Solyndra investors could reap tax windfall
Two investment companies stand to receive hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks under a bankruptcy exit plan for failed solar company Solyndra, government lawyers say.
Nearly a year to the day after the solar company filed for bankruptcy owing taxpayers more than $500 million, Solyndra is poised to restructure under a deal that government lawyers fear could provide a tax windfall to the investors.
The investment companies, Argonaut Ventures and Madrone Capital Partners, may be able to use net operating losses at Solyndra to avoid “hundreds of millions of dollars in future income taxes” unrelated to the solar company, according to a recent court filing by government lawyers.
In addition to earlier financing, both companies provided $75 million to Solyndra last year in a controversial restructuring deal approved by the Department of Energy (DOE) that allowed the financiers to be paid back before taxpayers in case of a default.
Taxpayers are expected to receive little of the $528 million that Solyndra still owes the government, but DOE officials have defended the restructuring, saying it was the best chance of keeping Solyndra in business.
Republicans said that the restructuring only caused taxpayers to lose more money and that the arrangement violated federal rules.
Argonaut is the investment arm of a family foundation in Oklahoma headed by businessman George Kaiser, who was a fundraiser for then-Sen. Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. Madrone has ties to the family that owns Wal-Mart.
Bankruptcy attorneys for Solyndra have not yet filed a response to the opposition to their disclosure statement.
The Justice Department, which represents the DOE, said the restructuring would leave an entity with no assets and no debts, according to its recent filing.
“It will, however, hold ‘tax attributes’ consisting of more than one-half billion dollars in net operating losses,” the government filing states. “The equity holders … may then, assuming they meet the other requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, use those net operating losses to reduce their income tax liabilities on income earned from other sources completely unrelated to Solyndra.”
Saying a judge should oppose the disclosure statement, government attorneys argue the plan doesn’t shed any light on whether there’s any intention to use the net operating losses after bankruptcy.
Once a poster child of the Obama administration’s stimulus program and efforts to encourage clean-energy sources, Solyndra turned into a big political headache after its bankruptcy.
Administration officials and the company both have blamed stiff competition from China and falling solar panel prices for Solyndra’s collapse, while Republicans said the administration ignored warning signs and badly mishandled the loan restructuring.
4 comments:
Frankly, I don't see the point of this article. It is not a tax loophole to be able to offset losses agsinst future gains. If the companies lost money in Solyndra, of course, they can claim the losses against future tax liabilities. While I object strongly to the government using my tax dollars to play venture capitalist, there is no reason that private investors who lost money should not be able to claim it.
Just like what John said, there really is no point in this article whatsoever. Might I suggest getting your facts straight and be more informative before posting something.
There are no problems with the facts, its the attitude of the article that is the issue. The idea that losses are somehow tax 'loopholes' are what I was objecting to.
Please read:
"In addition to earlier financing, both companies provided $75 million to Solyndra last year in a controversial restructuring deal approved by the Department of Energy (DOE) that allowed the financiers to be paid back before taxpayers in case of a default.
Taxpayers are expected to receive little of the $528 million that Solyndra still owes the government, but DOE officials have defended the restructuring, saying it was the best chance of keeping Solyndra in business.
Republicans said that the restructuring only caused taxpayers to lose more money and that the arrangement violated federal rules."
Extraordinary efforts to save a boondoggle and Obama's face.
Post a Comment