Patriot outraged as Facebook 'BANS' him from calling himself English...when will be corralled into using "comrade"?

Patriot outraged as Facebook 'BANS' him from calling himself English

A PROUD patriot has slated social media giant Facebook after it banned him from using the word "English" in his profile.

By PAUL JEEVES

PUBLISHED: 08:03, Sat, Oct 21, 2017 | UPDATED: 12:24, Sat, Oct 21, 2017

SWNS

Tim Cox slated Facebook after it banned him from using the word 'English' in his profile

Electrician Tim Cox, 54, was given the nickname "English" at school and has been using it on his profile since he signed up to the site nine years ago.

But it has now been removed by Facebook chiefs after a complaint from a fellow user.

The site says the word "English" represents a violation of its policies on fake names, despite other profiles using the names of mass murderers like Peter Sutcliffe or Osama Bin Laden.

Yesterday, many of Mr Cox's friends were busy changing their own profiles to add the word "English" in protest at the US-based web giant's decision. 

Married father-of-two Mr Cox, of Mackworth, near Derby, said: "I'm not somebody who gets upset at things easily but I really did at this.

"I got a message from Facebook saying somebody had asked them to review my profile because of my name.

"Then the English part of my name was deleted. I was shocked. I've been called it all of my life.

SWNS

Tim's nickname 'English' was removed by Facebook chiefs after a complaint from a fellow user

Facebook site and app goes down across Europe

 

I'm not somebody who gets upset at things easily but I really did at this 

Tim Cox

"I'm proud to be English and always have been. It's a part of me. I think it's very strange and I cannot understand why anybody would take offence or think of reporting it to Facebook.

"It's pathetic. I am known to friends for being a proud Englishman, just like millions of other people in this country, and there's nothing wrong with that."

Mr Cox, who also has the word tattooed on his chest, added: "My name is 'English Tim Cox' on other social media accounts and they have no problem with it."

Friend Sharon Winfield wrote: "I can't believe all the videos and pics of animal abuse I've reported that are OK, but 'English Tim Cox' is offensive!"

SWNS

Facebook said the word 'English' represents a violation of its policies on fake names

SWNS

Tim signed up to the site nine years ago

Mr Cox added: "It is ridiculous. I messaged Facebook asking them, 'Can you explain why you have done this?' It's not right."

A Facebook spokesman said: "We ask people to use their authentic names, as we believe this encourages genuine interactions and makes people more accountable for what they say.

"We encourage our community to report anyone they think may be using a fake name.

"We also understand people might like to use a nickname alongside their real name and so have created a way for them to do so through the 'Details About You' section."

Feminist Hypocrisy and Silence Behind Weinstein Era of Abuse 

image: http://jewishworldreview.com/0314/colon.jpg

By Alicia Colon

Published October 20, 2017

image: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/op-art/abortion_feminists2.jpg?ref=relatedBox

I certainly didn't tell my mother when I was seven that the taxi driver on the first floor would expose himself whenever he caught me leaving the building. In the '50's who talked about such things?
I don't blame the child actors whose families are probably depending on them to save them from a harsh life and who were probably threatened by their pedophile abusers not to tell or else. In this sexually promiscuous culture, the sex act has been so defiled and removed from emotional involvement that deviance has been totally accepted as the norm. "Don't make waves' was a common mantra in the '60's.
Now Ms. Milano is appearing on the nets to promote the Me Too campaign and in an interview on Good Morning America, she said, "We are going to be vocal until this stops."
I do not doubt her sincerity or motivation but I fear this movement will turn into a gender equality or hate all men campaign that the feminists always advocate. The sad truth is that this will never change until women recognize their own responsibility in their relationships with the opposite sex.
Woman's groups like N.O.W. and other militant organizations have failed in their mission to support all women and instead have surrendered it to support the vilest individuals because they are politically correct and are pro-choice.
The hypocrisy that seeps from their lips is reprehensible but since the mainstream media is also lacking in ethics, we have never really heard the really sordid details until now.
Thanks to Ronan Farrow's expose in the New Yorker, Harvey Weinstein's dirty laundry is blowing in the wind for all to see. His victims are coming out of the woodwork to share the lurid details but those outside the entertainment world are cynically observing many of these exposes as self-serving bumps for fading careers.
But not all sexual abusers are Hollywood titans or men in power. Ronald Reagan once described how men are basically cavemen that need to be tamed by good women and he was absolutely right.
What this Weinstein scandal teaches us is that women have lost that ability to tame the beast and for that I blame modern feminists who target offenders based on their political position on left wing issues.
That's why sharks like Gloria Alred and her daughter Lisa Bloom go after the Fox anchors but leave Weinstein and Hollywood icons alone.
Why Bill Cosby, then? Because Cosby had the audacity to point the finger at the real cause of poverty in the black community-the breakdown of the family and missing fathers. Can't say that in the Obama era where all the monsters are white supremacists.

As a senior in high school, I traveled to school on the West Side subway and it was common to have men sidle up to a young girl and press against them. During a discussion on this issue, Sister Anna Mercedes told us to turn around and tell him to 'just put it away' and we did. We handled it directly the rest of our lives in business and relationships. I am not surprised that so many Me Toos have responded and I'll bet if we ask all our female family and friends if they have been assaulted at one time or another we'll get an affirmative answer.
My mother-in-law who was a white Southerner told me once about a pervert uncle who'd visit and the girls had to hide when he came around. An elderly friend of mine who grew up on a middle class white household admitted that her stepfather had also molested her. In my own family, revelations of molestation have led to banishment by mothers who refuse to believe their boyfriends are abusers.
So what's the answer? How will this behavior stop? For one thing, women have to stop paying attention to feminist leaders who preach about women's rights only when advocating abortion but will not speak out to express outrage when Sharia law murders innocent Muslim women
. These militant organizers of pussy-hat women marches have ignored the victims of sexual predators like Bill Clinton, Harvey Weinstein, Eliot Spitzer and Anthony Weiner because they are Democrats and fund abortion. They lauded and elevated Ted Kennedy to statesmen status in spite of his murderous history in Chappaquiddick.
There are good feminist organizations that promote women's self worth and health issues without political demagoguery. At least I'm sure there are but can't name one. Groups like Democrats for Life and Susan B. Anthony List are respect all life organizations and worth a look for women who believe in the sanctity of life in the womb.
Someone told me that the Me Too campaign will fade and nothing will come of it. I hope that's not true because I survived the several assaults in my childhood because I had a firm religious backbone to handle it.
My experience has made it possible to impart some wisdom to my own children by sharing it as delicately as possible and teaching them to become super alert to possible danger. Most importantly they learned that they could always come to me and my husband for support.
I want to end this with a statement that will create some outrage by the adult victims but needs to be said. Not all men are predators or evil. Many are wonderful and yes, protectors of women and when women stop regarding men as cash cows to buy them security in exchange for abuse, things hopefully may change.
Perhaps this is a lesson that women's groups should teach instead of preaching that killing your baby is a civil right.

FBI Arrested Russian Spies Getting Close to Hillary Clinton in Lead-Up to Uranium One Deal

FBI Arrested Russian Spies Getting Close to Hillary Clinton in Lead-Up to Uranium One Deal

 

BY TYLER O'NEIL OCTOBER 20, 2017

In 2010, the FBI arrested ten Russian spies as part of "Operation Ghost Stories." According to a top FBI official, the agency had to act quickly because the "deep cover" agents had come very close to "a sitting US cabinet member." They had already infiltrated then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's inner circle, befriending a Democratic fundraiser close to Clinton.

Clinton's Russian connections have attracted more scrutiny following recent revelations of an FBI investigation into Russian company Rosatom, which gained control of 20 percent of U.S. uranium in the 2010 Uranium One deal. The fact that the Russian spies attempted to infiltrate Clinton's network just before the Uranium One deal has been previously reported by PJ Media's Pat Poole, and the connection to the recent revelations of the FBI investigation into Rosatom was reported by Center for Security Policy analyst J. Michael Waller in The Daily Caller Friday.

"We were becoming very concerned," Frank Figliuzzi, the FBI's assistant director of counterintelligence, told the BBC in 2012. "They were getting close enough to a sitting US cabinet member that we thought we could no longer allow this to continue."

There are many reasons to suggest Clinton was this "sitting US cabinet member." In June 2010, Barbara Morea, president of Morea Financial Services in Manhattan, confirmed that "Cynthia Murphy," Russian External Intelligence Service (SVR) spy Lidiya Guryeva, was a longtime employee and vice president at the company. The company managed the finances of Alan Patricof, one of New York's top Democratic donors, who fundraised for Clinton's Senate and presidential campaigns.

Federal court documents reported that Guryeva had "several work-related personal meetings" with "a prominent New York-based financier." The complaint added that Guryeva and her husband reported back to Moscow that the financier was "prominent in politics," "an active fundraiser for" a major political party, and a "personal friend" of a current Cabinet official. Patricof fit every one of these descriptions.

Orders from Moscow suggested Patricof might "provide [Guryeva] with remarks re US foreign policy, 'roumors' [sic] about White house internal 'kitchen...'" Worse, the court document also noted that Guryeva "explained to [her husband] that he would not be able to work at the top echelons of certain parts of the United States Government — the State Department, for example."

While the documents never mention Hillary Clinton by name, the evidence all points in her direction. Guryeva was focused on Patricof, a close friend of Clinton's, sought to gain information about the White House from a source close to Clinton, and expressed a familiarity with the State Department, the agency Hillary Clinton ran.

Patricof confirmed that he appeared to have been the target, and said he had never talked politics with Guryeva.

What Did Mueller Know? New Documents Show Clinton-Russia Scandal Dwarfs Anything on Trump's Side

He tried to massacre Americans on Christmas, now he’s suing for maltreatment in prison...perhaps it's time to free him from his earthly concerns!

He tried to massacre Americans on Christmas, now he’s suing for maltreatment in prison

5 hours

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, dubbed "the underwear bomber," is suing the federal government over what he says is maltreatment as he serves his life sentence for attempting to murder U.S. citizens. (Image Source: YouTube screenshot) 

Carlos Garcia

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab tried and failed to blow up an airliner full of passengers on Christmas in 2009, but now he’s suing the U.S. government for better treatment while in prison. 

What is he claiming?

In a lawsuit filed Wednesday and obtained by CBS, Abdulmutallab claims that the Department of Justice is violating his First, Fifth and Eighth Amendment rights. 

The lawsuit alleges that he is being abused by being held in longterm solitary confinement. The strict rules of imprisonment placed on “Mr. Abdulmutallab prohibit him from having any communication whatsoever with more than 7.5 billion people, the vast majority of people on the planet,” says the complaint. 

He also claims the restrictions keep him from praying with fellow Muslims, thus inhibiting his freedom to practice his religion. The court filing also claims “corrections officers have allowed… religious harassment by white supremacist inmates against Muslim inmates.” 

What is he in prison for?

Abdulmutallab is serving a life sentence at a Supermax federal prison for attempting to light chemicals he had secreted onto a plane in his underwear in 2009 on Christmas. When he tried to light the bomb, he only produced smoke and flame. 

Had he been successful, he could have killed the 289 people on board the flight.

San Francisco crime rate spikes. Could it be a result of the release of 99,000 felons to reduce the prison population? Or, that it's a safe haven for illegals.? Or, if you catch them which is rare, there's no effective punishment.

Does placing a 'no valuables inside' sign in a car window deter break-ins?

Car burglaries are at epidemic levels in San Francisco

By Mike Moffitt, SFGATE

 

Updated 9:18 am, Friday, October 20, 2017

• 

Photo: Cyberpatrolunit/Reddit

IMAGE 18OF 23

Other California cities made it onto the "hot spot" list:

22. Visalia-Porterville area

2,108 thefts

458.4 thefts per 100,000 people

IMAGE 1 OF 23

Is a sign like this one likely to discourage thieves from breaking into your car or truck? Some Reddit users who park their vehicles on San Francisco streets say it does. (Photo used with permission of Reddit user Cyberpatrolunit.)

In San Francisco, where no automobile parked on the street is immune from glass-smashing thieves, some people have taken to posting signs on car windows announcing that there are no valuables inside.

The hope, of course, is that a thief will read the notice and decide: "Huh. No valuables in this one.I guess I'll break into some other car."

On Tuesday, a Reddit user posted a photo of such a sign and posed the question "Do you think it works?" to the Reddit community. A lively debate ensued.

"Sounds a lot like something that someone with valuables in their car would say," wrote a skeptical Maddox83a.

But iamthewaffler disagreed, citing personal experience.

"It's strong signaling that works VERY well," the commenter wrote. "The intended victim for thefts from cars are people who are from out of town, other "safer" parts of SF, etc who don't know that certain areas are very prone to car break-ins. If you have bothered to print out a sign and put it in your window, that shows you know exactly what neighborhood you're in and the chances of anything valuable being in your car are extremely low.

"These are crimes of opportunity, and if you simply let the would-be thief know that you're from this part of town and aware of the danger, they'll pass right by.

 

Now Playing: San Francisco Crime Statistics 2017

We broke down San Francisco crime data by neighborhood based on 2017 data.

Media: Ted Andersen / SFGATE

"Source: my BMW was broken into 6-8 times in 2011-2013 in my neighborhood where I parked it nightly, and has been broken into zero times since 2013 when I started putting a sign in my window."

Several people on the thread had their doubts.

"Maybe they just know your car by now. ;)," cracked timewast3r.

One thing for sure, car break-ins are no joke in San Francisco.

About 85 vehicles are reported to have been broken into every day in the city, according to SFPD data for this year. That includes only cars whose owners reported the crime. The actual figure is doubtlessly higher.

This year a total of 17,970 vehicle break-ins were reported from Jan. 1 to July 31, a 28 percent increase over the same period in 2016. In August, a police shakeup eliminated a citywide task force focused on the epidemic in favor of assigning dozens more cops to walk neighborhood beats.

The effectiveness of that measure has yet to be determined.

A few Reddit users suggested that car owners forget about the sign and simply leave the car doors unlocked. But that prompted stories of homeless people sleeping in vehicles overnight, doing drugs and/or having sex in them, and even using backseats as a toilet.

Other recommendations included:

—Leaving your car a mess inside and out to discourage thieves. Place cardboard over floor carpeting or leave storage boxes of junk on top of seats folded down.

—Leave the glove compartment and center consoles open (take the bulb out if the glovebox light stays on).

—Get rid of your car and just use Lyft, Uber and BART.

One Reddit user said he had tried the sign ploy with no success. He wrote that his vehicle had been burglarized 10 times in the past 30 months. We reached out to the San Francisco Police Department for opinions on these methods, but had not heard back by the time of publication. 

William Gee, an insurance agent with AAA in San Francisco, said the best protection against break-ins is to carry comprehensive coverage with a low deductible — $50 or $100 — even on older cars that don't have collision insurance. He noted that making a comprehensive claim, say on a broken window, would not raise your premium as a collision claim would.

But Reddit user design_1987 says the sign is the way to go. 

"This works imo. I've seen vehicles in my neighborhood with (the) signs remain untouched for years while others get broken into right next to theirs. Saw this happen a few times so from my own personal experience it seems to be working. Again, its not a guarantee!"