We’ve already talked about the book laundering scheme, but here’s another way to pull off the bestseller list with sheer brute monetary force.

I was brought in to play a small role in a book launch a few years ago. Leading up to the launch date, I was on a few conference calls that outlined the author’s strategy for hitting the NYT and WSJ bestseller lists for a book.
Here are a few things the author did to make it happen:
  • Hired two high-end book publicists to get him booked on as many television interviews as possible.
  • Purchased full-page ads in national and local papers across the country.
  • Ran advertising in Times Square in New York City.
  • Paid the fee for the book’s publisher to have the book placed on the front tables at Barnes & Noble.
  • And my favorite: He hired people all over the country to go into their local Barnes & Noble and purchase every copy of the book one at a time with cash.
Did it work? Yes. The book debuted on the NYT and WSJ bestseller lists. Of course, the following week the book dropped off the lists, and was never seen again. Ninety-five percent of the sales happened in the first week. But the author, for all time, can be referred to as a “New York Times bestselling author.”
WSJ or NYT bestseller = more money.

IT’S THE GOOD, HARDWORKING AUTHORS WHO GET SCREWED

As I type this, there’s a huge shift happening inside the bestseller lists.
I’ve been on calls with people from two major publishers, and they can’t seem to give me a straight answer about how books are being reported and what is making the lists. They can’t tell me because they don’t know. 
They don’t know because the lists keep changing the rules without telling anyone. Apparently, WSJ‘s list has tightened its rules on bulk purchases. A recent book supposedly sold enough individual copies to make the list, but then was thrown out, because it had also sold a lot of bulk copies.
This, of course, makes no sense, but as an author you’re at their mercy.
One of my clients has worked really hard to establish great relationships with their clients, who are now interested in buying the author’s new book in bulk, but with the new rules we’re not sure what to do. Should we go ahead and let them order in bulk, and potentially get the book blacklisted?
This author has done the work ahead of time to make the book successful, with the goal of hitting one of the major lists, and now it could very well be for naught.
When the rules are fuzzy, hidden, and constantly changing, what can you possibly do?

UNKEPT PROMISES

A while ago, a colleague of mine wanted to run a campaign to his author platform for his new book.
He checked with his publisher to see if they could take the orders through his own website, so he could give special bonuses to early purchasers, and still get them counted as sales through one of the major book chains.
The publisher checked on it and said they could. He asked if they were sure. They said yes.
The author ran his campaign, sold thousands of books, and then turned in all the names and orders to his publisher. They sent the list to the retailer.
The retailer decided they didn’t want to do it. Since the publishers have made the retailers their customers instead of the readers, they didn’t want to push too hard to get the retailer to accept the deal. So they caved, and told the author “sorry,” but there was nothing they could do.
Huge investment of time, money, and effort to become a NYT and WSJ bestselling author. Time, money, and effort that had paid off in enough sales, that got thrown out and never saw the light of day.

YOUR BOOK ISN’T QUITE GOOD ENOUGH

Hugh Howey’s Dust sold more than 50,000 copies in its first week, yet only debuted at No. 7 on the NYT bestseller list—even though it far, far outsold books that were higher on the list.
Why?
Fantastic question. Apparently, the people making the decisions about which books are selling the most copies (notice the contradiction there?) didn’t think Dust was quite good enough.
This is the problem with having these decisions made by a hidden group of people who are highly selective with their data. Real numbers don’t matter to them.

YOUR BOOK WASN’T PURCHASED AT THE COOL BOOK STORES

The New York Times samples different stores across the country and weighs book sales based on where they are purchased.
What does this mean?
It means that a hardcover copy of your book purchased on Amazon.com is counted differently than the same hardcover book purchased at indie bookstore X.
At this point, do I really have to say how ridiculous this is, and how it punishes authors and readers alike?

WHAT CAN BE DONE NOW?

As authors, what can be done with this?
Yes, WSJ and NYT list = More money.
And it’s hard to ignore that, but we must. The only answer to this debacle is to stop worrying about hitting the major bestseller lists.
At this point, the results are so far outside of an author’s direct control, that it doesn’t make sense to make these lists a goal anymore.
Instead, focus on the reader.
Make your book available at the stores or websites your readers buy books from, in the formats they buy in. Make it easy to buy and easy to read.
Don’t make the lists your customer. Keep the reader your customer—the people you’re really writing books for.
Tim Grahl, founder of Out:think, where he helps authors connect with readers and sell more books. Tim is also the author of Your First 1000 Copies: The Step-by-Step Guide to Marketing Your Book.