Showing posts with label government unions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government unions. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 28, 2020

Why Illinois Is In Trouble – 109,881 Public Employees With $100,000+ Paychecks Cost Taxpayers $14B...and they won't miss a paycheck while the people who pay them will.

Adam Andrzejewski
Illinois could soon be the first state in history to have its bonds rated as “junk.” Last month, both Moody’s MCO and Standard & Poor’s downgraded Illinois debt to just one notch above junk status. 
Last week, the Illinois State Senate President Don Harmon (D-Chicago) wrote a letter to Congress requesting a $41.6 billion bailout. Critics balked. 
In many ways, Illinois may have already crossed the Rubicon. 
Our analysis at OpenTheBooks.com shows that an Illinois family of four now owes more in unfunded pension liabilities ($76,000) than they earn in household income ($63,585). In a state of 13 million residents, every man, woman, and child owes $19,000 — on an estimated $251 billion pension liability. 
Our auditors discovered 110,000 public employees and retirees who earned more than $100,000 last year. 
We found tree trimmers in Chicago making $106,663; nurses at state corrections earning up to $277,100; junior college presidents making $491,095; university doctors earning up to $2 million; and 111 small town managers who out-earned every governor of the 50 states ($202,000). 
Our interactive mapping tool allows users to quickly review the 110,000 public employees and retirees across Illinois making more than $100,000 (by ZIP code). Just click a pin and scroll down to see the results in your neighborhood rendered in the chart beneath the map. 

Saturday, November 30, 2019

How we are ruled by the Administrative State

Great America 

It’s Time for Civilian Control of the State Department

A second Trump term and an improved Congress could begin to enact salutary reforms to our foreign policy institutions, personnel systems, and operations. Cultural transformation of the clerisy is an undertaking for generations.
 
 
- November 29th, 2019

Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Kids are just collateral damage to the great social justice war

Hey, Mr. Mayor: Please don’t make me send my son to a rotten school



Hundreds of Queens parents have been phoning Mayor Bill de Blasio, asking him to provide classroom space for a Success Academy middle school — because without it, our kids won’t be able to continue the high-quality charter school education we chose for them.
Hizzoner doesn’t take our calls, and neither does anyone on his staff. They transfer us to 311 as soon as they learn why we are calling. They don’t even take down our information. It’s pretty clear that we aren’t a priority. The message City Hall and Gracie Mansion is telegraphing to us: Your voices don’t matter.
Success Academy first made a request for a middle school location in January 2017. The charter network provided a list of underutilized buildings — five different buildings with 475 to 700 empty seats — and showed future enrollment projections. With four Success elementary schools feeding into the one existing Success middle school in Queens, it was clear there wouldn’t be space for all our kids as more graduated from elementary school.
At first, the city told us there was space, but we would have to wait a year, until 2019. But now it’s 2019, there’s been no response on a location and the mayor is stonewalling. That isn’t a solution — it is an insult.
As a community that includes working-class families from Far Rockaway, Rosedale, Springfield Gardens and South Jamaica, we want what is best for our kids. Most of us have experience with the traditional schools in our neighborhoods, and it hasn’t been positive.
There are only two middle schools out of 55 in southeast Queens, where at least 80% of students are on grade level in both English and math. At Success, more than 96% of our children are on grade level in math, and 88% in reading. We want to build on their achievements — not watch them leave Success and regress.
The mayor and chancellor have campaigned for months to lower admission requirements for eight specialized high schools, because, they believe, it will allow more black and Latino students to reach for “excellence and equity for all.”
But when almost 2,000 children of color in southeast Queens — who are excelling in math and science and reading, who are on a path to a better future and the very excellence and equity the mayor extols — when those kids need a few hundred seats, a couple dozen classrooms, to continue their education, then de Blasio can’t be bothered to even have a staffer take our calls.
The mayor’s attitude is particularly disturbing in light of his recent intervention on behalf of PS 150. The mayor valiantly came to the rescue of this small school of mostly white students in TriBeCa this past December. Through his benevolent arbitration, the 200 children at PS 150 were allowed to stay in their building, rather than having to temporarily co-locate in a different building until construction of their new school was complete.
While our Queens families have to contemplate sending their children to underperforming district schools, the families in TriBeCa were going to be burdened with an additional 20 minutes added to their commute. But the mayor stepped in and saved PS 150 families — something he refuses to do for Queens working-class families of color.
By his own account, as soon as the mayor heard about PS 150’s problem, he met with Chancellor Richard Carranza and said, “We’ve got to figure this out, there’s got to be a way to save this school.” Within a few weeks, the mayor solved the problem and held a celebratory news conference, proclaiming “when there’s accountability, it makes a difference.”
If only the mayor felt accountable to working-class families in Queens.
The mayor has the power to help change the fate of these Queens students, but he is putting anti-charter politics ahead of kids. No schools have to be closed, no miracles have to be worked. It is simply a matter of sharing space, something that New York school children have done for more than a century.
“Sharing” — it is a concept most parents teach our children. The mayor has proposed that America’s wealthiest individuals share their wealth, but as the landlord of NYC’s public-school buildings, he won’t allow our children in charters to share space with their district peers.
AnnDena McCleary is a Success Academy parent. She lives in South Jamaica, Queens, with her son.

Saturday, June 15, 2019

Government employees exhibit an entitlement mentality. Government bureaucrats exist for the bureaucrats not the people they are supposed to serve!

Government employees throw fit because their agency is being moved to flyover country

Why shouldn't the Department of Agriculture work closer to the people it serves?

Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announced that government would move two research agencies within the U.S. Department of Agriculture jobs out of Washington, D.C., to areas in the United States where food actually comes from, and bureaucrats aren't happy about that.
On Thursday, the USDA announced plans to relocate the Economic Research Service and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture to the Kansas City, Missouri, region, in an effort to put the offices closer to farming areas.
"Following a rigorous site selection process, the Kansas City Region provides a win win," Perdue said in a Thursday statement, "maximizing our mission function by putting taxpayer savings into programmatic outputs and providing affordability, easy commutes, and extraordinary living for our employees."
"There is already a significant presence of USDA and federal government employees in the region, including the Kansas City 'Ag Bank' Federal Reserve," Perdue's statement concludes. "This agriculture talent pool, in addition to multiple land-grant and research universities within driving distance, provides access to a stable labor force for the future. The Kansas City Region will allow ERS and NIFA to increase efficiencies and effectiveness and bring important resources and manpower closer to all of our customers."

However, despite those selling points, some government employees showed up to protest the announcement, silently and symbolically turning their backs on their boss in the room.
Acting ERS Union Vice President Kevin Hunt called the decision "cold-hearted" and said it "highlights [Perdue's] disregard for the rights and well-being of employees," according to CNN. Hunt added, "Secretary Perdue continually speaks of transparency and communicating to employees but has failed on both fronts." 
The idea of moving federal bureaucracies to areas outside of the nation's capital has floated around for a while. In the last Congress, a handful of House Republicans led by Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) introduced the "Drain the Swamp Act of 2017," which would have required all federal agencies to move their headquarters outside of the D.C. metro area.
Davidson spoke with Conservative Review about the proposal in an on-camera interview:

Monday, January 21, 2019

Why I'm not attending any pity parties for furloughed federal workers

January 21, 2019
Why I'm not attending any pity parties for furloughed federal workers
By Thomas LifsonCall me a hard-hearted, mean-spirited conservative if you will, but I am not bleeding from the heart over the plight of most of the
furloughed federal workers. While I am certain that some of them have not bothered to accumulate savings, and thus are running out of money with which to pay important bills, the rest of us in the private sector have had to live with the possibility of our incomes being cut off for our entire careers. Moreover, federal employees, especially in the lower ranges of the income scale, make out like bandits compared to the rest of us with the same skills and responsibilities.
page1image10851824
Kristin Tate elaborates in The Hill:
Source.
page1image4619456page1image4615616
Federal workers receive pay that is 17 percent higher than private sector employees on average performing comparable work. That is on top of putting in 12 percent fewer hours. Furthermore, a Princeton University study found that when "taking differences in employee characteristics into account," federal workers actually earn 34 percent more than comparable private sector workers.
They receive "cadillac" federal employees health benefits, 75 percent of which is subsidized. These plans includes medical plus vision and dental benefits. On top of that, federal retirees are eligible for covered health benefits at 57 years old, a rare luxury in the private sector. They also have generous pension plans and Social Security benefits. Such payments are three times higher than private sector 401(k) and Social Security benefits.

It is also worth noting that federal workers face a 0.2 percent chance of getting fired in a given year. That is more than 45 times lower than their private sector counterparts. In some cases, it takes the effort from four different agencies to fire federal employees, and the process often takes years, even in simple cases. This shield protects public employees who are cited for malfeasance or incompetence. Meanwhile, a Brookings Institution study found that 65 percent of federal employees think job security is more important than helping the public, while only 30 percent think their organization does a good job disciplining poor performers.


page1image4615424page1image4613888page1image4617152
Moreover, the entire media narrative that essential employees are "working without pay" is a lie. They are guaranteed to be paid after the shutdown, so they are working for deferred compensation. And those non-essential employees are getting a paid vacation! The need to finance a few weeks (or, depending on Democrats, months) of income every few years, secure in the knowledge that the income will be paid on a delayed basis, is a tradeoff that I would gladly make in return for guarantees of a job paying much higher than in the private sector, and with gold-plated perks.
If I am going to feel sorry for people furloughed, I will save my pity for the coal miners thrown out of work by President Obama's plan to bankrupt coal mines, or for General Motors workers at Lordstown, where the factory will be closed, among many other private-sector workers who are exposed to risks that federal workers can blissfully ignore. Or even more, for workers in the "gig economy" where they get no secure paycheck.
Hat tip: Ed Lasky

Wednesday, September 19, 2018

Why work when you can be a revolutionary? He is an example of government employees you can meet anywhere they have power. End government worker unions and tenure

spaceplay / pause
  
qunload | stop
  
ffullscreen
shift + ←→slower / faster
↑↓volume
  
mmute
←→seek
  
 . seek to previous 
Federal Employee for State Department: “Resist everything… Every level. F**k sh*t up.” 
Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) Embedded in Federal Government Positions, Actively Resisting 
Stuart Karaffa Does Work for DSA While on Taxpayer’s Dime: “I’m careful about it. I don’t leave a paper trail.”
“I have nothing to lose. It’s impossible to fire federal employees.”
Ethics Officer Fails to Recognize Breach on Ethics Form: “somebody just rubber stamps it and it goes forward…”

UPDATE: 3:48 PM | Project Veritas attorney Benjamin Barr filed a complaint with the Department of State regarding the findings of our video. See the complaint here.
UPDATE: 2:22 PM | A Department of State spokesperson issued the following response to an inquiry from The Epoch Times:
“I can confirm Stuart Karaffa is a Management and Program Analyst with the Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations.
We take seriously any allegation of a violation of the Hatch Act and financial disclosure rules and are closely reviewing this matter.
This is a personnel matter that we cannot comment on further at this time.”

(Washington DC)  Today, Project Veritas released the first installment in an undercover videoinvestigation series unmasking the deep state. This video features a State Department employee, Stuart Karaffa, engaged in radical socialist political activity on the taxpayer’s dime, while advocating for resistance to official government policies. In addition to being a State Department employee Stuart Karaffa is also a ranking member of the Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America (Metro DC DSA.)
Metro DC DSA is a socialist group that works to advance progressive causes in the metropolitan DC area.
Socialist Activism at the State Department 
Mr. Karaffa’s loyalties seem to be with DSA, not with his employer.
Karaffa told an undercover Project Veritas journalist that he performs DSA activism while at work for the State Department. He explained that he drafts DSA communications while on the job at State Department:
“… I’m careful about it. I don’t leave a paper trail, like I leave emails, and like any press s**t that comes up I leave that until after 5:30. But as soon as 5:31 hits, got my like draft messages ready to send out.”
Karaffa also admits that on behalf of DSA he monitors Virginia political news online while at work:
“You could put two and two together probably. With like web traffic…. So with web traffic, I mean I could make the case before a court of law that- I’m going to the Virginia sort of, campaign finance website- that I’m just interested in what people are doing politically. But if they also go and look at like DSA minutes and like Officer positions they’ll be like, ‘that’s weird, you were the co-chair of the electoral caucus, and you spent three hours on a Virginia campaign finance website.'”
Insufficient Oversight
Karaffa does not believe that he will be caught and punished by the appropriate authorities, saying, “Maybe someday I’ll go to board of elections jail, probably not.”
Karaffa does not seem to be concerned about disciplinary action from the State Department: “I have nothing to lose. It’s impossible to fire federal employees.” When asked if his supervisor at the State Department knows about his activism, Karaffa reveals that “nobody knows” about it.
Some government employees are required to regularly submit disclosure forms to help management identify any potential conflicts of interest that may interfere with job responsibilities. Despite disclosing his political activities and officer positions on his financial disclosure form, Karaffa alleges that:
“… somebody just rubber stamps [the form] and it goes forward… I don’t know if [the ethics officer is] all there. He’s so checked out…”
Resistance
In one exchange, Karaffa’s attitude towards the current administration’s official policies appears to conflict with his duty to be impartial as a State Department employee. Karaffa says:
“Resist everything… Every level. F**k sh*t up.”
Stuart Karaffa is just the first federal government employee that Project Veritas has recorded in an undercover series unmasking the deep state.
“We’ve heard a lot about the Deep State; holdovers from the previous administration resisting change or nameless and faceless bureaucrats slowing things down or leaking secrets in an effort to undermine this administration,” said Project Veritas President James O’Keefe. “What is truly striking is their boldness, they are not afraid.  They are even boastful about a warped reality, where they won’t get caught and can’t get fired even if they did.”
More deep state investigation reports will be released soon.