions would determine how officials distribute the additional revenue, structure contracts, and measure whether the programs achieve their stated goals.

Election Day is Tuesday, November 3.