Sunday, April 29, 2012

The objective was to avoid accountability.

Sessions marks three years without budget: ‘Deliberate plan’ by Democrats

Thomas Jefferson is widely credited with coining an adage that makes fools of procrastinators: “Never put off until tomorrow what you can do today.” But where budgets are concerned, Congress has failed to execute the third U.S. president’s advice for three years.

April 29, 2009 was the last time the Senate passed a budget — three years ago today. Articulating a budget for the United States is among senators’ legally required duties.

Alabama Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, told The Daily Caller that Senate Democrats’ obfuscation is to blame.

“This is a deliberate plan that the Democratic majority has executed for three years to avoid the responsibility of laying out a financial plan for America,” he said in an interview.

The Democratic majority in the Senate, Sessions said, “cannot lead.”

“When your party cannot coalesce around a plan that your members can support and the American people can support, then you’ve got a very deep, serious problem. And I think that is basically what it is,” he explained.

“So you’ve got to hide that by avoiding any public accountability. So you have secret meetings, the gang of six, and those kind of things — trying to move along without every having to lay out their vision.”


In the three years since the Senate last passed a budget, the federal government has spent $10.4 trillion and accumulated $4.5 trillion in debt, an amount that equals $13,000 in new debt for every individual American and $34,000 per family.

While Republicans lodge thir protests, Senate Democrats claim the blueprint for 2013 was decided upon with the August debt ceiling compromise.

“We do not need to bring a budget to the floor this year — it’s done, we don’t need to do it,” Majority Leader Harry Reid said of the 2013 federal budget in February.

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad has indicated that he likely will not mark up a budget until after the November election, canceling a planned budget markup and vote last week.

Sessions said such delays are par for the course with this Congress, whose modus operandi in recent years has been last-minute patch-up jobs.

“The only thing that has worked is when we get into a crisis, like when we had to have the debt ceiling raised and the Republicans were able to force $2.1 trillion in spending reductions over ten years,” Sessions said. “It was a step — not enough — a step”

“Already they are trying to undermine that. The president’s budget wipes out half of that $2 trillion in savings. All we’ve done is lurch through deadlines and crises, which is not good for the economy.”

He added that he believes the American people should take this into account when the vote in the fall.

“The message of the 2010 election was not heard by the majority party in the Senate,” Sessions said. “I mean, they demanded more public accountability on their representatives, that you do something about the debt course of America, and you stand up and be accountable.”

“I think it is fair to say it has gotten worse. There is nothing but secret meetings and an effort to avoid public debates and votes.”




Lefties are just so much more civil then us....bwahaha.

Gathering of Dem women turns into angry showdown

It was supposed to be like "A League of Their Own," but it's showing shades of "Mean Girls."

We told you recently about an effort by the 18 women running in the June 5 election for seats on the city's Democratic County Central Committee to band together to publish slate cards, hold fundraisers, walk precincts and mentor each other. It was supposed to show that women can change the often nasty tenor of politics.

But the group's most recent meeting devolved into an angry showdown featuring a wagging finger, shouting "Shut up!", accusations of sabotage, a fuming early exit by three members and at least one upturned chair. And former Supervisor Chris Daly wasn't even there!

At issue was some progressive newcomers' inability to pony up the $1,000 they'd all agreed to contribute to publish the slate cards. Those will be going out soon to the roughly 23,000 "perfect women voters" in the city, meaning females who've voted in the past five city elections.

Apparently, Supervisor Malia Cohen told the cash-poor women they had to "pay to play," and attorney Kat Anderson accused them of sabotaging the entire effort. Then somebody accused Anderson of "living in the Marina," which is a fact, but apparently a mean one.

That's when Hene Kelly, a progressive stalwart and self-described "den mother" for the newcomers, told school board member Hydra Mendoza - who was trying to calm everybody down - to shut up and wagged her finger. Then, Kelly upturned her chair (she says that was out of sheer clumsiness) and stormed out of the room with the newcomers, Wendy Aragon and Kelly Dwyer.

"I just didn't want people to be shamed in there or to feel like second-class citizens," Kelly said. "What is this saying about women ... they can't help each other? It is breaking my heart."

Aragon said she's definitely not participating in the women's slate anymore.

"It turned into animal farm - it was even worse than watching men fight," she said. "It was mean girl bullying in that room - that's not why I'm here as a woman or here in politics."

Sounds like Kelly is out too. She said, "I am comfortable with being on a slate who wants me for who I am, not because I have ovaries."

Cohen, Anderson and women's slate founder Alix Rosenthal said they'd like all to come together again, but also point out that anybody who can't raise $1,000 doesn't have a shot at winning anyway.

"Running for office is more than a notion," Cohen said. "There's a certain level of organization that has to exist, and part of it has to do with fundraising."

Rosenthal said what happened is a sign of a larger problem in San Francisco politics.

"I think it's a symptom of this male-dominated political system we have where progressives and moderates have been conditioned to hate each other in this city," she said. "We all have to practice kindness."



Understanding union, politician, government cabal

Former county manager-turned-author takes on public employee pensions in new book


Whenever we write about the compensation of county firefighters (the current average is about $175,000), someone chimes in that it’s unfair to add pension contributions to the total. Adding money that firefighters won’t see until they retire is misleading, they contend, making it look like they take home much more than they actually do.

The truth is, according to a new book by former Clark County Manager Thom Reilly, too little focus has been put on the hidden costs of pensions. So little, Reilly says, that pension expenses soon may bankrupt many governmental bodies across the country if something isn’t done.

What’s this new book? And what gives a former county manager the expertise to write such a thing?

Reilly was Clark County manager from 2001 to 2006. He’s now a professor of social work at San Diego State University and president/CEO of the Reilly Group Inc., a consulting firm to public, private and nonprofit/nongovernmental organizations.

Reilly’s book, which he spent about a year writing, is “Rethinking Public Sector Compensation: What Ever Happened to the Public Interest?” (M.E. Sharpe, publisher). The cover of the book shows a balloon carrying away a piggy bank.

What prompted his writing of the book?

Life. Reilly was the county manager at a time when the Las Vegas area was booming. Public employee salaries were skyrocketing. He wanted to talk about the long-term costs, he said last week, but few others did. “When I brought up issues of public pay, I was out there alone,” he said.

The Great Recession brought public compensation to the forefront as tax revenues plummeted. Reilly says the media forced politicians to face the issues, even though politicians wince because solutions often mean unpopular cuts in services and/or raising taxes.

The book, by the way, is easy to read, even for a journalist; Reilly’s mom was one of his proofreaders.

How did it get this way?

Reilly calls it the Iron Triangle of Closed Policy Making, with three entities involved: unions, government managers and politicians. Oftentimes, the same government managers negotiating with public unions receive benefits identical to those of union employees. So, it’s safe to say the incentive to be a tough negotiator flies out the window. Then politicians, who give the thumbs up or down to those contracts, face this dilemma. If they say no, they are saying no to unions that can rustle up plenty of voters to throw them out of office. That triangle over many years led to lavish contracts for public-sector employees.

Reilly is only partially joking when he says he envisions governments without enough employees to meet service demands because wages are so high, government can’t afford to hire more people. (It is often noted, by the way, that Nevada’s public employees are among the highest paid in the country, and we have fewer of them per resident than most states.)

Are unions Reilly’s devil?

He laughs and says he’s certain union members will see it that way. He sees a great need for unions in the private sector because of the potential for unchecked abuses by corporations. But civil-service hiring provides a degree of protection for public employees that, he believes, makes unions less necessary in the public sector.

What does he suggest to offset potential disaster?

Change pension and other post-retirement benefits like subsidized retiree health care. More specifically, public employees need to contribute more to their pensions; maybe government needs to set employees up in 401(k)s, like many of those in the private sector. And he is big on transparency. That means opening contract talks to the public. It means pension costs have to be front and center of budget talks. He dismisses as nearly meaningless media stories about some union giving up cost-of-living increases because the amount of money is minuscule compared with pension costs.

What’s Reilly say about what’s going on in Clark County?

Clark County is hardly unique. What happened here with public employee contracts happened across the country. But as the former manager, he keeps tabs on the county. He points to Commissioner Steve Sisolak — who, it’s safe to say, is hated by firefighters — as almost a lone voice for transparency regarding employee wages and benefits here.


Islamic terrorists.

At least 20 Christians killed by Islamic terrorists at church service in Nigeria

Rick Moran

The Telegraph is reporting that 20 Chirstian worshippers were murdered by terrorists during a church service in Nigeria:

Several small bombs, believed to have been fashioned from fizzy drinks cans, were thrown into a lecture hall that was being used for a Sunday morning service in Kano, a city that has been repeatedly attacked by Muslim radicals.

The explosions killed one person and injured many others. But as the crowd fled the lecture hall, gunmen waiting outside opened fire with automatic rifles.

Several dozen people who had been unable to enter the building, at Kano's Bayero University, who were listening to the service outdoors were also targeted.

Within minutes, as many as 19 others were killed, and their bodies littered the campus grounds as the gunfire continued for up to half an hour more, witnesses said.

"I was inside and we were preparing for a prayer when there was the sound of motorbikes driving fast and then the first explosion," one student worshipper, who gave her name only as Grace, said.

"Everything then happened very fast. There were more bombs, I think, and so many gunshots, there was too much noise and people were panicking."

The attack started at 9.30am as several hundred people attended the church services, said Mohammed Suleiman, a history lecturer at the university.

"For over 30 minutes a series of bomb explosions and gun shots took over the old campus, around the academic blocks," he said.

It sounds like the death toll could go much higher.

The attacks bear all the earmarks of a Boko Haram operation. This is the same outfit that murdered 44 Christians on Christmas Day in 2001 and an Easter attack that killed 41. The government has been trying to crack down on the terrorist group but in the north, they have many supporters which makes it difficult for the government to find them.

The army showed up shortly after the attack but has been unable to find the perpetrators.


Knowing OWS

Occupy squatters finally flushed from B’klyn home

It’s finally un-Occupied.

Police arrested six Occupy Wall Street members squatting inside a Brooklyn home five months after the movement seized the property amid grand promises to “renovate” it and move in “a homeless family.”

Instead, the group moved itself in, wrecked the place, and made a hard situation even worse for a single father who actually owned the East New York home and was trying to save it from foreclosure.

Cops cuffed the occupiers after they allegedly smashed a window to get into 702 Vermont St. on April 1.

Mohammed Olivo, 22, of The Bronx, was charged with resisting arrest and burglary.

Also charged with burglary were: Carlos Goodall, 18, of Valhalla, NY; Mitchell Hundt, 20, of Chicago; Sean Gregg, 18, of Philadelphia; Terrence Hubbard, 23, of Ohio; and East Village resident Decorrus Jones, 25, who has been arrested 31 times for crimes like trespass and petit larceny. “He steals a lot,” cops said of Jones.

Wise Ahadzi, the property’s owner, was thrilled that cops collared the people who were preventing him and two daughters from getting back into their home.

“I’ve been angry since Day One,” Ahadzi said. “I told them that I didn’t want anybody there.”

The bill to fix the damage is at least $12,000, a source said.

“We’re exploring the possibility of assisting him with repairs to the property,” said Bank of America spokesman T.J. Crawford.

What a bunch of classless crooks. Makes you wonder about food critic bribes and what really goes on in the kitchen.

Batali’s paisan partner spills all the beans


How do you get a table at a notoriously overcrowded New York restaurant? Bribe the maitre d’.

You might try it next time you’re clamoring to get into Mario Batali’s perennial Greenwich Village hot spot Babbo, where co-owner Joe Bastianich admits his longtime maitre d’, John, is on the take.

According to Bastianich, they all are. It’s part of the job description.

“They get paid a salary, but then there’s the palm variable. A 50-dollar bill might get you noticed. Depending on the restaurant, they might even take a 20. For an Upper East Side rip-off joint or a busy Midtown steakhouse a hundie should get you in the game, but it’s just as likely that if they don’t know you, they’re going to think you’re a d-----bag,” writes Bastianich in his juicy new memoir, “Restaurant Man,” out Tuesday.

“It’s not about the cash flash, it’s all about the implicit value of your relationship. People send thank-you notes to the maitre d’ — not even thank-you notes but cash-value surrender trade.”

The book reveals the secrets of the restaurant empire Bastianich started with chef-partner Batali — which also includes Lupa, Esca, Otto, Del Posto and the juggernaut that is Eataly. It’s a behind-the-scenes look at how it runs, who their friends are, who their enemies are — and what cheap bastards they are.

“Ultimately, Restaurant Man’s job is to stop the people who want to f--k him from f--king him,” he writes of an owner’s life. “It’s a nickel-and-dime business, and you make dollars by accumulating nickels.”

He and Batali “block out the prime-time tables.” They’re the ultimate gate keepers:

“There’s no master plan — the rules are that we reward people who are good to the restaurant . . . There are a lot of famous, cool people who are total a--holes and are not restaurant-centric. They don’t get in.”

Fashionistas, for one, “suck.”

On the other hand, the maitre d’ at Babbo always has a table for “great customer” Bill Clinton.

AP

Bastianich recalls one night during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, when the gregarious Clinton loudly tells an off-color joke involving lesbians and Jerry Brown within earshot of journalists, even though Bastianich tries to warn him. The story goes viral the next day.

The restaurateur observes: “The ex-president is always funny, but he appears to have a hard time with any sort of self-governance. Like it seems that he is always trying to watch his weight, but when it’s time to order, he goes nuts on the menu.”

Wiseguys are also good customers — though they prefer the duo’s more opulent Del Posto on Tenth Avenue. They’re interested in the food. And they make friends with the staff: “There’s one group that’ll come in with the roll of hundies — a hundred to the coat-check girl, a hundred to every hostess, a hundred for the maitre d’, a hundred to the bartender, a hundred to the barback, a hundred to the piano player, and suddenly our piano player, Fat Tony Monte, turns on a dime and puts the brakes on the Sondheim mid-f--king measure and starts twirling tarantellas like he was working Don Corleone’s wedding reception.”

Bastianich is a shrewd businessman who grew up in the industry. His mother, Lidia, and father, Felice, ran two restaurants in Queens, Buonavia and Villa Seconda, before opening Manhattan’s acclaimed Felidia in 1981.

Much to a young Bastianich’s mortification, his grandmother was known to water her garden in her bra, the cigarette machine in his parents’ Queens restaurant was filled with black-market smokes and the neighborhood kids called him “Bus Head” thanks to the polyester uniform he’s forced to wear busing tables at Villa Seconda.

Like most kids of immigrants, he wants to get far, far away from his Queens roots, trying on a series of personas — Deadhead, Guido, preppy, Wall Street player — until he ultimately settles on Restaurant Man. He can’t escape it. It’s in his DNA.

“Being Restaurant Man means being there in the morning. It’s a drag — you closed late the night before, you were probably drinking too much and trying to lay the coat-check girl — but you have to shake it off and start all over again. You sip your espresso at the bar, maybe have a little Fernet-Branca to kill the hangover, and take a look at what happened the previous night.”

He marks booze bottles to see what his staff was up to the night before. He routinely checks the bartender’s tip jar “because that’s where they leave evidence — blow, money, theft, phone numbers.” He methodically inspects the restrooms, replacing all toilet seats on a monthly basis: “My father drilled this into my head from the time I was 6 years old. He used to say, ‘We don’t run this place like a f--king Chinese restaurant.’ ”

Though his mother would gain culinary fame, it was his father who was the original Restaurant Man. And, like his dad, he’s obsessed with the cost of restaurant linens, relying on those square paper napkins you find on bars — or “bev naps,” in restaurant parlance — because they’re free: “When the staff is eating, I make them use the bev naps. I take them home and make my family use them at dinner. I clean the windshield of my truck with them.”

He opens his first restaurant, Becco, in 1993, where he has the great idea of selling $6 bottles of wine for $15 — even though he admits he could get $18, the usual three-times markup. He figures he’ll make the difference on volume. He’s right.

Like any good Restaurant Man, he’s nothing but pragmatic: “So what if people thought I had a schleppy Italian place in the cheesy Theater District? So what if . . . I was humping it out with Mary Schleneggen from Morristown and Bobby Lipshitz from Larchmont — they wanted to get to the theater and they didn’t want to have to spend a lot to get a great meal.”

But bigger things were in store for Bastianich. In 1995 mama Lidia — “my matchmaking Italian yenta of a mother” — introduces him to Batali, then chef of the white-hot Po. He admits to being a tad jealous at first:

“I had the Midtown Theater District restaurant that was kind of square, and he had the hipper, downtown West Village restaurant that cool people went to.”

Yet they become friends — hitting the town late-night with “Tom Colicchio when he still had hair,” hanging out with strippers and checking out after-hours clubs. Batali and Bastianich would go on to open Babbo in June 1998, on Waverly Place in the former Coach House restaurant.

Christopher Sadowski

It was a game-changer: There was no veal parm on the menu, just the deliciously far-out culinary inventions of Batali. And there was music — LOUD rock and roll. Ruth Reichl gave it three stars. (Though Bastianich admits that since “Restaurant Man also trades in intelligence . . . we planted a few of our friends next to her . . . [to] order everything on the menu and ooh and aah.”)

But for all of his bashing of the old Italian restaurant rules, Batali, like Bastianich, isn’t above making money: “What really distinguishes Mario is that as much as he’s about the art and doing it for the love of it and doing it right, he won’t do anything unless it makes money,” writes Bastianich.

“[Batali] is famous for policing the garbage — if you throw it out, you can’t sell it. We’re two cheap f--ks from way back. He’s a genius at being showy but not spendy. Show is free — baby carrots cost three times as much as big carrots, but if you carve big carrots down to look like baby carrots, it’s the same thing.”

Another cash saver is to forgo the tradition known as “Friends and Family,” the trial run a restaurant hosts prior to an official opening: “It might as well be referred to as ‘enemies and detractors,’ because no matter how much you like these people or think you value their sagacity when it comes to your food, the second they start eating for free and offering opinions, you realize how much you’d rather just line them up in the street and shoot them in the f--king head . . . I’m all about rehearsing on paying customers these days.”

Hey, it works. Bastianich’s partnership with Batali has produced a series of restaurants that have become NYC institutions. But there were bumps along the way.

He admits to the initial disaster that was Del Posto “where something was always burning.” The restaurant took five years to evolve into the city’s first four-star Italian restaurant thanks to a 2010 re-review from Times critic Sam Sifton: “We laid it out there. Baited him, put the word out in the market to his friends. We played the game. That’s how it gets done. You can’t cheat. Either you’ve got it or you don’t. But if you want a four-star review, you’ve got to go out and tell those people that you’re a four-restaurant.”

Bastianich also has some good old-fashioned vendettas to settle. He calls chef Pino Luongo “a withering d-----bag.” Le Cirque’s Sirio Maccioni is a Restaurant Man “facing oblivion.” San Domenico’s Tony May is “a great Restaurant Man, but enough is enough. Take your wife to Positano.” Hospitality maverick Danny Meyer, whom he respects, “single-handedly spread this cancer of a five-day workweek through our industry.” (There’s no mention of the tip-skimming class-action lawsuit against Bastianich and his partners, which was settled last month when his company agreed to a $5.25 million payout.)


Perhaps you may recall that Mario Batali came out in support of the OWS crowd. What a hypocrite. Think he might be a 1 percenter?




Tolerance? Largest donor a hedge fund manager?

Largest Donor to Obama Super PAC Calls Mormonism a 'Cult'

Bill Maher, the largest donor to President Obama's super PAC, called Mormonism a "cult" on his HBO show last night, and said that donating money to that religion doesn't count as charity because it's "bulls---."

Maher has given the president's super PAC a cool one million dollars. "The biggest individual donor revealed Friday was hedge fund billionaire James H. Simons, who cut a $1 million check to Majority PAC at the end of last month," Politico reported. That matches him with controversial comedian Bill Maher, who gave $1 million to Priorities USA Action in February, as the biggest Democratic super PAC donors so far this year."

Considering Maher's financial support of Obama's reelection effort, one can't help but wonder whether his views on Mormonism are in line with the president's and his supporters.

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Leftist tolerance. No other opinions are permitted.

Anti-Bullying Speaker Curses Christian Teens

As many as 100 high school students walked out of a national journalism conference after an anti-bullying speaker began cursing, attacked the Bible and reportedly called those who refused to listen to his rant “pansy assed.”

The speaker was Dan Savage, founder of the “It Gets Better” project, an anti-bullying campaign that has reached more than 40 million viewers with contributors ranging from President Obama to Hollywood stars. Savage also writes a sex advice column called “Savage Love.”

Savage, and his husband, were also guests at the White House for President Obama’s 2011 LGBT Pride Month reception. He was also invited to a White House anti-bullying conference.

FOLLOW TODD ON FACEBOOK FOR CULTURE WAR NEWS

Savage was supposed to be delivering a speech about anti-bullying at the National High School Journalism Conference sponsored by the Journalism Education Association and the National Scholastic Press Association. But it turned into an episode of Christian-bashing.

Rick Tuttle, the journalism advisor for Sutter Union High School in California, was among several thousand people in the audience. He said they thought the speech was one thing – but it turned into something else.

“I thought this would be about anti-bullying,” Tuttle told Fox news. “It turned into a pointed attack on Christian beliefs.”

Tuttle said a number of his students were offended by Savage’s remarks – and some decided to leave the auditorium.

“It became hostile,” he said. “It felt hostile as we were sitting in the audience – especially towards Christians who espouse beliefs that he was literally taking on.”

Tuttle said the speech was laced with vulgarities and “sexual innuendo not appropriate for this age group.” At one point, he said Savage told the teenagers about how good his partner looked in a speedo.

The conservative website CitizenLink was the first to report about the controversy. They interviewed a 17-year-old girl who was one of students who walked out of the auditorium.

“The first thing he told the audience was, ‘I hope you’re all using birth control,’” she told CitizenLink. “he said there are people using the Bible as an excuse for gay bullying, because it says in Leviticus and Romans that being gay is wrong. Right after that, he said we can ignore all the (expletive deleted) in the Bible.”

As the teenagers were walking out, Tuttle said that Savage heckled them and called them pansy-assed.

“You can tell the Bible guys in the hall they can come back now because I’m done beating up the Bible,” Savage said as other students hollered and cheered. “It’s funny as someone who is on the receiving end of beatings that are justified by the Bible how pansy-assed people react when you push back.”

The executive director of the National Scholastic Press Association provided Fox News with joint statement from the Journalism Education Association that was sent to members – after a number of people complained about Savage’s remarks.

“We appreciate the level of thoughtfulness and deliberation regarding Dan Savage’s keynote address,” the NSPA wrote. “some audience members who felt hurt by his words and tone decided to leave in the middle of his speech, and to this, we want to make our point very clear: While as a journalist it’s important to be able to listen to speech that offends you, these students and advisers had simply reached their tolerance level for what they were willing to hear.”

The NSPA said they did not have a prior transcript of Savage’s speech and that wish “he had stayed more on target for the audience of teen journalists.” They also said it provided a “teachable moment” for students.

As for Savage’s attack on people of faith?

“While some of his earlier comments were so strongly worded that they shook some of our audience members, it is never the intent of JEA or NSPA to let students get hurt during their time at our conventions,” they wrote.

However, not once did the NSPA or the JEA offer any apologies to the students or faculty advisors or anyone else in attendance.

Savage did offer a sarcastic apology “if I hurt anyone’s feelings.”

“But I have a right to defend myself and to point out the hypocrisy of people who justify anti-gay bigotry by pointing to the Bible and insisting we must live by the code of Leviticus on this one issue and no other.”

Tuttle said that he “felt duped” by the event. “There were Christian schools who went to the conference. To have this happen was disappointing and shocking.”

The NSPA said they should have done a better job preparing schools for what to expect.

For his part, Tuttle said that he will definitely be more cautious about the speakers at future conventions.Tuttle related how Savage told students that for a number of years he was not allowed in schools. He told the students that because it’s gained national acceptance “he’s reveling in the fact that it’s basically a middle finger to all those teachers and administrators who wouldn’t let him have access to those students before.”

But for some of Tuttle’s students – they felt like the anti-bullying activist was in fact – the bully.

Watch the entire video posted below:

Your tax dollars at work.

Rein in United Nations pay

Salaries at the world body are out of control, writes a former staffer

At the UN in New York, I once had a boss who, whenever she had to take a personal trip back to Africa, found a conference to attend. The UN then paid for her business class flights between New York and Dakar, for instance, and gave her a travel allowance. She kept the mileage.

One Saturday, she called me on her way to the airport. She said I needed to find her another flight because she was running late. When I called her back with new flight details — 40 minutes and a thousand dollars later — she told me she managed to check in and hung up.

Knowing the pompous squandering of public resources that go on inside the UN, I cannot entirely refute the cynical comment that the UN takes money from poor people in rich countries and gives it to rich people in poor countries.

What I can say is that there are insiders dedicated to promoting the universal values of the United Nations. I can also say that the UN should do housecleaning of its own, as it urges others to up the ante in their fight against corruption.

My boss, an associate director, earned about $143,000 annually. She received an additional $65,000 cost-of-living pay, which ensures the same purchasing power worldwide. The UN paid for up to 40% of her $4,000 rent, 75% of her son’s tuition and her trips to home country every two years.

Between 2002 and 2011, the UN’s core budget grew from $2.89 billion to $5.37 billion (the United States pays 22% of this). The largest share was personnel costs.

The UN pay dates back to 1921 when the League of Nations, the UN’s predecessor, decided its staff should be paid the same as the highest paid national civil servants. They believed this would attract the best and the brightest. Since then, an independent commission tasked with setting salaries of international civil servants has used the U.S. federal pay as a keystone.

Last year, as pay freezes continued for U.S. federal employees, some 4,800 New York-based UN staff received a three-percent pay raise. When Joseph Torsella, Washington’s envoy for UN reform, called for the “inappropriate” salary hike to be rescinded, the independent commission responded by ratcheting up salaries in Geneva, Rome, Paris, London, Tokyo and a score of other cities.

An acquaintance of mine at the UN maritime agency in London told me her salary went up twice in less than a year. Yet she does not have the funds to fill the vacancies in her department.

Presently at 130% of U.S. civil service salary, the UN wage is seriously inflated. This is out of touch with reality, and it has not proved successful in recruiting or retaining talent. On the contrary, it has become a magnet for those who want a UN job only because it pays well.

The UN salaries should be reset to reflect staff members’ performance, rather than nationality or sex, even if that means less than perfect representation.

One problem of performance is directly related to the organization’s ominous one-year contracts, renewed yearly “subject to funding availability.” In the absence of job security, employees are naturally more focused on keeping their job, rather than producing results. The duration of contracts must be extended to at least two years. And meaningful performance-evaluation tools need to be put in place.

The cost-of-living pay has to be slashed. Instead, resources should be redirected to improving training and prospects for career development.

Additionally, the UN agencies should decide for themselves whether a pay raise is appropriate given their financial situation. A 15-person commission sitting in New York should not be determining salaries for UN agencies in other continents.

Given the dismal success rates (and emotional baggage) of past attempts, introducing any change at the UN seems impossible. Conflicting national interests and grotesque administrative procedures have time and again thwarted such initiatives.

Root-and-branch reformers insist only a fundamental change can save the UN. The ongoing conservative politicians’ threat to withhold all American contributions until they could be made voluntarily is an ultimatum along the same line that does not address the deep-seated institutional problems.

The UN will not collapse, nor are radical reforms possible. The solution is a modest but gradual change that can enable the organization to do more with less.

Such incremental improvements are not impossible. The UN has agreed to cut its biennial core budget from $5.37 billion to $5.15 billion. This 5%, only the second spending cut in 50 years, translates into $100 million of taxpayers’ budget, according to Torsella. The UN’s embattled office of oversight has begun to post audit findings on the web. Several other UN agencies are following suit.

I left the UN a year ago and now work for an intergovernmental organization in London. While it is not part of the UN system, it is on the same pay scale — and it is in a desperate need for some serious housecleaning just like the UN. For starters, it will separate the hard-working professionals from those who work the system to serve their own interests.

Park is a former UN staff member.