“Former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams sparked controversy in 2008 when he suggested it was ‘inevitable’ that elements of Shariah would be incorporated in British law,” according to the Express. Would this mean that in the near future Shariah law could run parallel and equal to United Kingdom law? Hope not. Shariah has an abysmal record when it comes to the treatment of women.
London’s Mayor Boris Johnson called the idea of Shariah law in Britain “absolutely unacceptable.” He is joined in his rejection by Home Secretary Theresa May, who has proposed a review into Shariah courts. The Independent recently published an investigative story revealing a parallel system of Islamic justice, which the writer says condemns many British women to “marital captivity,” while at the same time failing to protect them from domestic violence.
Leiden University scholar Machteld Zee, writes The Independent, managed to obtain unusual access to secretive Shariah courts. After attending 15 hours of hearings at the Islamic Shariah Council in Leyton and the Birmingham Central Mosque, Ms. Zee reviewed more than a dozen cases.
According to The Independent, some of her findings included:
• A case where a woman who claimed to be married to a physically and verbally abusive man is told by a “laughing” judge: “Why did you marry such a person?”
• A woman “ready to burst into tears” is sent away without an answer after saying that her husband took out a loan in her name on the day they married and is denying her a divorce until she gives him 10,000 pounds.
• A married couple asking for advice on whether the woman had been religiously divorced from her former husband were told “the secular divorce counts as nothing.”
While Ms. Zee found some judges granting divorces and urging people to live under British law, she also concluded that most of the Islamic judges “are not a neutral third party but are always in favor of the man.”
Ms. Zee has compiled her research in a book titled “Choosing Shariah? Multiculturalism, Islamic Fundamentalism and British Shariah Councils.” Her findings prompted Baroness Caroline Cox to introduce a bill in the House of Lords last summer that would make it illegal for Shariah courts to treat “the evidence of a man as worth more than the evidence of a woman.” The bill passed its second reading in the House of Lords in October.
In an editorial responding to Ms. Zee’s research, The Independent says, “Can a healthy, harmonious multicultural society tolerate private legal systems? Not if that means the subjugation of women in abusive and indeed dangerous marriages, a form of imprisonment in all but name sanctioned by their local religious leaders.”
Beyond the mass shootings in America, stabbings on London’s tube and Israeli bus stops, there is the larger question of Islam’s compatibility with Western values and laws. Will those of us who practice a different faith, including Muslims with a different view of Islam, or those who practice no faith at all, be required to adhere to Shariah law should the Muslim population become a majority? That’s what radical Islamists appear to want.
Carved into the facade of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., are the words “Equal Justice Under Law.” But how equal can justice be if that law becomes Shariah law, either in a parallel legal system, or a dominant one that forces all other laws, be they based on the Ten Commandments, or secular philosophy, to succumb?
The question is more than academic and theological. The answer could determine the future direction of the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.