Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 7, 2020

Jay Leno Is a Nice Guy, Part Four Million and Six

Jay Leno Is a Nice Guy, Part Four Million and Six

Seems everyone has some kind of Jay Leno story, and they’re always positive encounters.

Monday, January 6, 2020

Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg.”

Ricky Gervais TORCHES Hollywood Elite in Scathing Globes Opener: ‘You’re in No Position to Lecture the Public About Anything’

In a room filled with Hollywood powers, comic Ricky Gervais absolutely did not hold back at Sunday night’s Golden Globes.
As part of a scathing opening monologue, Gervais called out Hollywood heavyweights for palling around with Jeffrey Epstein, and for claiming to being “woke” while taking money from companies who run “sweat shops in China”
“You say you’re woke,” Gervais said. “But the companies you work for … Apple, Amazon, Disney. If ISIS started a streaming service, you’d call your agent, wouldn’t you?
“So if you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a platform to make a political speech, right? You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg.”
Watch above, via NBC. 
Have a tip we should know? tips@mediaite.com

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

This could get exciting for Hollywood...only the lawyers will come out richer.

Paz de la Huerta Brings Disney Execs Into Harvey Weinstein Lawsuit






Disney, its CEO Bob Iger and its ex-chairman Michael Eisner are being brought into Paz de la Huerta's sexual assault lawsuit against Harvey Weinstein.
The actress in November sued Weinstein for sexual battery, and also targeted The Weinstein Co. and the Four Seasons hotel in Beverly Hills for their alleged roles in the situation. De la Huerta says she met the mogul in 1999 when she was a 14-year-old actress working on the film The Cider House Rules, and she alleges that more than a decade later Weinstein raped her. Since the suit was filed, it was moved to federal court and remanded back to Los Angeles County Superior Court. 
Now, De la Huerta is expanding the list of people who she says are responsible for Weinstein's alleged assaults.
In a complaint submitted Tuesday, de la Huerta contends Eisner and Iger "made a series of decisions that allowed a range of actions by Harvey Weinstein that unacceptably harmed certain employees of Miramax," which Disney owned at the time.
"It is clear that the risk of sexual assault by Harvey Weinstein is inherent in the working environment fostered at Miramax," writes attorney Aaron Filler. "De La Huerta and her family were aware of and anxious about these risks at the time of the undertaking to allow Paz de La Huerta to participate in the making of the Cider House Rules film. ... The motivating emotions of Harvey Weinstein were fairly attributable to the work conditions of his controlling the work and hiring of young female actresses while imbuing all aspects of the work with a sense of likelihood or expectability of intimate sexual contact."
The actress alleges that Disney, as then-owner of Miramax, is responsible because the assault arose from "the bringing together of these two individuals [de la Huerta and Weinstein] in the course of business of Miramax."
De La Huerta's claims against Iger and Eisner, as well as former Miramax chairman Bob Weinstein, are negligent supervision and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Her claims against Disney are negligent supervision and violation of federal sex trafficking statutes.
Disney sent The Hollywood Reporter this brief statement in response to the complaint: “The Weinsteins operated and managed their business with virtual autonomy. There is absolutely no legal basis for claims against the company and we will defend against them vigorously.”
Aug. 27, 4:15 p.m. Updated with a response from Disney.

Tuesday, August 27, 2019

Movies and the Box Office

Beware Festival Fever: Sundance Faves Are Bombing at the Box Office

Studios seemingly threw caution to the wind at this year’s Sundance Film Festival, shelling out top dollar in hopes of finding the next indie sensation. A few Hollywood companies saw those shopping sprees pay off, while most will likely be feeling buyer’s remorse.
Amazon Studios was among the big spenders, unloading nearly $41 million at the 2019 festival, a large part of which was on the comedy “Brittany Runs a Marathon.” The feel-good film, which debuted in five theaters last weekend with a solid $175,696, is the latest Sundance favorite hoping to turn rave reviews into cold hard cash.
Amazon is pacing itself with “Brittany Runs a Marathon,” allotting more than a month before taking the film nationwide in an effort to avoid the same fate as fellow festival purchase “Late Night.” Despite critical praise, the Mindy Kaling and Emma Thompson-led comedy fizzled at the box office with $15 million, only $2 million more than Amazon paid for the movie.

That steady pace could benefit “Brittany” in the long run. But if it fails to pay off, “Brittany” could join the string of festival flops that have struggled at the box office. Theatrical tides are shifting, and this year indie movies are the first to feel the inexorable pull of changing tastes. Not all Sundance acquisitions have landed in theaters yet, but over the course of a lackluster summer, the hits have been few and far between.
Of the films that were seeking distribution, A24’s “The Farewell” has been the most widely embraced by the general public. The comedic drama — written and directed by Lulu Wang and starring Awkwafina — sparked a bidding war among buyers at Sundance before A24 nabbed it for around $6 million. After a profitable platform release, one that started in four theaters before ramping up its footprint as word of mouth grew, “The Farewell” has earned $14.5 million, an impressive result for a movie that’s mostly subtitled.
But this year, many Sundance shoppers have struggled to successfully replicate that method. Earlier in August, New Line hit the wrong notes with “Blinded by the Light,” a crowd-pleaser set to Bruce Springsteen tunes that rocked critics in Park City. That reception encouraged the Warner Bros. label to spend $15 million on the musical drama — a title decidedly out of its wheelhouse of low-budget horror flicks and romantic comedies. The effort was for naught. “Blinded by the Light” debuted nationwide with a disappointing $4 million and has since collected $8 million.
“You’re seeing pretty clearly that movies coming out of the festivals are really being challenged,” Warner Bros. president of domestic distribution Jeff Goldstein told Varietyafter the film’s launch on Aug. 18. “Unfortunately, audiences are spending money on the bigger spectacle films. The smaller niche movies are having a harder time finding their way when competition from content providers is making it harder to break through with an audience.”
Beyond moviegoers’ apathy for smaller films, “Blinded by the Light” highlights another potentially problematic trend. The bidding wars that have become synonymous with Sundance are driving up prices, causing studios to grossly overpay for movies. Hollywood companies are forced to launch a movie nationwide if they want to make their money back, which puts a lot of added pressure on films that might not have time to benefit from mounting buzz.
“That’s the biggest issue facing companies, which are buying movies at too high of a price in order to lock down filmmaker relations,” said Paul Dergarabedian, a senior media analyst with Comscore. “You’re stuck chasing the profits that are never going to come. It’s a really expensive lesson being learned right now.”
Documentaries haven’t repeated last year’s successes either. Three nonfiction films that premiered at Sundance — “RBG,” “Three Identical Strangers” and “Won’t You Be My Neighbor?” — all surpassed double digits at the box office, rarefied territory for documentaries. That kind of track record made docs the hot buy at the 2019 festival.
So far, only Neon’s “Apollo 11,” a look at the historic 1969 moon landing, has come close to matching those earnings, reaching $9 million in ticket sales. Other documentaries have mostly fallen flat. “Honeyland,” a nature film about the art of beekeeping from the same studio, has made $289,326 after five weeks in limited release. Sony Pictures Classics’ “David Crosby: Remember My Name,” an acclaimed look at the legendary musician, collected $459,880 over the same time frame. Magnolia’s “Toni Morrison: The Pieces I Am” and Hulu’s “Ask Dr. Ruth” ran out of steam at $807,000 and $297,195, respectively.
Of course, theatrical winnings is no longer a question for a significant segment of titles that sell at festivals. The buzzy Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez documentary “Knock Down the House” went straight to Netflix. Similarly, Michael Jackson exposé “Leaving Neverland” sold to HBO, which broadcast it in two parts and made headlines worldwide.
But while titles might make waves in the media, it’s difficult to gauge their triumphs on streaming platforms. Netflix also bought “Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile,” a drama from the perspective of Ted Bundy’s girlfriend, for a reported $8 million, but it’s not clear yet whether the streamer will mount an awards push. Amazon’s “The Report” likely won’t be breaking any box office records, since it will land on Prime Video two weeks after it opens in theaters. That might not matter, because streamers like Netflix, Amazon and Hulu are more concerned with expanding their content library and building buzz around their services than with finding the next blockbuster.
There are still a handful of Sundance leftovers that have yet to be seen by mainstream audiences. In November, Amazon is unveiling “Honey Boy,” a coming-of-age drama that’s based on Shia LaBeouf’s childhood. Unlike the festival films that failed to serve as counterprogramming in the midst of summer, “Honey Boy” could have an open runway ahead of the holidays.
“This summer, counterprogramming didn’t always work,” Dergarabedian said. “There’s going to be a lot of re-strategizing. We’re in a time of flux, and this is another area we are going to see changes.”

Monday, August 5, 2019

Anti Semitism: another Democrat running for office and her Hollywood supporters

Bryan Cranston Joins Holocaust Denier With Donation to Plame Campaign

Plame, running for Congress in New Mexico, blamed America’s Jews for America’s wars

Former CIA employee Valerie Plame, who became mired in controversy after tweeting out an anti-Semitic article, has received campaign donations from notable Hollywood figures and a prominent Holocaust denier.
Plame's Hollywood supporters include actors Bryan Cranston, Naomi Watts, and Michael Douglas, producers Doug Liman and Jonathan Nolan, and billionaire Lynda Resnick. Watts played Plame in the 2010 film Fair Game based on Plame's career at the CIA. Liman directed the film, which struggled at the box office
The donations came despite Plame's attacks on American Jews. She resignedfrom the Ploughshares Fund board in 2017 after tweeting an article titled "America's Jews Are Driving America's Wars," in which author Philip Giraldi suggested certain American Jews should be given a label when appearing on television "kind-of-like a warning label on a bottle of rat poison."
Plame initially defended the article, saying, "Many neocon hawks ARE Jewish" and asking people to "read the entire article." When that defense failed to silence her critics, Plame deleted the post and apologized. Plame has since blamed the tweet on multitasking during a move and claimed that she had not read the entire article. "Social media very unforgiving," she said.
It is unclear if Plame was also moving when she shared at least eight other articles from the same outlet, including one piece that accused Israelis of celebrating in the wake of 9/11. The publisher, a self-described "alternative media selection" known as the Unz Review, routinely features Holocaust denial arguments and rampant anti-Semitism. The Unz Review has donated tens of thousands of dollars to the website VDARE.
In addition to the celebrity supporters, Plame received three separate donations from former congressman Pete McCloskey, who once made reference to the "so-called Holocaust" during a 2000 address to the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), an organization known for publishing Holocaust denial books and articles. McCloskey, who served as a Republican before changing his affiliation to the Democratic Party, added, "I don't know whether you are right or wrong about the Holocaust." He began the speech by noting he came to the conference due to his "respect" for "the thesis of this organization." McCloskey later disputed the accuracy of IHR's transcript of his speech. 
McCloskey is also the founder of the Council for the National Interest (CNI), an advocacy group that has been described as anti-Israel. A former member of the CNI board of directors, Abdurahman Alamoudi, stated his support for Hamas and Hezbollah at an anti-Israel rally outside of the White House in 2000. Alamoudi was later sentenced to 23 years in prison "on charges related to his activities in the United States and abroad with nations and organizations that have ties to terrorism."
Plame has won positive press for her congressional bid from the national media. Articles in the New York Times and HuffPost failed to mention her history of publicizing anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. Plame and McCloskey are both contributors to HuffPost, including a 2016 article in which McCloskey defended a blog written by Plame.
New Mexico's Third Congressional District has remained blue since 1998, but Plame faces a crowded primary field. Eight other Democrats are in the running, including New Mexico district attorney Marco Serna and Santa Fe lawyer Teresa Leger. Plame narrowly leads the field in fundraising, with $239,173.44 raised compared with Serna's $232,940.50.
A representative for Resnick declined to comment. None of the other above mentioned donors to Plame responded to requests for comment. McCloskey could not be reached.
Plame’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment.