Michael Flynn says he would never have taken 2018 plea deal if he had full FBI evidence in his case
Prosecutors alleged the former three-star general lied about his contacts with a Russian diplomat.
Prosecutors alleged the former three-star general lied about his contacts with a Russian diplomat.
A defense attorney for the Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her two young children before fleeing to Vermont stunningly requested that his client be freed and the case be dismissed on Thursday.
Janette MacAusland’s lawyer, Joseph Krowski, argued to a judge that there wasn’t enough information to keep the 49-year-old Wellesley mom behind bars – despite her allegedly admitting to cops that she killed 7-year-old Kai and 6-year-old Ella and tried to take her own life back in April, according to court records and WCVB.
“I strangled them and then I tried to kill myself,” MacAusland told a Vermont cop at her aunt’s Bennington home, where she showed up out of the blue with bloody wounds across her neck late one night in April, according to a police report.
“I wanted the three of us to go to God together but it didn’t work,” she allegedly told the officer.
MacAusland made the appeal to the judge less than a week after a judge declared a mistrial in the murder case against Lindsey Clancy — who strangled her three children but argued she was suffering extreme postpartum psychosis at the time.
Prosecutors on Wednesday told the Dedham District Court judge that they were still waiting for the medical examiner’s office to determine the children’s official manners of death.
The judge denied Krowski’s requests and ordered that MacAusland remain behind bars without bail on two charges of first-degree murder, to which the mom has pleaded not guilty.
MacAusland, who was an acupuncturist with New England Integrated Health, had been fighting to get custody of the children after her husband filed for divorce last October after nine years of marriage.
The children’s father, Samuel MacAusland, was seeking custody of the couple’s children and home, court filings show.
The bitter legal battle appeared to come to a head when the parents filed a motion to have a third party make recommendations on custody – with a guardian being appointed on April 21, just three days before the slayings.
Prosecutors previously recounted in court that MacAusland had shown up “hysterical” at her aunt’s home,roughly 140 miles away from her $1.5 million mansion in the ritzy Boston suburb, on April 24.
After her concerned aunt called cops, Wellesley police found the bodies of the kids inside of a bedroom, and noted there was “blood spatter everywhere,” according to harrowing dispatch audio.
The children were in kindergarten and second grade at Schofield Elementary School.
The MacAuslands appeared to be a happy family in photos online, with people who knew them describing Janette as a “doting mom.”
Krowski and the Norfolk County District Attorney’s Office didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
Barred from selling the scene of the crime, a Bay Area landlord is trying to rent out his own murdered tenant’s home for $6,300 a month.
A 68-year-old landlord named Philippe Chagniot is trying to rent out his home after allegedly killing 58-year-old Eric Bigone –– his own tenant –– mid-May in front of the house at 2518 46th Avenue in San Francisco.
UCLA is facing fury from 9/11 survivors and victim’s families for hosting a 25th anniversary event featuring the lawyer for the terror attack’s mastermind and a Yale professor who labeled US counterterrorism efforts “racist.”
The UCLA School of Law School is set to open the event, “25 Years After 9/11: Reimagining Freedom, Justice, and Security,” on Thursday before concluding it on the anniversary of the attack that killed more than 3,000 people.
The conversation will be led by a variety of controversial speakers, including Melanie T. Partow, a defense attorney for the “principal architect” of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and Yale professor Aslı Ü. Bâli, who once referred to counterterrorism as a “racist gravy train.”
The tone-deaf event comes as UCLA has faced lawsuits from the Trump administration over allegedly failing to address antisemitism on campus or protect Jewish students and Israeli employees.
“It’s absolutely absurd,” Jim McCaffrey, an FDNY lieutenant at the time of the attacks who responded to the Twin Towers, told the California Post. “They’re pointing fingers at the victims. We’re the bad guys for being attacked. It’s mind-boggling. What’s going on in academia?”
Sally Regenhard, whose firefighter son, Christian, 28, died at Ground Zero, asked: “Can’t 9/11 families get a break?”
“Crazy people say crazy things,” she added, saying her blood boils that 9/11 perpetrators like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed have not been brought to justice. “Let them say it another time.”
Partow is a civil rights and international human rights litigator, according to her lecturer biography at the UC Irvine School of Law. She clerked at the International Criminal Court and recently made headlines for issuing an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Partow has represented Mohammed since at least February 2020 and is a “qualified member of the Military Commissions Defense Organization Civilian Attorney Pool for the detainees held at Guantanamo Bay.”
She is scheduled to speak on a panel titled “Torture, Rendition, and Detention: The Erosion of the Rights Regime post 9/11” that will focus on the “increased counterterrorism authority” the US and other countries have shown following the terror attacks.
No victims of the terror attack are listed among the speakers, and there is set to be little discussion about the actual tragedy or the first responders who died that day.
A 15-minute block, between 8:45 a.m. and 9a.m. Friday, is reserved for a moment of “remembrance” for the day’s victims. The day’s lunch break occupies a full hour.
UCLA Law describes the event as examining the “enduring legacies of 9/11; the ways the legal and political architecture of the post-9/11 era continues to shape contemporary debates about race, migration, surveillance, war, technology, policing, and international law; and think collectively about how to chart a better path forward.”
Bâli, a professor at Yale Law School, penned a 2020 essay questioning America’s approach to national security that claimed counterterrorism served little purpose other than to justify racism.
“Government agencies compete for funding and when they are able to style themselves as essential to national security, they access more revenue,” she wrote. “Law enforcement across the board has a direct funding incentive to characterize minority communities and dissidents as threat incubators. Counterterrorism serves as a kind of racist gravy train.”
Other speakers include Hussam Ayloush, director of the California Council on American-Islamic Relations, who once compared Israel to Nazi Germany and said it “should be attacked.”
“Israel should be attacked. If you continue to occupy people’s land, every means according to international law to defend and resist the occupation is [in] your hand,” he said just a month after the Oct. 7, 2023 massacre.
Ayloush and Bâli will speak at a panel titled “From Crisis to Legacy: 25 Years of the War on Terror and the Struggle to Reimagine Freedom, Justice, and Security.”
Another speaker, University of Minnesota Law school professor Amna Akbar, once called Luigi Mangione’s alleged murder of UnitedHealthCare CEO Brian Thompson a “spectacular act of protest.”
“Calls to ‘Free Luigi’ on the streets and inside jails express solidarity not just with one man, but against the catastrophic realities of capitalism, where necessities like health care, food, and housing are financialized commodities that few can truly afford,” she wrote in a January 2025 essay. “This is the system UnitedHealthcare stands for and profits from. This is the system that Mangione (allegedly) took aim at.”
The symposium will also discuss “the ongoing genocide in Gaza” and “White Christian nationalism.”
The event marks the latest controversy surrounding UCLA, which was sued by the Trump administration in February over claims of vile antisemitic acts at the school — including death threats, swastikas scrawled on university buildings and a statue depicting a pig holding a Jewish star and a bag of money.
In May, the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division sued the university alleging the school allowed students to create “Jewish exclusion zones” and attack their Jewish classmates after the Oct. 7 attacks.
A month earlier, the UCLA student government condemned an appearance by Omer Shem Tov, an Israeli man taken hostage and tortured during 505 days in captivity.
“While we affirm the humanity of all people impacted by violence, we reject the selective platforming of narratives that obscure the broader reality of ongoing state violence,” the UCLA student association said of the event, held on Holocaust Remembrance Day.
UC Regent Jay Sures slammed the UCLA student government, saying he was “disgusted” and “appalled” by the group’s stance.
The university appeared to defend its 9/11 event, telling the Washington Free Beacon that the law school “has a longstanding commitment to academic freedom and to fostering a wide range of scholarly inquiry.”
“Events organized by an individual UCLA Law program, centers, or institutes — and the views expressed — do not imply endorsement by UCLA Law, and neither the language of this symposium nor the views of its speakers should be understood as representing the school as a whole,” the spokesman said. “UCLA Law does not review or approve these choices, nor does the school withdraw invitations because a speaker or viewpoint is sensitive or controversial.”
Professional lawyers can earn continuing legal education (CLE) credits by attending the event, according to UCLA. The credits are mandatory to keep actively practicing law in California.
The California Post contacted UCLA Law and Partow for comment.
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament of the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand.
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use united force to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.