When parents pay twice to escape public schools, the verdict is in
FEBRUARY 13, 2026Us
Internal communications from the Obama Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) show that staffers rushed to publish a landmark climate regulation at a plum time for political messaging and imagining “group hugs” with green groups ahead of the announcement.
The regulation, known as the Endangerment Finding, expanded the definition of harmful air pollutants to include greenhouse gasses like carbon dioxide and therefore allows the EPA to regulate them under the Clean Air Act. The Trump EPA proposed a rule to rescind it in July 2025 and is expected to announce the final verdict on Thursday, a decision critics have previously told the Daily Caller News Foundation would be a boon for key industries and consumer choice.
Obama EPA officials were hoping to announce the Endangerment Finding proposal ahead of Earth Day, internally flagging concerns over missing the self-imposed deadline related to “domestic and foreign criticism [that] would begin immediately and mount steadily,” according to a memorandum for Obama attributed to former EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, dated March 2009. The proposed Finding was announcedon April 17, 2009.
Weeks after former President Barack Obama’s inauguration, on Feb. 16, 2009, an EPA official wrote that “the Sierra Club and other petitioners” who challenged a previous agency memo “will NOT be asking the court to stay the memo tomorrow. So, we should all be celebrating together tomorrow, and the Green Group meeting should be cause for a group hug. Have a good night.”
Though the timeline is unclear, other versions of these EPA documents redacted the sentence, “so, we should all be celebrating together tomorrow, and the Green Group meeting should be cause for a group hug,” and documents obtained by the government watchdog, Protect The Public’s Trust, include the full statement.
“The endangerment finding was an unprecedented power grab. These records provide evidence, if more were needed, that EPA leadership in the very early days of the Obama administration was determined to rush it through to achieve the bureaucratic coup regardless of the data, facts, or traditional process,” Michael Chamberlain, director of the government watchdog, Protect The Public’s Trust, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “They set artificial deadlines, attempted to steamroll procedural niceties, and coordinated with outside activist organizations. The records also reveal attempts by subsequent EPA staff to shield the officials involved by hiding embarrassing information from disclosure that was clearly not eligible for the justifications used to conceal it.” (RELATED: Trump Admin Reportedly On Precipice Of Axing Climate Agenda Cornerstone)
2025 EPA 07148 Records Combined by audreystreb
Mandy Gunasekara, a former EPA chief of staff under the first Trump administration, also told the DCNF that the Endangerment Finding was “more political than scientific.”
“We had good evidence of the politicization and how this was prebaked, prior to them initiating the process, but I don’t know that we had as clear of evidence that we do now,” Gunasekara told the DCNF. “The suggestion that this was some comprehensive scientific analysis is laughable.”
The reason for the “group hug” redaction is currently unclear. However, an EPA spokesperson told the DCNF that “the Obama-era Endangerment Finding was never about sound science, following the law, or protecting human health, it was about fulfilling a radical political agenda.”
“Their rule wasn’t built on gold standard science; it was built on climate alarmism and creative legal fiction with the goal of expanding EPA’s power beyond what Congress intended. Sixteen years later, it’s painfully clear those doomsday predictions didn’t happen. The same flawed models and fear-based assumptions that fueled climate hysteria have failed every real-world test,” the EPA spokesperson continued. “The Trump EPA has since confirmed what common sense always knew. Even if America ended every vehicle emission tomorrow, it would make no measurable difference to the global climate by 2100. The Trump EPA is ending the reign of the climate change religion and putting the American people, not radical activists, back in charge of our energy future.”
The March 2009 memorandum from Jackson notes that “climate change is the most pressing environmental issue of our time, and the ‘endangerment finding’ soon to be issued by EPA will be the United States Government’s first official recognition of this threat. I would urge that this announcement be the major Presidential event of this year’s Earth Week.”
Similar language to the memorandum went on to appear in the April 2009 proposed finding, which stated that “in both magnitude and probability, climate change is an enormous problem. The greenhouse gases that are responsible for it endanger public health and welfare within the meaning of the Clean Air Act.”
The memo continues to note that the Office of Management and Budget will receive a draft finding for interagency review on March 20 and that “OMB has indicated that they will endeavor to complete the process of interagency review in three weeks, so that the endangerment finding would be ready to be issued in mid-April.”
“In fact, the beauty of making the endangerment finding during Earth Week is that it would elate the Left without offering targets of opportunity to the Right. After all, the finding is comprised of nothing more than science and common sense. … I cannot imagine a more appropriate major Presidential event for Earth Week than this one,” the memo continues.
The Obama-era internal communications do reference a December 2007 Endangerment Finding draft, with an EPA official writing on Feb. 22, 2009, that the relevant agency offices were “comfortable with releasing the Dec. 2007 draft endangerment finding … [and asked] What date should we shoot for our own proposed endangerment finding? A number of press outlets have surmised … that the finding will be issued April 2, the Mass v EPA anniversary. You have also saif [sic] the first day of Earth Week would be good.”
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
Race, Sex, and Ethnicity of Victim by Race, Sex, and Ethnicity of Offender, 2019
[Single victim/single offender]FEBRUARY 12, 2026| Race of victim | Total | Race of offender | Sex of offender | Ethnicity of offender | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | Black or African American | Other1 | Unknown | Male | Female | Unknown | Hispanic or Latino | Not Hispanic or Latino | Unknown | ||
| White | 3,299 | 2,594 | 566 | 56 | 83 | 2,915 | 359 | 25 | 738 | 1,542 | 1,019 |
| Black or African American | 2,906 | 246 | 2,574 | 23 | 63 | 2,606 | 273 | 27 | 95 | 1,841 | 970 |
| Other race1 | 247 | 57 | 40 | 138 | 12 | 211 | 34 | 2 | 18 | 144 | 85 |
| Unknown race | 126 | 51 | 38 | 8 | 29 | 107 | 17 | 2 | 23 | 47 | 5https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6.xls |
Those with the means are fleeing America’s public schools. A recent article in The 74 reports that enrollment has dropped more in affluent Massachusetts districts than in all of the state’s low- and middle-income communities combined. That “rich flight” shows up even in a state whose schools routinely rank near the top nationally.
The 74 points to a July 2025 study by Joshua Goodman and Abigail Francis, published in Education Next, that compares actual Massachusetts enrollment to what pre-COVID trends predicted. The authors found a clear shift away from public schools and toward nonpublic options. Public-school enrollment came in 1.9% below the projected level. Private-school enrollment ran 15.6% above projections. Homeschooling rose 50% above projections.
Parents want options. If conservatives are serious, they will treat the school-choice win included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as a starting point, not a finish line.
Charter enrollment moved the other way: 18.9% below pre-trend predictions, though nearly flat compared with 2019. The study notes that Massachusetts law caps the number of charter schools statewide and limits how much district funding can flow to them, which likely constrains charter growth even when demand rises.
The income story is the most revealing. Enrollment losses proved “substantially larger” in high-income districts. Top-income districts lost nearly 50% more students than the lower-income four-fifths combined.
The authors also compared Massachusetts to national 2023 data and found similar patterns, suggesting that this is not a Bay State anomaly. It is a national trend with a clear lesson: Families with options are using them.
That matters for at least three reasons.
First, affluent families are choosing private schools even though they already pay for public schools through taxes. That means they are paying twice — once to support a system they are leaving and again in tuition to exit it.
If families with the greatest ability to navigate public-school choice still choose to walk away, that should raise a blunt question: How many more middle- and working-class families would leave if they could afford to?
It also raises another: How much bigger would charter schools be if Massachusetts did not restrict their growth by law?
Second, Massachusetts is not a cautionary tale of failing schools. It is widely viewed as a high-performing state. Yet the families most able to choose still choose private education. If families are leaving in a state with strong academic reputations, how much faster would the flight be in states with mediocre outcomes and chronic disorder?
Third, Massachusetts offers choice largely within the public system, not through broad state-supported private-school options. Even charter expansion is restricted. Families who can afford to buy their way out are doing it anyway. Families who can’t are stuck.
The conclusion follows: Private education is winning the revealed-preference test. Parents with money choose it — even when it costs them twice.
RELATED: Teaching kids to hate America will have real-world consequences
Now imagine what happens when parents don’t have to pay twice. How popular would private-school options be if families could use a tax credit or scholarship to offset what they already pay into the system?
That question should terrify teachers’ unions. It should energize lawmakers.
School choice has already become a major political force, and it will only grow as parents lose confidence in public schools. That may help explain why Americans keep moving south. The biggest population gainers from 2014 through 2024 included states like Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Florida — states with low taxes and high growth, yes, but also states that have embraced school choice more aggressively than Massachusetts has.
Meanwhile, the broader K-12 picture remains grim. Public dissatisfaction has risen sharply in recent years, and the academic and behavioral fallout from COVID-era closures has not fully receded.
Chronic absenteeism remains high. Math scores remain depressed. School leaders reportmore disruption, more fighting, more bullying, more classroom chaos, and more fear among parents. Seventy-five percent of college faculty “say current students are less prepared in critical thinking, reading, and analysis compared to pre-COVID students.”
At some point, blaming the pandemic becomes a dodge. The system’s decline began before COVID, and it has not reversed since.
If conservatives are serious, they will treat the school-choice win included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as a starting point, not a finish line. Parents want options. The country needs academic recovery. Competition would do more to improve outcomes — and to break the political stranglehold of teachers’ unions — than another decade of excuses.
Police said in a press release that they arrested a middle school vice principal in a child sex sting operation in San Jose, California.
The San Jose Police Department said officers were conducting the sting operation ahead of the Super Bowl game when they got 31-year-old Ruben Guzman to respond to their decoy.
Police asked for help from the public to identify other possible victims, given the suspect's access to children at his job.
The suspect believed he was communicating with a 13-year-old boy when he allegedly offered to exchange money for sexual acts, according to police.
"Guzman arranged to pick up the child in the city of San Jose," Police Sgt. Jorge Garibay said in the release. "But when he arrived, he was apprehended by officers with the SJPD Covert Response Unit who immediately took him into custody."
Police said that when they searched him as well as his vehicle, they found "items consistent with the planned encounter" but did not elaborate on what those items were.
They then discovered that Guzman was working as an assistant principal at Sunrise Middle School located in San Jose.
Guzman was arrested and booked into the Santa Clara County Main Jail on a charge of communicating with a minor for sex.
Police asked for help from the public to identify other possible victims, given the suspect's access to children at his job.
A KRON-TV report noted that his bio on the school's website read, "My job as a teacher is to make students believe in themselves and take an active role in their community."
Sunrise Middle School administrators said in a statement to KRON that Guzman was removed from the campus immediately and would not be allowed to have contact with students.
"Last Wednesday, we were informed by law enforcement that our assistant principal had been arrested in connection with allegations involving a minor that did not involve our school. Our immediate priority was student safety," administrators said in part. "We have spoken with students in age-appropriate ways, communicated directly with families, and made counseling support available on campus. At this time, there is no information indicating that any Sunrise students were involved. While this is deeply upsetting, it does not reflect who we are as a school."
Another 10 men were nabbed in the sting operation.
RELATED: Note saying 'Call the police' leads to arrest of elderly man's live-in caretaker, police say

The suspects were named Cesar Rodriguez-Vela, Jose Garcia-Hernandez, Nelson Mejia-Rivas, Dexter Goody, Luis Medina De Leon, Gonzalo Yesca, Michael Valdeolivar, Harjeet Singh, Joey Minh Truc Nguyen, and Frank Huang, according to a separate press release.
They were also booked into the Santa Clara County Main Jail on charges that included attempted lewd acts with a minor, arranging meetings with a minor for sexual purposes, and child exploitation crimes.
The suspects ranged in age from 25 to 72 years old.
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament of the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand.
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use united force to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.