Thursday, May 31, 2012

Now if he said that about Islam it would be believable.


Obama: ‘I probably know more about Judaism than any other president, because I read about it’

by Say It Ain't So
Oh, he knows so much, but in all his reading he seems to have missed the partabout Jerusalem being Israel's eternal capital.
He missed the parts about Judea and Samaria, about the patriarchs and matriarchs buried in Hebron, the Tabernacle in Shilo, and all the rest of the Biblical places so fundamental to the Jewish people that he demands Israel surrender to the Fakestinians.
”[He] wondered how come no one asks Speaker of the House of Representatives John Boehner or Senate minority leader Mitch McConnel [sic] about their support to Israel.” [below]
Because they aren't president.
Because they aren't demanding Israel return to the 49' armistice lines.
Because they aren't insisting that Jerusalem be divided.
Because they didn't go to Cairo to kiss the butts of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Because they have never said or done anything to put their friendship with Israel into question.
Because they don't pal around with Jew-hating Marxist revolutionaries.
Via Weekly Standard - President Obama met yesterday with “about 20 Conservative Jewish community leaders, thanking them for the work they do to improve communities around the country and discussed their shared commitment to rebuilding the U.S. economy,” Haaretz reports.
In the meeting, Obama reportedly boasted about his knowledge of Judaism, telling the leaders that he thinks he knows more “about Judaism” than all past presidents. He said he gained this knowledge of Judaism from reading.
Obama … stressed he probably knows about Judaism more than any other president, because he read about it,” Haaretz reports. ”[He] wondered how come no one asks Speaker of the House of Representatives John Boehner or Senate minority leader Mitch McConnel [sic] about their support to Israel.”
Similarly, he said to the group, “I [am] not going to tell you again how I even feel about Israel, but why [are] we still talking about it?”

No comments: