Bernie Sanders is known to many for taking on Bernie Sanders is known to many for taking on Hillary Clinton in a bid to become the Democratic candidate in next year's race for the White House. But his brother has been fighting a political battle of his own in the UK.
Larry Sanders sounds pretty cheerful for a person who recently lost an election.
The 80-year-old retired social worker and academic came fifth in the seat of Oxford West and Abingdon in May, representing the Green Party.
"Although we didn't win, we increased our share of the vote... we recruited new members and established new branches," he says.
He has lived in the UK since emigrating from his native New York in the late 1960s, but his voice still bears a trace of his childhood which was spent in Midwood, Brooklyn, from where his father used to travel to Long Island to sell paint.
That, he explains, was where his awareness of politics began.
"As a Jewish child growing up in the 1940s, in the shadow of the war, you saw quite starkly that politics was a life-and-death thing.
"But on a less dark note it was also the period of the New Deal. Our parents, who were not very political, believed politics could do something tangible for us. We didn't have many books in the house, but we had a good public library and a free college, Brooklyn College, which helped me get an education."
The "us" he mentions includes his younger brother, Bernie Sanders, familiar to Americans as the left-wing challenger to Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination in the 2016 presidential race.
Bernie is known for his progressive political agenda - a critic of the gulf between the richest 1% and the rest of the country, and an advocate of expanding social benefits and raising the minimum wage.
The two brothers each had a protracted journey towards party politics.
Bernie Sanders - unusually in US politics - began his career outside the two big parties. He was associated with the Liberty Union movement early on, later founding the Progressive Party and from 1988 onwards, running as an independent.
He has, in the past, argued that a third party is needed in US politics, but justifies his decision to stand as a Democrat.
He told The Nation last year: "If you run outside of the Democratic Party… you're not just running a race for president, you're really running to build an entire political movement. In doing that, you would be taking votes away from the Democratic candidate."
Larry, meanwhile, trained as a social worker and became a lecturer - first at the University of West London and later at Oxford University's department of social administration.
"I had been an active member of Labour in the 1980s, but it had become rather feeble. I noticed that in Oxford Labour councillors were voting with Conservatives, and the only person dissenting was a Green councillor.
"I stood unsuccessfully for them [the Green Party] a couple of times and was eventually elected to Oxfordshire County Council in 2005."
Discussing the Greens' limited success at general elections, Larry points to a "basic Conservative-Labour agreement on the fundamentals of the economy" which makes it "hard for a challenger to break through".
"It's not helped by the electoral system and right-wing press. There's also the problem of sheer money - which is bad, but not quite as bad as it is in the US," he says.
Larry calculates that he spent £3,000 on his campaign, whereas the official spending limit for candidates was more than ten times that.
Bernie faces a similar hurdle but on a much larger scale. While recent polls have put him within one point of Clinton in New Hampshire, and within 23 points in Iowa - two of the first states to vote - some warn his success may be limited.
"Bernie can only get so far with his small donor fundraising strategy - it might work in Iowa or New Hampshire, but after the small states it gets more difficult, you can't buy the TV ads you need," says Kyle Kondik, an analyst of political campaigns at the University of Virginia.
He cautions that Bernie seems to enjoy most of his popularity "in liberal enclaves and college towns - it's indicative of a hunger among some liberals for someone who is not Clinton".
"Bernie's supporters are not representative of the mainstream of US politics - or even the mainstream of the Democratic Party."
It's not a view Larry subscribes to.
"I don't think what I want, and what Bernie wants, is extreme," he says. "The things we are talking about are not very left-wing: having a proper health service, having enough money to eat, to heat your home."
In this sense, Larry can see a clear parallel between his political efforts and Bernard's (as he always refers to his brother).
"Although we didn't have a shot at winning, there was an intrinsic value in the Green Party standing, and it's the same for Bernard.
"The primaries last for a long time and candidates get a lot of attention so there will be a platform for his views. It's important he's there to say the things nobody else will say.
"The past 30 years have seen growing inequality in the UK and the US, and a failure by Labour here and by many Democrats there to address it. People feel excluded and there's a lot of anger, which Bernard is tapping into."
Larry still has US citizenship and he promises that, not only will he vote for his brother "at every opportunity", but he will be travelling to the US to work on the campaign.
Does Bernie have more of a chance than Larry did? The older brother laughs and says: "I wouldn't count him out."
Hillary Clinton in a bid to become the Democratic candidate in next year's race for the White House. But his brother has been fighting a political battle of his own in the UK.
Larry Sanders sounds pretty cheerful for a person who recently lost an election.
The 80-year-old retired social worker and academic came fifth in the seat of Oxford West and Abingdon in May, representing the Green Party.
"Although we didn't win, we increased our share of the vote... we recruited new members and established new branches," he says.
He has lived in the UK since emigrating from his native New York in the late 1960s, but his voice still bears a trace of his childhood which was spent in Midwood, Brooklyn, from where his father used to travel to Long Island to sell paint.
That, he explains, was where his awareness of politics began.
"As a Jewish child growing up in the 1940s, in the shadow of the war, you saw quite starkly that politics was a life-and-death thing.
"But on a less dark note it was also the period of the New Deal. Our parents, who were not very political, believed politics could do something tangible for us. We didn't have many books in the house, but we had a good public library and a free college, Brooklyn College, which helped me get an education."
The "us" he mentions includes his younger brother, Bernie Sanders, familiar to Americans as the left-wing challenger to Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination in the 2016 presidential race.
Bernie is known for his progressive political agenda - a critic of the gulf between the richest 1% and the rest of the country, and an advocate of expanding social benefits and raising the minimum wage.
The two brothers each had a protracted journey towards party politics.
Bernie Sanders - unusually in US politics - began his career outside the two big parties. He was associated with the Liberty Union movement early on, later founding the Progressive Party and from 1988 onwards, running as an independent.
He has, in the past, argued that a third party is needed in US politics, but justifies his decision to stand as a Democrat.
He told The Nation last year: "If you run outside of the Democratic Party… you're not just running a race for president, you're really running to build an entire political movement. In doing that, you would be taking votes away from the Democratic candidate."
Larry, meanwhile, trained as a social worker and became a lecturer - first at the University of West London and later at Oxford University's department of social administration.
"I had been an active member of Labour in the 1980s, but it had become rather feeble. I noticed that in Oxford Labour councillors were voting with Conservatives, and the only person dissenting was a Green councillor.
"I stood unsuccessfully for them [the Green Party] a couple of times and was eventually elected to Oxfordshire County Council in 2005."
Discussing the Greens' limited success at general elections, Larry points to a "basic Conservative-Labour agreement on the fundamentals of the economy" which makes it "hard for a challenger to break through".
"It's not helped by the electoral system and right-wing press. There's also the problem of sheer money - which is bad, but not quite as bad as it is in the US," he says.
Larry calculates that he spent £3,000 on his campaign, whereas the official spending limit for candidates was more than ten times that.
Bernie faces a similar hurdle but on a much larger scale. While recent polls have put him within one point of Clinton in New Hampshire, and within 23 points in Iowa - two of the first states to vote - some warn his success may be limited.
"Bernie can only get so far with his small donor fundraising strategy - it might work in Iowa or New Hampshire, but after the small states it gets more difficult, you can't buy the TV ads you need," says Kyle Kondik, an analyst of political campaigns at the University of Virginia.
He cautions that Bernie seems to enjoy most of his popularity "in liberal enclaves and college towns - it's indicative of a hunger among some liberals for someone who is not Clinton".
"Bernie's supporters are not representative of the mainstream of US politics - or even the mainstream of the Democratic Party."
It's not a view Larry subscribes to.
"I don't think what I want, and what Bernie wants, is extreme," he says. "The things we are talking about are not very left-wing: having a proper health service, having enough money to eat, to heat your home."
In this sense, Larry can see a clear parallel between his political efforts and Bernard's (as he always refers to his brother).
"Although we didn't have a shot at winning, there was an intrinsic value in the Green Party standing, and it's the same for Bernard.
"The primaries last for a long time and candidates get a lot of attention so there will be a platform for his views. It's important he's there to say the things nobody else will say.
"The past 30 years have seen growing inequality in the UK and the US, and a failure by Labour here and by many Democrats there to address it. People feel excluded and there's a lot of anger, which Bernard is tapping into."
Larry still has US citizenship and he promises that, not only will he vote for his brother "at every opportunity", but he will be travelling to the US to work on the campaign.
Does Bernie have more of a chance than Larry did? The older brother laughs and says: "I wouldn't count him out."
Keep these in mind as you contemplate the direction of the American government over the past 50 years and especially since the Obama election.
The Goals of Communism
(as read into the congressional record January 10, 1963, from "The Naked Communist" by Cleon Skousen)
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament of the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand.
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use united force to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.
No comments:
Post a Comment