Celal Gunes/Anadolu/Getty Images
Friday, May 1, 2026
Kamala
Saxophonist falls asleep onstage during Kamala Harris awards dinner anti-Trump rant
By
Published April 30, 2026, 8:58 p.m. PT
Another Hollywood brat living off the father's name who has produced nothing of value
TPUSA has scathing response to unhinged attack on Erika Kirk from famous director’s ‘radicalized’ daughter
Published May 1, 2026, 8:09 a.m. PT
California regulators apologized to SpaceX CEO Elon Musk this week as they settled a lawsuit that claimed a state agency showed political bias against the rocket company and its chief executive.
Elon Musk gets an apology from California regulators as a SpaceX lawsuit is settled
LOS ANGELES (AP) — California regulators apologized to SpaceX CEO Elon Musk this week as they settled a lawsuit that claimed a state agency showed political bias against the rocket company and its chief executive.
As part of the settlement, the California Coastal Commission acknowledged its members made “improper” statements about Musk’s political beliefs at a 2024 hearing on SpaceX’s Falcon 9 launch program.
“The commission agrees that it may not consider irrelevant factors in performing its function and specifically agrees that it will not take into account the perceived political beliefs, political speech or labor practices of SpaceX or its officers in considering any regulatory action concerning SpaceX,” the commission said in federal court documents filed Tuesday.
SpaceX had sued the commission over its opposition to expanding the launch schedule for Falcon 9 rockets from the Vandenberg Space Force Base on the Southern California coast near Santa Barbara.
The faces of the Democrat Party: A Communist, a neo Nazi and a an anti Semite
Graham Platner, Zohran Mamdani, Hasan Piker Are Officially the Future of the Democratic Party
DAVID STROM 2:00 PM | April 30, 2026
The leftist first instinct
UCLA Law backtracks after threatening conservative students if they ID protesters at DHS event
Administration apologizes "for any lack of clarity" that it "does not discipline students for speech that is protected under the First Amendment," after critic notes it didn't threaten protesters who identified conservatives to harass.
The Nature Reviews paper is a wake-up call. Mental health awareness isn’t neutral
Mental Health Awareness Is Backfiring: New Science Shows How ‘Helpful’ Campaigns Are Manufacturing Illness
The new data should be a wake-up call.
Monty Donohew | May 1, 2026
For decades, the mental health industry and its allies in media, government, and education have operated on a simple assumption: the more mental health awareness we spread, through campaigns, school programs, social media, and public service announcements, the better. Raise awareness, reduce stigma, encourage help-seeking, and mental health will surely improve.
New evidence shows the opposite is happening. Well-intentioned awareness efforts are actively backfiring, manufacturing distress, inflating diagnoses, and turning normal human emotions into chronic “disorders.” The shocking result is that these campaigns are turning mentally fit people into self-diagnosed mentally ill patients, with symptoms effectively “contracted” from the awareness messages themselves.
A major new review in Nature Reviews Psychology (March 2026) confirms what many conservatives have long suspected: well-meaning mental health awareness efforts can harm more than they help. Titled “The psychological consequences of mental health awareness efforts,” the paper, led by Oxford psychologist Lucy Foulkes, synthesizes experimental evidence showing these campaigns lower the bar for what counts as a “disorder,” train people to pathologize normal emotions, and lock in self-fulfilling “illness identities.”
The authors aren’t anti-awareness radicals: they acknowledge real benefits from such campaigns, such as reduced stigma in some cases and modest increases in help-seeking. Nonetheless, the actual data on harms is damning and growing.
Three Mechanisms of Harm
The review identifies three converging pathways, drawn from previously disparate literatures on concept creep, nocebo effects, prevalence inflation, and illness self-labeling:
- Lowering the threshold for disorder. Awareness materials serve to broaden definitions of mental illness. Normal feelings, such as loneliness, stress, and sadness, get “reframed” as pathology. Experiments show people exposed to awareness content are far more likely to self-diagnose with conditions they simply don’t clinically meet.
- Symptom-scanning and reinterpretation. Campaigns teach hypervigilance, demanding that you constantly assess your inner life. Normal fluctuations like a few bad days, social awkwardness, or stress get misinterpreted as “symptoms.” One cited study found that simply learning “stress is harmful” demonstrably worsened performance and well-being. Trigger warnings, meant to protect those with vulnerability, in fact, increase anticipatory anxiety, inducing stress that might otherwise not have existed or caused alarm.
- Illness identity becomes self-fulfilling. Once a person is labeled, whether by themselves or others, the person behaves in ways that confirm and deepen the identity. This is classic self-fulfilling prophecy, backed by decades of labeling theory now applied to mental health.
The evidence isn’t a handful of anecdotal stories drawn from specific extreme cases. The review cites over a dozen experimental manipulations (2010–2025) showing causal effects: ADHD workshops doubled false self-diagnosis rates in healthy adults; fake “awareness” videos about nonexistent syndromes produced real symptoms (headaches, nausea); nocebo education experiments proved you can prevent these harms by inoculating people against them.Real-World Fallout: Youth in Crisis Despite the Campaigns
Despite billions poured into awareness campaigns designed to help and protect our youth, ranging from school programs, TikTok PSAs, corporate “mental health months,” and government initiatives, youth mental health has dramatically worsened. CDC data shows persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness in teens hovering near 40% in recent years. University counseling centers are overwhelmed. Medication use is up. Yet awareness literacy is higher than ever.
The paper’s timing is perfect. Social media has supercharged the problem: 80% or more of popular mental health TikToks are misleading or oversimplified. Adolescents, whose identities are still forming, are especially vulnerable to suggestion and peer contagion.
Conservatives have warned about this for years. The left’s therapeutic culture, pushing “validate every feeling,” “trauma is everywhere,” and endless “awareness” without resilience education and training, turns normal human struggle into identity and disability. It’s the same dynamic seen in the explosion of rapid-onset gender dysphoria, ADHD self-diagnoses, and anxiety epidemics among affluent, screen-addicted youth. When every discomfort is a “disorder,” resilience atrophies.
Why the Left Won’t Admit It
Mainstream psychology and progressive media have treated awareness as an unmitigated and absolute good. Critics of overdiagnosis were dismissed as heartless or “stigma-enforcing.” Yet here is high-impact, peer-reviewed science, saying the quiet part out loud: some awareness efforts manufacture the suffering they claim to prevent.
This should prompt a reckoning. Social media platforms profit from doom-scrolling symptom lists. Big Pharma benefits from expanded diagnoses. The “awareness industrial complex” has incentives to keep the crisis narrative alive. The Make America Healthy Again movement should directly confront and reform these incentives.
At a minimum, schools should stop mandatory “mental health” modules that pathologize normal adolescence.
A Better Path Forward
The authors don’t call for ending awareness; they call for smarterawareness. “Inoculation” works: brief education about nocebo effects and concept creep prevents false self-diagnosis. Emphasize resilience, growth mindset, and the difference between normal distress and clinical disorder. Teach stoicism, not fragility. More, stop rewarding fragility by elevating it to a protected class or special identity, and conferring to those self-identifying special privileges. This is particularly necessary in law enforcement and in the judiciary where identities and illnesses can be treated as excuses for criminality or given exception from consequence.
These steps align with timeless wisdom: character is forged in adversity, not endless validation. Faith, family, discipline, and community have protected mental health for generations far better than TikTok quizzes or school counselors armed with symptom checklists.
The Nature Reviews paper is a wake-up call. Mental health awareness isn’t neutral. In its current form, vague, expansive, and TikTok-ified, “Awareness” risks turning generations into patients instead of resilient adults. Time to stop the treatment-induced epidemic before another generation is told their normal struggles are permanent disorders.

Oregon Forced to Clean Almost 20% of its Voters Off the Rolls Because They Are Ineligible: "A woman voted in four times but she was already dead!🤯🤯"
Oregon Forced to Clean Almost 20% of its Voters Off the Rolls Because They Are Ineligible
DAVID STROM 12:00 PM | April 30, 2026
Do you ever wonder why so many Blue states refuse to hand over their voter rolls to the federal government?
After all, there is a federal law that requires certain measures to ensure ballot integrity, passed in the wake of the 2000 Florida debacle. It requires, among other things, that states clean their voter rolls of ineligible voters.
But these states refuse to do that, and they refuse to show that they aren't breaking federal law.
Of course, every sentient person knows exactly why they do both of those things: they cheat, and want to make it as hard as possible to detect the cheating, and almost impossible to audit elections to ensure that they are fair. Every time you hear a liberal say that there are so few cases of voter fraud prosecuted, what they mean is that they get away with it because there are almost no mechanisms to prove it.
Judicial Watch, an invaluable conservative organization, sued the State of Oregon for its practice of mailing ballots to its "eligible voters" without ensuring that the voters were, indeed, eligible. Rather than face the lawsuit and the inevitable discovery proving their intention to cheat, the state settled it, agreeing to clean 800,000 ineligible voters off its rolls.
800,000. In a state of 4.3 million people, with only 3.4 million registered voters. That's about one out of four voters on the rolls. And those are only the ones we know about.
Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit in October 2024, alleging Oregon failed to remove ineligible voters and seeking to enforce Section 8 of the NVRA after identifyingwidespread voter roll maintenance failures across dozens of counties (Judicial Watch, et al. v. The State of Oregon et al. (No. 6:24-cv-01783)).
In its complaint, Judicial Watch argued that Oregon’s voter rolls contain large numbers of old, inactive registrations; and that 29 of Oregon’s 36 counties removed few or no registrations as required by federal election law. Judicial Watch asserted that Oregon and 35 of its counties had overall registration rates exceeding 100%; and that Oregon had the highest known inactive registration rate of any state in the nation. In combination, all of these facts showed that Oregon was failing to remove inactive registrations as required by federal law.
In August 2025, a federal court in Oregon denied a motion to dismiss by Oregon and ruled the lawsuit could proceed.
In response to the lawsuit, Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read announced earlier this year that Oregon has about 800,000 inactive registrations, which are kept separately from the active voter rolls and do not receive ballots. Of those, roughly 160,000 already meet federal and state criteria for removal—having received confirmation notices, failed to respond, and not voted in two federal elections—and are slated for cancellation. The remaining approximately 640,000 inactive records do not yet qualify for removal and will be processed through future list maintenance efforts.
In its press release, Oregon acknowledged that routine removal of outdated records effectively stalled in 2017, leaving a large pool of long-dormant registrations on the rolls without being fully processed for removal. The scale of the backlog underscores a gap in routine list maintenance that is only now being addressed. “These directives are about cleaning up old data that’s no longer in use so Oregonians can be confident that our voter records are up to date,” said Read.
Secretaries of State go to great lengths to claim that everything is fine, just as they go to great lengths to maximize the number of obviously ineligible votes that get counted. California, for instance, routinely takes weeks to count its ballots. Five weeks in the last election cycle.
Some states will accept mail-in ballots that arrive days after the election, without basic details like date stamps showing when they were actually mailed.
Hundreds of ballots are often sent to the same address. Mail drops can be used as addresses. Empty lots are used as voter addresses. The only reason we know any of this is because ordinary citizens get off their butts to check things out. Nobody in power wants to check, because they know it benefits them.
There are likely millions of ineligible voters in America who receive ballots that are harvested, voted, and counted. We don't know, and Democrats don't care to know.
Mail-in ballots are by far the least secure, which is why liberals love them. Keep the voter rolls as dirty as possible, mail ballots out to fake or ineligible voters, and voila!, you have Deep Blue cities pouring in votes in statewide and federal elections that can swing elections.
It's unlikely that city and county elections are swung by fraud because these places would overwhelmingly vote for Democrats in any case, but a Senate or presidential election could turn on fraudulent votes quite easily.
That's why Republicans are keen on increasing ballot integrity, and why Democrats will fight to the death to prevent it. Voters overwhelmingly want better fraud prevention; Democrat politicians will do almost anything to stop it.
As the Oregon case shows, the state would rather settle a lawsuit and make a modest effort to clean the voter rolls if it means avoiding discovery. Who knows what records are hidden? Theoretically, none should be, but we all know how that goes.
We are getting a glimpse into the financial fraud that funds the Democratic Party and its NGO complex; that, I suspect, is the tip of an even more corrupt iceberg.
Editor’s Note: We voted for mass deportations, not mass amnesty. Help us continue to fight back against those trying to go against the will of the American people.
Join HotAir VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
More Biden administration shenanigans uncovered
Biden Admin Used ‘Benghazi’ to Hide $90M to Planned Parenthood. Senator Wants DOJ to Probe.
Biden administration officials may have sought to dodge public records laws and congressional oversight by classifying taxpayer-backed loans to Planned Parenthood as “Benghazi,” according to findings by Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa.
Ernst, chairwoman of the Senate Small Business Committee, has been investigating Small Business Administration loans to the nation’s largest abortion provider under the Paycheck Protection Program during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In a letter sent Monday to acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Ernst asked for a Justice Department investigation “for potential Federal Records Act violation by concealment and/or attempted concealment” of SBA records regarding loans to Planned Parenthood and loan forgiveness.
“What does Benghazi have to do with Planned Parenthood? It appears the Biden SBA used it as a codename to hide the $90 million in taxpayer funds they gifted to the abortion provider,” Ernst told The Daily Signal in a statement.
“I’ve already exposed the Biden administration’s blatant disregard for transparency, but this potential cover-up demands answers,” Ernst continued. “I’m calling for a DOJ investigation to determine if Biden officials were illegally concealing federal records over their egregious handout to Planned Parenthood.”
The 13-page letter from Ernst to Blanche, shared with The Daily Signal, shows examples of email communications from SBA personnel.
The Biden admin’s COVID vaccine cover-up and lies can no longer be denied – or the damage they caused
Miranda Devine: The Biden admin’s COVID vaccine cover-up and lies can no longer be denied – or the damage they caused
Published April 29, 2026, 8:07 p.m. PT
Democrats live in a world of intentional ignorance: Yep, local small boat fisherman always buy boats with four or five very powerful outboard engines that would cost them a lifetime worth of earnings and fish at 40-50 knots.
VIDEO: CRAZED Democrat warns Hegseth could face EXECUTION over alleged war crimes
APRIL 30, 2026
Moulton says the strikes on narco-terrorist boats are not what the administration claims.
Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton of Massachusetts said that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth might have the same fate as some Nazis who were executed for their war crimes in World War II.
Moulton claimed that strikes ordered on narco-terrorist boats near Venezuela could be prosecuted as war crimes and lead to the secretary's execution.
'Back in World War II, the Allies tried Nazi submarine captains for doing this exact same thing.'
The Democrat was being interviewed by Erin Burnett on CNN on Wednesday when he made the bizarre threat against Hegseth.
"He's clearly behind the operation to shoot all these boats in the Caribbean when it's very unclear that we actually have any confirmation that these so-called narco-terrorists, a term the administration invented to justify this action, are even on the boats," he said.
Moulton went on to cite some reports claiming that the sailors killed were just fishermen who were trying to feed their families and "clearly not war criminals," as claimed by the Trump administration.
"And on top of that, we then have the strike where they came back and hit it again, a double tap just purely to kill these survivors who were clinging to wreckage," Moulton said.
"You know, it's interesting, Erin, another historical analogy: Back in World War II, the Allies tried Nazi submarine captains for doing this exact same thing," he added. "And guess what the conclusion was? They got executed! Listen to that, Mr. Secretary!"
The strikes on drug boats near Venezuela were a precursor to the military operation that led to the capture of Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro, who is now awaiting trial.
RELATED: MS Now host implodes over Pete Hegseth saying, 'We leave no man behind,' after pilot rescue
"Hegseth may want to read up on the Geneva Conventions," Moulton said on social media with video of his interview with Burnett.
Moulton is a former U.S. Marine Corps captain who served four tours in the Iraq War, while Hegseth is a former Army National Guard infantry officer with combat deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
The pipeline from university radical to would-be assassin
The pipeline from university radical to would-be assassin
MAY 01, 2026
Those wondering where the seemingly endless supply of violent leftists comes from need look no farther than our public universities.
Last weekend delivered yet another grim headline: political violence, an attempted presidential assassination, once again treated as a mystery by the left.
The alleged perpetrator, we are told, was not some fringe drifter living off the grid, but an award-winning teacher. This is a detail that would have seemed ironic a generation ago, but now seems almost predictable.
Reports indicate that the individual had a record of professional accolades and community involvement, the sort of résumé typically invoked to prove the impact of leftist ideologies.
If one wishes to understand what is happening to our country, there is no need to search for obscure explanations.
Alongside that résumé, there are early indications of ideological commitments and public expressions that fit comfortably within the increasingly militant strain of contemporary progressive activism and most university classrooms.
After such events, the public conversation follows a well-worn script. We are told this is an isolated incident. We are urged not to “politicize.” And yet, the same voices that warn against generalization in this context have no hesitation attributing sweeping moral guilt to entire categories when it suits the prevailing orthodoxy.
One is tempted to ask: How often must this pattern repeat before we permit ourselves the unfashionable act of noticing it?
It’s as if there are some mysterious places we send young adults to be indoctrinated to hate their country, hate their bodies, and hate God. The only thing worse is if we are footing the bill for tuition.
So let us ask, with due sobriety: Are there institutions in our country where young minds are being shaped, not merely to critique, but to despise?
Now that you mention it, yes, there are.
The university as moral re-education center
As a Christian and conservative professor, I have spent years calling attention to what occurs inside our universities.
Earlier this month, my college at Arizona State University formally adopted a Native American land acknowledgment as official policy.
These statements are often presented as benign gestures of historical awareness, but their actual function is quite different: They are meant to problematize the legitimacy of American land ownership and to “expose” what are called “structures of oppression.”
In practice, this language is not descriptive but rather accusatory. It does not invite inquiry; it prescribes judgment.
At the same time, faculty are encouraged to “decolonize” their curricula. That term, which sounds like a meaningless academic exercise, carries a very specific ideological payload. It teaches that Western civilization, particularly the United States, is not merely flawed but fundamentally illegitimate, built upon “white supremacy” and sustained by “structural violence.”
And if a system is fundamentally illegitimate, what follows?
Historically speaking, one does not reform such systems. One dismantles them. And so you find ASU professors calling for armed resistance to the United States.
From theory to rhetoric to action
This is not some abstract speculation. It is a demonstrable reality.
Across the country, we have seen:
- Professors at American institutions openly defending or rationalizing political violence as a form of “resistance.” If intersectionality calls you “oppressed,” it’s fine to be violent.
- University departments issuing statements framing America as inherently oppressive while praising movements aimed at its transformation.
- K-12 educators using classroom time to advance ideological positions that portray students’ own nation, heritage, and even biological identity as sources of moral guilt.
Consider the broader pattern:
- At Harvard and Columbia, student groups and faculty responses to recent global conflicts have included rhetoric that many Americans would recognize as moral inversion, where acts of violence are reframed as justified expressions of resistance.
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion programs across major universities and corporations routinely instruct participants to view American history through a lens of oppression, often discouraging dissent as a form of harm.
- “Decolonization” and the anti-settler, anti-whiteness initiatives increasingly reject the very idea of objective truth, reason, and even science, casting them as instruments of power and white supremacy.
One begins to see the progression:
Step 1: Teach the youth that America and Christianity are evil.
Step 2: Teach that dismantling them is justice.
Step 3: Act surprised when someone takes the final step.
Step 4: Cash your state employee checks.
What of oversight?
All of this brings us to a question that is at once practical and unavoidable: Where are the Arizona Board of Regents and similar institutions in other states?
Is it merely a ceremonial body, an occasion for polite applause and catered wine and cheese receptions, or does it exist to provide actual oversight of the institutions entrusted to it?
Public universities are not private salons for ideological experimentation. They are taxpayer-supported institutions with a mandate to educate, not indoctrinate; to pursue truth, not enforce orthodoxy.
In Arizona, professors sign an employee contract agreeing not to undermine the Constitution. And yet, when faculty openly promote ideas that undermine the constitutional order they are employed under, the response is silence or, worse, complicity.
Meanwhile, those who raise concerns find themselves subject to scrutiny, marginalization, and, in some cases, professional penalty.
RELATED: The anti-Christian myth of First Amendment 'neutrality'
What are we paying for?
American families send their children to universities like ASU at considerable cost. It is easily tens of thousands of dollars per year and sometimes far more when all expenses are counted and taxes are factored in.
What do they expect in return? An education in truth. Training in reason. Preparation for responsible citizenship. Maybe even a little wisdom and fear of God.
But that is not what they get. Instead, their kids receive instruction in grievance. Classes about envy and training to hate your neighbor. Formation in ideological hostility. Encouragement to view their own country, their own traditions, even their own families as objects of suspicion or contempt.
And occasionally, as we are now forced to confront, something worse: calls for violent resistance by professors on the state tax dime.
A modest proposal
If one wishes to understand what is happening to our country, there is no need to search for obscure explanations.
It is happening, in large measure, in our universities. And it is paid for by taxes in the very country these professors hate so much. Parents don’t know how bad it is and continue to send their children, paying tuition, into these ideological training camps.
And — this is the uncomfortable part — we don’t stop paying for it. It’s much worse than you think, and it is time to say enough is enough. No more state checks for those who hate America. They are free to start their own private university and teach their hatred there.
I have documented these trends extensively. I will continue to do so. If you would like to keep updated on what goes on within our universities, you can subscribe to my Substackas I report from within the belly of what some call the Devil’s University.
If you find yourself in conversation with someone who asks, in genuine bewilderment, “What is happening to America?” you might offer a simple reply: “Look at the institutions shaping the next generation.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)