Monday, July 27, 2026

Deep State In "Fight To The Death" To Defend Voter Fraud


Deep State In "Fight To The Death" To Defend Voter Fraud

BY TYLER DURDEN
MONDAY, JUL 27, 2026 - 09:25 AM

Via Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com,

Journalist Alex Newman is an expert on the so-called Deep State.  He is the author of the longtime popular book “Deep State” and, most recently, “Deep State 2.0.” 

The Deep State is not a conspiracy theory.  It is a conspiracy fact. 

This year, the Deep State will be going to war with the Trump Administration to hold onto the voter fraud that has won them elections for many years.  Without voter fraud, Deep State Democrats lose and lose big in the midterms.  They are fighting every way they can to keep the cheating going.  

The Trump Administration is threatening fines and jail time if the Dems in Blue States “Refuse to Cooperate to Secure Elections.”  It is so bad that Harvard PhD and political expert Dr. Jerome Corsi says President Trump must “Stop Voter Fraud or Lose the Republic.”  The fight is going to get much more intense and violent before the midterm elections in November. 

Alex Newman says:

“Voter integrity is one of the arenas where this fight to the death is taking place. 

We are going to determine in the not-so-distant future if the Deep State and those who hate America and our Constitutional Republic are going to control the most powerful military and most powerful economy in the world, or are ‘We the People’ going to exert control over the government we created to protect our liberties?  

It will be a fight to the death.  

There is no option these two can end up with control of the government.  We have a long fight ahead.”

This is no small thing as the very existence of America hangs in the balance in November.  Newman says, “I don’t think the Left, the Deep Staters or totalitarians are going to roll over and play dead here..."

"They realize everything is at stake, and if they get caught, a lot of them are going to end up in jail...

We are talking about treason, and that is a key point to understand.  This is not just a little crime, a misdemeanor or steering government contracts to your brother-in-law.  This is an effort to subvert our form of government...

President Trump made it very clear that this is not just a domestic subversive movement.  He made clear there are international forces involved such as communist China very directly . . . as one of the players to rig our elections...

President Trump spoke about how Deep State swamp creatures within the intelligence agencies and law enforcement deliberately suppressed the information they had about communist China trying to manipulate and steal our elections.  What we are talking about, to be very clear, is treason.  It’s an effort to seize control or perpetuate control over the most powerful country on the face of the earth.”

If the Deep State loses total control, Newman says you can expect the very worst.  Newman explains,

“I believe there is a very good chance that this goes nuclear.  

That might be the Iranians trying to launch a nuke . . . or the Russians trying to use a nuke, or it could be the communist Chinese using a nuke.  

I think that is a very real possibility, especially if it looks like the whole thing is going to unravel and Americans are going to regain control of their country.”

The Deep State has tentacles all over the world, including the International Criminal Court, the UN and politicians installed in governments of many of our so-called allies.

In closing, Newman says, “I think we all need to be involved, and we all need to be praying for the President..."

"  In fact, the Bible commands us to pray for those in authority whether you like them or not.  We need to recognize this is much bigger than a personality and much bigger than a party.  Please recognize that right now, President Trump, his Administration and the Hand of God are the only things standing between the people of the United States with our liberties and constitutional form of government and a global totalitarian political, economic and religious system that they have been telling us about openly for decades. . ..   We better hope Trump succeeds and do everything in our power to help him succeed.  

One of the key milestones is making sure we have a secure 2026 Election. . .. We are playing for all the marbles.  That is a very good way to put it.  If Donald Trump is not successful, I don’t know if we are going to have another opportunity to stop this . . .. controlled demolition of America.”

There is much more in the jam-packed 43-minute interview.

Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog as he goes One-on-One with hard-hitting journalist Alex Newman to talk about the stunning new Deep State revelations found in his new book called “Deep State 2.0” and the fight to the death coming for voter integrity coming this November for 7.25.26.

To order “Deep State 2.0” click here.

To support Alex Newman with electronic donations, click here.

Posted by jerry at 10:42 AM 0 comments

Mamdani publishes a hit list for his rabid loons

Mamdani publishes names and addresses of all NYC property owners who could be hit with new pied-à-terre tax

By 
Chris Nesi
Published July 27, 2026
 Updated July 27, 2026,
Posted by jerry at 10:36 AM 0 comments

Anti white racism

California family left in a pool of blood after horrific ‘anti-white’ attack at exclusive Hawaii resort



By 
Daniel Farr
Published July 26, 2026, 10:21 a.m.
Posted by jerry at 10:22 AM 0 comments

Some will get big pay raises, some will get no pay at all

CALIFORNIA NEWS 
EXCLUSIVE

Smoking gun letter reveals LAUSD ignored dire budget warning before approving huge staff pay raises



By 
Benjamin Brown
Published July 26, 2026,
Posted by jerry at 10:18 AM 0 comments

But the motive is unknown....bwahaha

Crazed Paris terrorist cuts down 3 women, then screams, ‘Allah commanded me’


By 
Chris Nesi
Published July 27, 2026
Posted by jerry at 9:38 AM 0 comments

How the left has corrupted the jury system

SHOCKING: 75,000 Noncitizens Summoned for Jury Duty in New Jersey Every Year as State’s Voter-Roll Scandal Explodes

By  Jul. 26, 2026
Posted by jerry at 9:32 AM 0 comments

The people in favor of closing all prisons!

Feeding Our Future Fraudster Gets 10 More Years for Trying to Buy a Verdict


Scott McClallen  |  Another person has been sentenced to prison related to the $250 million Feeding Our Future fraud scheme.

Abdiaziz Shafii Farah, 37, was sentenced to 120 months’ imprisonment for attempting to bribe a federal juror during his 2024 fraud trial. 


Posted by jerry at 9:29 AM 0 comments

Marxist/socialist/communists produce nothing but try to steal everything...can you imagine this buffoon running a large corporation?

DSA Co-Chair to Fox News: We Want to Abolish Everything and Seize Corporations

Jorge Bonilla
July 26th, 2026 5:48 PM

Text to Speech

00:0000:00
Font Size
 

Throughout this cycle, the Elitist Media have abetted DSA-affiliated candidates running as Democrats: gleefully amplified socialists such as Zohran Mamdani and covered for the sins of others such as Graham Platner. Through it all, they have assisted them in concealing what the Democratic Socialists of America actually stand for. A recent Fox News interview rips that veil open.

Shannon Brean interviewed DSA national co-chair Megan Romer on Fox News Sunday. Here are some of that interview’s most remarkable moments.

After an introduction and exchange of pleasantries, Bream asks Romer to respond to former Democratic National Committee chair Jaime Harrison’s complaints about DSA candidates who hate the Democrat Party. Her response confirms what many of have suspected all along:

 

 

SHANNON BREAM: So Jamie Harrison, who was the DNC chair, after you had such a big night in New York City knocking out some of those incumbents and having success with your candidates in the congressional primaries, he said if you hate the Democratic Party, then don't run for our nomination. Don't use our resources and don't rely on our volunteers and don't use our infrastructure and focus on building the party you actually support. Other Democrats out there saying this is a separate party- the DSA- you don't belong within the party. How do you respond to his statements there?

MEGAN ROMER: Yeah, I mean- the two parties have over years and decades created a system where ballot line access is difficult for third parties. I also have been told a lot of times by Democrats “don't vote third party, it’s wasting your vote.” So we run on the Democratic ballot line where it makes sense. We run independents sometimes where that is a viable possibility, but it's a ballot line. And what matters is what the voters think, and the voters are overwhelmingly choosing our candidate.

Romer essentially admits that the DSA is essentially a third party latching on to Democrat structures for ballot access, and that their voters are totally fine with that. Bream then moves on to specific policy positions platformed by the DSA. Although we often focus on the “Abolish ICE” and “Abolish the Supreme Court” portions of their platform, be sure to watch this clip to the very end:

 

intranet image

 

SHANNON BREAM: OK, so we’re going to put on the screen a few things that are part of your platform and I want to ask you to give me sort of a true or false on these: Abolish the Senate.

MEGAN ROMER: True.

BREAM: Okay. Replace the presidency and Supreme Court as we now know them.

ROMER: Yup.

BREAM: Abolish ICE?

ROMER: Absolutely.

BREAM: Abolish borders and give amnesty to anyone currently in the U.S. illegally.

ROMER: As a long term plan, yup.

BREAM: Defund the Pentagon.

ROMER: Absolutely.

BREAM: Abolish prisons, at least in large part.

ROMER: Yeah, again as part of a long term program- yeah.

BREAM: Okay, so no prisons. Government or public ownership of most large corporations.

ROMER: Yeah. Absolutely.

“Government or public ownership of most large corporations” doesn’t mean a 10% stake, but outright seizure. Of the means of production. The DSA co-chair doesn’t deny or dissimulate, either. This is a clarifying moment that we’ve not seen anywhere on Elitist Media. Instead, we get anchors saying DSA are “not communists.”

Bream then pushes for clarification on some of the earlier policy items such as “Abolish the Senate”:

 

 

SHANNON BREAM: OK, let's go back through some of those then. Abolish the Senate. There are people in the Senate now who are very supportive of DSA. They lose their seats?

ROMER: Well- the Senate is an anachronistic institution. It comes from the British House of Lords. It is made to protect power for -- the Senate was part of the system made to make sure people didn't have too much of a say, so we want to expand Congress significantly but make it a unicameral legislature.

BREAM: Okay, and without the presidency and the Supreme Court. So, abolish ICE. Would there be any enforcement of immigration laws- or with abolishing the border there’s- we’re not enforcing immigration laws, they go away.

ROMER: Yeah- so, again. This is part of this longer term plan, and part of it includes- think-

BREAM: But if you can get there.

ROMER: Yeah, if we can get to the place where the U.S. is not destabilizing countries in order to mine them for resources, there will be significantly less migration. If we are not-

BREAM: What do you say to those, though, that that would potentially destabilize the U.S.? Because there's only so much the economy can bear, and when you have a flood of people coming in it might not work out economically, according to a lot of analyses, if you just open up the borders and there's no enforcement at all.

ROMER: Well, we’re not saying open the borders tomorrow.

BREAM: But eventually.

ROMER: We are saying rebuild an economy in a society that works for everyone. And the open borders is part of a longer term international plan that involves us stopping destabilizing countries. Most people who are coming to this country are coming as economic refugees and we have destabilized their country. We did that.

BREAM: Well, a lot of- you know, if you look at data, the Center for Immigration Studies says right now the people- the households here in the U.S. that are headed up by people who are here illegally, nearly 61% of them are on some type of government or welfare program here in the U.S. Can we afford to do that? I mean, at some point you run out of resources.

ROMER: Well, right now we make it very difficult for people to participate in society in such a way that they can avoid using services. So we want people to be able to work and live and go to school and actually participate which means contributing to society and also getting that we need from society.

BREAM: Okay.

ROMER: It’s a collective choice we all make.

It should be noted that the Senate, presidency, and Supreme Court cannot be abolished except by drastically amending the Constitution itself. Romer goes on to describe what Congress might actually look like. When asked about abolishing ICE, Romer goes into a redistributionist rant wherein she blames America for people being here illegally. Conversely, illegal immigration can only be stopped by making America into the sort of country people would also flee.

Finally, Bream engages Romer on the DSA’s call for abolishing prisons:

 

 

SHANNON BREAM: If we talk about abolishing prisons, does that make society better? Is there anyone who should be incarcerated? Rapists, child predators?

ROMER: When we think about most people in prison. Mostly imprisoned for crimes of poverty.

BREAM: But I am talking about the really --

ROMER: Right. When we get rid of this need for crimes of poverty to exist, when we get rid of that destabilizing force that creates so many people who are living in desperate situations and doing desperate things, that brings those numbers down to a very small numbers and then we can collectively decide what we do with those people. I suspect it won't look like the prison system as we know it today.

BREAM: But you do think some people need to be locked away from society.

ROMER: Some people are not able to be functional members of society. That's true. But what does that look like to keep the rest of us safe? We are talking about safety, we are not talking about punishment. We are talking about making sure that we are safe, everybody is safe, everybody maintains their dignity and everybody maintains their humanity. 

Romer tried to go around the issue as much as she could but could not commit to the idea of locking murderers and rapists away for the rest of their lives. “We are talking about safety, we are not talking about punishment.” 

At a time when socialism is increasingly popular among the left, the Elitist Media seem more interested in hiding from the public what that means. More perverse than the usual bias by omission, this seems to be a perverse accommodation in pursuit of access to future power. In all, the interview performed an extremely valuable public service. May the rest take note.


Posted by jerry at 9:26 AM 0 comments

Sunday, July 26, 2026

Diversity Barriers

UK Cities Roll Out More Diversity Barriers; Vehicle-Ramming Threat Now The Norm

BY TYLER DURDEN
SUNDAY, JUL 26, 2026 - 04:00 AM

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

A family summer beach event in the UK city of Nottingham now sits behind portable anti-ram steel barrier, the latest admission that open borders have turned public spaces into soft targets.

Local authorities across Britain are quietly installing more of what critics now call "diversity barriers" - heavy portable steel devices designed to stop vehicles being driven into crowds.

The annual artificial "Nottingham Beach" event opened this week behind a line of bright red Husson H-Stop units.

About 15 of the barriers now block the four main entrances. They tip upward on impact, changing a vehicle's trajectory and generating enough friction to halt a three-and-a-half-tonne truck travelling at 30 mph.

Councillors and organisers insist the move is simply a precaution. The multi-agency safety group that approved them included counter-terrorism officers.

Councillor Neghat Khan, leader of Nottingham City Council, described them as an "additional safety measure" installed "following advice from the multi-agency events safety advisory group, which includes counter-terrorism colleagues."

Event organiser James Mellors was more blunt: "I don't think they look very pretty. But the Market Square is a very high footfall area. It's not always about how things look, it's about keeping people safe."

A regular visitor, Amanda Hose Hawley, said she was "not surprised" and called the barriers "a sign of the climate we live in."

The language is careful, the justification technical. Yet the reason these barriers exist is no mystery.

Across Europe, radical Islamists have repeatedly turned vehicles into weapons against ordinary people gathered in public spaces. Britain is simply catching up with the physical reality already visible on the Continent.

Last winter German towns were forced into even more extreme measures. In the small Bavarian community of Külsheim, officials resorted to recycled anti-tank barriers pulled from old military barracks.

Four massive concrete blocks, each 1.4 metres wide and weighing several tonnes, were painted red and white and placed around the Christmas market.

The town's mayor, Simone Hickl-Seitz, explained the grim arithmetic: "They know exactly that all cities need this. But the coffers are empty."

Bollards that once cost €800 had risen tenfold in price because demand had exploded. The anti-tank relics saved the town €30,000.

That was not an isolated improvisation. Security spending on German Christmas markets rose 44 percent in three years, according to the Federal Association of City and Town Marketing.

Some towns simply cancelled their markets rather than meet the new requirements. The pressure intensified after the December 2024 Magdeburg attack, in which a Saudi national living in Germany for nearly two decades drove a vehicle through a Christmas market, killing six and injuring hundreds.

AfD politician Ulrich Siegmund cut through the official euphemisms: "Why do we need to protect Christmas markets? Go to Czech Republic, Poland - they haven't opened borders... We are losing our freedom bit by bit."

The same pattern has been documented in footage that circulated widely at the time. One widely viewed report showed Berlin's markets ringed by the same style of heavy concrete barriers once intended to stop invading armies, not shoppers buying Glühwein.

Britain's new portable barriers are lighter and more mobile, but they serve the identical purpose. Hostile vehicle mitigation has become standard guidance from the National Protective Security Authority.

Official documents now list crash-rated bollards, vehicle barriers and stand-off distances as core measures against "vehicle as a weapon" attacks.

The threat is no longer theoretical. In October 2025 a man who pledged allegiance to Islamic State used a vehicle and a bladed weapon outside a Manchester synagogue, killing three. Other plots and attacks across Europe have followed the same method: low-skill, high-impact, directed at soft civilian targets.

The Nottingham installation is being described as a trial. Organisers say there was no specific intelligence of an imminent attack. That claim misses the larger point.

Permanent or semi-permanent barriers are appearing at markets, festivals, high streets and public squares precisely because the background risk has become chronic.

Before the era of mass, uncontrolled immigration from regions where Islamist ideology remains mainstream, British towns did not need steel ramps that can stop a truck.

Children played in squares without negotiating "filter" gaps between anti-ram devices. Christmas markets did not require military surplus concrete painted in festive colours.

Now the physical landscape of everyday life is being redesigned around the assumption that someone may try to drive a vehicle into a crowd of shoppers, holidaymakers or beachgoers. The barriers are painted bright red and labelled H-STOP so no one can claim they are invisible. Their very visibility is the admission.

The cost is not only financial. Every barrier is a quiet confession that the post-1990s experiment in open borders has produced a security environment European cities once associated with conflict zones.

Politicians continue to speak of "community cohesion" and "diversity as strength" while the practical response is to harden every public gathering against the most predictable form of attack.

Nottingham's beach will close at the end of the summer and the portable barriers will be stored away. The underlying problem will not. The same devices, or heavier permanent versions, will reappear at the next festival, the next market, the next Christmas period.

Local authorities are not inventing a threat; they are reacting to one that has already left bodies in European streets and forced democratic societies to turn festive spaces into fortified zones.

The choice facing Britain and the rest of the West remains the same one German politicians have already faced: continue importing the conditions that make these barriers necessary, or finally reverse the policies that created the danger in the first place. Concrete and steel can stop a truck. They cannot restore a country that no longer feels safe enough to gather without them.


Posted by jerry at 11:08 AM 0 comments
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)