The Evening Standard
reported on Airbnb’s patent for AI that crawls and scrapes everything it can find on you, “including social media for traits such as ‘conscientiousness and openness’ against the usual credit and identity checks and what it describes as ‘secure third-party databases’.”
Blue makes the connection to China, where similarly invasive surveillance is used to build a profile and a social credit score on every citizen:
The most famous social credit system in operation is that used by China’s government. It “monitors millions of individuals’ behavior (including social media and online shopping), determines how moral or immoral it is, and raises or lowers their “citizen score” accordingly,” reported Atlantic in 2018.
…
Trooly — nee Airbnb — is combining social credit scores with predictive policing. Tools like
PredPol use AI that combines data points and historical events, factors like race and location, digital footprints and crime statistics, to predict likelihood of when and where crimes will occur (as well as victims and perpetrators). It’s no secret that predictive policing
replicates and perpetuates discrimination.
Last August,
Fast Company made the same observation, pointing out that Silicon Valley’s combination of invasive surveillance with arbitrary user policies meant that “a parallel system” to China’s is being created in the United States.
Blue is upset because the same methods that have been used to monitor and blacklist conservatives and right-wingers (many of whom have been kicked off Airbnb for political reasons) are now being used to ban prostitutes, a profession championed by the intersectional left.
Combine this with companies like Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and yes, Airbnb deciding what legal behaviors are acceptable for service, and now we’re looking at groups of historically marginalized people being denied involvement in mainstream economic, political, cultural and social activities — at scale.
This week AP reported that Facebook and Instagram are doing exactly that. “Activists, sex therapists, abuse survivors, artists and sex educators,” are being unfairly censored by both services. “And it’s no small matter for them. Artists can be suddenly left without their audience, businesses without access to their customers and vulnerable people without a support network … it means that a company in Silicon Valley, whose online platforms have become not only our town squares but diaries, magazines, art galleries and protest platforms, gets final say on matters of free speech and self-expression.”
Silicon Valley companies getting the final say on matters of free speech? Woah!
Sound the alarms! Social media companies as the new town squares? That might be a groundbreaking argument,
if PragerU hadn’t already made it three years ago. Unaccountable corporations, using their power to circumvent the democratic system and ban otherwise-legal behavior? It’s only something Breitbart Tech has been talking about for
one,
two,
three, let’s say
four years at a conservative estimate.
Given that Violet Blue takes issue with tech companies “deciding what legal behaviors are acceptable for service,” this means she will surely get behind political efforts to force social media companies to be strictly value-neutral in their approach to content. You know, like
Rep. Louie Gohmert’s and
Rep. Paul Gosar’s and
Sen. Josh Hawley’s.
It’s only a matter of time, right?
Are you an insider at Google, Facebook, Twitter or any other tech company who wants to confidentially reveal wrongdoing or political bias at your company? Reach out to Allum Bokhari at his secure email address allumbokhari@protonmail.com.
Allum Bokhari is the senior technology correspondent at Breitbart News.
No comments:
Post a Comment