Saturday, January 30, 2016

A bad guy with a gun requires a good guy with a gun.

Robbery Suspect Takes Hostage, Uses Her as Shield — Without Warning, Cop Drops Him With Deadly Shot

A robbery suspect was shot and killed by police near Dallas, Texas, Friday after taking a female hostage.
Two Irving police officers respond to a robbery in the afternoon when the suspect took a female hostage and threatened her with a handgun if cops didn’t back down, KDFW-TV reported.
Image source: Screen grab
Image source: Screen grab
Video captured the harrowing scene that unfolded next.
One of the officers fired a single shot that struck the suspect in the head killing him and causing him to fall to the ground. The hostage escaped with no physical injuries.
Content warning: Video contains graphic content
Follow link in headline for video.
“The suspect rounded the corner and put the hostage into a car. At that moment, realizing the hostage’s life was in danger, the officers opened fire – striking and killing the suspect,” Irving police spokesman James McClellan told KDFW.

Democrats don't believe in campaign finance reform...here's the pervert Eliot Spitzer example of money laundering.

Eliot Spitzer helped out then gal-pal with $100K donation to O’Malley campaign


Eliot Spitzer and his mom, Anne Spitzer, gave a total of $100,000 to a super PAC supporting Martin O’Malley’s flagging campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination at the time Spitzer’s gal pal was working as deputy campaign manager for the ex-Maryland governor, according to a report filed Friday with the Federal Election Commission.
The Spitzers’ donations came in late September, three months before it was reported that the Love Guv and his former girlfriend Lis Smith, had broken up, Politico reported.

Are these the people you want rescuing children?

Rampant sex, brawling women at child-welfare offices: suit


The city’s child-welfare lawyers toil in a den of iniquity, with top staffers engaging in rampant sex with subordinates — and two women even brawling over the affections of their boss at work, according to a Brooklyn federal court suit.
Delano Connolly, a veteran lawyer for the Administration for Children’s Services, claims in court documents that at least two top lawyers within ACS carried on relationships with underlings — with one lothario juggling two staffers simultaneously.
That precarious arrangement ultimately led to a fight between the two ladies over their common lover inside a Brooklyn ACS office, the suit states.
Connolly’s case also alleges that superiors routinely ignored his sexual- harassment claims and that he was retaliated against, after complaining about a co-worker.
The city Law Department said, “We will review the suit.”

Flint, Michigan is the poster child of one-party, generational Democratic rule.

Lessons from Flint



Flint, Michigan is the poster child of one-party, generational Democratic rule.
Flint, Michigan’s City Council is all Democratic.  A generation of Flint’s mayors have been Democratic.  Rick Snyder’s immediate predecessor as governor was Obama darling Jennifer Granholm – a Democrat.  The federal bureaucratic agencies – including the EPA – are all Democratic.

As others have documented (here and here), Flint’s water problems were baked into that state’s cake long before Rick Snyder (R) was elected governor.
But what lessons can be learned from the Flint debacle?
To paraphrase Winston Churchill – never, never, never cooperate with Democrats or any others who benefit politically from your demise.
It seems that Rick Snyder’s most grievous error was acting in a bipartisan effort to clean up a long-building series of Democratic blunders.  In Snyder’s “reach across the aisle” effort, he assigned the emergency manager position to, wait for it, a Democrat.  Big mistake.
Statism serves the statist.  “Never let a crisis go to waste.”  If in the midst of a crisis, find some stooge to take over, and assign blame.  If a Republican, better yet.  A twofer.
We see leftists around the globe exacerbating crises, whether Flint and their water crisis or Chicago and the “gun” crisis or Europe and its “refugee” crisis.  No matter.  Leftist policies are the root and branch.
What we need to understand – and Flint, Chicago, and Europe expose the game – is that leftists benefit electorally and economically from destruction.  Today, Democrats in Congress are “using the [Republican] crisis” to demand $600 million to fix Flint’s “water problem.”
While I enthusiastically await a Republican victory in 2016 (fingers crossed), I also very clearly see the assignment of blame for continued/accelerated crisis.  As with the transition from Clinton to Bush II, reporting of the unemployment rate overnight will go from 5% to a more accurate 20+%.  Obamacare will implode sometime in 2017/2018.  The Fed will determine that their near-zero interest rate exercise has run its course, with undetermined outcome.  Terrorist attacks will increase and be blamed on a tightening immigration policy.  The increased crime rate being seen in predominantly liberal cities (NYC, Detroit, Baltimore, Chicago) will be cast as a national (read: Republican) crisis.  Race relations in America will have a new (white) face to blame.
There will be calls for bipartisan solutions.  Paul Ryan, et al. will ring in a new era of “working across the aisle.”  As with Flint, this will result in opportunities for leftists.  Don’t think that they won’t let “every/any new crisis go to waste.”  In an environment where one party benefits from the expanding benevolence of the state, look for Democrats to seize (and manufacture) more crises.   
Will we (Republicans) learn Flint’s lesson?  Sadly, it’s doubtful.
Flint, Michigan is the poster child of one-party, generational Democratic rule.
Flint, Michigan’s City Council is all Democratic.  A generation of Flint’s mayors have been Democratic.  Rick Snyder’s immediate predecessor as governor was Obama darling Jennifer Granholm – a Democrat.  The federal bureaucratic agencies – including the EPA – are all Democratic.
As others have documented (here and here), Flint’s water problems were baked into that state’s cake long before Rick Snyder (R) was elected governor.
But what lessons can be learned from the Flint debacle?
To paraphrase Winston Churchill – never, never, never cooperate with Democrats or any others who benefit politically from your demise.
It seems that Rick Snyder’s most grievous error was acting in a bipartisan effort to clean up a long-building series of Democratic blunders.  In Snyder’s “reach across the aisle” effort, he assigned the emergency manager position to, wait for it, a Democrat.  Big mistake.
Statism serves the statist.  “Never let a crisis go to waste.”  If in the midst of a crisis, find some stooge to take over, and assign blame.  If a Republican, better yet.  A twofer.
We see leftists around the globe exacerbating crises, whether Flint and their water crisis or Chicago and the “gun” crisis or Europe and its “refugee” crisis.  No matter.  Leftist policies are the root and branch.
What we need to understand – and Flint, Chicago, and Europe expose the game – is that leftists benefit electorally and economically from destruction.  Today, Democrats in Congress are “using the [Republican] crisis” to demand $600 million to fix Flint’s “water problem.”
While I enthusiastically await a Republican victory in 2016 (fingers crossed), I also very clearly see the assignment of blame for continued/accelerated crisis.  As with the transition from Clinton to Bush II, reporting of the unemployment rate overnight will go from 5% to a more accurate 20+%.  Obamacare will implode sometime in 2017/2018.  The Fed will determine that their near-zero interest rate exercise has run its course, with undetermined outcome.  Terrorist attacks will increase and be blamed on a tightening immigration policy.  The increased crime rate being seen in predominantly liberal cities (NYC, Detroit, Baltimore, Chicago) will be cast as a national (read: Republican) crisis.  Race relations in America will have a new (white) face to blame.
There will be calls for bipartisan solutions.  Paul Ryan, et al. will ring in a new era of “working across the aisle.”  As with Flint, this will result in opportunities for leftists.  Don’t think that they won’t let “every/any new crisis go to waste.”  In an environment where one party benefits from the expanding benevolence of the state, look for Democrats to seize (and manufacture) more crises.   
Will we (Republicans) learn Flint’s lesson?  Sadly, it’s doubtful.

Flint last built a water treatment facility in 1952!

Did the NOAA Cook the Books to Show Warming During Hiatus?

Image courtesy of Shutterstock
One of the least reliable sources for data on climate change is the U.S. federal government. Now, a group of 300 scientists and academics want Congress to investigate the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for cooking the books on climate data in order to erase the pause in the rise in temperature cited by, among other sources, the IPCC.
Incredibly, the NOAA accumulated data by measuring the water temperature from the engine intake valves of oceangoing cargo ships. The scientists want Congress to investigate whether the agency violated the Data Quality Act, which seeks to ensure the accurate dissemination of scientific information to the public.
“We, the undersigned, scientists, engineers, economists and others, who have looked carefully into the effects of carbon dioxide released by human activities, wish to record our support for the efforts of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology to ensure that federal agencies complied with federal guidelines that implemented the Data Quality Act,” some 300 scientists, engineers and other experts wrote to Chairman of the House Science Committee, Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith.
“In our opinion… NOAA has failed to observe the OMB [Office of Management and Budget] (and its own) guidelines, established in relation to the Data Quality Act.”
The Data Quality Act requires federal agencies like NOAA to “ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information, including statistical information.”
Smith launched an investigation into NOAA’s study last summer over concerns it was pushed out to bolster President Barack Obama’s political agenda. Democrats and the media have largely opposed the probe into NOAA scientists and political appointees, but Smith is determined to continue investigating. NOAA officials surrendered emails to congressional investigators in December.
“It is this Committee’s oversight role to ensure that federal science agencies are transparent and accountable to the taxpayers who fund their research,” Smith told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “Americans are tired of research conducted behind closed doors where they only see cherry-picked conclusions, not the facts. This letter shows that hundreds of respected scientists and experts agree that NOAA’s efforts to alter historical temperature data deserve serious scrutiny.”
Of the 300 letter signers, 150 had doctorates in a related field. Signers also included: 25 climate or atmospheric scientists, 23 geologists, 18 meteorologists, 51 engineers, 74 physicists, 20 chemists and 12 economists. Additionally, one signer was a Nobel Prize winning physicist and two were astronauts.
NOAA scientists upwardly adjusted temperature readings taken from the engine intakes of ships to eliminate the “hiatus” in global warming from the temperature record.
This is a blatant attempt to politicize science by the administration and should be exposed for the dishonest research it is. The only question is who at NOAA was behind the attempt to whitewash the termperature hiatus and whose orders they were acting under.
There is yet to be a credible scientific explanation for the lack of rising temperatures despite models saying there should have been close to a one-degree increase over the last 17 years. NOAA's attempt to create an explanation out of whole cloth only shows the desperation of climate hysterics who are vigorously denying the facts in front of their face.

The real goal here has more to do with government control of private enterprise then equal pay. The decision of what is equal is subjective and so it becomes a tool of the government to reward and punish.

Another Bogus Effort To Bridge The Phony Gender Pay Gap 

With Lilly Ledbetter looking on, President Barack Obama signs executive actions aimed at closing a compensation gender gap that supposedly favors men at the White House on April 8, 2014. The signing was timed to mark Equal Pay Day.   (AP)
With Lilly Ledbetter looking on, President Barack Obama signs executive actions aimed at closing a compensation gender gap that supposedly favors men at the White House on April 8, 2014. The signing was timed to mark Equal Pay Day. (AP)
Politics: Using executive orders, President Obama has placed an intrusive new requirement on private employers to provide data about employee wages, gender and ethnicity to “help” enforcers of pay equity and spy on business. This is not about equality, it’s about making big government even bigger.
“Women are not getting the fair shot that we believe every single American deserves,” the president declared, a statement so cynical, an Emory University professor quoted by NBC speculated that it was a likely bid to boost Hillary Clinton’s flailing campaign for president. “What kind of example does paying women less set for our sons and daughters?” Obama asked. His office made a big deal about his signing the new rule on the anniversary of the first law he signed as president, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.
This new rule — it’s not a law — will create a massive legal fishing expedition against businesses with more than 100 people, a de facto subpoena for such firms with the presumption of guilt to find “violations” based on highly questionable data about the gender pay gap. It’s also another federal invasion of the privacy of  63 million American workers, whose salary data will now be out there, with or without their consent.
“This step,” the White House press release said, “will help focus public enforcement of our equal pay laws,” as if that were needed, given the size and scope of Obama’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The White House also said that the rule’s purpose was to “provide better insight into discriminatory pay practices across industries and occupations.”
There’s just one problem: It’s all based on junk data.
The prevailing myth, perpetrated by even the president’s Council of Economic Advisers, which issued a brief on the matter Friday, is that women earn only 79 cents on the dollar to men, the result of woman-hating discrimination. Exhibit A of this claim is found not in the private sector but in the White House itself. It pays its female employees 13% less than their male counterparts. One staffer, Anita Dunn, called it “a genuinely hostile workplace for women.”
But studies repeatedly show that the discrimination mantra is a myth. Manhattan Institute scholar Diana Furchtgott-Roth has done considerable research on the matter, finding that the conventional wisdom about women getting less pay for equal work, being discouraged from taking higher-paying jobs and being subject to a “glass ceiling” on advancement are all false.
The studies, she has noted, lump men and women working different numbers of hours above the 35-hour full-time mark, create vastly distorted results. They also lump together dirty, dangerous, physically demanding and disagreeable jobs dominated by men with more conventional lines of work, ignoring the compensation required for the higher stress and physical risk.
Meanwhile, they ignore that many female workers prefer to work part-time and take leaves of absence to fulfill family duties. Those are free choices, and they can contribute to differing levels of pay for comparable work. “It’s not the ‘glass ceiling’ that keeps women out of the corner office, it’s a choice of how much time and effort to put into one’s career,” wrote Furchtgott-Roth in a 2012 essay for MarketWatch.
She notes that in some areas, women’s pay exceeds that of men — particularly for those who work 30-34 hours a week, as well as those who enter fields with low female representation, commanding higher salaries based on the laws of supply and demand. In fact, accounting for all of these variables, Furchtgott-Roth finds that there is virtually no difference in the pay scales of men and women doing equal work.
Which is why Obama’s executive orders are likely to change nothing in pay equity. All they are going to do is politicize the process, vastly expanding the powers of the federal government to fish up new data to obtain the result they want. It’s nothing but another power grab.


Obama’s Warnings About Anti-Semitism Ring Hollow

Obama’s Warnings About Anti-Semitism Ring Hollow 

Palestinian demonstrators carry a flag during an anti-Israel protest in Gaza. Demonstrations such as these have served as inspiration for anti-Israel     demonstrations in the U.S. (Zumapress.com/Newscom)
Palestinian demonstrators carry a flag during an anti-Israel protest in Gaza. Demonstrations such as these have served as inspiration for anti-Israel demonstrations in the U.S. (Zumapress.com/Newscom)
Leadership: President Obama staged a political show for a Jewish audience Wednesday, loudly warning of the new atmosphere of anti-Semitism in Europe and the U.S. It’s a hollow statement, given his weak record on a rapidly metastasizing problem.
“Here, tonight, we must confront the reality that around the world, anti-Semitism is on the rise. We cannot deny it,” the president told his listeners at the Israeli embassy on Wednesday night. Citing the flight of Jews from Western Europe, as well attacks on Jews in India and Kansas, he got his lines right in concluding, “When we see that, we must not be silent.”
Problem here is that these conditions are the very result of his silences, denials, and lifelines to Islamists for political purposes. What’s more he’s ignored the behavior in the U.S. of an increasingly anti-Semitic intelligentsia that has added to the atmosphere where terrorism can flourish. In short, it’s been an absence of leadership from the supposed leader of the free world that has assured this plague’s spread.
In typical straw-man fashion, Obama equated the attack of a Ku Klux Klan-linked lunatic on a Jewish center in Kansas in 2014, to the large-scale mass flight of Jews from Europe as they are systematically persecuted in the name of political correctness and the empowerment by Europe’s elites of Islamofascist migrants. To him, there’s little difference between the two, despite the easy control-ability of one and the huge failure to lead on the other.
It’s nothing but a way of obscuring the very real problem of Islamic anti-Semitism by equating fringe criminals with major failures of U.S. and European Union policy.
Fact is, President Obama has been strangely silent as Iran’s Islamofascist rulers have vowed to destroy Israel as a state aim in public statements. It’s the result of the President’s desire to “make history” by cutting a nuclear deal with Iran, which Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rightly warned is a mortal threat to Israel. He got stepped up espionage from the U.S. and even campaign operatives helping his opposition as a result.
Obama’s also been silent in the United Nations as Israel has been condemned for various supposed transgressions. Where’s his speech on the evils of anti-Semitism to the non-Jews at the United Nations? It’s not there.
Obama’s also held Israel’s enemies to a lower standard of behavior than Israel itself in his useless Palestinian “peace process” talks, demanding that only Israel and not its anti-Semitic enemies make concessions. Obama has even warned Israel that the support it has garnered from 40 years of U.S. policy would no longer be assured in UN votes.
And in the worst of his silences, Obama has kept the words “radical Islam” from the U.S. government lexicon as terror attacks, often on Jews, have escalated. During an anti-Semitic attack on a Jewish supermarket in Paris last year, he dismissed it was the work of “zealots” who “randomly shoot a bunch of folks” instead of put his finger on the essential anti-Semitism of the attackers.
His inability to use the world “Islamic,” “Islamist” or “Islamofascist” as an identifier of the source of the terror attacks has much to do with his inability to admit that their targets are Jews. His silence and denial means to suggest there is no rhyme or reason in who terrorists choose to kill. And it says something that not only did Obama not speak out at that time, he failed to come to the demonstration in Paris to reaffirm civilized values in the wake of the Jewish supermarket attack and the related attack on a Paris newspaper.
As a result, Jews are fleeing Western Europe in numbers not seen since the Holocaust era. Anti-Semitic attacks are up 40% since 2008, the European Jewish Congress estimates.
Obama’s silence has been so conspicuous, his rival, Vladimir Putin has seized the opportunity to offer Europe’s Jews haven in Russia this week. “Let them [Jews] come to us then,” Putin told Vyacheslav Kantor, the president of the European Jewish Congress, adding that “during the Soviet period they were leaving the country, and now they should return.”
Back home, Obama’s also been dead silent as U.S. college campuses have been engulfed in the Palestinian-led and highly anti-Semitic project linked to his own progressives: the “boycott, divest and sanction” movement against Israel, a major move to undercut the Jewish state economically. Just Thursday, Obama’s Department of Homeland Security acceded to the demands of anti-Semitic activists by now requiring goods originating from the West Bank to be labeled separately labeled and identified from Israeli products, the better to enable boycotts from the politically correct.
It adds up to a sorry picture of lip service to the idea of opposing anti-Semitism, but a fundamental failure to identify its roots and admit its evil aims. The production at the embassy was stage-managed by film director Steven Spielberg. In the case of Obama it was nothing but an act.

The EU Commission has an agenda and the truth is not part of it. To paraphrase my favorite Marx: Who you going to believe me or your lying eyes?

EU leaders insist there is 'NO LINK' between the migrant crisis and New Year sex attacks in Cologne - and vow to bring about an end to 'false accusations' 


  • European Commission wants to 'unconditionally reject' link, minutes show

  • Officials are also growing concerned about possibility of a public backlash 

  • Hundreds of women filed sexual assault complaints after wave of attacks
  •  
  • Internal minutes were taken at a cabinet meeting for officials on January 13




There is 'no link' between the migrant crisis and the wave of sex attacks in Cologne during New Year celebrations, EU officials believe.  
The European Commission wants to remove 'false associations' between the increasing number of some criminal acts and the arrival of migrants, documents show.
Internal minutes taken at a cabinet meeting on January 13 suggest officials are also growing concerned about the possibility of a public backlash in relation to the attacks.
Scroll down for video 
There is 'no link' between the migrant crisis and the wave of sex attacks in Cologne during New Year celebrations, EU officials believe. Above, fireworks were thrown into the New Year's crowd outside Cologne's main station, prompting members of the public to flee
Some of the attacks are believed to have been carried out after fireworks were thrown into the New Year's crowd outside Cologne's main station, prompting members of the public to flee
There is 'no link' between the migrant crisis and the wave of sex attacks in Cologne during New Year celebrations, EU officials believe. Above, fireworks were thrown into the New Year's crowd outside Cologne's main station, prompting members of the public to flee
Fireworks thrown into crowd outside train station in Cologne
Progress: 0%
00:00
Play
Mute
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration Time1:28
Fullscreen
Need Text
They document the first vice president of the European Commission, Frans Timmermans, stating that the two events are 'not related', according to Matthew Holehouse for The Telegraph.
Minutes state: 'As far as the crimes in Cologne were concerned, he [Timmermans] said that these were a matter of public order and were not related to the refugee crisis.'
They also suggest officials want 'the unconditional rejection of false associations between certain criminal acts, such as the attacks on women in Cologne on New Year's Eve, and the mass influx of refugees'.
But the officials simultaneously do not want to 'downplay' the problems.
A large group gathers outside Cologne train station six days after the attacks. The European Commission wants to remove 'false associations' between the increasing number of some criminal acts and the arrival of migrants, documents show
A large group gathers outside Cologne train station six days after the attacks. The European Commission wants to remove 'false associations' between the increasing number of some criminal acts and the arrival of migrants, documents show
The attacks prompted a protest by hundreds of people, who waved German flags and carried banners with the slogan 'Rapefugees Not Welcome'
The attacks prompted a protest by hundreds of people, who waved German flags and carried banners with the slogan 'Rapefugees Not Welcome'
President Jean-Claude Juncker ended the debate and stressed he wanted to maintain the 'credibility of the Commission', the minutes reveal. 
Hundreds of women filed sexual assault complaints after the wave of attacks in the German city on New Year's Eve. 
A mob of men - believed to be of North African and Arab origin - were said to have molested and robbed women after congregating at the city's central station. 
One woman told police she was surrounded by 20 men of North African appearance before they attacked her intimate parts while another said she was pinched in the crotch.
Volunteers pull a raft packed with refugees and migrants as they arrive on a beach on the Greek island of Lesbos on Friday. Around 1 million refugees are thought to have now entered Europe illegally 
Volunteers pull a raft packed with refugees and migrants as they arrive on a beach on the Greek island of Lesbos on Friday. Around 1 million refugees are thought to have now entered Europe illegally 
Cologne has already been branded dangerous for women
Progress: 0%
00:00
Play
Mute
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration Time3:27
Fullscreen
Need Text
The exposure of the minutes by The Telegraph comes after Swedish police revealed they have dealt with around 5,000 incidents involving migrants since October.
Two bomb threats, four rapes and more than 550 assaults were among the reported offences officers were called to, according to data obtained by SvD.  
They also attended 450 fights, 194 violent threats and 58 fires involving migrants or asylum seekers. 
It also comes after 22-year-old aid worker Alexandra Mezher was knifed to death at the child migrant centre where she worked in Molndal, Sweden, on Monday. 
A 15-year-old boy from Somalia appeared in court on Wednesday charged with murder. 
Around 1 million refugees are now thought to have entered Europe illegally.