Wednesday, September 30, 2026

News not seen on CNN and other leftist media outlets

Better Off? Income Beat Inflation In 2025, Poverty Dropped To Record Low Amid Rising Earnings


By Robert Romano

2025 was a good year for American households, the latest data from the U.S. Census Bureau shows, with real household median income rising to $87,460, the highest on record, while the percent of the population below the poverty line fell to 10.2 percent, a record low after 2019’s 10.5 percent.

The news came even as the unemployment level rose slightly from 6.9 million in December 2024 to 7.5 million in December 2025, making 2025’s gains largely the product of higher earnings.

Even with those numbers, labor markets are still fairly tight with the unemployment rate averaging 4.3 percent — the average annual unemployment rate since 1948 has been 5.67 percent — amid the continuing Baby Boomer retirement wave and shrinking migration. The combination of labor markets still tight on a postwar basis and shrinking inflation did the work of boosting incomes on a real basis.

But looking forward, 2026 may see a slight reversal of some of those trends. While seasonally adjusted average weekly earnings nominally increased 3.4 percent from December 2024 to December 2025 and consumer prices only grew by 2.6 percent, so far in 2026, with eight months on the books, average weekly earnings are up 2.6 percent so far, while seasonally adjusted consumer prices have already jumped 2.5 percent amid rising energy costs as global supply chains are destabilized out of Ukraine, Russia and the Middle East.

While there is still time left in the year for a reversal of prices — June and July showed what that could look like as the U.S. and Iran were drafting their memorandum of understanding — its rapid violation as Iran began firing on oil tankers and other oil and gas infrastructure in the region have thrown that somewhat into doubt even as President Donald Trump predicted the war in Iran would end soon after the Congressional midterm elections.

Speaking at the United Nations General Assembly on Sept. 22, President Trump stated, “I believe we’ll make a deal right after the election, because it doesn’t make sense for them not to.”

Trump explained: “They’re waiting to see how I do in the midterm election. What they don’t realize is that I’m not running… The Republican Party is running and I’ll be helping them, but I am not running. I gave absolutely no credence and will not give credence to the election. When it comes to Iran, it doesn’t even enter my mind. The only thing that does is that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon.”

But that “one way or another” the President said the war would end: “We will get it done one way or the other. It’s going to be done. It’s going to be done fast.”

If so, again, the cessation of hostilities in the late spring and early summer did show that prices had a propensity to come down very fast indeed. And when they do, American households will benefit, who will certainly be watching gas prices but the better measure remains the gap between earnings and inflation that was narrowing since 2022, spiked again in 2026 but is again dropping.

Eventually, we’ll break even on the post-Covid inflation. The question is will it be before 2028? We were on track to break even by December 2026, now, assuming prices go back to the way they were before March, break-even might be by October 2027. Everyone’s focused on the midterms, but the real target is 2028.

Once incomes get ahead of inflation, people will be feeling a lot better. The question will be “Are we better off?” On that count, in January 2025, the gap between inflation and income growth since December 2020 forward was 4.3 percent more inflation than earnings growth, and by February 2026 that was down to 2.15 percent. It spiked to 3.9 percent in May 2026, and now is back down to 2.75 percent in August.

So, disinflation has resumed, but appears dependent on getting global supply chains fully open. We need to break even and start getting wealthy again. It’s critical. Trump ran on getting prices down in 2024. It’s why he won. If incomes stay ahead of inflation, then we’re getting wealthier and the politics will usually take care of itself.

Historically, when it doesn’t, that is, when inflation outpaced incomes during the incumbent’s term, you get 1976, 1980, 1992, 2008 and 2024: The incumbents lose. 4 out of 5 of those were one-term presidents. One exception was Obama in 2012 following the Libya war oil spike. He’s the only one who escaped.

So, there’s a real incentive to keep those numbers right-side up. It’s worth noting every one of those episodes in part had pressure on oil prices from wars overseas. Inflation regardless of the cause destabilizes incumbents. Security before politics. As the President stated, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. But there might be a price.

Robert Romano is the Executive Director of Americans for Limited Government Foundation.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Tragedy averted


Israel-bound plane pilot stabbed by co-pilot, causing jet to plunge 18K feet: They ‘tried to do 9/11’



The Islamo-Nazi state of Iran


Iranian security forces have stepped up their presence in Tehran and other cities, with motorcycle patrols, checkpoints and forces positioned across major urban areas as authorities brace for possible unrest, multiple sources inside Iran told Fox News Digital.

The security buildup comes as university students have returned to the streets in Tehran, protesting compulsory hijab rules, rising education costs and political repression, videos published on Iran International show.

Sources inside Iran confirmed to Fox News Digital that motorcycle units have been operating across Tehran and other cities during events surrounding Iran’s annual "Sacred Defense Week," while members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Basij and law enforcement have been positioned at major squares and other locations.



How a mental illness is normalized by the left


'Breakthrough Model of the Year' is transgender-identifying child of Naomi Watts


It's good to be a corrupt Black Democrat politician in DC


'Come on': Democrat DC councilman makes BIZARRE comment after beating bribery charge in mistrial


Jack Smith the American Stasi


New records show rushed software buys, mountains of data, and an investigation that reached far beyond the former president.

Jack Smith, the Biden regime’s former special counsel, is back in the news with his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday. The Oversight Project has uncovered new records that don’t focus on the settled question of whySmith used federal power to target political enemies, but instead on how he was able to do it.

Understanding the “how” is more important at this stage. We all know why the weaponization of the Biden years happened. It happened because they wanted to extinguish a political movement so that people from around the country could never truly shake up Washington, D.C., again. 

For those who believe Smith’s investigation crossed the line from legitimate law enforcement into political targeting, that broader reach is the central issue.

We also know why it can happen again if Democrats take back power. 

In Democrats’ minds, they have unfinished business. They regard Donald Trump and his supporters as too great a threat to stop short the next time. That makes it essential to understand how the weaponization of government happened, how it could happen again, and what reforms are needed now to prevent a repeat.

Instead, systemic reform has largely fallen by the wayside, replaced by political declarations that government weaponization has been solved once and for all.

With few signs of meaningful accountability, the need for concrete action is urgent.

January 6 gave Democrats the justification they needed to discard restraint and use the powers of federal law enforcement against their political opponents. That effort did not stop with President Trump. It extended to his supporters, especially those who challenged the conduct of the 2020 election or became prominent figures in the broader America First movement.

Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Jack Smith in November 2022 to investigate Trump’s handling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago and his actions surrounding January 6. Smith became the central figure in the federal effort to prosecute the former president.

Smith took over the FBI’s Arctic Frost investigation, a sweeping inquiry that gathered records involving Republican politicians, Trump allies, and organizations.

RELATED: ‘Deranged partisan fanatic’ Jack Smith obtained personal info on Trump supporters to try to rig the election, Tom Cotton says

The investigation grew out of an inspector general inquiry that was later folded into Arctic Frost. Smith has cited that earlier investigation in denying knowledge of actions taken before his involvement, including those associated with former FBI agent Timothy R. Thibault.

According to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Smith’s team issued hundreds of subpoenas involving more than 400 Republican individuals and organizations. It also obtained phone records connected to 20 current or former Republican members of Congress.

Newly released records provide more detail about how Smith’s office conducted the investigation.

The scale is worth considering. Investigators collected cellphone records, audio, video, and other digital data involving elected officials as well as private citizens engaged in political activity.

Understanding exactly what was collected, from whom, and under what authority is essential to judging whether the investigation stayed within legitimate law enforcement bounds.

Smith’s office then faced the tough task of sorting through a vast trove of information and building a case for trial.

The investigation also gave prosecutors an unusually detailed picture of Trump’s political network. If the argument is that this information could be used for purposes beyond prosecution, the piece should show that rather than assume it.

Venue mattered too. Washington, D.C., offered prosecutors a jury pool markedly less favorable to Trump than many other jurisdictions.

Through Freedom of Information Act litigation, the Oversight Project obtained 844 pages of records from Smith’s office.

Those documents show that in July 2023, just weeks before Trump was indicted over his actions surrounding January 6, Smith’s team said it was in “desperate need” of forensic video software from Axon, a major law enforcement vendor best known for Tasers and police body cameras.

Axon has since drawn attention as cities across the country consider the company’s expanding surveillance technology.

The urgency inside Smith’s office was enough to override normal purchasing procedures, despite initial objections from a member of his own staff.

On July 13, 2023, the office’s executive officer wrote that Smith “supports more strict requirements than DOJ’s standard policies.” Even so, she authorized the purchase “prior to creating the UFMS obligation” — before the expense had been entered into the Justice Department’s financial system — because “the purchase is urgent.”

The order was placed July 14. Axon shipped the software licenses the next day.

Eighteen days later, on August 1, Smith indicted Trump over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election and events surrounding January 6.

The records leave key questions unanswered.

The Justice Department withheld the purchase price. It also has not disclosed what video or audio Smith’s team needed to process so urgently. Given the timing, the material may have been related to the January 6 case, but the records do not establish that.

Axon’s proposal also included language allowing the government to share “de-identified segments of Agency Content with Axon to develop new products.”

The Justice Department released only an unsigned copy of the agreement. As a result, it remains unclear whether Smith’s office agreed to let a private vendor use investigative material in product development.

Smith’s investigation likely cost taxpayers more than $50 million, according to a Fox News analysis of Justice Department spending reports. How much of that money went to outside vendors such as Axon remains unclear. Some expenses may have been recorded through the Antitrust Division or U.S. attorneys' offices, making the full cost difficult to trace.

But we do know that when Smith needed help targeting President Trump, he called Axon in a rush, and the company was more than happy to answer. The grand jury indictment over January 6 that quickly followed appears to be a natural consequence of Smith finally being able to dig through the results of his dragnet. 

Smith’s office was far less careful with its own records. When it moved its files at the start of the investigation, Justice Department e-discovery staff warned the transfer “will change the metadata on those files (create and modify dates).”



The office replied, “The team has no issue with the changes to metadata.” Its records officer decided the team’s Microsoft Teams chats were “not necessary to be moved.” Phones and an iPad used by Smith’s lawyers were returned to other Justice Department offices, with nothing in the records showing their contents were preserved first.

In the end, Smith did not secure a conviction.

The classified documents case was dismissed after a federal judge ruled that Smith’s appointment was unlawful. The election case was narrowed by the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling, then dismissed after Trump won the 2024 election and Justice Department policy barred continued prosecution of an incoming president.

Smith resigned 10 days before Trump returned to office.

For many Americans, the arguments and passions of that period have faded. For those who were investigated, subpoenaed, or otherwise drawn into the government’s scrutiny, they have not.

Smith remains one of the central figures associated with that period. His return to the news is a reminder that the powers of federal prosecution remain in place regardless of which party controls the executive branch.

The damage was not limited to the final disposition of the cases.

Years of litigation brought legal bills, damaging headlines, invasive discovery, and scrutiny of people beyond Trump himself. The investigation placed an entire political network under examination by the federal government.

Trump was the central defendant. But the investigation reached far beyond him, touching elected officials, activists, and others associated with the America First movement.

For those who believe the investigation crossed the line from legitimate law enforcement into political targeting, that broader reach is the central issue.

Understanding how Jack Smith almost pulled it off, and who he worked with, would go a long way toward understanding how lawfare works. The senators questioning Smith this week have a chance to start. Republicans would be wise to take the leads developed by the Oversight Project and get to the bottom of it.

Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Socialists are deadbeats...DSA candidates think they're above the law

Socialist Candidate Nixon Now Hit With Criminal Referral Over Hidden Debts

Corrupt politicians go back as far as politics. Now, in the latest apparent example of such, Florida's Republican candidate in the 2026 Senate election, Ashley Moody, may have just gotten a boost. How so? Because her opponent, the card-carrying "democratic socialist" Angie Nixon, is now facing a criminal referral to the Department of Justice over financial shenanigans.

What is it with these socialist nitwits, anyway?

An ethics watchdog group filed a criminal referral to Attorney General Todd Blanche on Wednesday demanding an investigation into Florida Democratic Senate nominee Angie Nixon for allegedly filing a false financial disclosure to the Senate in violation of the Ethics in Government Act.

Nixon, who earned at least $270,000 from her various jobs and investments in 2025, reported in her financial disclosures—submitted to the State of Florida on August 31 in her capacity as a state lawmaker—that she owes nearly $14,000 in unpaid taxes to the IRS on top of $17,600 in unpaid federal student loans, the Washington Free Beacon reported. Nixon's tax and student loan delinquency would be news to anyone who reviewed the other financial disclosure she filed on August 31 with the U.S. Senate, which omitted any reference to those debts.

So, she allegedly lied in her financial disclosure. Who didn't see that coming? That seems to be what the watchdog group, the National Legal and Policy Center, thinks of the whole thing.

"It's clear that Nixon’s failure to list the two liabilities was no mere oversight but constitutes a knowing and willful filing of false financial disclosure reports," the National Legal and Policy Center wrote in its complaint, adding that it "demands prompt civil and criminal enforcement against Angie Nixon for her flagrant violations of the Ethics in Government Act's financial disclosure requirements."

This is the same Angie Nixon who, aside from parading around the Florida State House of Representatives with a bullhorn shouting incoherently over redistricting, is also refusing to repay her student loans, claiming "education should be free."

In October 2024, when Congress ended the pandemic-era student loan moratorium, Nixon declared on Facebook she was "above" paying back her educational debts.

"Dear Student Loans. It's above me now," Nixon wrote. "I don't wanna pay it back. Education supposed to be free."

You can "supposed to" all you like, Ms. Nixon, but you signed a contract, and you have to pay this back. Education isn't free, no matter how many bullhorns you wear out shouting otherwise.

That's another thing that the DOJ may as well look into.

Now, as to her income: $270,000 is a pretty good haul for a year, especially when it's from "various jobs and investments," which is one way of saying she's never done an honest day's work in her life. And hey, whatever happened to "from each according to her abilities, to each according to her needs"? Shouldn't Angie Nixon's fellow Democratic Socialist communists be enforcing a little economic justice here? Or, at least, a little ideological purity?

Oh, I'm just kidding. It's always like this with commies. That "to each according to their needs" only applies to the peasants. You know — the people that she represents, who can stand in bread lines after they spend 10 hours in the grist mills so they can pay taxes to cover Angie Nixon's student loans that she refuses to pay. 

Now, regardless of what happens with this referral, this issue has given Nixon's Republican opponent a big, beautiful weapon to use against her in the campaign as we are running into the last few weeks. It looks a lot like it's already working: Ashley Moody is running ahead in the polls, leading Nixon in the RealClear Polling average by 6.6 points — and remember, this is a statewide election in Ron DeSantis's Florida. Nixon may have managed to take out Alexander Vindman, who was tragically born with no personality, in the primary — but a general election in Florida is a whole different kettle of crayfish.

Let Angie Nixon stick that in her... bullhorn.

Then, of course:

The Nixon campaign did not return a request for comment.

You don't say. 


Stop the invasion and find the organizers