Monday, February 29, 2016
White House wants increase of Syrian refugees. Bringing in more people who share no western values is destabilizing...but that's all this regime has done to us since it took office
The White House is quietly pushing for an increase in refugees from Syria, despite new concerns raised by state and county officials that federal help is often missing when they arrive.
President Obama's assistant for immigration policy told a task force set up by the National Association of Counties that the U.S. is eyeing a bigger role to help alleviate the growing crisis.
"We want to make sure that we can increase our numbers of refugees that are able to settle here," Felicia Escobar said. "The need globally is so, so, so massive right now, given all the displacement and conflict around the world, but we also know that we have to do it in a way that's smart."
The issue has become a flashpoint in the presidential race and among governors who are concerned that Washington won't properly vet the refugees to weed out terrorists.
But locally, it's an issue of money and support. Sean Conway, a county commissioner from Weld County in Greeley, Colo., said he has had to "fight" with the State Department to get promised services such as healthcare and interpreters. Worse, he added, "Many times we don't even know that relocation is taking place until it's going on."
By law, the administration can let in some 10,000 Syrian refugees a year, though fewer have been. There are an estimated 4.2 million Syrian refugees.
Labels:
anti-Americanism,
anti-West,
illegal immigration,
Islamists
Horror in Moscow as burka-clad babysitter 'decapitates four-year-old girl in her care' - then walks through streets carrying her severed head and shouting 'Allahu Akbar'
Horror in Moscow as burka-clad babysitter 'decapitates four-year-old girl in her care' - then walks through streets carrying her severed head and shouting 'Allahu Akbar'
Labels:
murder
Sunday, February 28, 2016
More proof Turkey is in league with Islamic State. Erdogan is a tyrant!
Recall when Erdogan was quoted as saying "Democracy is like a bus, you get off when you want to."
Erdogan says he will not respect court ruling in favor of "Cumhuriyet" journalists
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan dismissed the release from jail of two Turkish journalists accused of spying. He said he would neither "respect" nor "obey" the decision.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan made his comments following a recent constitutional court ruling saying that the detention of two newspaper journalists had violated their rights.
Can Dundar, editor-in-chief of "Cumhuriyet" and his Ankara bureau chief, Erdem Gul, had been released pending trial on February 26, following the constitutional court ruling. Their arrest last November drew international condemnation and concern about media freedom in Turkey.
"I will remain silent to the decision the court has given. But I don't need to accept it. I want to make that clear. I don't obey or respect the decision," Erdogan told reporters in Istanbul.
"This has nothing to do with press freedom. This is a case of spying," he said.
"Cumhuriyet" had published video footage online purporting to show Turkey's state intelligence agency MIT helping send weapons to fighters associated with the self-styled "Islamic State" (IS) in Syria. The two journalists were charged with publishing material in violation of state security "for espionage purposes" and intentionally aiding an "armed terrorist organization."
A personal vendetta
Turkey's Constitutional Court remains as one of the few public institutions in the country that are not under Erdogan's control.
The court has in the past issued several rulings that went against the president, notably in May 2014, when it ruled that a ban on YouTube was unconstitutional.
The two journalists still face possible life sentences at a trial due to start on March 25. They are banned from leaving the country until the end of the hearings.
Erdogan had personally laid the charges against the two journalists and said that he would "not forgive such reporting," vowing that Dundar would "pay the price" for reporting on the story.
Special interest groups have been eroding our freedoms in the name egalitarianism.
The legal battle between the FBI and Apple is getting far more attention, but another privacy case has enormous implications for California schoolchildren and their families.
A federal judge in Sacramento ordered the release of a staggering amount of protected personal information for 10 million students to attorneys for a nonprofit group suing the state.
These records include Social Security numbers, home addresses, grades, test scores, behavioral disciplinary reports, even medical and mental health information.
It’s an identity thief’s dream — and a nightmare for anyone else.
The sweeping order, issued by U.S. District Judge Kimberly Mueller, covers anyone who has attended a K-12 school in California since the beginning of 2008, including students no longer enrolled in the state’s public schools. Lawyers for a group called California Concerned Parents Association contend the state isn’t providing adequate educational services for special-needs children and say they need the data to help prove their case.
We aren’t familiar with the particulars of the 5-year-old lawsuit, so we make no judgments about the merits of the case.
California’s constitution guarantees a free and equal public education for all children, and the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires states to evaluate students suspected of having disabilities, including learning disabilities and to provide appropriate services.
If California is shortchanging any students, the state should be held accountable. Lawyers for the parents group say they need the state Department of Education data to complete a statistical analysis of services being provided for special-needs children. Mueller’s order says the information won’t be made public, and spokesmen for the group promise that the data will be secure.
That’s not satisfactory, not when data breaches are routine.
“Data is like toothpaste,” Steven Liao, an IT expert and Bay Area parent, told the San Jose Mercury-News. “Once you squeeze it out of the bottle, people are going to put it on 10 different toothbrushes and scrub like crazy to see what they find. Then they’re responsible for putting the foam back into the tube, and ensure there’s no spray, not one dot, left on the mirror? That’s impossible.”
There must be a way to assess the state’s compliance with the federal disability law without trampling on the privacy and personal security of millions of children. We see no reason why names, Social Security numbers and other identifying information cannot be redacted, or why a random sample of anonymous records wouldn’t be sufficient, and Mueller didn’t explain why she issued such an expansive order.
Don’t bother asking. The court isn’t accepting phone calls about this case.
We gleaned that bit of information from an objection form that parents can submit to the court by April 1. Failing to object “will be deemed a waiver of your right to object to the disclosure of your or your child’s protected personal information and records,” the form says. But the judge’s order doesn’t say whether she will block the release of records if parents object.
You can download the form at www.cde.ca.gov/re/di/ws/documents/form2016jan26.pdf
School officials around the state are urging parents to file objections. If enough of them do, maybe Mueller will find a less invasive way to resolve this lawsuit.
(This is a NY Times newspaper)
Most Popular Stories
Labels:
lost rights,
Lost Values,
privacy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
