Saturday, July 1, 2017
China: Still totalitarian after all these years. It's how one party states rule. China is an imperial force for no good.
Chinese President Xi Jinping and Hong Kong’s new Chief Executive Carrie Lam in Hong Kong on Saturday. PHOTO: FAVRE/EUROPEAN PRESSPHOTO AGENCY
HONG KONG—Chinese President Xi Jinping delivered a stern warning to Hong Kong, where a pro-democracy movement has provoked mass protests in recent years, saying that challenges to mainland sovereignty won’t be tolerated.
“Any attempt to endanger China’s sovereignty and security, challenge the power of the central government…or use Hong Kong to carry out infiltration and sabotage activities against the mainland is an act that crosses the red line, and is absolutely impermissible,” Mr. Xi said in a speech marking the 20th anniversary of the city’s return to Chinese rulefrom Britain.
The 64-year-old leader spoke at the end of a three-day visit to Hong Kong, his first as China’s president, as the mainland exerts growing influence over a city that has operated with a free-market ethos under a “one country, two systems” arrangement introduced in the 1997 handover. In the past year, mainland authorities have intervened in local elections and moved to block pro-democracy Hong Kong legislators from taking their seats.
Two decades after the handover to China, the former British colony evolves and suffers some growing pains under growing mainland influence.
The speech amounted to an admonition to the city of seven million people to end an era of political upheaval and embrace its place in broader China. Mr. Xi, who left the city Saturday afternoon, took pains to extol the virtues of Hong Kong’s free-market system as a source of growth and a symbol of mainland accommodation and promotion of “global peace.”
Mr. Xi lauded the “one country, two systems” model as a success and affirmed China’s long-term commitment to it. But he also cautioned against the dangers of political turmoil.
“Making everything political or deliberately creating differences and provoking confrontation will not resolve the problems,” Mr. Xi said. “It can only severely hinder Hong Kong’s social and economic development.”
Mr. Xi demanded changes, some of which have the potential to rekindle controversy. For example, Mr. Xi underscored the need to “step up the patriotic education of the young people,” reviving the memory of a failed 2012 attempt to introduce a pro-China curriculum in Hong Kong schools. The initiative failed after it sparked mass protests by local parents who decried it as Communist Party brainwashing.
Analysts say pressure now falls on Hong Kong’s new leader, Carrie Lam, to reintroduce the controversial measure. Ms. Lam, who was sworn in shortly before Mr. Xi’s speech, is also expected to try to introduce an anti-sedition law that failed amid mass protests in the past.
For now, Hong Kong’s protest movement appears mostly subdued by prosecutions of protest leaders and a sense among many local residents that resisting mainland encroachment is hopeless. Mr. Xi’s visit was marked by small rallies, but nothing like the scale of the mass pro-democracy protests that shut down parts of the city for 79 days in 2014.
Mr. Xi has consolidated power since assuming leadership of the Chinese Communist Party in 2012, introducing a sweeping anticorruption campaign that has often targeted his political rivals and taking on the title of “core” leader, a designation that gives him broad decision-making authority. Exerting firm authority over Hong Kong carries enormous symbolic weight as Britain’s 19th century colonization of the territory marked the beginning of a humiliating century of Chinese weakness.
Though Mr. Xi’s visit to Hong Kong was freighted with political meaning, it was also mostly a closed-door affair. Mr. Xi made none of the large public appearances one associates with visiting leaders, and attended outdoor events only under highly controlled circumstances, such as reviewing People’s Liberation Army troops garrisoned in Hong Kong. He didn’t attend an outdoor flag-raising ceremony featured prominently on the schedule of handover events.
Security for the visit was tight, with police fanned out across the city. Police detained small groups of protesters who called for universal suffrage and greater autonomy for Hong Kong. A new protest is scheduled for Saturday night.
While the opposition movement has ebbed, its leaders said they hold out hope that further encroachment by Beijing would spark a revival of the protest movement, especially if new measures impinge on the city’s way of life, grounded in rule of law.
“If Hong Kong people don’t stand up for themselves, don’t come out and fight, then Hong Kong will turn into China,” said Avery Ng, a leader of a Hong Kong democracy group.
—Chester Yung and Jenny W. Hsu contributed to this article.
Labels:
China,
Communism,
Totalitarian regimes
What's he hiding? Terry McAuliffe Again Obstructs Efforts to Investigate Voter Fraud
Terry McAuliffe Again Obstructs Efforts to Investigate Voter Fraud
McAuliffe won't give voter data to Trump admin's election integrity commission
The decision by Virginia governor Terry McAuliffe (D.) not to cooperate with a White House commission examining voting processes in federal elections comes after a year in which the governor circumvented the commonwealth's supreme court to restore voting rights for convicted felons and stalled efforts by the Virginia legislature to fight voter fraud.
McAuliffe announced on Thursday evening he has "no intention of honoring" a requestfor publicly available voter data made by the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, which was established through a May executive order and is being led by Vice President Mike Pence.
McAuliffe stated in his rejection that there is "no evidence" of voter fraud in Virginia, and that the "only irregularity in the 2016 presidential election centered around Russian tampering." He also stated his belief that the commission was set up as a "tool to commit large-scale voter suppression."
The governor's statement was echoed by other Democratic officials across the country, including both California's Democratic secretary of state Alex Padilla and Kentucky's Democratic secretary of state Alison Lundergan Grimes, a failed Senate candidate.
McAuliffe, whose office did not respond to requests for comment, has already vetoed numerous attempts this year by the Virginia legislature to limit the possibility of voter fraud in the commonwealth's elections, despite the fact that 5,500 noncitizens have been identified on its voter rolls.
In February, McAuliffe vetoed legislation that would have triggered investigations in jurisdictions that had more people registered to vote than people who were eligible to vote.
The legislation followed a report that looked at a sample of just 8 of Virginia's 133 jurisdictions and found more than 1,000 individuals who were illegally registered.
McAuliffe also vetoed a March bill that would have required the Virginia Department of Elections to notify local registrars of voters who were registered to vote in other states.
In both cases McAuliffe cited the "administrative burden" that would be put on localities, which was not an issue for the governor in 2016 when he attempted to rush the restoration of voting rights for more than 200,000 Virginia felons.
Local registrars complained that they had "no forewarning at all" of McAuliffe's order and were left unprepared to help individuals they were made responsible for.
"We had phones that were ringing off the hook," said a local Hanover county registrar. "It was really a shock to me and my staff that this was coming."
"Our concerns were how the process was going to be handled," said another registrar. "It's not only been haphazard for registrars' offices, think of the individuals affected."
Mistakes were made as the state rushed to get McAuliffe's order executed before the 2016 election—voting rights were restored for 132 individuals that remained in custody because they were deemed "sexually violent predators," and several violent felons that remained in prison were discovered to have mistakenly had rights restored.
Included were a man that attempted to murder a woman by locking her in a house after lighting a mattress on fire, and another who pointed his gun at a state trooper while fleeing from police by car.
McAuliffe's office excused the mistakes by saying that it was "obviously a massive administrative undertaking" and that it was "working constantly to refine the working administrative database that we're using to implement this process."
The mistakes led Republicans to bash the order as "reckless," but McAuliffe shielded the order from oversight by keeping the list of felons confidential and denying Virginia Freedom of Information Act requests despite guidance from the state's official FOIA council.
McAuliffe's attempt to restore all 206,000 individuals’ rights with one order was stopped by Virginia's supreme court, but he circumvented their ruling by giving clemency to 13,000 individuals on a case-by-case basis.
A Republican leader in the legislature responded to McAuliffe's Thursday rejection by stating that he has observed for years "how hard Virginia Democrats work to protect the maximum potential for voter fraud."
The White House has stated the goal of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity is "to increase the American people's confidence in the integrity of our election systems."
"The integrity of the vote is a foundation of our democracy; this bipartisan commission will review ways to strengthen that integrity in order to protect and preserve the principle of one person, one vote," Pence said on a call with commission members on Wednesday.
A spokesman for Pence says there was no objection to the request for information from states from any members of the commission, which includes four Democrats.
The commission is scheduled to have its first meeting on July 19.
Labels:
Democrats,
Dissecting leftism,
vote fraud
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















