Saturday, May 18, 2013

Even among liberals lights are turning on


There Was No Surge in IRS Tax-Exempt Applications in 2010

Fewer groups sought recognition as 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations that year than in 2009, according to the Treasury Department.
Screen Shot 2013-05-17 at 12.46.35 PM.png
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration
A number of people have sought to explain the IRS targeting of Tea Party, patriot, and 9/12 group applications -- as well as those from other conservative groups -- for "specialist team" treatment (mainly delays and excessive and inappropriate questions) in 2010 by pointing to the Citizens United decision that year allowing for unlimited, undisclosed fundraising by such groups. That's the explanation IRS official Lois Lerner gave a week ago when she first revealed that the agency had improperly handled a slew of applications -- the political shorthand was a mistaken attempt to deal with a surge in applications.

"[W]e saw a big increase in these kind of applications, many of which indicated that they were going to be involved in advocacy work," Lerner said.

But Todd Young, a Republican congressman from Indiana, pointed out atFriday's House Ways and Means Committee hearing with former acting IRS commissioner Steve Miller and Treasury Inspector General J. Russell George that this was not the case, according to the very data the IRS provided to the Treasury IG's office. 

There were, he noted, actually fewer applications for tax-exempt status by groups seeking to be recognized as social-welfare organizations that year than the previous one, according to this IRS data. The real surge in applications did not come until 2012 -- the year the IRS stopped the practice of treating the Tea Party class of groups differently from others.

All of which raises, once again, the question financial journalist David Cay Johnson asked in a column today: "Why is Lois G. Lerner still on the taxpayer's payroll?"

NB: The Chronicle of Philanthropy was on this story two days ago.

More Islamist terror


Credit: Idaho State Police
Fazliddin Kurbanov
KTVB.COM
Posted on May 17, 2013 at 7:49 AM
Updated yesterday at 5:39 PM

Terrorist arrested in Boise
BOISE -- An Uzbekistan national arrested in Boise has pleaded not guilty in federal court to charges he conspired with a terrorist group on a scheme to use a weapon of mass destruction.
Fazliddin Kurbanov, 30, appeared before a federal judge at 8:30 a.m. He used an interpreter over the phone to communicate his not-guilty plea.
Kurbanov's trial is now set for July 2, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.
The 30-year-old Uzbekistani also faces a detention hearing on Tuesday to determine whether he'll stay in custody until his trial.  KTVB has obtained documents that show prosecutors believe Kurbanov is a serious flight risk if he is not in jail.
KTVB's Jamie Grey was in federal court during Friday's proceedings. She said Kurbanov sat quietly and didn't appear to have any family in court.
On Friday, we also learned that Kurbanov is employed locally as some sort of truck driver.
U.S. ATTORNEY SPEAKS 
U.S. Attorney Wendy Olson cautioned the public not to stereotype Boise's Muslim community because of the arrest.
"Some of the online commenting was starting to make critical comments about Islam and Muslims," Olson told KTVB. "I would like to say that the fact that this individual was arrested and the terrorist organization identified reflects not at all on the broader Muslim community here in Idaho."
Olson went on to say her office and the Department of Justice are focused on the conduct of one individual, not an ethnic or religious group.
"We have outstanding partnerships with the Muslim community with them in a number of different areas, and this shouldn't be seen in any way as a reflection on that community," Olson continued. "This is about the specific conduct of an individual."
FBI AGENTS RAID APARTMENT
FBI agents and police raided Kurbanov's apartment on Cassia Street in Boise on Thursday after a grand jury issued a three-count indictment accusing him of federal terrorism charges.
Court documents show those charges are based on evidence Kurbanov conspired with a foreign terrorist organization in Uzbekistan, possessed an unregistered explosive device, made shopping trips for bomb-making materials, conspired with others on how to make bombs, and showed instructional videos on the topic.
Kurbanov's neighbors at the Glenbrook apartment complex told KTVB they noticed about six black SUVs arrive around 10:30 a.m.
Authorities say Kurbanov was arrested in connection with the raid, but have not detailed how he was arrested.
A KTVB photojournalist on scene captured video and images of FBI agents searching his apartment and car. 
FEDERAL CHARGES IN IDAHO
According to U.S. district court documents, Kurbanov both conspired with individual terrorists to carry out illegal activities and conspired with the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, a known terrorist organization. The charges state the Kurbanov also provided material support and resources to the organization, including computer software and money.
The indictment out of Idaho also states that Kurbanov possessed a hollow hand grenade stuffed with a hobby fuse, aluminum powder, potassium nitrate and sulfur on or about the time of Nov. 15, 2012.
FEDERAL CHARGES IN UTAH
A separate federal grand jury in Utah also returned an indictment charging Kurbanov with distributing information about explosives, bombs and weapons of mass destruction.
David Barlow, the U.S. attorney in Utah, said the grand jury alleges that Kurbanov provided written recipes for how to make improvised explosive devices and went on instructional shopping trips in Utah showing what items are necessary to buy to make the devices. He said Kurbanov also showed Internet videos on the topic.
The prosecutor declined to say whom Kurbanov took on the shopping trips in Utah but said that information will come out as the case moves through the courts.
Federal authorities tell KTVB Kurbanov will likely face the Idaho charges and any resulting trial period here in Boise before he faces the charges out of Utah.

Point out the truth about a Democrat and you instantly become "vile"



By Jim Haddadin
jhaddadin@fosters.com
Thursday, May 16, 2013

Picture
U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.
DOVER — With a scandal at the Internal Revenue Service continuing to broaden, U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen faced fresh criticism Wednesday from her political opponents over letters she sent to a former IRS commissioner.

Republicans are accusing Shaheen and other Senate Democrats of exerting pressure on the IRS to crack down on political groups seeking nonprofit status.

The critique comes amid new revelations this week that the IRS improperly targeted conservative groups for scrutiny over a period of more than 18 months, between 2010 and 2012.

During that time, the IRS singled out conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status, identifying them based on their policy positions or certain markers in their names, such as the phrase “Tea Party.”

The practice resulted in substantial delays in processing some applications, according to a new report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.

The report has fueled seething controversy in Washington D.C., where IRS officials are being called to account for the campaign of discrimination.

Calling the conduct an “outrage,” President Barack Obama announced Wednesday that the top official at the IRS, acting commissioner Steven T. Miller, had tendered his resignation. Meanwhile, Republican House Speaker John Boehner suggested the actions rise to the level of a criminal offense.

Republican leaders also questioned whether Senate Democrats wielded their influence to incite the enhanced IRS scrutiny.

Speaking on Fox News Tuesday, conservative powerbroker Karl Rove highlighted a letter sent by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Montana, to the director of the IRS in 2010 calling for further investigation of tax-exempt groups. Rove also discussed a letter sent to the IRS in 2012 by Shaheen and six other Democrats.

“(The IRS was) doing what people on Capitol Hill wanted them to do,” Rove said.

In the Feb. 16, 2012 letter, Shaheen and other lawmakers urged the IRS to develop new standards to evaluate the activities of so-called “social welfare” organizations.

Such groups are granted nonprofit status by the IRS, provided their primary function is not to engage in political campaigning. The groups are also known as 501(c)(4)s, a reference to their designation under the federal tax code.

In their letter, Shaheen and the other senators questioned whether some groups with overtly political aims were masquerading as social welfare organizations in order to skirt federal tax laws. The senators urged the IRS to prevent organizations “focused on federal election activities” from “abusing the tax code.”

The same group sent a second letter to former IRS commissioner Douglas H. Shulman in March 2012. They called for the IRS to implement a strict cap on the amount of political spending permissible for tax-exempt groups. The senators also called for the IRS to require organizations to document the exact percentage of their undertakings dedicated to “social welfare.”

“The IRS currently only requires that the purpose of these non-profits be ‘primarily’ related to social welfare activities, without defining what ‘primarily’ means,” the letter reads. “This standard should be spelled out more fully by the IRS.”

The senators concluded by stating their intention to introduce legislation to codify the changes if the IRS was unable to “issue administrative guidance” on the subject.

Following Rove’s line of attack, the New Hampshire Republican State Committee issued a statement Wednesday calling on Shaheen to address the letter.

“There are very serious questions about whether Shaheen’s partisan effort to pressure the IRS to increase investigations of 501(c)(4) organizations contributed to the outrageous practices that took place at the agency,” said NHGOP Executive Director Matthew Slater.

A timeline of events provided in the inspector general’s report casts doubt on the theory Shaheen’s letter spurred the agency’s actions. The practice of targeting conservative groups had been in effect for more than one year by the time Shaheen and the other senators composed their letters.

According to the report, IRS officials began singling out applications from conservative groups by March 2010 and continued through July 2011. More generic criteria was then put in place for a period of six months.

The parameters were changed once again in January 2012, allowing for IRS workers to once again parse applications based on political beliefs. The new guidelines called for scrutiny of organizations involved in limiting or expanding government, educating people about the constitution or promoting social and economic reforms, according to the report. The practice finally ended in May 2012, when the criteria was revised once again.

Shaheen has been highly critical of the IRS this week, beginning Monday with a statement calling the agency’s actions an “outrageous abuse of power.” Then on Wednesday, Shaheen called for a complete and thorough audit of the IRS by the agency’s inspector general.

Shaheen also briefly mentioned her letters to the IRS. She characterized them as a call for “clear regulations,” which might have prevented the abuses at the IRS.

The announcement came at about 4 p.m., several hours after Shaheen came under fire from Rove and others. In response to the Republican criticism, Shaheen spokesman Shripal Shah said Shaheen’s letter made no mention of political affiliation.

“Senator Shaheen believes that the tax code needs to be applied fairly and impartially and thinks the agency’s targeting of conservative groups is an outrageous abuse of power,” Shah said.

New Hampshire Democratic Party Communications Director Harrell Kirstein characterized the attempt to link Shaheen to the IRS scandal as “desperate even for the New Hampshire GOP.”

“This is merely the latest pathetic partisan attempt to distract voters from the never ending series of scandalous and vile comments made by Republican elected officials,” Kirstein said. 

Don't you wonder if Obama thought Ambassador Stevens was paranoid? It's not paranoia when the threat is real


The Autocrat Accountants

Once government is ensnared in every aspect of life, a bureaucracy grows increasingly capricious.
By  Mark Steyn