BRIAN ROSS: While the President-Elect begins to make his plans to run the country, his lawyers will be in court today in San Diego — dealing with one of the dozens of active lawsuits against him involving allegations of fraud, sexual harassment, and failure to pay his bills....Students who paid a $35,000 fee claim the now president-elect committed fraud when he falsely told them he had personally selected the faculty. The actual trial is set to begin at the end of the month — presided over by the San Diego federal judge Trump accused during the campaign of bias because he is of Mexican heritage....In addition to the Trump University case....there are at least 30 other significant cases, in which the President-Elect is being sued or suing for issues that happened before he was elected....during the campaign, the famously-litigious candidate threatened to bring his own set of lawsuits against the women who claimed he had sexually assaulted them....Trump's business interests may also create conflicts for the soon-to-be president....Trump has had extensive ties with several Russian oligarchs close to Vladimir Putin. He and his children have sought investments with controversial overseas figures. And ethics experts say his plan to let his children run his business empire, as though it were a blind trust, is not blind at all.And then, there are the questions of the President-Elect and the IRS. Mr. Trump has said his tax returns are being audited by the IRS, as President Trump will elect and select the new head of the agency — even as his employees are pouring over how he managed, by his own admission, to avoid paying any tax at all — any federal income tax at all — over the last two decades.
Saturday, November 12, 2016
The insanity on the left is mind boggling...losing a civil suit is not a conviction of anything. Convictions are criminal. And, that would be in Hillary's future.
ABC's George Stephanopoulos raised the prospect of the impeachment of President-Elect Trump on Thursday's Good Morning America, as the morning show spotlighted the multiple civil lawsuits against the billionaire. The former Clinton administration communications director underlined that "if he takes the risk of going to trial and he's convicted, that could be seen as an impeachable offense." ABC legal analyst Dan Abrams corrected Stephanopoulos's faulty take: "You can't impeach someone for stuff that they did before they became president." [video below]
The anchor first brought on correspondent Brian Ross, who reported on the several legal cases involving Mr. Trump:
Stephanopoulos then turned to Abrams, and contended that "there would likely be a lot of pressure on Mr. Trump to settle" the Trump University cases. The analyst responded by giving some historical background on past civil lawsuits involving presidents: "Remember: this happened with the Paula Jones lawsuit and the Bill Clinton case. The U.S. Supreme Court actually weighed in on this, and said that a sitting president is not immune from a civil lawsuit."
The ABC journalist followed up by giving his "impeachable offense" statement. Abrams countered that "impeachable offenses are only for something you do while you're president. So, you can't impeach someone for stuff that they did before they became president. So, if he is president and something happens, that's a different story from something that happened before he became president." Stephanopoulos ended the segment by noting that "on the issue of his businesses, the President actually isn't bound by any conflict of interest laws."
The full transcript of the Dan Abrams segment from ABC's Good Morning America on November 10, 2016: