Wednesday, September 11, 2019

NY Times practicing moral relativism on 9/11

New York Times remembers 9/11 as the day airplanes became sentient and killed 2,000


EELiMdDXYAYap_q.jpeg
I count at least three problems in this since-deleted tweet. First, there is no mention of who carried out the 9/11 attacks or what motivated them. That's like writing a headline memorializing the Aug. 3 El Paso, Texas, mass shooting and not once mentioning that there was a white nationalist gunman involved. 
Second, and I hate to be the one to say this, airplanes lack agency. They did not take aim or crash themselves. The terrorists flying them did.
Perhaps you think that's just due to the limitations of Twitter, but the report that this tweet linked to, titled "Remembering Those Lost 18 Years Ago on 9/11,” had all the same issues.
The article's second paragraph read originally: “Eighteen years have passed since airplanes took aim at the World Trade Center and brought them down.” There were also no mentions of the words “terror,” “terrorist,” or “terrorists" anywhere in the body of the story as it appeared originally on the Times website. The closest the report came to mentioning the ill intent behind Sept. 11 was when it recalls Mayor Rudy Giuliani “was heralded for his leadership as mayor of New York when it was attacked.” So at least there's an admission that it was an attack, although there's no explicit admission that it was an attack by people. It might as well have been an earthquake.
In its original publishing, the report's sole mention of "terror" appeared in its subhead, but nowhere in the story itself.
I am not alone in thinking this is all rather bizarre. The Times editors appear to agree, at least once scolded. The article now includes at least two references to terrorism. The report's second paragraph now reads, “Eighteen years have passed since terrorists commandeered airplanes to take aim at the World Trade Center and bring them down.” 
Considering the role that terrorism played in the attacks, and the way in which terror shaped U.S. foreign and domestic policy for the next 18 years, it must have taken the writers more effort not to mention terrorism in an article detailing Sept. 11 memorial events than to mention it. And the readers, unwilling to spend so much energy blinding themselves about the story, had to point out the problems. 
You just have to wonder to yourself, what is the motive behind all that effort?

No comments: