Ron Paul has real issues.

Ex-Aide Says Ron Paul Is a 9/11 Truther & Isolationist Who Thinks U.S. Shouldn't Have Fought Hitler

John McCormack

A former Ron Paul staffer named Eric Dondero, who worked closely with the Texas congressman and presidential candidate over the course of 15 years, has issued a statement in which he both defends his old boss from charges of racism and anti-Semitism and reveals damning new details about about the "sheer lunacy of [Paul's] foreign policy views".

First, Dondero claims that his old boss is such an extreme isolationist that "he strenuously does not believe the United States had any business getting involved in fighting Hitler in WWII. He expressed to me countless times, that 'saving the Jews,' was absolutely none of our business."

Second, Dondero writes that that Paul himself is a 9/11 conspiracy theorist:

He engaged in conspiracy theories including perhaps the attacks were coordinated with the CIA, and that the Bush administration might have known about the attacks ahead of time. He expressed no sympathies whatsoever for those who died on 9/11, and pretty much forbade us staffers from engaging in any sort of memorial expressions, or openly asserting pro-military statements in support of the Bush administration.

And lastly, Dondero reveals that Paul wanted to vote against the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 but lacked the courage of his convictions to do so:

There is much more information I could give you on the sheer lunacy of his foreign policy views. Let me just concentrate on one in specific. And I will state this with absolute certainty:

Ron Paul was opposed to the War in Afghanistan, and to any military reaction to the attacks of 9/11.

He did not want to vote for the resolution. He immediately stated to us staffers, me in particular, that Bush/Cheney were going to use the attacks as a precursor for “invading” Iraq. He engaged in conspiracy theories including perhaps the attacks were coordinated with the CIA, and that the Bush administration might have known about the attacks ahead of time. He expressed no sympathies whatsoever for those who died on 9/11, and pretty much forbade us staffers from engaging in any sort of memorial expressions, or openly asserting pro-military statements in support of the Bush administration.

On the eve of the vote, Ron Paul was still telling us staffers that he was planning to vote “No,” on the resolution, and to be prepared for a seriously negative reaction in the District. Jackie Gloor and I, along with quiet nods of agreement from the other staffers in the District, declared our intentions to Tom Lizardo, our Chief of Staff, and to each other, that if Ron voted No, we would immediately resign.

Ron was “under the spell” of left-anarchist and Lew Rockwell associate Joe Becker at the time, who was our legislative director. Norm Singleton, another Lew Rockwell fanatic agreed with Joe. All other staffers were against Ron, Joe and Norm on this, including Lizardo. At the very last minute Ron switched his stance and voted “Yay,” much to the great relief of Jackie and I. He never explained why, but I strongly suspected that he realized it would have been political suicide; that staunchly conservative Victoria would revolt, and the Republicans there would ensure that he would not receive the nomination for the seat in 2002.

None of these allegations will surprise those who took a close look at company Ron Paul keeps, but this is the first time someone close to Paul has come forward to try to expose how extreme the Texas congressman's views are. I've reached out to the Paul campaign for a response to Dondero's statement.

Update: Paul campaign manager Jesse Benton emails THE WEEKLY STANDARD: "Eric Dondero is a disgruntled former staffer who was fired for performance issues. He has zero credibility and should not be taken seriously."

I asked Benton if he could rebut the specific charge that Rep. Paul thinks the United States had no interest in fighting Hitler to stop the Holocaust. Benton replied: "Eric Dondero is a disgruntled former staffer who was fired for performance issues. He has zero credibility and should not be taken seriously."

Some interesting remembrances from a Lucianne poster named Fed Up:

In 1988, Paul ran for president under the Libertarian banner and was best buds with Dr.Timothy "LSD" Leary. Remember him? "Tune in, turn on, drop out". In a recent San Francisco Examiner article, the author reminisces about first meeting Dr. Paul at Dr. Leary's house. Leary even put on a fund-raiser for Paul. I guess the drug legalization thing goes back a ways.Libertarians presently hold 0 of 100 US Senate seats, 0 of 435 US House seats, 0 of 50 governorships, 0 of 1921 state senatorial seats, and 1 out of 5410 state representative seats. Sounds like a wildly-popular, powerhouse party to me.

Even worse, the second time he went delusionally "tilting at windmills" in 2008, he was rightfully rejected in the Republican primaries, and just like any ordinary Republican adult would do, he threw a temper tantrum, held his breath and endorsed, not the "Republican" Sarah Palin and her "albatross", but put his tribe and dough behind Green Party nominee, 9/11 truther, Arab-cause sympathizer, anti-Semite, and certified nut, Cynthia McKinney. Remember Cindy when she slugged a cop for asking her for an ID when she refused to stop and blasted though a Capitol Hill security checkpoint? He also endorsed and supported the Libertarian nominee, and Ralph Nader, and the Constitution Party's candidate all helping to elect Alfred E. ZERO.

Why this self-centered phony, (who would probably nominate Reverend Jeremiah Wright as his Secretary of State, because they share the same beliefs about the "chickens coming home to roost")is even allowed on the stage with serious Republican candidates is disgraceful, and he could potentially guaranty the re-election of ZERO, but isn't that the plan? His spoiler role will certainly send us a "message," but its a message that the entire world can't survive.