Showing posts with label Big Lie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Big Lie. Show all posts

Sunday, August 16, 2020

German Green party youth wants to 'replace' police...they prefer mob rule as long as they're the mob

German Green party youth wants to 'replace' police

The German Green party's youth organization, the Grüne Jugend, has defied the party leadership's line by calling for a radical reduction of the powers of state security forces, according to a newspaper report.

Riot police in Berlin (picture-alliance/dpa/P. Zinken)

The Grüne Jugend wants to "gradually eliminate state force as a means to resolve conflicts and replace it with prevention and cooperation," according to a policy paper seen by the taz newspaper.

The organization's aim, the paper said, was to create a "liberated society that slowly overcomes violence and repression as a means to solve social problems."

Like police-defunding campaigns in the US, the Grüne Jugend argue that many of the tasks currently being carried out by the police could be performed much better by other state representatives, such as social workers or care workers with psychiatric training.

As examples, the paper named dealing with victims of domestic or sexual abuse, homeless people, refugees, or drug addicts.

The paper also calls for disarming many police operations, not allowing officers to carry pepper spray as standard, and banning the use of dogs and horses to manage demonstrations.

Other demands include the nationwide introduction of theanti-discrimination law that Berlin passed earlier this year, which specifically bars the police from discriminating according to skin color, gender, religion or mental or physical disability.

Read more: Opinion: White men need to open their eyes to racism

'Perpetrators in uniform'

The Grüne Jugend paper occasionally uses provocative language, describing some police officers as "perpetrators in uniform" and arguing there was a "structural problem" in the force.

It added that there were "thousands of cases of police brutality a year that no one is called to account for."

The German police has been dogged by accusations of unnecessary violence,right-wing culture in the ranks, and deliberate racial profiling. Interior Minister Horst Seehofer has refused to green-light a study into racial profiling in the police.

Grüne Jugend spokesman Georg Kurz called the plans "first steps towards binding the police to principles of the rule of law."

"It is a disaster for democracy if it can be ascertained that unlawful police violence remains without consequences in most cases," he said.

The Green party itself has yet to comment directly on the paper. "We are constantly exchanging ideas with Grüne Jugend, but it is an independent organization with its own leadership and its own ideas," spokeswoman Nicola Kabel told the taz.

Irene Mihalic, domestic policy spokeswoman for the Green party in the parliament, and herself a police officer, said the paper contained, "a lot of interesting impulses," but that she did not like the "tone and the often polemical evaluations." "Most police officers do a very good job and have nothing to do with racism," she told the taz.

Friday, August 18, 2017



Mapping hate: Southern Poverty Law Center monitors extremist groups across U.S.
WJLA - Washington, DC
 - The Washington Times - Thursday, August 17, 2017
Brad Dacus was thousands of miles away in California last weekend when the Charlottesville protest erupted, so he was flabbergasted when CNN labeled his Pacific Justice Institute a “hate group.”
“Here are all the active hate groups where you live,” said the CNN wire story headline on Chicago’s WGN-TV website.
The article listed the 917 organizations on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s much-disputed “hate map,” which names racist groups like the Aryan Nation alongside mainstream conservative organizations such as the Alliance Defending Freedom and the Family Research Council.

Mr. Dacus’ conservative Sacramento-based institute, which specializes in religious-liberty cases, was featured on the CNN list right below the Pacific Coast Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.
“Why is the Southern Poverty Law Center doing this? It’s simple. They want to vilify and isolate anyone that doesn’t agree with their very extremist leftist policy and ideology,” said Mr. Dacus. “This isn’t about defending civil rights; this is about attacking civil rights.”
Other conservative groups blasted CNN and called on the cable network to retract the article.

“I am shocked that CNN would publish such a false report on the heels of the Charlottesville tragedy,” said Mat Staver, Liberty Counsel’s founder and chairman. “To lump peaceful Christian organizations, which condemn violence and racism, in with the KKK, neo-Nazis and white supremacists is offensive. This is the epitome of fake news and is why people no longer trust the media.”
Conservatives have repeatedly called out media outlets this year for uncritically repeating the SPLC’s “hate group” label, calling it inaccurate and arguing that it has put their organizations at risk for violence.
It’s not hypothetical.

In 2012, Floyd Lee Corkins shot and wounded a Family Research Council security guard and later told authorities that he wanted to kill as many employees as possible after finding the group on the SPLC’s “hate map.”
Tom McClusky, former vice president of government affairs at the Family Research Council, took to Twitter to say, “Thanks for the reminder @CNN of this inaccurate map. Last time I saw it one of my friends got hit with a bullet. Real responsible reporting.”
Mr. McClusky, now executive director at March for Life Education and Defense Fund, noted in another tweet that “@CNN decides to reprint map that guided shooter to try to kill me & my colleagues because of our view on marriage.”
In June, Liberty Counsel sued the charity tracker GuideStar for defamation for adding the SPLC tag to its list of nonprofits. GuideStar later removed the labels from its listings but said the information would be available upon request.
“Using the Southern Poverty Center as a source for information shows that CNN is not interested in reporting news but rather creating scandal and security threats,” said Mr. Staver. “It is well known that the SPLC label against peaceful, nonviolent people and organizations has motivated some unhinged people to commit violence. This is no time to exploit the tragedy of Charlottesville.”
CNN did not immediately return a request for comment Thursday but did add an editor’s note to the story saying that the headline was changed to make it clear that the information came from the SPLC.
The new headline said, “The Southern Poverty Law Center’s list of hate groups.” In addition, CNN said it had replaced the list of 917 “hate groups” with links to the SPLC website.
“Some critics of the SPLC say the group’s activism biases how it categorizes certain groups,” said the CNN story. “But since the FBI doesn’t keep track of domestic hate groups, the SPLC’s tally is the widely accepted one.”
That “hate group” listing may be widely accepted on the left, but it’s widely rejected on the right.
Earlier this year, the Philanthropy Roundtable’s Karl Zinsmeister called the SPLC a “cash-collecting machine,” pointing to its $50 million in contributions in 2015 and $334 million in holdings. In May, the Federalist’s Stella Morabito called it a “big-money smear machine.”
The Alabama-based center added to its coffers Wednesday with a $1 million donation from Apple CEO Tim Cook, who also said he would match 2-1 donations to the SPLC as well as a list of other designated groups until Sept. 30, citing the Charlottesville clash.
“Apple has been at the forefront of the fight against hate in the tech industry, and we are truly humbled by its support of our work,” the SPLC said in a Thursday statement.
Organizations can land on the SPLC’s “hate map” for a variety of reasons not limited to racism. Categories include being “anti-immigrant” or “anti-Muslim,” as well as being “racist skinhead,” “neo-Nazi” or “neo-Confederate.”
Most of the conservative groups fall into the SPLC’s “anti-LGBT” category for their opposition to, for example, same-sex marriage or transgender bathroom laws.
“Opposition to equal rights for LGBT people has been a central theme of Christian Right organizing and fundraising for the past three decades — a period that parallels the fundamentalist movement’s rise to political power,” the SPLC said on its website.
The ADF this week called out Phoenix news outlets that relied on SPLC’s “hate map” for post-Charlottesville stories, including a report on the NBC-TV affiliate 12News headlined, “What are Arizona’s hate groups?”
ADF spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said most news outlets may not realize that the SPLC is not politically neutral but rather avowedly anti-right.
On its “Hatewatch” page, for example, the SPLC states that it “monitors and exposes the activities of the American radical right.”
“I don’t think that most news organizations that SPLC states on its website that it only goes after groups on the right,” said Ms. Kupec. “They only target people on the right.”
Last month, the ADF blasted ABC and NBC for using the “hate group” designation on a story about a no-press speech by Attorney General Jeff Sessions at an ADF conference in Dana Point, California.

Saturday, November 5, 2016

Stagecraft Hides Small Turnout for Tim Kaine Rally in Melbourne, FL


Stagecraft Hides Small Turnout for Tim Kaine Rally in Melbourne, FL

Democratic Party vice presidential nominee Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia held a sparsely attended rally Friday evening at the Florida Institute of Technology in Melbourne, Florida that stagecraft wizardry made into a packed room for the media.
The rally was held at the Clemente Center gymnasium. Two-thirds of the gym was walled off for the rally. The media pen took up one third of the remaining space. Security fencing forced the attendees to appear bunched near the stage. At stage right, a large amount of space was blocked off by black pipe and drape with a large American flag.
A couple hundred supporters were squeezed into the rally space with about eighty sent to the second floor workout room that had an open view of the gym/rally below.
It worked.

Saturday, September 19, 2015

Global warming: authoritarian academics show their fascist streak. Protecting their jobs and grant money is what they're all about.

Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics




DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION

Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics

The science on global warming is settled, so settled that 20 climate scientists are asking President Barack Obama to prosecute people who disagree with them on the science behind man-made global warming.
Scientists from several universities and research centers even asked Obama to use the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) to prosecute groups that “have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change, as a means to forestall America’s response to climate change.”
RICO was a law designed to take down organized crime syndicates, but scientists now want it to be used against scientists, activists and organizations that voice their disagreement with the so-called “consensus” on global warming. The scientists repeated claims made by environmentalists that groups, especially those with ties to fossil fuels, have engaged in a misinformation campaign to confuse the public on global warming.
“The actions of these organizations have been extensively documented in peer-reviewed academic research and in recent books,” the scientists wrote.
But these riled up academics aren’t the first to suggest using RICO to go after global warming skeptics. The idea was first put forward by Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, who argued using RICO was effective at taking down the tobacco industry.
“In 1999, the Justice Department filed a civil RICO lawsuit against the major tobacco companies… alleging that the companies ‘engaged in and executed — and continue to engage in and execute — a massive 50-year scheme to defraud the public, including consumers of cigarettes, in violation of RICO,’” Whitehouse wrote in the Washington Post in May.
“We strongly endorse Senator Whitehouse’s call for a RICO investigation,” the scientists wrote to Obama. “The methods of these organizations are quite similar to those used earlier by the tobacco industry. A RICO investigation (1999 to 2006) played an important role in stopping the tobacco industry from continuing to deceive the American people about the dangers of smoking.”
“If corporations in the fossil fuel industry and their supporters are guilty of the misdeeds that have been documented in books and journal articles, it is imperative that these misdeeds be stopped as soon as possible so that America and the world can get on with the critically important business of finding effective ways to restabilize the Earth’s climate, before even more lasting damage is done,” the scientists added.

This year has been a trying one for global warming skeptics. Earlier this year, Democratic lawmakers began an investigation into scientists who disagreed with the White House’s stance on global warming. Many of these skeptical scientists were often cited by those critical of regulations to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
Arizona Democratic Rep. Raul Grijalva went after universities employing these researchers, which resulted in one expert being forced to get out of the field of climate research altogether.
“I am simply not initiating any new research or papers on the topic and I have ring-fenced my slowly diminishing blogging on the subject,” Dr. Roger Pielke Jr. of the University of Colorado wrote on his blog.
“Congressman Grijalva doesn’t have any evidence of any wrongdoing on my part, either ethical or legal, because there is none,” Pielke wrote. “He simply disagrees with the substance of my testimony – which is based on peer-reviewed research funded by the US taxpayer, and which also happens to be the consensus of the IPCC (despite Holdren’s incorrect views).”
Follow Michael on Facebook and Twitter
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


Thursday, June 11, 2015

A few years ago New York Times columnist Paul Krugman was frequently heralding the Veterans Health Administration as a model of medical improvement in America. Another example of liberal ideology crushed by reality.

This Is Paul Krugman's Idea of Good Health Care Reform


New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, shown here giving a lecture in Athens, Greece, has penned several op-eds praising the Veterans Health...
New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, shown here giving a lecture in Athens, Greece, has penned several op-eds praising the Veterans Health... View Enlarged Image
Afew years ago New York Times columnist Paul Krugman was frequently heralding the Veterans Health Administration as a model of medical improvement in America.
It is, he wrote, "a huge policy success story," that has "achieved a remarkable combination of rising quality and successful cost control."
One wonders if Krugman is aware of this story.
A decade ago, Veterans Affairs made plans to build a new hospital in the Denver area to serve nearly 400,000 veterans — for a relatively modest $328 million.
In the years since, the VA managed to spend $1.7 billion on the project — 418% more than promised — making it one of the most expensive hospitals in the world.
And still nowhere near finished, as NPR reports this week.
Unless Congress grants the VA more money soon, construction will halt, costing taxpayers still more money. Alternatively, the VA will have to squeeze its other programs.
The Denver hospital is hardly the only extravagantly bungled VA construction project. A Government Accountability Office audit found what the Washington Post described as "extravagant planning divorced from financial reality and bungled execution" at several projects.
This comes on top of the last year's scandal about deadly delays and active attempts to cover them up by VA administrators, which seems to undermine Krugman's other claim about the "rising quality."
The idea that the government can do things better and more efficiently than the private sector is a favorite claim of the single-payer crowd. Krugman said once the private insurance market "has huge administrative costs and has no demonstrated ability to reduce other costs."
He and others routinely compare Medicare's allegedly low overhead costs with the private sector's.
This claim ignores one inconvenient fact. Without the disciplining force of market competition, the government gets lazy, inefficient, careless and corrupt.
It's why the VA — despite huge increases in its budget in recent years — still forces veterans to wait months for treatment, and can blow $100 million on a hospital atrium with curving walls and huge glass windows.
It's why Britain's National Health Service and Canada's single-payer system are riddled with deadly delays. And why the federal government managed to blow $2 billion on the still unfinished Healthcare.gov.
It's also why public transportation projects are always late and over budget. Why public schools can't seem to accomplish the one job they're paid handsomely to do — educate children. And it's why the DMV is never heralded for its superior customer service.
When you include the cost of waste and fraud, you'd be hard pressed to find any government program that runs as well as its private sector counterpart.
Unless, that is, you simply ignore all the bad stuff.
"In Britain," Krugman once wrote, "the government itself runs the hospitals and employs the doctors. We've all heard scare stories about how that works in practice; these stories are false."
Just as false as the horror stories about the VA?
Hat tip Investors Business Daily