Showing posts with label regulation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label regulation. Show all posts

Friday, April 24, 2020

This is what happens when bureaucrats who will lose no pay use regulatory power to destroy business.

California’s fish and wildlife director has announced he will close the commercial crab season south of Mendocino County on May 15, six weeks early, to prevent potential entanglements of endangered whales and other marine creatures, including sea turtles.
The early closure was formalized Wednesday, one week after Chuck Bonham, head of the state fish and wildlife agency, issued a preliminary determination declaring his plans. It deprives commercial crabbers of the final weeks of a season already truncated by a one-month delay that pushed its start well into December. The season normally closes June 30.
But under the terms of a legal settlement reached last spring between Bonham and the Center for Biological Diversity, the presumptive season end was April 1 this year. 
So Bonham, who has been advised by a long-standing working group that includes commercial crabbers and which meets periodically to assess entanglement risk, already has let the season run longer than he might have.
Still, the news has upset many in the commercial fishing fleet who are having a difficult time finding markets for their product, given the mass closure of restaurants and disruption of trade due to the coronavirus pandemic.
They noted that there is limited crab gear in the water along the affected stretch of coast this late in the season, as many commercial fishermen and women prepare to launch for salmon May 1. The sporadic movement of blue and humpback whale is just beginning through coastal feeding grounds, some said, making the threat of entanglement low.
“The risk of crab fishing gear harming endangered whales is statistically insignificant because of low concentrations of whales, as well as the relatively small amounts of gear being deployed,” Crescent City fisherman Ben Platt, president of the California Coast Crab Association, said in a written statement. “In fact, there have been no confirmed interactions between commercial Dungeness crab gear and any whales during the current crab season.”
However, Ryan Bartling, senior environmental scientist with the state wildlife agency, said as long as there are gear and whales in the water, the risk is there.
“Whales move around,” Bartling said. “We do know we’ve had entanglements this time of year, and the whales are back, and the director has to make hard decisions.”
The state’s intervention comes under a legal deal hashed out between environmentalists, crabbing interests and state regulators after a major spike in fatal whale entanglements off the West Coast, beginning in 2014 and peaking in 2015 and 2016. Though not all cases involved commercial crabbing gear, many did.
In October 2017, on the eve of the autumn crab season, the Center for Biological Diversity filed suit against Bonham, claiming his agency’s management of the commercial crab fishery had allowed for unauthorized capture and killing of threatened and endangered humpback whales, endangered blue whales, and endangered Pacific leatherback sea turtles without possession of an incidental take permit under the Endangered Species Act.
As an alternative to protracted litigation or closing the fishery while the agency pursues a permit and develops a required habitat conservation plan, the parties settled on a plan to regulate the fishery based on close, almost real-time assessment of whale migrations and fishing activity to determine the risk of entanglement. Because of feeding and migratory patterns, that risk is deemed highest in the spring.
But the season got started late last fall because of concern about gear and whale interaction at that time. As April 1 approached, it was allowed to continue because factors suggested the threat remained minor.
And to most members of the working group, it did not seem any worse two weeks later, said Bodega Bay fisherman Dick Ogg, an original task force member.
But Ogg said one additional consideration was the need to allow extra time for crabbing crews to remove gear from the water this spring, due to rough seas in the forecast and the difficulty of physical distancing efforts aboard a small vessel.
In addition, Bartling said, the incremental increases in blue and humpback whales on the coast north and south of San Francisco Bay even over a week or two means that prolonging the season any longer would only heighten entanglement risk.
“It’s a tough one,” said Ogg, who believes that risk to be low. 
“The department, like I said, they’re trying to err on the conservative side and understandably so,” he said. “But still, it’s difficult for the fishermen. There are guys who need this.”
You can reach Staff Writer Mary Callahan at 707-521-5249 or mary.callahan@pressdemocrat.com. On Twitter @MaryCallahanB.

Tuesday, June 5, 2018

Once this would be unheard of. America of old would increase the supply of water. The path to Venezuela!

California Water Law Could Prevent Showering, Doing Laundry on Same Day

dog bath
Pixabay

California Governor Jerry Brown signed two bills that will force water districts and municipalities to permanently adopt even more aggressive water rationing level than during the state’s 5-year drought.

The San Jose Mercury News reported that Brown issued a press statement that a changing environment means the state must begin to conserve water resources in preparation for the next drought. Brown started: “We have efficiency goals for energy and cars – and now we have them for water.”
Gov. Brown signing AB 1668 sponsored by Assemblywoman Laura Friedman (D-Glendale) and SB 606 sponsored by Senator Robert Hertzberg (D-Van Nuys), will require California’s urban water districts, large agricultural water districts and municipal governments to develop plans for strict annual water budgets by January 1, 2020; start implementing long-term water use efficiency standards by June 30, 2022; and achieve their assigned water rationing goals beginning in 2027.
Water conservation director for the Natural Resources Defense Council Tracy Quinn said that the combined daily indoor and outdoor water use has already dropped from 109 gallons a day in 2013, to about 90 gallons a day in 2017.
But the State Water Resources Control Board in coordination with the Department of Water Resources now has the authority to set much more aggressive mandatory water use levels based according to three factors: 1) an initial indoor water allowance of 55 gallons per person per day — dropping to 50 gallons by 2030; 2) an outdoor residential amount set by regional climates and; 3) a set standard for systemwide pipe leak losses.
According to the attentive folks at The Organic Prepper, this allotted water ration exceeds the amount required for taking a shower and doing a single load of laundry and excludes taking baths altogether.
Failure by any water district or municipality to meet its 2027 mandatory water rationing goals may result in $1,000 per day fines in normal years and $10,000 a day during inevitable drought emergencies.
The Mercury News reported that water districts were angry with the 8 percent to 36 percent mandatory water rationing cuts ordered by Gov. Brown during the drought because water targets were inflexible and did not take into consideration regional factors.
Negotiations over the last few months led to an agreement between business interests, water districts, and environmentalists. Leading advocates for the deal include the Silicon Valley Leadership Group and Bay Area Council for the business side, the Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Santa Clara Valley Water District, and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California for water agencies; and Audubon Society, Nature Conservancy and Natural Resources Defense Council for the greens.
Many environmentalists, like the Sierra Club, still oppose the final deal because the rationing was not more severe, and anger remains over the cities and districts that inserted a 15 percent water credit for production of recycled water that was inserted late in the negotiations.

Sunday, December 17, 2017

FCC chairman Ajit Pai drops truth bomb on Jimmy Kimmel after ‘hysteria’ over net neutrality repeal

FCC chairman Ajit Pai drops truth bomb on Jimmy Kimmel after ‘hysteria’ over net neutrality repeal

FCC chairman Ajit Pai drops truth bomb on Jimmy Kimmel after ‘hysteria’ over net neutrality repeal
FCC chairman Aijt Pai responds to Jimmy Kimmel's hysteria over the repeal of net neutrality. (Image source: YouTube screenshot) 
When the Federal Communications Commission voted on Thursday to repeal Obama-era internet regulations known as “net neutrality,” the left lost its mind. CNN claimed it was the end of the internet, while late-night comedians like Jimmy Kimmel bashed FCC chairman Ajit Pai.
Pai responded to the criticism Friday on Fox News.

What did he say?

Responding directly to Kimmel, who called Pai a “jackhole,” Pai said objectors to the repeal of net neutrality have everything wrong.
“Those who’ve said the internet as we know it is about to end have been proven wrong starting this morning,” Pai said. “We have a free internet going forward.”
Pai added that Kimmel’s “name-calling hysteria is disappointing, but it’s not surprising.”
“Those on the other side have literally nothing other to peddle than hysteria and misinformation and fear about the light-touch approach that we’ve had for most of the internet’s existence,” he explained.

What else did he say?

The FCC chief went on to explain what exactly his agency did on Thursday. Prior to 2015, the U.S. government chose to let the internet operate free of government regulation and left the ebbs and flows to the free market. That changed in 2015 when the Obama administration passed net neutrality. Repealing the Obama-era law simply frees the internet from government regulation, which is typically not helpful for consumers or a free market.
Pai noted that most of his critics argue that his agency’s actions have allowed major corporations to squash their competition. However, Pai explained the best way to organically allow a market to grow is by providing an environment where there is less government regulation, meaning more new competitors can enter the market.
As far as internet speed, Pai said speeds won’t be affected and will continue to get faster and faster, which has been the industry norm for decades.

Why did net neutrality need to be repealed?

Pai said there is “no question” government regulators would have enacted even more regulations in the future and further stifled internet markets had net neutrality remained in place.
“There’s no telling how far they would have gone. They would have been limited only by their own imagination,” Pai explained.

Sunday, January 8, 2017

Manhattan culinary staple China Fun shutters, blaming government over-regulation....Former Carnegie Deli workers hungry for their jobs back protest outside the shuttered restaurant

Manhattan culinary staple China Fun shutters, blaming government over-regulation





NYC PAPERS OUT. Social media use restricted to low res file max 184 x 128 pixels and 72 dpi

Albert Wu, the son of China Fun’s owners, said the small business was impossible to maintain under a mountain of bureaucratic regulations.

  (HOWARD SIMMONS/NEW YORK DAILY NEWS)
For 25 years, China Fun was renowned for its peerless soup dumplings and piquant General Tso’s chicken.
What left a bad taste in the mouths of its owners and loyal patrons was the restaurant’s sudden Jan. 3 closing, blamed by management on suffocating government demands.
“The climate for small businesses like ours in New York have become such that it’s difficult to justify taking risks and running — nevermind starting — a legitimate mom-and-pop business,” read a letter posted by the owners in the restaurant’s front door.
“The state and municipal governments, with their punishing rules and regulations, seems to believe that we should be their cash machine to pay for all that ails us in society.”
The Second Ave. restaurant became a beloved local mainstay, with customers bemoaning its unexpected disappearance. The Daily News hailed the soup dumplings as the best on the Upper East Side in 2015.
“So sad to learn @ChinaFunNYC closed,” tweeted fitness blogger Amanda Lauren. “I grew up on the UES and it was my fav Chinese restaurant. Pouring out a green tea for you, China Fun.”
NYC PAPERS OUT. Social media use restricted to low res file max 184 x 128 pixels and 72 dpi

The restaurant’s interior is dismantled.

  (HOWARD SIMMONS/NEW YORK DAILY NEWS)
Albert Wu, whose parents Dorothea and Felix owned the eatery, said the endless paperwork and constant regulation that forced the shutdown accumulated over the years.
“When we started out in 1991, the lunch special was $4 a plate,” he recalled. “Now it’s $10, $12. The cost of doing business is just too onerous.”
Wu cited one regulation where the restaurant was required to provide an on-site break room for workers despite its limited space. And he blamed the amount of paperwork now required — an increasingly difficult task for a non-chain businesses.
“In a one-restaurant operation like ours, you’re spending more time on paperwork than you are trying to run your business,” he griped.
Increases in the minimum wage, health insurance and insurance added to a list of 10 issues provided by Wu. “And I haven’t even gone into the Health Department rules and regulations,” he added.
NYC PAPERS OUT. Social media use restricted to low res file max 184 x 128 pixels and 72 dpi

Neighbors read the surprise notice posted to the restaurant’s door.

  (HOWARD SIMMONS/NEW YORK DAILY NEWS)
The de Blasio administration noted the city provides free help to small businesses. The “Small Business First” initiative helps owners save time and money while reducing the amount of paperwork.
Free compliance advisors are available for on-sight consultation aimed at helping small businesses comply with regulations.
“The NYC Department of Small Business Services makes it easier for businesses to start, operate, and grow, including by helping businesses navigate important City regulations,” said spokesman Nick Benson.
But Adele Malpass, Manhattan Republican Party chairwoman, said the issues cited by the Wu family are common complaints.
“For smaller businesses like China Fun, each little thing that occurs makes it harder,” said Malpass. “Each regulation, each tax — you put it all together and it’s just a hostile business environment.”
No matter how generous for the union member the business owner is always the enemy.

Former Carnegie Deli workers hungry for their jobs back protest outside the shuttered restaurant

NYC PAPERS OUT. Social media use restricted to low res file max 184 x 128 pixels and 72 dpi

The diner — famous for its gut-busting sandwiches — told its employees in September that it would close for good at the end of December, according to a spokeswoman for the owner.

  (SUSAN WATTS/NEW YORK DAILY NEWS)
Workers at a famous Manhattan deli are in a real pickle after getting laid off at the end of the holiday season.
Thirty-five members of UNITE—HERE Local 100 marched outside Carnegie Deli at 55th St. and Seventh Ave. on Friday — waving picket signs and chanting, “Bring back our deli jobs.”
The diner — famous for its gut-busting sandwiches — told its employees in September that it would close for good at the end of December, according to a spokeswoman for the owner.
But its employees haven’t given up hope on a reprieve.
“We are here (to beg) the owner of the Carnegie to reopen and accept all of the employees that work here to come back to work for her,” said Rachaneeuuan Sriphud, 63, of Queens.
Sriphud, known as Toy to employees and customers at the restaurant, worked as a waitress at Carnegie Deli for 27 years.
“I’ve worked here more than two-thirds of my life, (it’s given) me very good support for my family,” said the mother of two.
Like the other laid-off workers, Sriphud was at a loss to explain the owner’s decision to close the deli.
The owner, Marian Harper-Levine, told workers she couldn’t manage the deli anymore, the waitress said.
“This place is very, very good. People all over the world know it as the world’s most famous deli,” Sriphud said.
“This place runs itself, believe me. I make more money than ever within these last 10 years."
NYC PAPERS OUT. Social media use restricted to low res file max 184 x 128 pixels and 72 dpi

Employees are holding out hope the deli will reopen.

  (SUSAN WATTS/NEW YORK DAILY NEWS)
Mohammed Chowdhury, 44, who goes by the moniker Salim to other staff and diners, is a Queens resident and father of two who has been a waiter at the deli since 1999.
“I was very, very heartbroken .... I believe they'll reopen, of course they'll reopen, this is the busiest restaurant in the world," he said.
Chowdhury said he served former President Bill Clinton and boxing legend Muhammad Ali while working at the deli.
He’s so convinced Carnegie Deli will reopen, he’s not even looking for another job, he said.
He sees the closure as a union-busting tactic for new management to step in and take over the profitable business.
NYC PAPERS OUT. Social media use restricted to low res file max 184 x 128 pixels and 72 dpi

Thirty-five members of UNITE—HERE Local 100 marched outside Carnegie Deli at 55th St. and Seventh Ave. on Friday — waving picket signs and chanting, “Bring back our deli jobs.”

  (SUSAN WATTS/NEW YORK DAILY NEWS)
“I believe ... they make a plan, take the union out, break the union first, and then they'll reopen — this is my opinion,” he said. “It’s very sad.”
Cristyne Nicholas, a spokeswoman for the deli owner, said Harper-Levine made sure to give employees three months’ notice — and kept the deli running through Christmas because she knew it was their busiest season.
She denied any attempt at union-busting as a motive for the shut down.
“The union contract ... expired on Nov. 30. However, Carnegie Deli management honored the contract beyond its terms for an additional 30 days, operating under the same benefits and agreements which had been in place the previous four years,” she said.
She added that the owner closed the deli on Christmas Day but paid employees anyway so they could enjoy the day at home with their families.

Monday, November 14, 2016

U.S. businesses spend more on regulatory compliance than Russia’s GDP

U.S. businesses spend more on regulatory compliance than Russia’s GDP

 
U.S. businesses spend more on regulatory compliance than Russia’s GDP
Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images 
3

Figures released from The Libre Institute give us a frightening look at just how much businesses in the United States have to spend in order to keep up with all the red tape government regulations force upon them. As you will see, the cost of keeping up with government intervention is monumental.
Using major U.S. industries as a kick off point, The Libre Institute marked their contribution to America’s GDP, then ads up just how much money these industries spend trying to stay legal in the face of governmental red tape.
Using data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, we compare the size of the construction, health care, and financial and insurance industries with the size of total U.S. regulatory compliance costs as a share of GDP. In 2015, the total burden of regulatory compliance costs in the U.S. exceeded 10 percent of GDP.
To put it in perspective, regulatory upkeep surpassed $1.8 trillion in 2015. This is much larger than Russia’s entire GDP.
“If red tape in the United States were a country,” says the Libre Institute. “It would be larger than all but the world’s 8 largest economies.”
What’s more, these regulations aren’t really hurting large corporations. They are actually far more burdensome on smaller businesses.
All of these regulatory costs take their toll on businesses, and in fact systematically benefit large businesses at the expense of their smaller competitors. According to the American Action Forum, “for every 10 percent increase in regulatory costs in an industry, the number of small and medium-size businesses in that industry falls 3 to 6 percent. The number of large businesses, meanwhile, grows 2 to 3 percent. In sum, … regulations cumulatively have a highly regressive effect, substantially reducing the smallest businesses and growing the largest.”
George Mason University has drawn up figures that say without much of these regulations, our economy would be actually be 25 percent larger as of 2012. That’s $4 trillion smaller than it would have been had government interference been kept to a minimum as it was in the 1980’s. That’s $13,000 less for the American worker per capita.