Thursday, October 2, 2014
Being rich vicariously
Singapore Airline's Suites Class
Courtesy Derek Low
The walk to the Class Suites.
If during your recent air travels, the slog to your coach seat through the first-class cabin had you feeling a bit envious, then these photos of Singapore Airlines Suites Class might push you over the edge into a full-blown fit of jealousy.
Entrepreneur and former Cal student Derek Low lived the dream for a day when he cashed in enough miles for an $18,400 golden ticket to travel from Singapore to New York City in Suites Class.
On his website, Low writes, “With round-trip tickets costing up to S$23,000 (or US$18,400), it was completely unattainable for most people. Formerly, the only way for an average person to fly in the Suites was to take out a bank loan. And then I remembered that most of my personal net worth exists in frequent flier miles rather than cash.”
As one does these days, Low documented the entire decadent experience to show it off to the rest of us. A day after he posted his photos, Low’s incredible one-way Class Suites trip is being shared everywhere. And for good reason: These images are insane!
Low began his adventure dining on lobster and a burger with foie gras in the ultra-swank Private Room at Singapore Changi Airport. From there, he walked a private jet bridge onto the plane, where he was greeted by name and escorted to his cabin. He chose a middle suite because it can be turned into a double bed, like an actual double bed, not just the miniaturized plane equivalent.
In addition to the bed, other perks included Bose headphones, Givenchy blankets and pajamas, a 5-course meal with more lobster and foie gras and turn-down service. Oh, and lots of champagne.
Expressing a sentiment none of the rest of us has ever felt before, Low sums up his rich-and-famous flight thusly: “I didn’t want to leave the plane.” It’s almost impossible to imagine, but a look through the photos above will prove such an amazing air travel experience is possible — if only you had the cash.
Update: Low’s account of traveling via Singapore Airlines’s Class Suites has sparked some controversy over accusations he paraphrased content from travel blogger Andy Luten. Luten, who posts on Andy’s Travel Blog, wrote about Singapore Airline’s luxury suites in 2013; in addition to this post, Luten claims Low took content from two others, also published in 2013. You can read more about the accusations here.
Labels:
technology
Two of ISIS’s most bloodthirsty savages, who were pictured holding severed heads in Syria, were caught on film rioting in Australia two years ago, according to a new report.
ISIS savages seen on film rioting in Australia in 2012
By Joe Tacopino
October 2, 2014 | 3:50am
Modal Trigger
ISIS fighters Khaled Sharrouf (center, in sunglasses) and Mohamed Elomar (left of Sharrouf, with full beard) were present at a 2012 riot in Sydney, Australia. Photo: News Limited
Two of ISIS’s most bloodthirsty savages, who were pictured holding severed heads in Syria, were caught on film rioting in Australia two years ago, according to a new report.
Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar, who fled their native Australia to wage jihad in the Middle East, are seen at the September 2012 riots that took place in Sydney’s Hyde Park, according to the Daily Telegraph.
The two terrorists are pictured standing right next to one another, while a police officer urges the crowd to protest peacefully.
The demonstrations — staged against an anti-Islamic film that was released on YouTube — turned violent, and six police officers and 19 protesters were injured in the ensuing riots.
About 15 months after the violent protests, the deadly duo fled Australia to start their jihadist careers, the paper said.
Sharrouf needed to use his brother’s passport to leave the country because his own had been confiscated by authorities.
The terror team joined ISIS at the group’s home base in Syria’s Al-Raqqa. They have been rampaging across the country in a white BMW collecting taxes from Christians and other minorities on behalf of the Islamic State, the Daily Telegraph said.
Counterterrorism experts in Australia said the newly released photos reveal a previously unknown link between ISIS and radical Muslims in the country.
“With hindsight, there may have been some direct links to ISIS that we didn’t know about at the time,” terror expert Greg Barton told the paper.
Both of the ISIS savages have a criminal history in Australia.
They documented their twisted terror spree on social media while waging a bloody campaign in Syria and northern Iraq.
The two savages can be seen carrying the heads of beheading victims and mugging for the camera in images that were taken earlier this year.
In one of the most disturbing photos posted, Sharrouf shows his 7-year-old son holding a severed head with both hands.
“That’s my boy!” he wrote in the caption.
Sharrouf was arrested on terror charges in Australia. He bragged on social media about tricking doctors into believing he was mentally ill to obtain a shorter sentence.
He served less than four years in jail and was released in 2009.
Labels:
Islamists
A true liberal. He wishes supercede those of the people who want to move into the area. Did I mention he's an anti Semite...
Brooklyn coffee shop owner calls Jews ‘greedy infiltrators’ in rant
Modal Trigger
Michael Avila, owner of The Bushwick Coffee Shop, posted an anti-Semitic rant on social media. Photo: Paul Martinka (2)
That’s a whole latte hate!
A Bushwick coffee shop is serving up a side of anti-Semitism — with the owner taking to Instagram to speak out against greedy Jewish “infiltrators.”
Michael Avila, owner of The Bushwick Coffee Shop, which opened this summer, claims the 378-word tirade he posted to Instagram on Wednesday came from a well-intentioned place and was fueled by customers complaining about rent and housing issues in Brooklyn.
His post, which is making the rounds on the Internet, was specifically targeted at two Jewish men visiting from Israel who were looking to buy a building next door.
Avila, 32, called them “rude and cold” and said the incident was the tipping point that led him to blame Jewish people for ruining the up-and-coming feel of Bushwick.
“Ok, what I REALLY want to talk about is how to consider the Jews (oh yes, let’s talk about it) who want a piece or all of Bushwick,” he wrote in the rant, adding that Jews “function via greed and dominance.”
“Bushwick IS rising and progressing, and bettering, but us contributing or just appreciating this rise and over all positive change do not want to be lumped with greedy infiltrators,” Avila continued in the typo-ridden and sometimes incomprehensible post.
The rant, which garnered 27 likes and features a blurred block of text with the words “greedy infiltrators” in focus, set off steaming Instagrammers who were shocked by Avila’s thoughts.
“Don’t you realize that this is incredibly racist?” one user wrote. “Generalize all you want, but acknowledge that you are a bigot. Bigoted thinking is not going to make Brooklyn better.”
“As a young Jewish adult yes, I’m Jewish. I may not be religious or practicing, but I’m proud to say that it’s part of my identity), I can say with absolute certainty that the money-grubbing, over-reaching, overzealous people make up a VERY SMALL part of Judaism,” another commenter wrote.
Avila conceded that he was making generalizations, but only made matters worse singling out his own race.
“As a Hispanic I’m fine calling out any stereotypical [bulls--t] they can’t let go of,” he wrote.
Hours later, he posted two videos of Jews he’s “in love with,” including Roseanne Barr and a YouTube video that features Jews against Zionism, to prove that he was not “bigoted.”
When he opened the coffee shop in July, Avila said he was focused on building a sense of community. But he’s found it troubling to hear of people getting kicked out of their homes to pave the way for fancy new apartment buildings.
“It tends to be a lot of Jewish people who are buying buildings here and then turning them into luxury condos, but it could apply to anyone of any race who is trying to be manipulate and self serving,” he said Thursday.
Avila stood by his statements, saying they were intended to “jolt people into some kind of awareness.”
“I apologize for any feelings that I may have hurt,” he said. “I love Bushwick and I hope it continues to love me back.”
Fundamental change...
For the first time, Russia has more deployed nuclear warheads than U.S.
For the first time, Russia, which is in the midst of a major strategic nuclear modernization, has more deployed nuclear warheads than the United States, according to the latest numbers released by the State Department.
Russia now has 1,643 warheads deployed on intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles and heavy bombers. The United States has 1,642, said the fact sheet released Wednesday.
The warhead count for the Russians, based the Sept. 1 report required under the 2010 New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), shows an increase of 131 warheads since the last declaration on March 1. The U.S. reported a warhead increase of 57 during the same period. It is not clear why the warhead numbers increased.
The treaty limits each side to 1,550 deployed warheads, 700 deployed missiles and bombers and 800 deployed and non-deployed launchers.
On New START delivery systems, the latest fact sheet reveals that the current Russian arsenal of deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles, silo-launched ballistic missiles and heavy bombers is 528, up from 498.
Labels:
military,
Obama Foreign Policy,
peace movement
Orwell predicted despised government/bureaucratic are given new pleasant names like: Nice.
New drug for 'mild alcoholics' drinking two glasses of wine a night
GPs will prescribe nalmefene and actively ask about patients' alcohol consumption, under new plans by national health watchdog Nice to tackle alcohol abuse
Men drinking three pints of beer and women drinking two large glasses of wine per night and who do not cut down within two weeks should be prescribed the drug, Nice has said Photo: ALAMY
Hundreds of thousands of people drinking half a bottle of wine a night are to be put on the first ever drug to help reduce alcohol consumption, under plans announced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
Men drinking three pints of beer and women drinking two large glasses of wine per night and who do not cut down within two weeks should be prescribed a new drug, Nice has said.
There are an estimated 750,000 people in the UK who would be eligible for nalmefene who show no overt symptoms associated with their drinking.
The plans mean GPs will actively ask patients about their alcohol consumption even when they see them for unrelated health matters such as low mood, inability to sleep, diabetes and high blood pressure.
The drug, which costs £3 per tablet, is taken when people feel the urge to have a drink and stops them from wanting more than one.
The plans will cost £288m per year and it is estimated to save 1,854 lives over five years and prevent 43,074 alcohol-related diseases and injuries over the same period.
The NHS and local authorities will be required to make funding available within three months.
Prof Mark Bellis, alcohol lead for the Faculty of Public Health said there were relatively simple alternatives that would reduce alcohol consumption without the need to medicate the middle classes such as reducing advertising of alcohol and introducing a minimum price per unit.
He said: "Once again this is going to increase pressure on the NHS when there are alternatives that would reduce pressure on health services by cutting alcohol consumption.
"There are plenty of ways that don't require prescribing and the additional pressures on the NHS that could reduce harmful drinking.
"We need to think very carefully about how we use limited resources and prescribe for people who with relatively simple population interventions such as reducing advertising and minimum unit price could quite easily reduce alcohol consumption to safer levels."
He added that nalmefene reduced alcohol consumption by a relatively modest amount when compared with counselling alone and added that medicating people always came with the risks of side effects. He also said that it was not known whether the reduction in drinking was maintained long-term.
Dr Niamh Fitzgerald, a lecturer in Alcohol Studies, Institute for Social Marketing (ISM) at the School of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, said: “The fact that alcohol problems are widespread in society is an important principle for effective policy options such as minimum unit pricing and restrictions on marketing of alcohol.
"It would be unfortunate if the availability of nalmefene led to a sense that the appropriate response to these widespread problems was for the NHS to medicate large numbers of people, rather than initiating these other more effective and less costly approaches to reduce consumption.”
However, other experts welcomed the guidance.
Andrew Langford, chief executive of the British Liver Trust, said: “The range of people who put themselves at risk through their drinking is quite wide. Some have not yet experienced social problems and are functioning well until they develop an alcohol-related physical illness such as high blood pressure, cancer or liver disease; while others lose their social supports and then tend to fit the stereotype of the 'alcoholic'.
"Reducing alcohol consumption can prevent these social and physical damages developing.”
Professor Jonathan Chick, a consultant psychiatrist and honorary professor at Queen Margaret University Hospital Edinburgh said: "The decision by NICE to recommend nalmefene for appropriate patients is important.
"Although for many people dependent on alcohol, abstinence is the preferred and optimal goal, nalmefene represents an alternative step, helping people to cut down drinking to less harmful levels when they are not ready and have no medical need to give up alcohol altogether. This may help us to engage many alcohol dependent patients that we know are not currently receiving help.”
Professor Carole Longson, director of the Nice Health Technology Evaluation Centre, said: “Alcohol dependence is a serious issue for many people.
"We are pleased to be able to recommend the use of nalmefene to support people further in their efforts to fight alcohol dependence
“When used alongside psychosocial support nalmefene is clinically and cost effective for the NHS compared with psychosocial support alone.”
Jackie Ballard, chief executive of Alcohol Concern, said: “It is important that there is a variety of treatments available to support people who want help with their alcohol dependency.
"The introduction of nalmefene will be a useful addition to the clinician’s toolbox, when used in conjunction with other treatment methods to tackle the harmful consequences of alcohol misuse.”
In order to qualify for treatment with nalmefene, also known as Selincro, a drinker would need to be consuming 7.5 UK units per day, which is three pints of 4.4 per cent beer for men and five UK units per day, around half an average 750ml bottle of 12.5 per cent wine, for women. If they cannot reduce this level two weeks after being warned by a doctor or nurse to cut down, then the drug should be prescribed alongside regular advice from a doctor or nurse.
More severe alcoholics and those who can cut down on their own will not be eligible for treatment with nalmefene.
The drug works on the reward part of the brain to reduce the urge to have more than one drink.
It is the only licensed medicine to help people reduce their drinking rather than helping them to stop drinking altogether and does not make drinkers feel sick.
People can be diagnosed with alcohol dependence if they have any three out of these six symptoms together at some time in the last twelve months:
- A strong desire or compulsion to take alcohol
- Difficulties in controlling the use of alcohol
- Neglect of alternative interests due to alcohol use
- Persisting with alcohol use despite evidence of harmful consequences
- Tolerance to the effects of alcohol
- Withdrawal symptoms
In clinical trials the drug helped people to cut their alcohol consumption by about 60 per cent from 13.5 units a day to five units.
However this was only 1.8 units more than those receiving just counselling.
Labels:
Nanny State,
social planning
Hillary Gets Tocqueville Wrong By 100 Years...which means she has no clue about the man or his works, just the cliches.
Hillary Gets Tocqueville Wrong By 100 Years
Speaking at a Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors event last night, Hillary Clinton decided to talk about Alexis de Tocqueville. The problem? She got it wrong -- by about a hundred years.
"There's a wonderful phrase that was first used by Alexis de Tocqueville, who came to the United States in the very early 1930s and traveled around our country," said Hillary Clinton, a probable 2016 presidential candidate. "And he was so amazed at how Americans organized themselves -- you know, coming from aristocratic Europe, which was totally top-down and hierarchical -- he couldn't believe how many of us were joiners. But it was not only because individually going that far back we saw that as something we wanted to do for ourselves, but because we knew together we could do so much more. You know, at a time, when sometimes we seem divided and people seem to be arguing all the time, we really have to take stock of how blessed we are, be grateful for the men and women who serve us, and be thankful that we have through all of our ups and our downs and our challenges continue to stand for the values that unite us: freedom and democracy and opportunity."
Tocqueville died in 1859, well before the 1930s. Indeed, the French man came to America in the 1830s, meaning Clinton got her history wrong by a hundred years.
POLL: 71%, INCLUDING MAJORITY OF DEMS, SAY NO GOVERNMENT BENEFITS FOR ILLEGAL NEWCOMERS
POLL: 71%, INCLUDING MAJORITY OF DEMS, SAY NO GOVERNMENT BENEFITS FOR ILLEGAL NEWCOMERS
38
109
An overwhelming majority of likely voters, including a majority of Democrats, believe illegal immigrants from Central America should not be eligible for taxpayer-funded government benefits, according to a new poll.
A Rasmussen Reports poll found that 71% "say these illegal newcomers should not be eligible for government services and benefits." Only 16% think "they are entitled to government aid" while 13% are undecided. Even a majority of Democrats (51%) "do not think illegal immigrants should be eligible for government services and benefits" in addition to "91% of Republicans and 75% of unaffiliated voters."
A strong majority (68%) also "say the new illegal immigrants should not have the same legal rights and protections that U.S. citizens have," and that includes a plurality--and a near-majority--of Democrats (49%). The poll found that "89% of GOP voters and 70% of unaffiliateds think illegals should not have the same legal rights and protections that U.S. citizens have."
There have been nearly 66,500 illegal immigrant juveniles who have been detained at the U.S.-Mexico border since October of last year and the number of apprehensions spiked after President Barack Obama enacted his Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program in 2012. Obama, who is set to enact another executive amnesty after the midterm elections, delayed it to help Senate Democrats keep the Senate. The poll, consistent with others, found a strong majority (67%) are opposed to executive amnesty, including the potential granting of work permits for illegal immigrants, and think such actions will only entice more illegal immigrants to come to America.
The poll, which was conducted September 29-30 and has a margin of error of +/- 3 percentage points, found that 63% of voters "think the availability of government money and services draws illegal immigrants to the United States."
Labels:
illegal immigration,
Welfare State
Howard Dean going to absurdity to defend Obama in spite of the facts
Posted By Bryan Preston On October 1, 2014
As the Islamic State rose to become the terrorist mass that it is today, President Barack Obama ignored warnings and reportedly skipped about half of his presidential daily briefings. He downplayed the threat, calling ISIS “jayvee.”
Those briefings that the president reportedly skipped included “specific” intelligence about ISIS and its capabilities even before the 2012 election.
At that time, Obama was publicly campaigning on having “decimated” “core al Qaeda” and sent it “on the run.”
So was Obama reading his briefings or not? It’s an important question that aims directly at how the president is performing his duties. Obama tossed the intelligence community and his own Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, under the bus on 60 Minutes when he blamed them for “underestimating” ISIS. That comment has sparked a sort of cold war between the president and his intelligence agencies, as the nation grapples with the Islamic State’s rise and threat, and what to do about it.
But if you are concerned about this, former Democratic Party chairman Howard Dean thinks that you’re a kook.
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough asked Dean about the skipped briefings on his show this morning. “Howard Dean, you get 42% of the briefings face-to-face, 42% in the second term, missed the rest. Is that a big deal? Are there sometimes you’d rather read something than have people talk?”
Dean wasn’t subtle in dismissing the question: “This rises to the level of Obama was born in Kenya and is a right wing Muslim. I saw Crossroads did this, he has no credibility whatsoever. The presidents, leaders, governors do things differently, I just think this is ridiculous. I can’t even believe we are talking about this. This is silly.”
At that time, Obama was publicly campaigning on having “decimated” “core al Qaeda” and sent it “on the run.”
So was Obama reading his briefings or not? It’s an important question that aims directly at how the president is performing his duties. Obama tossed the intelligence community and his own Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, under the bus on 60 Minutes when he blamed them for “underestimating” ISIS. That comment has sparked a sort of cold war between the president and his intelligence agencies, as the nation grapples with the Islamic State’s rise and threat, and what to do about it.
But if you are concerned about this, former Democratic Party chairman Howard Dean thinks that you’re a kook.
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough asked Dean about the skipped briefings on his show this morning. “Howard Dean, you get 42% of the briefings face-to-face, 42% in the second term, missed the rest. Is that a big deal? Are there sometimes you’d rather read something than have people talk?”
Dean wasn’t subtle in dismissing the question: “This rises to the level of Obama was born in Kenya and is a right wing Muslim. I saw Crossroads did this, he has no credibility whatsoever. The presidents, leaders, governors do things differently, I just think this is ridiculous. I can’t even believe we are talking about this. This is silly.”
(hat tip PJ Media)
Labels:
Democrats,
Dissecting leftism,
Obama,
political enemy lists
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)