Tuesday, November 1, 2011

OWS supporters list


The Occupy Wall Street movement has received so much media coverage in recent weeks that it’s nearly impossible to keep abreast of all the developments. So many endorsements and criticisms coming from all directions enter the news cycle in such rapid succession that even the most dedicated news junkies may have missed out on many of the pronouncements. Supporters and detractors of OWS both might find it useful to have a handy all-inclusive list of who has endorsed or embraced the protest.

To satisfy that demand, we hereby present a list of groups, organizations, individuals and entities that have expressed their support for, sponsorship of, or sympathy for the Occupy Wall Street movement.

Note: All entries on this list are real and verified. Below each entry you will find a series of source links documenting the support for OWS. We have striven in almost all cases to reference either first-hand statements by the groups or individuals themselves, hosted on their own Web sites; or videos of the people in question voicing their support for OWSat various Occupations; or news reports from reliable mainstream networks; or articles by publications or organizations sympathetic to the Occupy movement; or indisputable evidence, whatever the source. As a result, it cannot be claimed that these statements of support were made up or distorted by detractors of the Occupy movement.

As each new controversial endorsement has appeared over the last month, OWS supporters have dismissed them one by one as “isolated examples” that don’t reflect any overall trend toward extremism. But when viewed in aggregate like this, it becomes much more difficult to dismiss any individual endorsement as an aberration; instead, an undeniable pattern emerges.

This list is obviously incomplete; we hope to update it over the upcoming days and weeks.

If you think we’ve left out any well-known endorsers for which there is solid evidence, then please post suggestions and evidentiary links in the comments section; but please try to supply links that will stand up to any potential claims of misrepresentation.

If you disagree with the inclusion of any of the entries on this list, please post your reasoning and any contravening source links in the comments section, and we will take the evidence into account when updating the list.

Members of the media, bloggers, activists, OWS supporters and detractors as well are all free to repost this list, in whole or in part, without any restrictions. Do note, however, that it may be updated over time, so make sure to get the latest version.

And without further ado, here is…


The 99%: Official list of Occupy Wall Street’s supporters, sponsors and sympathizers


Communist Party USA

      Sources:

Communist Party USA, OWS speech, The Daily Caller


American Nazi Party

      Sources:

Media Matters, American Nazi Party, White Honor, Sunshine State News


Ayatollah Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran

      Sources:

The Guardian, Tehran Times, CBS News


Barack Obama

      Sources:

ABC News, CBS News, ForexTV, NBC New York


The government of North Korea

      Sources:

Korean Central News Agency (North Korean state-controlled news outlet), The Marxist-Leninist, Wall Street Journal, Times of India


Louis Farrakhan, Nation of Islam

      Sources:

video statement (starting at 8:28), Black in America, Weasel Zippers, Philadelphia Weekly


Revolutionary Communist Party

      Sources:

Revolutionary Communist Party, Revolution newspaper, in-person appearance


David Duke

      Sources:

Talking Points Memo, video statement, davidduke.com


Joe Biden

      Sources:

Talking Points Memo, video statement, Mother Jones


Hugo Chavez

      Sources:

Mother Jones, Reuters, Examiner.com


Revolutionary Guards of Iran

      Sources:

Associated Press, FARS News Agency, UPI


Black Panthers (original)

      Sources:

in-person appearance, Occupy Oakland, Oakland Tribune


Socialist Party USA

      Sources:

Socialist Party USA, IndyMedia, The Daily Caller


US Border Guard

      Sources:

White Reference, www.usborderguard.com, Gateway Pundit, Just Another Day blog


Industrial Workers of the World

      Sources:

IWW web site, iww.org, in-person appearances


CAIR

      Sources:

in-person appearance, Washington Post, CAIR, CAIR New York


Nancy Pelosi

      Sources:

Talking Points Memo, video statement, ABC News, The Weekly Standard


Communist Party of China

      Sources:

People’s Daily (Communist Party organ), Reuters, chinataiwan.org, The Telegraph


Hezbollah

      Sources:

almoqawama.org, almoqawama.org (2), almoqawama.org (3), wikipedia


9/11Truth.org

      Sources:

911truth.org (1), 911truth.org (2), 911truth.org (3)


International Bolshevik Tendency

      Sources:

bolshevik.org, Wire Magazine


Anonymous

      Sources:

Adbusters, The Guardian, video statement


White Revolution

      Source:

whiterevolution.com


International Socialist Organization

      Sources:

Socialist Worker, socialistworker.org, in-person appearance


PressTV (Iranian government outlet)

      Sources:

PressTV, wikipedia


Marxist Student Union

      Sources:

Marxist Student Union, Big Government, marxiststudentunion.blogspot.com


Freedom Road Socialist Organization

      Sources:

FightBack News, fightbacknews.org


ANSWER

      Sources:

ANSWER press release, ANSWER web site, Xinhua


Party for Socialism and Liberation

      Sources:

Liberation News (1), pslweb.org, The Daily Free Press, Liberation News (2)

    Central planning on display

    Md. rural officials, lawmakers threaten tax revolt, mass exodus over environmental plan

    Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley is threatening to ram through a sweeping new land use plan that imposes an environmentalist agenda on the state’s sprawling rural populations — a move that could spark a tax revolt and mass exodus unless it is rewritten, county officials and state legislators told The Daily Caller on Monday.

    O’Malley has indicated that he intends to impose what some lawmakers are calling a draconian new environmentalist agenda, known as “Plan Maryland,” through executive order and regulation, rather than through the state legislature, even though his fellow Democrats dominate both chambers.

    Plan Maryland’s expensive new mandates for rural home builders will make new residences prohibitively expensive. O’Malley also intends to withhold state funds from new road projects and even new sewage systems if they are proposed outside the “smart growth” boundaries designated by his state planning board.

    “As rural legislators and county commissioners, we will do everything we can to stop it through legislative means,” Delegate Kathy Afzali, a Republican from Frederick County told TheDC.

    “But if we can’t stop it, we are going to push back. We are going to tell the governor quite simply, we won’t pay for it,” she added. “People are calling for absolute disobedience. We’re not going to take it lying down.”

    Republicans often call Maryland a “one-party state” because Democrats control all the levers of power. Democrats can achieve just about anything they want through the state legislature, and count on a Democratic governor to sign it into law.

    But there have been limits in the past. During the most recent legislative session, for example, a highly touted bill to legalize same-sex marriage went down in flames after black Democrats balked at the last minute on moral and religious grounds.

    Republican opponents of Plan Maryland are hoping O’Malley will take another look at the underlying assumptions of his “smart growth” blueprint. At a conference Monday afternoon in a suburb of Baltimore, they marshaled a host of U.S. and international experts to present data disproving the underlying assumptions of the plan, many of which were rooted in global warming orthodoxy.

    The assembled experts argued that the first to suffer from Plan Maryland would be the underprivileged, primarily the urban poor and the aspiring middle class who would see housing prices shoot through the roof.

    Representatives from 16 of Maryland’s 24 counties attended Monday’s session.

    They were joined by state delegates, state senators, and the head of the state planning commission.

    “We believe the issues we have raised here today are legitimate, and that reasonable people would agree that we have impeached the basic premises of the plan,” said Carroll County Commissioner Richard Rothschild, the conference organizer.

    “If the premises of the plan are false, the policies derived from those premises are false and the plan cannot promote the general welfare and therefore should not be signed by the Governor,” Rothschild said. “Therefore, we are asking the Governor to reconsider.”

    If the plan goes through, he argued, “ironically those who will be hurt the most will probably be the disadvantaged members of our community.”

    Additionally, he said, many business owners have told him, “If this plan goes through, they are going to move out of the state. They are afraid of it … because of extensive government overreach. We are scared.”

    Lord Christopher Mockton, a former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, presented an economic analysis of Plan Maryland — an analysis that he purposely based on flawed data from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the much-criticized international panel of scientists whose leaked email exchanges discussing the need to doctor their raw data became known as “Climategate.”

    “How much warming will Plan Maryland abate, and how much will it cost? They don’t say — and I’m going to show you why,” Lord Mockton said.

    Even using the “flawed and one-sided” data from the IPCC, Lord Mockton found that it would cost 1884 times as much to shut down carbon-producing activity in Maryland over the next fifty years as it would to sit back and do nothing, only later mitigating the most catastrophic effects of global warming the IPCC is predicting.

    “In less than 40 years from now, 90 percent of all economic activity in Maryland is to be shut down. That is in their proposal,” he said.

    He based that calculation on Plan Maryland’s requirement that greenhouse gas emissions drop by 2050 to 90 percent below their 2006 levels, without any provision for building new power generating capacity.

    Lord Monckton also presented complex data gathered by new weather satellites debunking the idea that the earth’s seas will rise by several feet over the next hundred years, as Plan Maryland claims.

    Overall, he said, Plan Maryland amounted to “gesture politics.”

    One of the plan’s most controversial measures is a dramatic reduction in the use of septic sewage systems throughout rural Maryland.

    But county commissioner Richard Rothschild argued that septic tanks return filtered wastewater to the water table, and are more sustainable than sewage systems that deplete water underground.

    “In rural counties, we feel we have a giant target painted on our backs,” Delegate Kelly Schulz, a newly-elected Republican from Frederick County, told TheDC.

    Plan Maryland will require Frederick County to spend $2.3 billion to retrofit its storm drain system so it meets new standards issued by the federal Environmental Protection Agency. “When we asked the state how we were to pay for this, they told us we just had to raise county taxes,” Schulz said.

    “This isn’t just a question of smart growth. Plan Maryland hits the core fabric of who we are as a community,” she said.

    State Planning Commissioner Richard E. Hall showed up for the final session of the day, but refused to respond to critics’ concerns about Plan Maryland’s underlying global warming assumptions.

    Hall tried to downplay the impact of the new regulations. “The Plan does not give us any powers we do not already have,” he said. “It’s a playbook, a game plan, to coordinate existing programs for land use.”


    Is their free speech more sacrosanct then those of the campaigns?

    Iowa protesters call for national help to ‘occupy’ presidential campaign HQs here

    Unions

    Quebec Wal-Mart workers leave union

    Isn't this what the aparatchiks say about their leader: Mao, Dear Leader, Stalin. They were all superhuman in their horribleness.

    Politico's White House Correspondent Gushes Over Obama's Blood Pressure: It's 'Superhuman

    Do you think they cared much about W's health other then to wish he were dead.


    ]The teachers are doing just fine....

    Study Concludes Public School Teacher Salaries $120 Billion Over Market Value

    Those on the left are wont to complain that government employees are under assualt these days because GOP politicians are going after public sector unions and generous deals they've leveraged through collective bargaining. The standard defense of civil service workers is, yes, they might have good benefits and more job stability but these things are necessary because public sector workers earn significantly less than private sector counterparts.

    Sharia law

    The moment man was publicly beheaded in a Saudi Arabian car park for being a 'sorcerer'




    Name calling, especially vile insulting name calling, is the base currency of the Democrats

    Carrying Water for Obama, Hilda Solis Picks a Fight with the Tea Party

    Will the media do its job and tell people what Democrats are made of?

    Someone Is Going To Jail For This: MF Global Caught Stealing Hundreds Of Millions From Customers?

    Tyler Durden's picture




    Say you are the head back office guy at MF Global, it is the close of trading on Thursday, the firm has already completely drawn down on its revolver, and all the resulting cash in addition to all the firm's cash at your disposal in affiliated bank accounts, up to and including petty cash, has been used to satisfy margin demands due to declining collateral value, yet the collateral calls just won't stop, and impatient voices on the other side of the phone line demand you transfer even more cash over immediately or else risk default proceedings commenced against you within minutes. What do you do? Do you go ahead and tell your superior that the firm is broke even though the co-opted media is trumpeting every 5 minutes that "MF Global is fine", knowing full well you will be immediately fired for being the bearer of bad news, or do you assume that courtesy of your uber-boss being the former head of the Vampire Squid, and thanks to infinite moral hazard which after Lehman made sure nobody would ever fail ever again, that there is simply no way that you will be left without some miraculous rescue, if only you can last one more day, and as a result proceed to "commingle" some client funds with the firm's cash. It turns out that at MF Global you do the latter... over and over... until you have literally stolen hundreds of millions from the firm's client accounts in hopes that the miracle rescue will come on Friday... then over the weekend... and then you realize no miracle is coming, partly because your actions have been exposed, partly because miracles only exist in fairy tales. The next thing you know, your firm is bankrupt and hundreds of clients are about to learn that all their money is gone. Poof. This is not a fictional tale. This is precisely what very likely happened at MF Global in the past 72 hours. And someone has to go to jail. That someone, if indeed this criminal act is proven to have taken place, should be none other than Jon Corzine himself.

    The sad truth of just how low Wall Street has fallen comes to us courtesy of the New York Times:

    Federal regulators have discovered that hundreds of millions of dollars in customer money have gone missing from MF Global in recent days, prompting an investigation into the company’s operations as it filed for bankruptcy on Monday, according to several people briefed on the matter.

    The revelation of the missing money scuttled an 11th hour deal for MF Global to sell a major part of itself to a rival brokerage firm. MF Global, the powerhouse commodities brokerage run by Jon S. Corzine, had staked its survival on completing the deal.

    As for the details:

    What began as nearly $1 billion missing had dropped to less than $700 million by late Monday. It is unclear where the money went, and some money is expected to trickle in over the coming days as the firm sorts through the bankruptcy process, the people said.

    But regulators are examining whether MF Global diverted some customer money to support its own trades as the firm teetered on the brink of collapse. If that was the case, it could violate a fundamental tenet of Wall Street regulation: Customers’ money must be kept separate from company money.

    And just like in the Lehman collapse where tens if not hundreds of international prime brokerage hedge fund clients, due to no fault of their own, found themselves insolvent after their cash ended up being caught at the London Lehman office (the details of how that money was illegally transferred from London to the US is a different topic entirely) and never to be seen again except to satisfy general unsecured claims, so thousands of MF clients are about to realize that money they thought they had, even if completely unencumbered with other assets, read pure cash, read money not at risk, is now gone forever, and they will have to wait years until the bankruptcy process determines if the claim deserves priority status to the unsecured bondholders. Best case: assume a 70% haircut on the money, if it is every to be seen again at all.

    So who can be sued? Who can be blamed for this malicious and purposeful criminal act? Why everyone from the back office clerk presented in the thought experiment above, all the way up to the man at the very top, Jon himself, who, like in every other act of Wall Street impropriety will plead stupidity and deny he ever knew of this crime. Unfortunately, our criminal regulators, who will be just as complicit in clearing him of all wrongdoing, will aid and abet this latest destruction of faith in US capitalism.

    What happens next? Why customers at all other brokerages, all other exchanges, afraid that their money will suffer the same fate as MF, even if they transact with perfect solvent clearers and agents, will proceed to pull their money, as they know they have nobody to trust but their own prudent and forward looking actions. Which in turn will start the kind of liquidity drain that killed not only Lehman, but froze money markets, and with that brought the complete capital markets to a standstill, only to be thawed after the Fed pledged multiples of the US GDP to rescue Wall Street in October of 2008.

    And that, dear reader, is called unintended consequences, and how the bankruptcy of a small exchange can avalanche into a crippling Ice Nine of what is left of capital markets all over again, courtesy of crony capitalism, rampant criminality and a regulator and enforcement body that is more fascinated with midget porn than any regulating or enforcing of the very firms it hopes to get an assistant general counsel job from in a few short years.


    Corzine: the face of the crony capitalist Democrat Party.