Monday, August 24, 2009

The New Luddites

The Eco-Loonies don't often state their real objectives as openly and honestly as this:

We must leave behind 10,000 years of civilization; this may be the hardest collective task we’ve ever faced. It has given us the intoxicating power to create planetary changes in 200 years that under natural cycles require hundreds of thousands or millions of years—but none of the wisdom necessary to keep this Pandora’s Box tightly shut. We have to discover and re-discover other ways of living on earth.

....

If we live at all, we will have to figure out how to live locally and sustainably. Living locally means we are able get everything we need within walking (or animal riding) distance. We may eventually figure out sustainable ways of moving beyond those small circles to bring things home, but our track record isn’t good and we’d better think it through very carefully.

Likewise, any technology has to be locally based, using local resources and accessible tools, renewable and non-toxic. We have much re-thinking to do, and re-learning from our hunter-gatherer forebears who managed to survive for a couple of hundred thousand years in ways that we with our civilized blinders we can barely imagine or understand.

...

How do we survive in a world that will probably turn—is already turning, for many humans and non-humans alike—into a living hell? How do we even grow or gather food or find clean water or stay warm or cool while assaulted by biblical floods, storms, rising seas, droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, snow, and hail?

It is crystal clear that we cannot leave it to the technophiliacs. It is human technology coupled with our inability to comprehend, predict, and prevent unintended consequences that have brought us global catastrophe, culminating in climate disruption, in the first place. Desperate hopes notwithstanding, there are no high-tech solutions here, only wishful thinking—the tools that got us into this mess are incapable of getting us out.


So let's see if I've got this right, he thinks a return to the world of 10,000 years ago, when local farming used orders of magnitude more land per person to provide bare sustenance levels of existence for a much tinier population is the only way we can reverse our current 'living hell'. And all that technology which extended lifespans by decades and managed to feed an enormously increased population, while simultaneously improving the quality of life for people everywhere should be reversed. He doesn't mention that doing so would require getting rid of about 90%+ of the current human population (some of the even more honest of the eco-nuts are more explicit about that wish as well).

No comments:

Post a Comment