Thursday, December 16, 2010

The NY Times is always behind the reality ball

NYTimes finally gets around to publishing an article about the evil of Mao


One of Instapundit’s readers thinks “it is possible to be a communist with the “good will,” i.e. to sincerely wish the best most prosperous future for everyone.” The thing is, the “good intentions” argument is done for.

Whether Marx or Lennin had good intentions ever (which they didn’t), or whether Communist apologists “sincerely wish the best most prosperous future for everyone”, is besides the point: The moral blindness and lack of compass of anyone who can possibly defend the Communist system, knowing that Communism is directly responsible for the deaths of some 100 million people*, is indefensible as of itself.


No comments: