Monday, March 6, 2017

NY Times writer asks IRS to leak Trump’s tax returns — receives hefty dose of legal advice instead. Need more proof the Left is about power.


Don't think Obama would wiretap Trump and get cover from the mainstream media hacks like Kristof. 



NY Times writer asks IRS to leak Trump’s tax returns — receives hefty dose of legal advice instead

 

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof took to social media Sunday to call for an IRS agent to leak the tax returns of President Donald Trump.
Responding to a tweet from Vox.com editor Matthew Yglesias that said, “It’s impressive that the IRS never leaks,” Kristof tweeted: “But if you’re in IRS and have a certain president’s tax return that you’d like to leak, my address is: NYT, 620 Eighth Ave, NY NY 10018.”

However, instead of the leaked returns, Kristof received stern rebuke — and some unsolicited legal advice.




Others tagged the official Twitter accounts of the FBI and Twitter to alert them of Kristof’s seemingly illegal request:


Still others said Kristof’s request proved their theory about the mainstream media being the “opposition:”




One person even called for Kristof to release his own tax returns:

Another person noted the hypocrisy of the request:

The subject of Trump’s tax returns has been a sour one for most. During his run for the White House, Trump repeatedly promised he would release his tax returns once the IRS stopped auditing him.
However, the IRS said in February 2016 that an audit need not stop him from publicly releasing his tax returns.
Despite Trump’s failure to release any of his tax returns, one of his returns that was more than 20 years old was anonymously leaked to a New York Times beat reporter last October. That return was the subject of an entire news cycle because it showed that Trump potentially avoided paying federal income tax for more than a decade because of a business loss of nearly $1 billion in a single year.
Trump still hasn’t released his tax returns — and he believes the public doesn’t really care.

No comments: