Sunday, June 2, 2013

Egypt is getting more unhinged by the day

Egypt: Court rules legislature illegally elected

By HAMZA HENDAWI
(AP) In this file photo taken on Tuesday, April 23, 2013, Egyptian Shura Council members meet to...
Full Image


CAIRO (AP) - Egypt's highest court ruled on Sunday that the nation's Islamist-dominated legislature and constitutional panel were illegally elected, dealing a serious blow to the legal basis of the Islamists' hold on power.
The ruling by the Supreme Constitutional Court says that the legislature's upper house, the only one currently sitting, would not be dissolved until the parliament's lower chamber is elected later this year or early in 2014. The constitutional panel has already dissolved after completing the charter.
But the ruling nonetheless deepens the political instability that has gripped the country since the overthrow of authoritarian leader Hosni Mubarak two years ago.
The same court ruled to dissolve parliament's lower chamber in June, a move that led to the promotion of the toothless upper chamber, the Shura Council, to becoming a law-making house. The Shura Council, long derided as nothing more than a talk shop, was elected by about seven percent of the electorate last year.
(AP) Hamdy El-Fakharany, an opposition leader and former member of the now-dissolved Parliament, center,...
Full Image
It was not immediately clear whether the ruling on the 100-member constitutional panel would impact in any way on the charter it drafted. The constitution was adopted in a nationwide vote in December with a relatively low turnout of about 35 percent.
But even if it does not, the ruling will question the legal foundations of the disputed charter pushed through by allies of Islamist President Mohammed Morsi in an all-night session late last year. Critics say the charter restricts freedoms and gives clerics a say in legislation. The Islamists who drafted it hail the document as the best one Egypt ever had.
There was no immediate comment from Morsi's office on the ruling.
Regardless of their consequences on the ground, Sunday's ruling is likely to prolong the polarizing political transition that followed Mubarak's overthrow. Rival political groups disagree not just on policies and the future course of the nation but on the legitimacy of the basic institutions of government.
It will give heart to the mostly secular and liberal opposition, while providing fresh ammunition to the argument often repeated by the president's supporters that the judiciary is filled with Mubarak loyalists determined to derail the nation's political process.
(AP) An Egyptian traffic policeman manages the traffic in front of the Supreme Constitutional Court in...
Full Image
Morsi, elected nearly a year ago, tried to reinstate parliament's lower chamber just days after he came to office on June 30 but eventually bowed to the court ruling and backed down.
In both rulings on parliament's two chambers, the court contended that political parties that fielded candidates for the third of seats set aside for independent candidates, as allowed by the election law, amounted to a breach of the principle of fairness.
The Shura Council's critics say it is ill-equipped to be the nation's sole law-making body, and complain that it's considering legislation that will have a far reach into the future rather than simply pass what is absolutely necessary during the transition period.
Of the chamber's 270 members, 180 are elected with the other 90 being appointed by Morsi. Five percent of its members are Christians - about half the proportion of the population - and four percent are women.
When elections were held in early 2012, not only did many voters stay away but so did many political parties - especially several of the newborn liberal groups with smaller budgets. Over 70 percent of the seats were taken by Islamists.
The court on Sunday also ruled unconstitutional clauses in a 1958 law giving the president far-reaching powers under a state of emergency. The invalidated clauses had allowed suspects to be arrested with little recourse and placed restrictions on the freedoms of movement and assembly.
The ruling comes ahead of the scheduled climax on June 30 - the president's first anniversary in office - of a campaign by anti-government protesters to collect 15 million signatures of Egyptians who want to see Morsi go.
Morsi has yet to say whether he intends to take any action against the campaign or its organizers, who plan to stage a massive protest outside his Cairo palace on June 30. But the president's supporters have denounced as illegal the campaign, called Tamarod, or "Rebel," and there have been several street scuffles between the two sides. 

So, was Benghazi Obama's revenge on Hillary?


Obama was pushed by Clintons into endorsement of Hillary in 2016: book


President Obama made a secret deal to support Hillary Clinton when she runs for president in 2016, campaign sources say, payback for the support her husband gave him in 2012.
Bill Clinton’s animosity toward Obama is legendary. A year before the last election, he was urging Hillary to challenge the sitting president for the nomination — a move she rejected.
According to two people who attended that meeting in Chappaqua, Bill Clinton then went on a rant against Obama.
“I’ve heard more from Bush, asking for my advice, than I’ve heard from Obama,” my sources quoted Clinton as saying. “I have no relationship with the president — none whatsoever. Obama doesn’t know how to be president. He doesn’t know how the world works. He’s incompetent. He’s an amateur!”
For his part, Obama wasn’t interested in Bill Clinton upstaging him during the presidential campaign. He resisted giving him any role at the convention.
But as last summer wore on, and Democrat enthusiasm waned, chief political strategist David Axelrod convinced the president that he needed Bill Clinton’s mojo.
A deal was struck: Clinton would give the key nominating speech at the convention, and a full-throated endorsement of Obama. In exchange, Obama would endorse Hillary Clinton as his successor.
Clinton’s speech was as promised; columnists pointed out the surprising enthusiasm in which he described the president. It also lived up to Obama’s fears, as more people talked about Clinton’s speech in the weeks following than his own.
But after his re-election, Obama began to have second thoughts. He would prefer to stay neutral in the next election, as is traditional of outgoing presidents.
Bill Clinton went ballistic and threatened retaliation. Obama backed down. He called his favorite journalist, Steve Kroft of “60 Minutes,” and offered an unprecedented “farewell interview” with departing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The result was a slobbering televised love-in — and an embarrassment to all concerned.
It is just one of the debacles that have marked Obama’s second term, from Benghazi to the IRS scandal. While he was effective on the campaign trail, once in the Oval Office, he becomes a different person, one who derives no joy from the cut and thrust of day-to-day politics and who is inept in the arts of management and governance.
Obama has made a lot of promises — and nothing ever happened.
He once boasted that he’d bring the Israelis and Palestinians to the negotiating table and create a permanent peace in the Middle East. Nothing happened.
He said he’d open a constructive dialogue with America’s enemies in Iran and North Korea and, through his special powers of persuasion, help them see the error of their ways. And nothing happened.
He said he’d solve the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression and put millions of people back to work. And nothing happened.
He may yet try to back out of his promise to Hillary Clinton. But as Obama’s presidency sinks deeper into scandal and inaction, the question is — will Clinton even still want his endorsement?
Adapted from the new paperback edition of Edward Klein’s “The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House” (Regnery Publishing), out this week.

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Watch your language


Revealed: Hundreds of words to avoid using online if you don't want the government spying on you (and they include 'pork', 'cloud' and 'Mexico')


  • Department of Homeland Security forced to release list following freedom of information request

  • Agency insists it only looks for evidence of genuine threats to the U.S. and not for signs of general dissent

The Department of Homeland Security has been forced to release a list of keywords and phrases it uses to monitor social networking sites and online media for signs of terrorist or other threats against the U.S.
The intriguing the list includes obvious choices such as 'attack', 'Al Qaeda', 'terrorism' and 'dirty bomb' alongside dozens of seemingly innocent words like 'pork', 'cloud', 'team' and 'Mexico'.
Released under a freedom of information request, the information sheds new light on how government analysts are instructed to patrol the internet searching for domestic and external threats. 
The words are included in the department's 2011 'Analyst's Desktop Binder' used by workers at their National Operations Center which instructs workers to identify 'media reports that reflect adversely on DHS and response activities'.
Department chiefs were forced to release the manual following a House hearing over documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit which revealed how analysts monitor social networks and media organisations for comments that 'reflect adversely' on the government. 
However they insisted the practice was aimed not at policing the internet for disparaging remarks about the government and signs of general dissent, but to provide awareness of any potential threats.
 


    As well as terrorism, analysts are instructed to search for evidence of unfolding natural disasters, public health threats and serious crimes such as mall/school shootings, major drug busts, illegal immigrant busts.
    The list has been posted online by the Electronic Privacy Information Center - a privacy watchdog group who filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act before suing to obtain the release of the documents.
    In a letter to the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Counter-terrorism and Intelligence, the centre described the choice of words as 'broad, vague and ambiguous'.
    Scroll down for full list
    Threat detection: Released under a freedom of information request, the information sheds new light on how government analysts are instructed to patrol the internet searching for domestic and external threats
    Threat detection: Released under a freedom of information request, the information sheds new light on how government analysts are instructed to patrol the internet searching for domestic and external threats
    They point out that it includes 'vast amounts of First Amendment protected speech that is entirely unrelated to the Department of Homeland Security mission to protect the public against terrorism and disasters.' 
    A senior Homeland Security official told the Huffington Post that the manual 'is a starting point, not the endgame' in maintaining situational awareness of natural and man-made threats and denied that the government was monitoring signs of dissent. 
    However the agency admitted that the language used was vague and in need of updating. 
    Spokesman Matthew Chandler told website: 'To ensure clarity, as part of ... routine compliance review, DHS will review the language contained in all materials to clearly and accurately convey the parameters and intention of the program.'

    MIND YOUR LANGUAGE: THE LIST OF KEYWORDS IN FULL

     List1
    List
    list3




    Need a reason to avoid Staples other then their high prices...


    STAPLES DISQUALIFIES GUN STORES, LUMPS FIREARMS TOGETHER WITH ILLEGAL DRUGS

    The bureaucrats have become leftist advocates and any semblance of non partisanship is gone

    Report: IRS sought gift tax on conservative group's donors

    The IRS tried to impose a gift tax on donors to a conservative group formed to support former President George W. Bush’s 2007 troop surge in Iraq, The Wall Street Journal reported Saturday.

    The timing of the effort coincided with the timeframe of the IRS’s scrutiny of Tea Party groups seeking tax-exempt status, and it began under the unit led by Lois Lerner, who is the subject of a congressional investigation into the Tea Party targeting.
    The probe centered on a group called Freedom’s Watch and involved five separate audits, the Journal reported. It was halted in 2011 after an outcry from Congress, although the identity of the organization was not revealed at the time.
    Freedom’s Watch is now defunct, but tax experts told the Journal that the effort to impose gift taxes on its donors was highly unusual. The IRS declined to comment in the story.
    The report could add to the problems of the IRS, which is facing bipartisan outrage, a criminal investigation and multiple congressional inquiries on Capitol Hill after officials admitted to inappropriately targeting conservative groups for additional scrutiny.
    Acting IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel late Friday acknowledged that an upcoming audit would find improper spending at a 2010 agency conference, calling it an “unfortunate vestige” from a time before the agency tightened its belt.
    “While there were legitimate reasons for holding the meeting, many of the expenses associated with it were inappropriate and should not have occurred,” Werfel said in a statement.

    Doesn't seem like al-Qaeda is on the run


    Iraq uncovers al-Qaeda 'chemical weapons plot'

    Laboratory equipment and chemicals are seen on display during a news conference at the defence ministry in Baghdad (1 June 2013)The militants allegedly built two facilities to produce sarin and mustard gas
    The authorities in Iraq say they have uncovered an al-Qaeda plot to use chemical weapons, as well as to smuggle them to Europe and North America.
    Defence ministry spokesman Mohammed al-Askari said five men had been arrested after military intelligence monitored their activities for three months.
    Three workshops for manufacturing the chemical agents, including sarin and mustard gas, were uncovered, he added.
    Remote-controlled toy planes were also seized at the workshops.
    Mr Askari said they were to have been used to release the chemical agents over the target from a "safe" distance of 1.5km (0.9 miles), reports the BBC's Rami Ruhayem in Baghdad.
    All of the arrested men had confessed to the plot, and said they had received instruction from another al-Qaeda offshoot, he added.
    As the defence ministry spokesman spoke on Iraqi TV, footage was shown of four men with black hoods on their heads, our correspondent adds. Three of them were wearing bright yellow jumpsuits and a fourth was in a brown jumpsuit.
    Four men accused of manufacturing chemical weapons are pictured at a news conference in Baghdad (1 June 2013)All of the arrested men have allegedly confessed
    Their arrests were possible because of co-operation between Iraqi and foreign intelligence services, Mr Askari said.
    Chlorine bombs
    Al-Qaeda in Iraq is believed the only offshoot of the Islamist militant network to have used chemical weapons.
    It detonated a 16 crude chlorine bombs in Iraq between October 2006 and June 2007.
    Chlorine inhalation made many hundreds of people sick, but no deaths resulting from exposure to the chemical were recorded, US officials said at the time. Instead, the bomb blasts are believed to have caused the fatalities.
    At the time, US officials said al-Qaeda appeared to want to use debilitating agents like chlorine in their bombs to cause casualties beyond those hit by the initial explosion.
    US and Iraqi troops subsequently killed or detained many of the militants who were building the chlorine-laced bombs and seized much of their stockpiled chemicals.
    A letter written by the late al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden five days before he was killed in a US military raid in Pakistan in 2011 urged members of the group's offshoot in Yemen who he believed were considering using "poison" to be "careful of doing it without enough study of all aspects, including political and media reaction", according to CNN.



    Gunmen open fire on prison in Niger's capital

    Map of Niger

    Related Stories

    Gunmen have attacked a prison in the centre of Niger's capital, Niamey, officials and witnesses say.
    Justice Minister Marou Amadou told the AFP news agency that at least two guards had been killed.
    Some of the gunmen are reported to have entered the prison, which has been surrounded by the security forces.
    The attack comes days after suicide bombings at a military base in Agadez and a French-operated uranium mine at Arlit killed more than 20 people.
    The al-Qaeda-affiliated Signed-in-Blood Battalion said its leader, Algerian militant Mokhtar Belmokhtar, had masterminded the assaults.
    They were carried out in co-ordination with another group, the Movement for Unity and Jihad in West Africa (Mujao), the group claimed.

    Washington is overrun by leftist/progressives who make a great living think alike and hate anyone who disagrees


    FORMER IRS CHIEF'S WIFE WORKS FOR LEFTIST CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM GROUP


    On Friday, reports broke that Former IRS chief Doug Shulman’s wife works with a liberal lobbying group, Public Campaign, where she is the senior program advisor. Public Campaign is an “organization dedicated to sweeping campaign reform that aims to dramatically reduce the role of big special interest money in American politics.”

    The goal of Public Campaign is to target political groups like the conservative non-profits at issue in the IRS scandal. The Campaign says it “is laying the foundation for reform by working with a broad range of organizations, including local community groups, around the country that are fighting for change and national organizations whose members are not fairly represented under the current campaign finance system.”
    CEO of Public Campaign Nick Nyhart has offered words of support for the IRS’ targeting: “There are legitimate questions to be asked about political groups that are hiding behind a 501(c)4 status. It’s unfortunate a few bad apples at the IRS will make it harder for those questions to be asked without claims of bias.”
    Public Campaign gets its cash from labor unions like AFL-CIO, AFSCME, SEIU, and Move On.

    Here's a link to the TAX EXEMPT Public Campaign...a pretty far left OWS supporting group. Don't they and MoveOn.org deserve a little investigation?

    Time to break up the Bloomberg monopoly


    Hunch About Bloomberg Brought Rivals Together

    Nothing Obama says can be taken at face value. It's always shaded, exaggerated, self aggrandizing or a flat out lie


    Obama's Student Loan Rate Proposal Saves Average Borrower 25¢ Per Day


    How are those strict gun laws working for Chicago?

    UN: Iraq saw deadliest month in years

    More than 1,000 civilians and security personnel were killed in sectarian conflict in May, UN casualty figures show.


    Population about 34.1 million

    Chicago police confirm 'tragic number' of 500 homicides

    December 28, 2012

    Population about 2.7 million

    Putin wants the US to reduce its nuclear capabilities while he expands Russia's. Is this Obama's flexibility come home to roost?


    Russia to send nuclear submarines to southern seas

    Photo
    9:40am EDT
    MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia plans to resume nuclear submarine patrols in the southern seas after a hiatus of more than 20 years following the break-up of the Soviet Union, Itar-Tass news agency reported on Saturday, in another example of efforts to revive Moscow's military.
    The plan to send Borei-class submarines, designed to carry 16 long-range nuclear missiles, to the southern hemisphere follows President Vladimir Putin's decision in March to deploy a naval unit in the Mediterranean Sea on a permanent basis starting this year.
    "The revival of nuclear submarine patrols will allow us to fulfill the tasks of strategic deterrence not only across the North Pole but also the South Pole," state-run Itar-Tass cited an unnamed official in the military General Staff as saying.
    The official said the patrols would be phased in over several years. The Yuri Dolgoruky, the first of eight Borei-class submarines that Russia hopes to launch by 2020, entered service this year.
    Putin has stressed the importance of a strong and agile military since returning to the presidency last May. In 13 years in power, he has often cited external threats when talking of the need for a reliable armed forces and Russian political unity.
    Fears of a nuclear confrontation between Russia and the United States has eased in recent years, and the Cold War-era foes signed a landmark treaty in 2010 setting lower limits on the size of their long-range nuclear arsenals.
    But the limited numbers of warheads and delivery vehicles such as submarines that they committed to under the New START treaty are still enough to devastate the world. Putin has made clear Russia will continue to upgrade its arsenal.
    Russia's land-launched Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) would fly over the northern part of the globe, as would those fired from submarines in the northern hemisphere.
    Both the Borei-class submarines and the Bulava ballistic missiles they carry were designed in the 1990s, when the science and defense industries were severely underfunded.
    Russia sees the Bulava as the backbone of its future nuclear deterrence, but the program has been set back by several botched launches over the past few years.