Monday, May 11, 2026

The twisted logic of economics on the left....how many jobs has AOC created compared to Musk and Bezos

print-icon
print-icon

"You Just Can't Earn A Billion Dollars": AOC Declares Billionaires To Be A Capitalist Myth

BY TYLER DURDEN
MONDAY, MAY 11, 2026 - 07:35 AM

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

This week, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) came up with the best reason to tax billionaires: They do not actually exist.

On a podcast, Ocasio-Cortez declared with all the certainty of a freshman in a Smith College political science course that the notion of a self-made billionaire is simply a fantasy, because “you just can’t earn” a billion dollars. It is only the latest in a series of socialist fables that are being dressed up as economic facts.

The difference is that this fable, if told often enough, could become true.

In suggesting that true billionaires are a capitalist myth, Ocasio-Cortez is suggesting that people like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos really did not earn their wealth and, therefore, it is really not their money.

“There’s a certain level of wealth and accumulation that is unearned. You can’t earn a billion dollars. You just can’t earn that. You can get market power, you can break rules, you can abuse labor laws, you can pay people less than what they’re worth, but you can’t earn that.”

In other words, you can only make a billion dollars through theft and exploitation rather than actual entrepreneurial enterprise. This statement comes as support builds for the California billionaires’ tax which, even before it has a chance to pass in November, has already cost the state trillions due to an exodus of these billionaires.

In my book, “Rage and the Republic,” I discuss common myths spread by the left to fuel economic factionalism.

One common myth is that the “wealthy do not pay their fair share of taxes.” In truth, the top ten percent of taxpayers pay the vast majority of taxes in the U.S. In the book, I also dispel the claim that most millionaires inherited their wealth or came from privileged backgrounds.

These myths are designed to make redistribution schemes more palatable. And Democrats are ramping up the “eat-the-rich” rhetoric ahead of the midterms in pushing both millionaire and billionaire taxes. Democrats from Washington to Virginia are pushing millionaire taxes, and the mere conversation has already set off a stampede of high-earning taxpayers to red states like Texas and Florida, which have no state income tax.

It was also evident in this week’s California gubernatorial debate. Candidate Katie Porter (D) said she opposes the billionaire’s tax because it would not go far enough. Porter then pressed the only billionaire in the group, Tom Steyer, who has been moving to the far left to grab voters in the wake of the departure of former Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) as a candidate. Steyer said that he supports the billionaire tax but would want to go even further.

Steyer has spent a fortune of his own money on this race, apparently to convince Democratic primary voters that he is some kind of red billionaire in the mold of a George Soros or Neville Roy Singham. Good luck with that — after spending roughly $150 million of his own money, Steyer is still languishing between 12 and 18 percent support.

Of course, Steyer was not asked if he believes that real billionaires such as himself exist. Yet he has already apologized for making considerable money on private prisons, including those used to hold undocumented immigrants.

Ironically, in finance, a “unicorn” is a company worth more than $1 billion dollars, a term coined by venture capitalist Aileen Lee to capture the rare and almost magical status of such enterprises.

Conversely, Ocasio-Cortez’s unicorn myth is part of a general denial of economic realities that has taken hold on the left. The cost of these policies is borne by workers, who are being left to eat soundbites.

Democrats have sold voters on raising minimum wages as high as $30 per hour, even though such policies cost thousands of jobs. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg bragged about blocking a merger of JetBlue and Spirit Airlines, claiming that it would create cheaper flights and better jobs. Spirit has now been forced to close its doors, causing the loss of thousands of flights and jobs.

A rising generation of voters is eagerly devouring soundbites and promises of the “warmth of collectivism” from figures like New York’s socialist mayor, Zohran Mamdani. From promises of free buses to state-run grocery stores, voters are buying the same threadbare socialist schtick.

That was on display this week as socialist Seattle mayor Katie Wilson laughed when asked about the millionaires fleeing the city over rising taxes and crime. She delighted the crowd by mocking the departing millionaires with two words: “Like, bye!”

The last laugh, however, rests with those fleeing a city facing a projected deficit of $114 million. As Wilson faces major cuts in the city budget, she gleefully mocks those whose tax dollars the city will desperately need to close this gap if it is to maintain public services.

Ironically, Wilson and other Democrats are quickly making their myth a reality. Soon, there will be no billionaire unicorns roaming the land.

Even millionaires may become scarce, as these wealthy citizens move to less hostile states with less delusional leaders.

The solution to this exodus is equally predictable. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who has campaigned for a billionaire tax in his state while representing Silicon Valley, has also joined with socialist Bernie Sanders to push for a national billionaire’s tax — an effort to guarantee that there is no place to hide. This is the same approach that tanked the French economy under François Mitterrand after the wealthy fled that nation.

This is not, however, a time for economics or history. It is the time of fables. Ocasio-Cortez has thrived in the land of socialist unicorns. 

She can even attend the ultra-rich Met Gala wearing an expensive “Tax-the-Rich” gown.

Like her dress, it is fashionable to deny that billionaires created their wealth. It is your money for the taking. 

The result is that billionaires and even millionaires in states like New York may go the way of unicorns, fanciful creatures that once thrived in a land of jobs and growth.

Jonathan Turley is a law professor and the best-selling author of “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.


The problem with government bureaucracies is it's never their money or their children

Family of tragic NYC tots who died under ACS care slam agency over scathing report: ‘Someone has to pay’

The insane in our school systems

Teaching aide allegedly exposed 7-year-old girl in front of students, compared her to ‘porn star’



Nothing will change until the Iranian regime is completely annihilated...it took the total defeat of Japan and Germany to make a difference

Tehran executes 29-year-old grad student accused of being CIA and Mossad spy


Sexual predators

High school counselor busted for allegedly having sex with student on campus

This is why Seattle is a hellhole of progressives

Hawaiian hailed as hero for beating entitled tourist caught hurling rock at beloved seal Lani in viral video



Progressive logic: $20 per hour, but zero hours

Five Guys closing multiple California stores, including 2 LA County locations



Holding the Media Responsible for the SPLC Scandal

Holding the Media Responsible for the SPLC Scandal

For those who have long watched Southern Poverty Law Center and the extraordinary influence it has with the media, the last few weeks have been positively beautiful to behold. 


holding_the_media_responsible_for_the_splc_scandal.html


Christopher Knight | M


We are owed an expansive apology. That however would require sincere admission on the part of the aggressors that they did us wrong.

A vigorous scan through the legacy news from this past two weeks has not turned that up. Indeed, the parties at fault have circled the wagons instead of confronting the problem. They are attempting to make it out that the Department of Justice at the behest of President Trump is executing a campaign of persecution against a “storied civil rights organization,” as CNN on Facebook described Southern Poverty Law Center.

For those who have long watched Southern Poverty Law Center and the extraordinary influence it has with the media, the last few weeks have been positively beautiful to behold. That nigh-unassailable bastion of “anti-racist monitoring” has been indicted in federal court for funneling $3 million of its nonprofit coffers toward paying the very racial extremists it professed to stand against. The scheme could have sprung from the pages of a comic book: SPLC funding neo-Nazis and other white supremacists to actively hate people, so that SPLC could campaign against them. It’s basically akin to the fire department putting the torch to your house and expecting to be paid to put it out.

SPLC’s motives and actions could almost be laughable. But there is no hilarity in this situation. Not with SPLC having fought tooth and claw across the previous five and a half decades to establish itself as the definitive arbiter of “hate” in America. Which in the case of SPLC happens to be anything to the right of the Politburo. Conservative individuals and organizations, and especially Christians, however minimum the magnitude of their actions, have long been cast by SPLC as being “extremist hate mongers” to be abhorred. This, while Southern Poverty turns a blind eye to the violence and mayhem and even loss of life brought about by leftist groups such as Antifa and those inspired by Black Lives Matter.

No, there is not and never has been any intention by the Southern Poverty Law Center to legitimately monitor hate groups. The organization is just as Morris Dees and his confederates intended it to be: a weapon against liberty-minded people and groups that few would dare oppose without also being likened to racists.

And the legacy media agencies have been willing co-conspirators in Southern Poverty Law Center’s wicked agenda against innocent people. Too much so than to let them get away with less than condemnation.

For one giddy moment I thought of telephoning the station I grew up watching. It has been in the tank with Southern Poverty Law Center for decades. I wanted to talk to the general manager and ask him if there would be some disparaging or disavowal of SPLC that we could expect from the station for its years of close alignment with the organization’s modus operandi. But that would have come to nothing substantial.

Not that something shouldn’t happen with the media, however.

For decades, the legacy media has cited the Southern Poverty Law Centeras the definitive resource on hate groups. Whenever “the Klan” re-emerged -- which was always never much than misguided yokels digging out dirty white sheets from the hamper while surrounded by police informants -- there was the left-leaning media waiting to jump on the story. And in recent years that media has ever been vigorous in associating “the Klan” with conservatives in general and President Donald Trump in particular (witness how the establishment press has relished connecting Trump to the events in Charlottesville in 2017).

That is not journalism. That is propaganda.

The mainstream liberal media exists within a bubble, beyond which is a reality that it cannot comprehend. That Southern Poverty Law Center apparently engaged in criminal activity is something that does not compute with most journalists and editors. In fact, it’s downright impossible for them to conceive of the notion. It comes down to emotions and vague intentions. SPLC didn’t really mean to break the law, those of the leftist media will try to persuade us with. “They were only doing good,” we will be told.

It’s very simple with such minds: SPLC was an absolute good and thus anything they stood against was an absolute evil. And even now, they will refuse to admit that an organization they had considered so righteous has actually been exceedingly nefarious in funding those very racists they have portrayed themselves as opposing.

But now the jig is up. And the media who were darlings with the Southern Poverty Law Center have been caught like a chicken in a tractor’s innards, as Slim Pickens in Blazing Saddles more colorfully put it. There is no walking this back for the media. Innocent people lost their reputations, if not careers. Well-meaning and peaceful activists, especially Christians, were painted as violent extremists, a lie that the mainstream media perpetuated. Millions of individuals had their voices silenced as they were completely shut out on Facebook and Twitter regarding public debates on COVID and Joe Biden’s fitness for office, at the urging of Southern Poverty Law Center.

And in addition to these evils and many others, quite a number of commentators have argued that it’s altogether possible that Southern Poverty Law Center played a part in the assassination of Charlie Kirk following his being put on SPLC’s “hate list.” It certainly has motivated others, like the assailant who shot congressman Steve Scalise during baseball practice in 2017.

It is time that we pose a question of our own to the reporters and editors and managers of the traditional press: “Why should we trust you?” In the wake of the indictments against the SPLC -- something that the legacy media would pounce upon evangelical Christians for mere allegation -- how does any such news agency regain its own reputation? Because from where a lot of us are seeing things, the SPLC should be hung like a dead albatross from the neck of every journalist who referred to it as a credible source of information.

With the indictments, there has come a magnificent crack in the media’s stranglehold on American culture. Victims of SPLC for the past fifty years and more would do well to strike while its wounds are fresh, and hold the media inescapably culpable in its activism against the innocent.

If the guiding minds of the traditional media wish to get back in the good graces of the American people, then they would do well to acknowledge the part that they played alongside the Southern Poverty Law Center in destroying the reputations of good and innocent individuals and the groups that they represent. The legacy media will beg forgiveness, and then sincerely promise us that their agencies will proceed forward with more thoughtfulness and less blatant bias.

That is what an ethical and responsible people would do, anyway.

Christopher Knight blogs frequently at theknightshift.com and recently published his first book Keeping the Tryst: A Generation Xer’s Tale of Pop Culture, Faith, Madness, and Love.


Democrat buffoons

Tennessee Democrat Calling for ‘Secession’ in Memphis Previously Questioned Whether Assassination Attempt on Trump Was ‘Staged Act’

Antonio Parkinson

The Democratic state lawmaker calling for Memphis to secede from the State of Tennessee over the new congressional districts signed into law by Governor Bill Lee previously drew controversy in 2024, when he questioned whether the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump was “staged.”

The call by State Representative Antonio Parkinson (D-Memphis) for the city to secede was first highlighted by a reporter for The Tennessean, and the Democrat later wrote in a post to X, “SECESSION NOW! Enough is enough!”

In his post, Parkinson specifically called for the portion of Tennessee, x, “From the eastern border of Nashville – Davidson County to Memphis – Shelby County and the Mississippi River,” to establish itself as “West Tennessee.”

Now generating headlines over the redistricting effort, Parkinson (pictured above) was among Tennessee Democrats who drew controversy over their response to the attempt on Trump’s life in Butler, Pennsylvania, which resulted in his ear being grazed and a member of the audience being fatally shot.

“I certainly hope this is not a staged act,” wrote Parkinson. Alongside an eye-rolling emoji, he added, “But…”

The post prompted immediate condemnations and calls for an apology, and the Memphis Democrat ultimately issued another statement, declaring he was “glad the former president is doing ok” and declaring that his “heart goes out to the families of the victims of today’s violence.”

Amid his remarks about secession in West Tennessee, Parkinson live-streamed his participation in the protest that erupted at the Tennessee State Capitol as the General Assembly passed its redistricting legislation on Thursday, revealing he joined the crowd as it screamed and blew whistles at a television showing lawmakers cast their votes.

“Here we go,” Parkinson appeared to say at the beginning of his live-stream, before later joining the crowd in a chorus of boos.

While Parkinson floats secession, lawsuits have been filed by U.S. Representative Steve Cohen (D-TN-09) and State Representative Justin Pearson (D-Memphis), the Democrats competing for their party’s nomination to represent Tennessee’s 9th Congressional District, as well as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), aiming to reverse the new map.


Hamas loving America hating Democrats..He's been endorsed by Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.), Ilhan Omar (D., Minn.), and other luminaries of the party's far left.


‘This Doctor and His Staff Are Horrible!’ Democratic House Hopeful Under Fire for Terror Ties Denounced as ‘Creep’ Who Left Patients Scarred, Disfigured, According to Complaints

Adam Hamawy’s plastic surgery practice has been the subject of scathing and furious online reviews going back almost a decade. 

Adam Hamawy (drhamawy.com)

The deepest cuts are his reviews.

A New Jersey plastic surgeon now running for Congress—under fire for his long friendship with the notorious, terror-plotting "Blind Sheikh"—has left a string of patients with lifelong burns, scars, and other disfigurement

Adam Hamawy, a far-left progressive, is currently the favorite to win a crowded Democratic primary to replace retiring member Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman in the Garden State's 12th district, which leans heavily Democratic. He's been endorsed by Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.), Ilhan Omar (D., Minn.), and other luminaries of the party's far left.

But at least some of Hamawy's former patients won't be voting for him. In addition to being hit by a lawsuit, Hamawy's plastic surgery practice has been buffeted by a wave of negative Yelp reviews, some going back almost a decade—well before he became prominent politically.

In a harrowing Yelp review from July 2019, a Princeton Junction woman named "Diva S." said she was left permanently burned after seeing Hamawy for a routine laser hair removal treatment.

I left the practice in a significant amount of pain and drove home. Upon arriving home my parents saw my face and asked what happened. That's when I noticed the second degree burns under my chin on my neck. I emailed Princeton Plastic Surgeons asking them what I should do. They got back to me the following morning telling me that "It will be fine. Put Neosporin on it". I asked if they could prescribe me some mediation as the pain was unbearable. Adrienne confirmed that Dr Hamawy would prescribe me medication. However a full day went by and he did not prescribe any medication. I followed up with Adrienne several times and she was of no help. As a last resort my parents took me to the emergency room where I was treated for second degree burns. Three days later Dr Hamawy finally prescribed me medication. Apparently he was too busy up until then to follow up with his own patient. It has been six months since this unfortunate experience and I still have large scars. As an actress by profession these scars have made working very difficult. Dr Hamawy has still not called a single time to follow up.

Diva also included a photo with her review showing the burns with the caption "Second degree burn courtesy of Dr Hamawy."

(Yelp)

In another post from 2025, "Clair T" noted that "this Doctor and his staff are horrible!"—before telling her own story.

"What was supposed to take 45 minutes he completed in 12 minutes, the outcome was filler improperly injected in the wrong areas," she said.

When Clair tried to have the issue resolved, she was told Hamawy was unavailable as he'd left for Gaza, where he famously volunteered at a hospital that sat on top of a Hamas command center.

"He refused to fix improper filler procedure he performed on me. He left lumps under my eyes, chin and my cheek and dark marks on my face that yet to subside," Clair said. "So beware of this physician, he is only out to get your money, once he gets it, he'll do the most terrible job and you will be stuck, he is uncaring about what damage he does to his patient."

In her August 2020 review, Nicole F. in Monroe Township said Hamawy was a "creep" with "awful bedside manner, and the worst attitude ever!" and noted that he was "very rude" when she declined to opt for an invasive procedure he had recommended.

John C warned in a November 2017 review to "Save yourself a lot of grief and unnecessary suffering. Not only is this doctor dishonest, he does not tell you what side effects your procedure will have," he wrote.

"I now have to seek another doctor to undo the damage that Doctor Hamawy did. I have never written a bad review for anyone in my life and only wrote this one because I don't want anyone else to have to go through what I did. I have never in my life had a bad experience with a doctor before this."

Complaints against Hamawy have also made their way to the courts. In July 2017, Annamarie Scarpati, a retired academic support staff member of Princeton University, sued Hamawy, alleging that a botched neck lift and chemical peel left her with "severe and permanent injuries," according to the court filing.

"The above named Defendant was negligent and deviated from the appropriate medical standard of care or standard medical practice; was careless and failed to exercise the degree of knowledge, training, skill and expertise he held himself out to possess; failed to follow and carry out rules, practices and requirements for standard, safe medical diagnosis, care and treatment of Plaintiff; failed and neglected to heed the signs and symptoms that Plaintiff was exhibiting in the course of treatment; failed to administer and perform proper diagnostic steps or treatment necessary to safely and effectively diagnose and treat Plaintiff's condition; failed to otherwise exercise due, proper and reasonable care in the treatment, care, rehabilitation, and convalescence of Plaintiff; and were otherwise careless and negligent in the medical care rendered to Plaintiff," the suit read.

The lawsuit was dismissed in 2022—only after the parties settled for an undisclosed amount.

"We settled because I had moved from New Jersey to Florida, and it was kind of becoming a problem going back and forth and having the right documentation," Scarpati told the Washington Free Beacon by phone. "At the time, I was devastated."

"I wouldn't recommend him to anybody else, because I don't think he did right by me," Scarpati said—adding that she was "shocked" to hear he was running for Congress.

"I don't feel that he has the qualifications to be a congressman, because he's a plastic surgeon."

Hamawy has raised more than $540,000 so far in his quest for Congress. Democrats hold a 13-point advantage in the district, and the winner of the June 2 primary will almost certainly cruise to victory in the November general election. 

In addition to providing medical services at a Hamas command center in Gaza, Hamawy also served as a defense witness in the 1995 trial of terrorist mastermind Omar Abdel-Rahman. The so-called Blind Sheikh was later convicted and sentenced to life in prison for his role in orchestrating the 1993 bombings of the World Trade Center bombings and planning a host of other terrorist attacks.

In his trial testimony, a 26-year-old Hamawy said he maintained a yearslong relationship with the sheikh, visiting his home, traveling with him, and meeting his associates abroad.

"If you need anything, you can just give me a call," Hamawy told Rahman in 1993, just months after the WTC bombing, which left six dead, trial transcripts show.

On Thursday, when confronted by local press, Hamawy refused to denouncehis late mentor, referring to him as a gentle old man who said "innocuous" things.

Reps for Hamawy did not respond to requests for comment from the Free Beacon.